I am trying to rotate a rectangle without using the rotate function, but instead using a matrix..I know how to rotate a line using a matrix but all my attempts to rotate a rectangle have failed.
I dont think this is use full but heres is my code that rotates the line.
float[][] rotation;
float[] position;
float theta = 180;
float pointX;
float pointY;
void setup() {
frameRate(60);
size(600, 600);
pointX = 0;
pointY = 0;
rotation = new float[2][2];
position = new float[8];
}
void draw() {
background(200);
theta = mouseX;
position[0] = mouseY;
position[1] = mouseY;
position[2] = -mouseY;
position[3] = mouseY;
rotation[0][0] = cos(radians(theta));
rotation[0][1] = -sin(radians(theta));
rotation[1][0] = sin(radians(theta));
rotation[1][1] = cos(radians(theta));
float newpos[] = new float[8];
newpos[0] += position[0] * rotation[0][0];
newpos[1] += position[1] * rotation[0][1];
translate(width/2, height/2);
line(0, 0, pointX+newpos[0], pointY+newpos[1]);
line(0, 0, pointX+newpos[0] * -1, pointY+newpos[1] * -1);
}
Although the lines behaves properly it is by chance... You have a crucial part of the calculation of the new x and y of the point not as it should have been. As you can find in wikipedia, you need to calculate the sin and cos in the matrix as you properly did, but when creating the new point you don't exactly do this:
Start by having a look at pushMatrix()/popMatrix() and coordinate spaces.
Have a look at Daniel Shiffman's tutorial as well, it's pretty well explained.
If you need to get lower level than this, have a look at the PMatrix2D class.
Notice there is a rotate() function. After you rotate, you can either simply apply
the matrix(using applyMatrix()) but you might as well be using push/pop matrix calls.
Another option is multiply vectors(rectangle corners) to the rotation matrix and draw the result/transformed points.
Related
Some time ago, I coded a little fidgetable logo based on CSS transforms alone.
You can fiddle with it over https://document.paris/
The result feels nice, it feels natural to click/touch and drag to rotate the logo.
I remember banging my head against the walls until I found out that I could chain CSS transforms quite easily just by chaining them.
transform: matrix3d(currentMatrix) rotate3d(x, y, z, angle);
And most importantly to get the currentMatrix I would simply do m = $('#logobackground').css('transform'); with jQuery, the browser would magically return the computed matrix instead of the raw "css" which actually avoided me to deal with matrices or to infinitely stack rotate3D() properties.
So the hardest part was then to calculate the rotate3D arguments (x, y, z, angle) based on mouse inputs. In theory shouldn't have problems transposing this part to java so i'll just skip over it.
Now
I'm trying to do the exact same thing with Processing and there is two problems :
There is no rotate3D() in processing.
There is no browser to apply/chain transformations and return me the current matrix state automatically.
Here's the plan/implementation I'm working on :
I need a "currentMatrix" to apply every frame to the scene
PMatrix3D currentMatrix = new PMatrix3D();
In the setup() I set it to the "identity matrix" which from what I understand is equivalent to "no transformation".
// set currentMatrix to identity Matrix
currentMatrix.set(1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1);
Every frame I would calculate a transformation matrix and apply it to the currentMatrix.
Then I would apply this matrix to the scene.
// Apply Matrix to the currentMatrix
void mouseRotate() {
float diag = sqrt(pow(width,2)+pow(height,2));
float x = deltaX()/ diag * 10; // deltaX = difference between previous prevous MouseX and current mouseX)
float y = deltaY()/ diag * 10; // deltaY = same with Y axis
float angle = sqrt( pow(x, 2) + pow(y, 2) );
currentMatrix.apply( rotate3D(y,x,0,angle) );
}
// Apply Matrix to the scene
applyMatrix(currentMatrix);
PMatrix3D reference : https://processing.github.io/processing-javadocs/core/processing/core/PMatrix3D.html
ApplyMatrix() reference : https://processing.org/reference/applyMatrix_.html
All I need to do then is to implement the rotate3D css transform as a function which returns a transformation matrix.
