Is there any way to automate process of rendering tables with Spring MVC? I'm looking for some mechanism for automated rendering List of POJO's on JSP instead of manual writing code like this:
<c:if test="${not empty objects}">
<table>
<c:forEach var="o" items="${objects}">
<tr>
<td>${o.id}</td>
<td>${o.name}</td>
</tr>
</c:forEach>
</table>
</c:if>
Probably something like this:
<awesometaglib:smarttable data="${listOfPOJOs}"/>
You can try DisplayTag or any other library.
Related
I think what I want to ask if it's possible to get around sql:hide (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/relational-databases/sqlxml-annotated-xsd-schemas-using/hiding-elements-and-attributes-by-using-sql-hide?view=sql-server-2017), but I've described my actual problem below in case I'm mistaken:
I'm trying to scrape the "foo" urls from a website with a DOM similar to the following:
<html>
<body>
<tbody>
<tr>
...
...
</tr>
</tbody>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
...
</tr>
<tr>
...
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Whenever I try print(response.css('a')) or equivalently print(response.xpath('//a')), I can see the "foo" urls, but not the "bar" urls. Additionally, using XPath I can access up to the table, but print(response.xpath('//table//*')) and print(response.xpath('//table//a')) both output [].
Could it be possible that the elements of table have been hidden from Scrapy somehow? How would one resolve this?
Thanks in advance. This is mainly for interest as the urls have a predictable pattern anyway.
I know that this is just a wild guess, but you can try
//a[starts-with(#href,'foo')]/text()
This should give you the text values of all a tags which have a href attribute which value starts with the string 'foo'.
But it could be possible that some parts of the result XML/HTML are loaded by JavaScript at a later time what would explain your difficulties locating certain elements.
I am new to Thymeleaf.I am having a Spring-Boot app which used Thymeleaf component in view pages.
Now while using eclipse code assist I came across few thymeleaf tag/attributes namely th:form,th:formaction.
Once I change my above code to following format :
Its stopped working.My webpage is not getting submitted to server.
So,I wanted to understand the following things:
What is the use of th:form tag?
What is the difference between th:action and th:formaction tag?
The ´th:action´ and ´th:formaction´ tags will create the html tags action and formaction. This question is not really related to Thymeleaf but the html tags itself.
The action tag can be placed onto a form to specify the url to pass the form to. In your first example submitting the form will send a POST request to /saveStudent.
The second example is not valid HTML that's why the form will not submit. formaction can be used to override the action attribute of the form within the form. It can be used on input tags:
<form th:action="#{/saveStudent}" th:object="${user}" method="post">
<table>
<tr>
<td>Enter Your name</td>
<td><input type="text" th:field="*{userName}"/></td>
<td><input type="submit" value="Submit"/></td>
<td><input th:formaction="#{/saveSomewhereElse}" type="submit" value="Submit to other url"/></td>
</tr>
</table>
</form>
In this example the default action is to submit to /saveStudent but if someone clicks the second submit button the form will submit to /saveSomewhereElse.
In general you probably will need just the action tag in 99% of the cases.
i have a j2ee written with spring framework and we are using tiles for templating.
overtime, developers have created numerous css styles and reuse them all over the jsp pages. for example we created a <table class="tablestyle blue ">, or <select class="style1 style2 style3"> and it is used in multiple pages. the problem i faced is that whenever we create a new table/select, we have to ensure we key in the correct css styles and this is cumbersome.
my question is, is it possible to put this <table> and <select> with its css class styles into a template and reuse it in other templates?
you can have this kind of tile for example it is the table
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<c:foreach items="${tableColumn}" var="column">
<td><c:out value="${column}"/>
</c:foreach>
</tr>
</thead>
</table>
from the controller you will just put an column attribute to make it more flexible
and the select is all the same right?
<select>
<c:foreach items="${optionItems}" var="option">
<option><c:out value="${option}"/></option>
</c:foreach>
</select>
in this case you could reuse the table and option tile in every jsp you want it.
I'am currently creating a MVC Java Web App with Struts2.
