I have been wondering what is the right way to write code in OO style in model. Certainly you can have a function that retrieve data from DB and then map to model-level variables. This approach, however, becomes counterintuitive when you have other function in model trying to get other data from BD. For example:
class User extends CI_Model {
$id, $name, $age .... ;
public function get_user_from_db_with_id($id) {
...
// get data and map to variable.
}
public function get_all_users() {
// return all users in db
}
}
somewhere in controller:
$user = new User();
$ben = $user->get_user_from_db_with_id($id);
// this does not make sense!!
$all_user = $ben->get_all_users();
Any thought or comment?
Thanks in advance!
I had to make a similar decision and opted for this (trimmed for clarity)
class UserModel extends MY_Model
{
public $UserID = 0;
public $CustomerID = null;
public $FirstName = '';
public $LastName = '';
public $EmailAddress = '';
public $Password = null;
public $UserGroupID = true;
function __construct()
{
parent::__construct();
}
private function get($id)
{
$row = $this->get($id);
if ($row !== null)
{
$this->dbResultToObject($row, $this);
}
}
// Return an array of User objects
public function get_list($deleted = false, $userIDToInclude = null)
{
$params = array(null, $deleted, $userIDToInclude);
$query = $this->db->call("spUserGet", $params);
$users = array();
foreach ($query->result() as $row)
{
$user = new UserModel();
$this->dbResultToObject($row, $user);
$users[] = $user;
}
return $users;
}
// Other Methods (Validate, Save etc)
}
I use a mixture of public, protected and private properties so that the reflection code I've written to map the properties from the DB results and to the DB sproc calls then only includes the public properties and prevents too many parameters being sent. But that's getting off-topic so my controller then just looks like:
class Users extends MY_Controller
{
public function __construct()
{
parent::__construct();
$this->load->model('UserModel', 'user');
}
....
}
Then a list can be retrieved with
$users = $this->user->get_list();
And a single record with
$user = $this->user->get($userID);
i'm a big fan of thinking about the design in terms of "roles" - not resources. so a "User" is going to be able to get their own Profile. but its only going to be an "Admin" who is able to get All User Profiles.
so that distinction and important separation between what a User can do - get one record - and what an Admin can do - get all records - starts by having separate controllers for each. The User Controller methods are based upon verifying a single user and granting them access to one record. The Admin Controller methods are based upon verifying an admin and granting them access to all records. And this makes sense even from a URL design standpoint - you want your admin area clearly separate.
This separation at the controller makes everything simpler and easier. When you are resource oriented you are constantly checking the credentials in every method and even in your views. Views should be as simple as possible and not be tasked with "is this person an admin"? When you are role oriented - you check the credentials in the controller - and then your methods, the models, and the views are appropriate for what that 'role' needs to accomplish.
Since you are think about OO programming, i think you need to think: what does this class represent?
each instance means one user?
each instance means one user-data-generator?
if it's the first case, it makes sense this class has attributes like $id, $name, $age ....
and the following codes make sense
$user = new User();
$ben = $user->get_user_from_db_with_id($id);
if it's the second case, it shouldn't have the attributes like $id, $name, $age in you sample.
and these codes
$all_user = $ben->get_all_users();
should be replaced with this
$all_user = $user->get_all_users();
Related
Needing help understanding codeigniter 3 behavior
I'm not understanding the controller behavior very well and I ask for help
class Simulado extends CI_Controller {
function __construct(){
parent::__construct();
$this->load->helper('url');
$this->load->helper('funcoes_helper');
$this->load->helper('file');
$this->load->library('session');
$this->load->library('controle_acesso');
$this->load->model('resumoapp_model', 'resumo');
$this->load->model('homeapp_model', 'homeapp');
$this->load->model('simulado_model', 'simulado');
//permissão para acessar app
$this->controle_acesso->acesso();
$this->output->enable_profiler(TRUE);
}
public function index() {
$dados = '0'//todas as materias;
$bdinsert = $this->simulado->set_bd($dados);
$this->load->view('prova',$dados)
}
public function materia () {
$dados = 1; //idamateria
$bdinsert = $this->simulado->set_bd($dados);
$this->load->view('prova',$dados)
}
}
model
public function set_bd ($dados) {
$data = [
'id_mat' = $dados
];
$this->db->insert('simulados', $data);
}
routes.php
$route['default_controller'] = 'home';
$route['404_override'] = 'my404';
$route['translate_uri_dashes'] = FALSE;
$route['app'] = "/app/home";
$route['site'] = "/home";
when accessed through the link http://localhost/escola/app/simulado, the system behaves in the desired way, it writes the value zero once in the database, for example.