Based on what I found on this page https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/transform-function/rotate3d()
I implemented this first function :
PMatrix3D rotate3D(float x, float y, float z, float a) {
PMatrix3D rotationMatrix = new PMatrix3D();
rotationMatrix.set(
1+(1-cos(a))*(pow(x,2)-1), z*sin(a)+x*y*(1-cos(a)), -y*sin(a)+x*z*(1-cos(a)), 0,
-z*sin(a)+x*y*(1-cos(a)), 1+(1-cos(a))*(pow(y,2)-1), x*sin(a)+y*z*(1-cos(a)), 0,
y*sin(a)+x*z*(1-cos(a)), -x*sin(a)+y*z*(1-cos(a)), 1+(1-cos(a))*(pow(z,2)-1), 0,
0,0,0,1
);
return rotationMatrix;
}
and based on what I found on this page https://drafts.csswg.org/css-transforms-2/#Rotate3dDefined
I implemented this other function :
PMatrix3D rotate3Dbis(float getX, float getY, float getZ, float getA) {
float sc = sin(getA/2)*cos(getA/2);
float sq = pow(sin(getA/2),2);
float normalizer = sqrt( pow(getX,2) + pow(getY,2) + pow(getZ,2) );
float x = getX/normalizer;
float y = getY/normalizer;
float z = getZ/normalizer;
PMatrix3D rotationMatrix = new PMatrix3D();
rotationMatrix.set(
1-2*(pow(y,2)+pow(z,2))*sq, 2*(x*y*sq-z*sc), 2*(x*z*sq+y*sc), 0,
2*(x*y*sq+z*sc), 1-2*(pow(x,2)+pow(z,2))*sq, 2*(y*z*sq-x*sc), 0,
2*(x*z*sq-y*sc), 2*(y*z*sq+x*sc), 1-2*(pow(x,2)+pow(y,2)*sq), 0,
0, 0, 0, 1
);
return rotationMatrix;
}
When testing, they don't produce exactly the same result with the same inputs (although the differences are kind of "symmetric" which makes me think that they are kind of equivalent at least in some way ?) Also rotate3Dbis() has a tendency to produce NaN numbers, especially when i'm not moving the mouse (x & y = 0).
But most importantly, in the end it doesn't work. Instead of rotating, the drawing just zooms out progressively when I'm using rotate3D(), and rotate3Dbis() doesn't render correctly because of the NaNs.
The overall question :
I'm trying to get guidance from people who understand transformations Matrices and trying to narrow down where the issue is. Are my processing/java implementations of rotate3D() flawed ? Or would the issue come from somewhere else ? And are my rotate3D() and rotate3Dbis functions equivalent ?
You might get away with simply rotating on X and Y axis, as you already mentioned, using the previous and current mouse coordinates:
PVector cameraRotation = new PVector(0, 0);
void setup(){
size(900, 900, P3D);
rectMode(CENTER);
strokeWeight(9);
strokeJoin(MITER);
}
void draw(){
//update "camera" rotation
if (mousePressed){
cameraRotation.x += -float(mouseY-pmouseY);
cameraRotation.y += float(mouseX-pmouseX);
}
background(255);
translate(width * 0.5, height * 0.5, 0);
rotateX(radians(cameraRotation.x));
rotateY(radians(cameraRotation.y));
rect(0, 0, 300, 450);
}
The Document Paris example you've shared also uses easing. You can have a look at this minimal easing Processing example
Here's a version of the above with easing applied:
PVector cameraRotation = new PVector();
PVector cameraTargetRotation = new PVector();
float easing = 0.01;
void setup(){
size(900, 900, P3D);
rectMode(CENTER);
strokeWeight(9);
strokeJoin(MITER);
}
void draw(){
//update "camera" rotation
if (mousePressed){
cameraTargetRotation.x += -float(mouseY-pmouseY);
cameraTargetRotation.y += float(mouseX-pmouseX);
}
background(255);
translate(width * 0.5, height * 0.5, 0);
// ease rotation
rotateX(radians(cameraRotation.x -= (cameraRotation.x - cameraTargetRotation.x) * easing));
rotateY(radians(cameraRotation.y -= (cameraRotation.y - cameraTargetRotation.y) * easing));
fill(255);
rect(0, 0, 300, 450);
fill(0);
translate(0, 0, 3);
rect(0, 0, 300, 450);
}
Additionally there's a library called PeasyCam which can make this much simpler.