One element of my app is searching for some results via form. When the user submits the form an Action gets the necessary values from the database and populates a Map:
Map<Integer,List<String>> values = new HashMap<Integer,List<String>>();
Which has a list of column values for each row.
By Following this approach I can have generic JSP for displaying the results of any resultbox:
<s:div cssClass='resultContainer'
cssStyle=' min-height: 150px; max-height:%{header}px; overflow: auto; %{display}; '
theme="qxhtml">
<table id='resultTable'>
<tr id='tableHeader'>
<s:iterator value="headers">
<th><s:property /></th>
</s:iterator>
</tr>
<s:iterator value="values">
<tr class='results'>
<s:iterator value="value">
<td><s:property escape="false" /></td>
</s:iterator>
</tr>
</s:iterator>
</table>
I feel now that this is a bad approach. Instead I should change the Map to a List of ResultBoxRow objects. Each ResultBox will have its own View Jsp instead of one generic one allowing me to iterate over the objects and output for example:
<s:iterator value="value">
<td><s:property name="firstname" /></td>
<td><s:property name="lastname" /></td>
etc.
In the case of the table headers I may need to give certain headers individual style properties. I feel these should be defined in the JSP itself rather than get the JSP to reference a value from the controller containing the style for that header.
I think my overall question is how much should the controller control the style/display of elements of the View? I feel it should just generate the individual elements displayed in the tags but not the values to put in the "style" tag of the row for example. Even if this does sacrifice a simple single JSP to handle every result box.
It would be great to get your opinions.
The controller should have nothing to do with the display mechanism: that's the point of MVC, to completely separate the data from its presentation.
You can still DRY up the view layer via custom tags, includes, templates, etc. Styles may be passed as attributes, while the underlying DOM would be created by a single page or template.
It also matters what the nature of the attributes you want to pass. If they're semantic that could logically from from the model or controller that's fine. If they're purely presentational, like colors, widths, etc. then it has no business in the model or controller.
I am developing a site with Header, Main Menu, Body and Footer sections.
I am using a web page base layout _Layout.cshtml where I use the RenderPartial() method to render the Header, Main Menu and Footer. For the body, I am using the RenderBody() method.
In _Layout.cshtml I have the following code:
<body style="margin: 0">
<form name="FormStart" method="post" action="Start.aspx" id="FormStart">
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%" align="center" border="0">
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="1px"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" width="972" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<table id="Table1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="972" border="0" bordercolor="yellow">
<!-- HEADER -->
#{Html.RenderPartial("_Header");}
<!-- MAIN MENU -->
#{Html.RenderPartial("_Menu");}
<!-- CONTENT -->
#RenderBody()
</table>
<br />
<!-- FOOTER -->
#{Html.RenderPartial("_Footer");}
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</form>
</body>
On the other hand, I created a very simple view with the following code
#{
ViewBag.Title = "Page";
Layout = "~/Views/Shared/_Layout.cshtml";
}
<h3>You just clicked </h3><h1>NATURAL ALOE SECTION</h1>
The thing is, that the content of this simple view is displayed at the very top of the page, whereas the rest is on the bottom. Instead of displaying HEADER-MAINMENU-my site-FOOTER it displays it in the order of my site-HEADER-MAINMENU-FOOTER.
I am quite new with MVC all around; I have been reading here about the possibility of using RenderSection instead of RenderPartial in my main Layout site, but could this be the reason while it is displaying this way? Probably I am way off base, any advice is much appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
This might be happening because you render the header, menu and body inside a <table>. At least the body seems to be missing the row and cell tags (<tr><td>...</td></tr>). Therefore there are no rows and cells in your table which can lead to all sorts of rendering problems.
It would probably help if you didn't render into a table and use CSS for layout purposes instead.
This looks to be nothing to do with the MVC side of what you are doing - that looks perfectly fine.
The issue will be with your HTML. I would suggest having a look at the site using one of the browser developer tools (e.g. in Chrome or IE open your site and press F12) - you can use the features of these to examine how the visual elements on your page relate to the HTML. These tools are invaluable as an MVC programmer.
Using tables to control the layout of a web-page is discouraged in favour of using css for layout. You can find some basic css layout templates via Google to get started.