accessing the url we have the method of the class, simulated, http://localhost/escola/app/simulado/materia/1/exatas-matematica calls the method in the correct way, but when writing to the database it writes the code of the matter.
I did a test and put the same code of the article method in the index and called the url, and it worked perfectly, writing only once the code of the article in the database.
I need to know why it is recording 3 times in the database when accessing the url is a method of the class and has parameters.
i have 3 models: Order, Lancenter and ClientAccount
Lancenters can create Orders.
ClientAccounts stores username and password.
When an order is created, the Lancenter can choose an existant client account or create a new one, so i show up all ClientAccounts related with the current Lancenter.
For security reasons, i don't retrieve the ClientAccount password when a lancenter wants to create a new order.
So, in ClientAccount.php i have this:
protected $hidden = ['password'];
And in Lancenter.php:
public function client_accounts()
{
return $this->hasMany('App\ClientAccount', 'id_lancenter');
}
In LancenterController.php this function retrieves lancenter's client accounts without the password:
public function getClientAccounts()
{
$lancenter = Lancenter::with('client_accounts')->where('id_owner', Auth::id())->first();
return response()->json(['client_accounts' => $lancenter->client_accounts]);
}
The problem is that the created order belongs to a ClientAccount and in this case i need to retrieve also the password of ClientAccount.
So i have in Order.php:
public function client_account()
{
return $this->belongsTo('App\ClientAccount', 'id_client_account');
}
And this function in OrderController.php retrieves new orders:
$orders = Order::with('client_account')->where('status', $status)->get();
return response()->json(['orders' => $orders]);
Obviously, the ClientAccount is retrieved without the password.
I get it by doing a loop to get the ClientAccount of each order in the index function in OrderController, but i supose that there is a cleaner to do it. Hope you can help me.
Update:
this is the loop in OrderController that i'm talking about
public function index($status)
{
$orders = Order->where('status', $status)->get();
foreach($orders as $key => $order) {
$client_account = ClientAccount::find($order->id_client_account)->makeVisible('password')->toArray();
$orders[$key]['client_account'] = $client_account;
}
return response()->json(['orders' => $orders]);
}
I am trying to implement a widgets library using load->view. I know I can use include to call directly the file and avoid the vars cache issues but just wondering why it does not work.
Here is how I have structured my code:
My Controller:
class Page extends MY_Controller {
public $data = array();
public function __construct() {
parent::__construct();
...
$this->load->library('widgetmanager');
}
public function index($slug = '') {
echo $this->widgetmanager->show(2);
echo $this->widgetmanager->show(1);
}
}
My Library
class WidgetManager
{
private $CI;
public function __construct()
{
$this->CI = & get_instance();
}
public function show($widget_id) {
$data = array();
$widget_id = (int)$widget_id;
$this->CI->db->select('*');
$this->CI->db->from('widget');
$this->CI->db->where('id', $widget_id);
$query = $this->CI->db->get();
$item = $query->row_array();
$data['widget_title'] = $item['title'];
$data['widget_content'] = $item['content'];
$widget = $this->CI->load->view('widget/'.$item['source'], $data, TRUE);
$data['widget_title'] = '';
$data['widget_content'] = '';
$this->CI->load->view('widget/'.$item['source'], $data);
return $widget;
}
}
widget 1: Calls widget/content
widget 2: Calls widget/banner
What is happening is, the vars set on the first widget call (they are same name as second widget call), get cached, meaning values from the first call are passed to same call. It is weird because are different views.