If you do want to implement your own version using PMatrix3D here are a couple of tips that could save you time:
When you instantiate PMatrix3D() it's the identity matrix. If you have transformations applied and you want to reset() to identity.
If you want to rotate a PMatrix3D() around and axis the rotate(float angleInRadians, float axisX, float axisY, float axisZ) override should help.
Additionally you could get away without PMatrix3D since resetMatrix() will reset the global transformation matrix and you can call rotate(float angleInRadians, float axisX, float axisY, float axisZ) directly.
Part of the answer is a fix added to the first rotate3D function.
I needed to normalize the x,y,z values to avoid the weird scaling.
I'm posting the current state of the code (i'm skipping a few parts for the sake of simplicity):
// Mouse movement since last fame on X axis
float deltaX() {
return (float)(mouseX-pmouseX);
}
// Mouse movement since last fame on Y axis
float deltaY() {
return (float)(mouseY-pmouseY);
}
// Convert user input into angle and amount to rotate to
void mouseRotate() {
double diag = Math.sqrt(Math.pow(width,2)+Math.pow(height,2));
double x = deltaX()/ diag * 50;
double y = -deltaY()/ diag * 50;
double angle = Math.sqrt( x*x + y*y );
currentMatrix.apply( rotate3D((float)y,(float)x,0,(float)angle) );
}
// Convert those values into a rotation matrix
PMatrix3D rotate3D(float getX, float getY, float getZ, float getA) {
float normalizer = sqrt( getX*getX + getY*getY + getZ*getZ );
float x = 0;
float y = 0;
float z = 0;
if (normalizer != 0) {
x = getX/normalizer;
y = getY/normalizer;
z = getZ/normalizer;
}
float x2 = pow(x,2);
float y2 = pow(y,2);
float z2 = 0;
float sina = sin(getA);
float f1cosa = 1-cos(getA);
PMatrix3D rotationMatrix = new PMatrix3D(
1+f1cosa*(x2-1), z*sina+x*y*f1cosa, -y*sina+x*z*f1cosa, 0,
-z*sina+x*y*f1cosa, 1+f1cosa*(y2-1), x*sina+y*z*f1cosa, 0,
y*sina+x*z*f1cosa, -x*sina+y*z*f1cosa, 1+f1cosa*(z2-1), 0,
0, 0, 0, 1
);
return rotationMatrix;
}
// Draw
draw() {
mouseRotate();
applyMatrix(currentMatrix);
object.render();
}
I thought that using this method would allow me to "stack" cumulative rotations relative to the screen and not relative to the object. But the result seems to always do the rotation relative to the object drawn.
I am not using a camera because I basically only want to rotate the object on itself. I'm actually a bit lost atm on what I should rotate and when to that the newly applied rotations are relative to the user, and the previously applied rotation are conserved.
I have this code that basically reads each pixel of an image and redraws it with different shapes. All shapes will get faded in using a sin() wave.
Now I want to rotate every "Pixelshape" around its own axis (shapeMode(CENTER)) while they are faded in and the translate function gives me a headache in this complex way.
