recently i am publish a gmail gadget on google app marketplace. my listing is perfect but my gadget is not work fine 100%. my gadget reade the mail
signature if mail does not have a signature than it will not working .
GAM Technical Specialist respond back to me a mail =>
I'm sorry to hear that you're running into some technical difficulties. Unfortunately, I am only responsible for testing the applications to make sure they meet the Google App Marketplace listing requirements.
i could not understand what is the exact problem what type of technical difficulties they talking about. is there any criteria to gadget working.
thanks
Related
I am planning to publish a new app on store. The app will be free, but you will not be able to use the app unless you purchase an in app product.
You will not have to pay to download the app, but you will have to pay use it, because without a purchased product, you can not use the app.
Will google accept my app? I couldn't find any answer for this, neither the support from google gave me a clear answer.
Thanks
Your use case is certainly unusual.
While it is possible that the app is allowed on the google store, I can almost guarantee that if someone reports your app, it might get removed under the Minimum Functionality section.
It will depend on what the description of your app says because as you should have guessed it should describe the base functionality of your app if it has in-app purchase or summarize the all features the app has to offer in case it is free.
As long as you mention in the description of the app that the user will have to purchase a product to use your application, you should be good to go.
I would like to create a test on google play console, where I can specify the testers by email, like with internal testing, but only the added testers can download the app WITH their phone from the google play store?
Currently using internal testing requires the users to download the app from their computer, IF their phone is connected to their account. The app does not show up on the google play store on testers phones. If I have over 50 testers, going around the organization to help users download the app is not an efficient way in my opinion. I tried a beta test, which made my app go out to public, which I do not want. So, a test where I can allow only testers whos email i've added to the testers list to download the app from THEIR phone on the play store!
Internal testing does not require downloading from a computer. And beta testing does not make the app go public. What makes you think these things?
Even if an internal testing app does not show up in search, you can email a link to it that users can open on their phones.
I read about alpha/beta testing of apps in Play Developer Console. I have almost understood the concept of beta/alpha testing. Just have a question:
I want my app to be visible in Play Store but only those people can download it who are invited (like using email addresses or G+ communities). Seems like Alpha/Beta Testing hides the app from public.
But I have seen several apps (Can't think of the name) in Play Store with the text similar to This app is still in beta. Please wait until we reach more audience. And as expected there's no install button.
I want something similar to this. Public can see but only those can install who join G+ community.
Does open/closed beta testing provide such feature?
I created and used application softwares(exe file written in C++ with Win SDK) of Windows OS(Win7) which has a function to upload(post) user photos to Facebook. They were working fine but now it is not possible to post photos to Facebook and I got to know I need get my application reviewd for public_actions permission. I tried to do it but could not find way to submit since there's no category for Windows application. How can I do it? I think the reviewers need to 'run' the app and it looks OK for andriod, iOS, Win8 apps, and Web site since reviewers can access to them by codes or URL for the apps but I have no idea how to make it for my Windows application. It is big size application with lots of images over 1Gbytes. Will it be OK to use an FTP account for the reviewers to download and review it?
In your review notes you can explicitly mention that this is a Windows application. You will need to provide as much screenshots as possible or preferably, a screencast where you show how you use the Facebook integration.
To get all the required fields, you can fill in the website for your application (if you have one) or an other website. Just make sure to mention that in your reviewer notes.
That should work with getting your app reviews.
ps: this question actually is not appropriate for Stackoverflow. I suggested using the Facebook Developer Community group for these kind of questions (non-technical).
I have a Wp7 app (ready in a xap), and I'd like to give it to a client, so he can use it in 5-10 devices. But it is an "internal" client for our service, so I'd rather not publish it on WP Marketplace for all to see...
Is there any reasonable way to do this?
when you upload app on marketplace you can set it as private so only users with direct link can see/install it. There was an app which hacked WP7 that allows you to install apps without marketplace but I've heard it's not legal anymore*.
*search for it because I'm not sure about this one.
edit: http://www.electronista.com/articles/12/01/02/chevronwp7.runs.out.of.tokens.may.not.renew/
Maybe you can try http://labs.chevronwp7.com/
EDIT : Sorry, it seems that all tokens are sold out, so this is not solution for you.
As pointed out by others, you can publish a application on the marketplace as a beta, allowing 5 users to test it using their Live IDs.
But all unlocked phones can have a XAP installed. Generally, Windows Phone applications aren't designed for internal distribution. If you don't intend to publish the application on the marketplace at any point, you need to estimate in the cost of $100 per phone, per year, for the usage of your application.
I'll recommend you contact Microsoft, if you need a specialized deal.