I have an outlook ICS file. When I open it in Outlook and then double click on any event, sometimes the link show up as a Hyperlink and sometimes it dooes not.
Can anybody please tell me what change I need to make in the format such that the link shows up as Hyperlink in the mail?
The file is here https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B37FvLpUIq9sTUt4V3FfemJ4Qkk/edit?usp=sharing
Thank in advance.
Besides the DESCRIPTION part, you also need to use X-ALT-DESC part with the FMTTYPE attribute equal to text/html) - you can then include HTML with an explicitly specified link.
An example is
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//E
N">\n<HTML>\n<HEAD>\n<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server ve
rsion 08.01.0240.003">\n<TITLE></TITLE>\n</HEAD>\n<BODY>\n<!-- Converted f
rom text/rtf format -->\n\n<P DIR=LTR><SPAN LANG="en-us"></SPAN></P>\n\n</
BODY>\n</HTML>
Related
I would like visitors to be able to download my music files, rather than have those files automatically open in their browsers' players, but I don't know how.
I have read that HTML5's download attribute is made for this, but I can't get it to work.
My site's DTD is HTML 4.01 Strict -- would that be affecting it?
The relevant markup is:
<ul>
<li>Test.wav</li>
</ul>
How can I get the audio files to download instead of playing them directly in the browser?
UPDATE:
Some stackoverflow members are trying to educate me as to how this site works. They believe that one of my subsequent discoveries (posted below) isn't an answer to the above question. In my opinion it goes deeper than an answer, because it proved that my question wasn't valid. Here's what I wrote:
Thanks to Sql Surfer and Developer90 for your help.
It turns out that the problem was me: I hadn't realized that, in order for the HTML 5 "download" attribute to work, my files had to be online! I had been testing them via local files on my own desktop!
Once uploaded, "download" did everything it was supposed to do.
As I commented (above), testing showed me that "download" works in files that are HTML 5 doctype as well as those that are HTML 4.01 (strict) doctype.
My apologies for inconveniencing you!
It depends on the browser the user is. As you said, you can add the download attr in the <a></a> html tag like this:
<ul>
<li><a href="Test.wav" download="Test.wav" download>Test.wav</a></li>
</ul>
What you may can use is the target attr. But this is to open a new tab. Example:
<ul>
<li>Test.wav</li>
</ul>
It must be the html4 that is affecting it.
2 Ideas:
A: Keep html 4.01 and use javascript to affect the
"Content-disposition".
B: Use the <!DOCTYPE html> to force html 5
As Devloper90 points out the target tag is relevant. Having no target tag is probably what you want.
I'm making custom file adaptor using adaptor library.
In my adaptor getDocContent(), I retrieve file from URL, and set the content to the Response's OutputStream like sharepoint connector do.
So, I thought "Where is the file's title property I have to set? This is just a content."
As I was thinking, the file does not hit by it's title on the GSA search API. Also by File Extension Filter.
When developing a connector for Google Search Appliance using the Adaptor Framework, you have a few options on how to display metadata. You can send metadata via HTTP headers, but this lacks somehow. For example, when your metadata is too long, it will get truncated (because of it's size).
Since some time we use Handlebars for templating in GSA connectors. You pass your retrieved object to Handlebars, after which you can compose an HTML document such as following:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta name="description" content="{{object.description}}"/>
<meta name="filetype" content="{{object.filetype}}"/>
<title>{{object.title}}</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>{{object.title}}</title>
<p>{{object.description}}</p>
<p>{{object.someMoreContent}}</p>
</body>
</html>
So when you getDocContent method is invoked (usually, when GSA crawls you connector), it will crawl the page you design with HTML and HandleBars. Very straightforward and easy to maintain!
We use mandrill to send emails and we have many templates defined to send emails. Below is one such template
<!doctype html>
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"/>
<style type="text/css">
----- some styling information ----
</style>
</head>
<body>
------ Other html content ------
</body>
</html>
As you can see there is no mention of text only version of this email template. To improve the chances of this email not going to spam i also want to add text only version of it as well. I got to know about "multipurpose internet mail extensions" but i still do not understand how i can make my email to have a text only version too.
I will be really grateful for any kind of help on this.
Strongly suggest using a templating service on top of Mandrill, such as apostle or sendwithus.
Makes it way easier to manage and edit html+text templates, and I believe both support your use case.