Here is the code so far:
void setup() {
size(1080, 1350);
shapeMode(CENTER);
img = loadImage("loremipsum.png");
…
}
void draw() {
background(123);
for (int gridX = 0; gridX < img.width; gridX++) {
for (int gridY = 0; gridY < img.height; gridY++) {
// grid position + tile size
float tileWidth = width / (float)img.width;
float tileHeight = height / (float)img.height;
float posX = tileWidth*gridX;
float posY = tileHeight*gridY;
// get current color
color c = img.pixels[gridY*img.width+gridX];
// greyscale conversion
int greyscale = round(red(c)*0.222+green(c)*0.707+blue(c)*0.071);
int gradientToIndex = round(map(greyscale, 0, 255, 0, shapeCount-1));
//FADEIN
float wave = map(sin(radians(frameCount*4)), -1, 1, 0, 2);
//translate(HEADACHE);
rotate(radians(wave));
shape(shapes[gradientToIndex], posX, posY, tileWidth * wave, tileHeight * wave);
}
}
I have tried many calculations but it just lets my sketch explode.
One that worked in another sketch where I tried basically the same but just in loop was (equivalent written):
translate(posX + tileWidth/2, posY + tileHeight/2);
I think I just don't get the matrix right? How can I translate them to its meant place?
Thank you very much #Rabbid76 – at first I just pasted in your idea and it went of crazy – then I added pushMatrix(); and popMatrix(); – turned out your translate(); code was in fact right!
Then I had to change the x and y location where every shape is drawn to 0,0,
And this is it! Now it works!
See the code here:
float wave = map(sin(radians(frameCount*4)), -1, 1, 0, 2);
pushMatrix();
translate(posX + tileWidth/2, posY + tileHeight/2);
rotate(radians(wave*180));
shape(shapes[gradientToIndex], 0, 0, tileWidth*wave , tileHeight*wave );
popMatrix();
PERFECT! Thank you so much!
rotate defines a rotation matrix and multiplies the current matrix by the rotation matrix. rotate therefore causes a rotation by (0, 0).
You have to center the rectangle around (0, 0), rotate it and move the rotated rectangle to the desired position with translate.
Since translate and rotate multiplies the current matrix by a new matrix, you must store and restore the matrix by pushMatrix() respectively popMatrix().
The center of a tile is (posX + tileWidth/2, posY + tileHeight/2):
pushMatrix();
translate(posX + tileWidth/2, posY + tileHeight/2);
rotate(radians(wave));
shape(shapes[gradientToIndex],
-tileWidth*wave/2, -tileHeight*wave/2,
tileWidth * wave, tileHeight * wave);
popMatrix();
Wondering if someone could help me, I am new to processing and programming in general.
I have created a random walker that walks a point around a 3D space. Please see code below.
Now I would like to be able to rotate the view of this walker as it is drawn, so I can view it from different angles. I have tried using PeasyCam to achieve this, but when I use the mouse to rotate the camera, it only affects the location of the new points, and not the previously plotted ones.
If anyone could let me know what I'm doing wrong that would be really helpful! Thanks, here is my code:
import peasy.*;
PeasyCam camera;
void setup() {
size(500,500,P3D);
background(0);
camera = new PeasyCam(this, 0, 0, 0, 50);
}
void draw() {
walker();
}
float x = 0;
float y = 0;
float z = 0;
void walker() {
pushMatrix();
stroke(255);
strokeWeight(5);
point(x,y,z);
x = x + random(-2.5,2.5);
y = y + random(-2.5,2.5);
z = z + random(-2.5,2.5);
popMatrix();
}
If you want your previous points to be affected by the rotation, then you need to redraw them.
You could do this by storing all of the points in a data structure like an array or ArrayList. Then you'd iterate over the points and redraw them every frame.
I want to achieve a slow fade in size on every collapse into itself. In other words, when the circle is at its biggest, the ellipses will be at the largest in size and conversely the opposite for the retraction. So far I am trying to achieve this affect by remapping the cSize from the distance of the center point, but somewhere along the way something is going wrong. At the moment I am getting a slow transition from small to large in ellipse size, but the inner ellipses are noticeably larger. I want an equal distribution of size amongst all ellipses in relation to center point distance.
I've simplified the code down to 4 ellipses rather than an array of rows of ellipses in order to hopefully simplify this example. This is done in the for (int x = -50; x <= 50; x+=100).
I've seen one or two examples that slightly does what I want, but is more or less static. This example is kind of similar because the ellipse size gets smaller or larger in relation to the mouse position
Distance2D
Here is an additional diagram of the grid of ellipses I am trying to create, In addition, I am trying to scale that "square grid" of ellipses by a center point.
Multiple ellipses + Scale by center
Any pointers?
float cSize;
float shrinkOrGrow;
void setup() {
size(640, 640);
noStroke();
smooth();
fill(255);
}
void draw() {
background(#202020);
translate(width/2, height/2);
if (cSize > 10) {
shrinkOrGrow = 0;
} else if (cSize < 1 ) {
shrinkOrGrow = 1;
}
if (shrinkOrGrow == 1) {
cSize += .1;
} else if (shrinkOrGrow == 0) {
cSize -= .1;
}
for (int x = -50; x <= 50; x+=100) {
for (int y = -50; y <= 50; y+=100) {
float d = dist(x, y, 0, 0);
float fromCenter = map(cSize, 0, d, 1, 10);
pushMatrix();
translate(x, y);
rotate(radians(d + frameCount));
ellipse(x, y, fromCenter, fromCenter);
popMatrix();
}
}
}
The values you're passing into the map() function don't make a lot of sense to me:
float fromCenter = map(cSize, 0, d, 1, 100);
The cSize variable bounces from 1 to 10 independent of anything else. The d variable is the distance of each ellipse to the center of the circle, but that's going to be static for each one since you're using the rotate() function to "move" the circle, which never actually moves. That's based only on the frameCount variable, which you never use to calculate the size of your ellipses.
In other words, the position of the ellipses and their size are completely unrelated in your code.
You need to refactor your code so that the size is based on the distance. I see two main options for doing this:
Option 1: Right now you're moving the circles on screen using the translate() and rotate() functions. You could think of this as the camera moving, not the ellipses moving. So if you want to base the size of the ellipse on its distance from some point, you have to get the distance of the transformed point, not the original point.
Luckily, Processing gives you the screenX() and screenY() functions for figuring out where a point will be after you transform it.
Here's an example of how you might use it:
for (int x = -50; x <= 50; x+=100) {
for (int y = -50; y <= 50; y+=100) {
pushMatrix();
//transform the point
//in other words, move the camera
translate(x, y);
rotate(radians(frameCount));
//get the position of the transformed point on the screen
float screenX = screenX(x, y);
float screenY = screenY(x, y);
//get the distance of that position from the center
float distanceFromCenter = dist(screenX, screenY, width/2, height/2);
//use that distance to create a diameter
float diameter = 141 - distanceFromCenter;
//draw the ellipse using that diameter
ellipse(x, y, diameter, diameter);
popMatrix();
}
}
Option 2: Stop using translate() and rotate(), and use the positions of the ellipses directly.
You might create a class that encapsulates everything you need to move and draw an ellipse. Then just create instances of that class and iterate over them. You'd need some basic trig to figure out the positions, but you could then use them directly.
Here's a little example of doing it that way:
ArrayList<RotatingEllipse> ellipses = new ArrayList<RotatingEllipse>();
void setup() {
size(500, 500);
ellipses.add(new RotatingEllipse(width*.25, height*.25));
ellipses.add(new RotatingEllipse(width*.75, height*.25));
ellipses.add(new RotatingEllipse(width*.75, height*.75));
ellipses.add(new RotatingEllipse(width*.25, height*.75));
}
void draw() {
background(0);
for (RotatingEllipse e : ellipses) {
e.stepAndDraw();
}
}
void mouseClicked() {
ellipses.add(new RotatingEllipse(mouseX, mouseY));
}
void mouseDragged() {
ellipses.add(new RotatingEllipse(mouseX, mouseY));
}
class RotatingEllipse {
float rotateAroundX;
float rotateAroundY;
float distanceFromRotatingPoint;
float angle;
public RotatingEllipse(float startX, float startY) {
rotateAroundX = (width/2 + startX)/2;
rotateAroundY = (height/2 + startY)/2;
distanceFromRotatingPoint = dist(startX, startY, rotateAroundX, rotateAroundY);
angle = atan2(startY-height/2, startX-width/2);
}
public void stepAndDraw() {
angle += PI/64;
float x = rotateAroundX + cos(angle)*distanceFromRotatingPoint;
float y = rotateAroundY + sin(angle)*distanceFromRotatingPoint;
float distance = dist(x, y, width/2, height/2);
float diameter = 50*(500-distance)/500;
ellipse(x, y, diameter, diameter);
}
}
Try clicking or dragging in this example. User interaction makes more sense to me using this approach, but which option you choose really depends on what fits inside your head the best.