You didn't indicate anything about your environment, where you're storing the templates, or whether you're using Mandrill's SMTP integration or API. Those things can make a difference in how/where you store the text versions of your templates.
If you're generating the full SMTP message in some fashion in your system, then you'd need to create a multi-part/alternative MIME document to store the text version. Or use a library or templating engine that can generate this for you in accordance with the relevant specifications.
If you're storing them in your system, and using the Mandrill API, then you'd want to store a separate text version to pass in the text parameter.
For Mandrill templates, there's an explicit text version that can be provided and saved.
Alternately, Mandrill has an option to auto-convert your HTML to text. It can be configured in your Sending Defaults, or on a per-message basis through the API or with SMTP headers.
When you share a link on facebook it will automatically find images on the website and randomly picks one as a preview. How can you influence the preview image? When a person shares the website link on his facebook?
1. Include the Open Graph XML namespace extension to your HTML declaration
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
xmlns:fb="http://ogp.me/ns/fb#">
2. Inside your <head></head> use the following meta tag to define the image you want to use
<meta property="og:image" content="fully_qualified_image_url_here" />
Read more about open graph protocol here.
After doing the above, use the Facebook "Object Debugger" if the image does not show up correctly. Also note the first time shared it still won't show up unless height and width are also specified, see Share on Facebook - Thumbnail not showing for the first time
Note also that if you have wordpress just scroll down to the bottom of the webpage when in edit mode, and select "featured image" (bottom right side of screen).
Years and years pass and this problem with the facebook cache has not yet been solved ...
Why doesn't facebook put a button to totally clear the cache in Debug Tools ???? How difficult is that?
OK ... Now the definitive solution:
Use this on "og:image"....: ?[sequentialNumber] example: ?1 / ?2 / ?3 .....
Example of use:
<meta property="og:image" content="http://example.com/image.jpg?1" />
Did you change the image? Add 1 to the number ...
<meta property="og:image" content="http://example.com/image.jpg?2" />
Each time the image is changed, add 1 to the number
This can be done manually or dynamically, with PHP for example.
It's working really well for me, I hope I helped.
If you're using Weebly, start by viewing the published site and right-clicking the image to Copy Image Address. Then in Weebly, go to Edit Site, Pages, click the page you wish to use, SEO Settings, under Header Code enter the code from Shef's answer:
<meta property="og:image" content="/uploads/..." />
just replacing /uploads/... with the copied image address. Click Publish to apply the change.
You can skip the part of Shef's answer about namespace, because that's already set by default in Weebly.
In order to simply create templates for HTML pages (no PHP, no ASPX etc), I need the ability to build up HTML page-chunks that I could then assemble to form a complete HTML page.
So that when I need adding a new menu item, I can re-assemble all the pages with the changed menu-chunk.
I tried W3C's Amaya, and got it fatal error on 1st attempt! Yes, it's W3C and it's a bug pot lol.
Komposer's outdated version had a templating model, but not in the new version.
Since I can't find any "honest" open source website editor to do that, I think I will try this as a solution:
Use c# of VB .NET to build a database out of all HTML chunks.
Create very simplistic web pages with chunk names as comments, like:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="content-type">
<title>A title here</title>
</head>
<body>
<!-- menu_chunk12 -->
<!-- body1_chunk -->
<!-- footer3_chunk -->
</body>
</html>
When some chunk is edited, I just click a button and my little app will rebuild all the web pages and I'll re-publish them upload to the server.
What do you guru guys think about that?
This is not a terrible approach, but I would probably use some special notation in the comments like <!-- #include(chunk_name) --> so that these special comments are distinguished from regular comments.
You might also look at something like htp.
It's an interesting idea, but in my opinion, if you want a little more extensibility, look into doing XSLT tranformations into HTML. This would provide you a very homogeneous design, that would work on any platform serving HTML, and provide you with a complexity level you desire (simple or extreme).
Yes. I wrote a very simple but effective preprocesor for html that does this.
I used an extremely simple format where "##" was used to introduce a command. The most useful command was "##include " which caused another file's contents to be inserted in place of the include command.
Other useful commands would allow me to set variables, increment variables, and emit the value from a variable into the HTML output. These allow you to add things like a copyright date on all your pages and simply update it easily in a single ##included location.
It's a trivial program to write, and you have full power over the features.
I used this for about 10 years until I pretty much switched from html to php.