The code below draws a spiral using objects from a string array. Everything is fine, except that I would like the text objects to be drawn at a roughly 45 degree angle at each instance (based on the current x, y coordinates in the code below) rather than being drawn horizontally (when the text is horizontally drawn, it naturally overlaps with other text at concentrated points along the top & bottom of the curve). I researched some methods, but I'm still very new to all of this, and potential solutions have all evaded me.
String example = "";
String[] wordSet = split(example, " ");
float x, y;
float angle = 0;
float radiusSpiralLine = 10;
size (800, 800);
translate(width/2, height/2);
background(#ffffff);
smooth();
fill(0);
for (int i = 0; i < wordSet.length; i++) {
angle += .05;
radiusSpiralLine += .5;
x = cos(angle) * radiusSpiralLine;
y = sin(angle) * radiusSpiralLine;
textSize(9);
text(wordSet[i], x, y);
}
Here is tutorial to very similar problem. In basic you need to store projection matrix by pushMatrix() then translate and rotate according to position of letter on curve and then restore matrix by popMatrix(). I don't know how exactly do you want to rotate you text but just fold round your text() function like this maybe it will help you:
pushMatrix();
translate(x, y);
rotate(angle);
text(wordSet[i], 0, 0);
popMatrix();
First, you should start getting in the habit of wrapping code in the setup() and draw() functions. Since you're drawing a static image you don't need the draw() function, but I think it's good practice to have those two.
Now, what you are doing now is simply translating the words by a very small amount. Do the math:
x = cos(angle) * radiusSpiralLine; //cos(.05)*.5 = .499
y = sin(angle) * radiusSpiralLine; //sin(.05)*.5 = .024
That means they move less than a pixel, and they're not rotating at all.
What you need is your good ol' friend, the rotate() function.
Let's re-write code:
String example = "These are a bunch of words going around!";
String[] wordSet = split(example, " ");
float x, y;
float angle = 0;
void setup() {
size (800, 800);
background(#ffffff);
smooth();
fill(0);
pushMatrix();
translate(width/2, height/2); //Translate when you need to translate, not before
for (int i = 0; i < wordSet.length; i++) {
angle = PI/5; //Our good friends, radians
textSize(20); //What is this, text for ants? Change to 20
rotate(angle);
text(wordSet[i], 20, 0);
}
popMatrix();
}
void draw() {
}
First notice, the setup() and draw(). I like them there. It looks nicer, I think.
A couple of important things to note.
The effects of rotate() and translate() are on the canvas are cumulative.
We could have had the same effect in different ways:
for (int i = 0; i < wordSet.length; i++) {
angle = PI/5;
textSize(20);
rotate(angle); //always rotating by PI/5 ON TOP of previous rotation
text(wordSet[i], 20, 0);
}
//Everything from now on will still be rotated, we don't want that!
Slightly better, but not there yet:
for (int i = 0; i < wordSet.length; i++) {
angle += PI/5; //constantly increasing the angle
textSize(20);
pushMatrix(); //push a new canvas on top of everything
rotate(angle); //rotate by angle (which increases every loop)
text(wordSet[i], 20, 0);
popMatrix(); //pop the rotated canvas out, go back to original canvas
} //Things won't be rotated, but they'll still be translated, since translate() is outside of pushMatrix and popMatrix
Hope this helps.