I have tried:
Using clear_vars(): $this->CI->load->clear_vars(), before and after doing load->view on the library.
Calling load->view with empty array, null, etc
Tried to add a prefix with the widget slug to the vars (that works, but I have to send in some way the prefix to the view, so it is not possible due cache issue)
Any ideas?
Here is what should work.
(I took the liberty of simplifying your database call making it require much less processing.)
public function show($widget_id)
{
$data = array();
$widget_id = (int) $widget_id;
$item = $this->CI->db
->get_where('widget', array('id' => $widget_id))
->row_array();
$data['widget_title'] = $item['title'];
$data['widget_content'] = $item['content'];
$widget = $this->CI->load->view('widget/'.$item['source'], $data, TRUE);
//clear the cached variables so the next call to 'show()' is clean
$this->CI->load->clear_vars();
return $widget;
}
On further consideration The call $this->CI->load->clear_vars(); is probably pointless because each time WidgetManager::show() is called the $data var is recreated with exactly the same keys. When the $data var is passed to load->view the new values of $data['widget_title'] and $data['widget_content'] will replace the values in the cached vars using those keys.
I have an eloquent statement like this:
$constraint = function ($query) {
$query->where('session', Session::getId());
};
$selectedImages = ImageSession::with(['folder' => $constraint])
->whereHas('folder', $constraint)
->where('type', 'single')
->get();
Which I need to call in several controllers.
How is the best way to do it without putting this code every time?
Should I put this code in the Model? but how I put the ImageSession::with if it is inside the same model that has ImageSession class?
In the controller do I have to write...
$imageSession_table = new ImageSession;
$selectedImages = $imageSession_table->getSelectedImages();
Well there are several solutions to this, but one rule that I have learned is whenever you are doing copy paste in the same file it means you need to create a function to encapsulate that code.
The same applies when you are copying and pasting the same code over classes/controllers it means you need to create a class that will have a method, that will encapsulate that code.
Now you could in fact change your model and this depends on your application and what kind of level of abstraction you have.
Some people tend to leave the models as pure as possible and then use transformers, repositories, classes whatever you want to call it. So the flow of communication is something like this:
Models -> (transformers, repositories, classes) -> Controllers or other classes
If that's the case just create a ImageSessionRepository and in there have your method to get the selected images:
<?php namespace Your\Namespace;
use ImageSession;
use Session;
class ImageSessionRepository
{
protected $imageSession;
public function __construct(ImageSession $imageSession)
{
$this->imageSession = $imageSession;
}
public function getSelectedImages($sessionId = false){
if(!$sessionId){
$sessionId = Session::getId()
}
$constraint = function ($query) use ($sessionId){
$query->where('session', $sessionId);
};
$selectedImages = ImageSession::with(['folder' => $constraint])
->whereHas('folder', $constraint)
->where('type', 'single')
->get();
return $selectedImages;
}
}
Then on your controller you just inject it:
<?php namespace APP\Http\Controllers;
use Your\Namespace\ImageSessionRepository;
class YourController extends Controller
{
/**
* #var ImageSessionRepository
*/
protected $imageSessionRepository;
public function __construct(ImageSessionRepository $imageSessionRepository)
{
$this->imageSessionRepository = $imageSessionRepository;
}
public function getImages()
{
$selectedImages = $this->imageSessionRepository->getSelectedImages();
//or if you want to pass a Session id
$selectedImages = $this->imageSessionRepository->getSelectedImages($sessionID = 1234);
//return the selected images as json
return response()->json($selectedImages);
}
}
Another option is adding that code directly into your Model, using scopes, more info here
So on your ImageSession Model just add this function:
public function scopeSessionFolder($query, $session)
{
$constraint = function ($constraintQuery) use ($sessionId){
$query->where('session', $sessionId);
};
return $query->with(['folder' => $constraint])
->whereHas('folder', $constraint);
}
And on your controller just do this:
$selectedImages = ImageSession::sessionFolder(Session::getId())
->where('type', 'single')
->get();
Or you can include everything in your scope if that's your case
public function scopeSessionFolder($query, $session)
{
$constraint = function ($constraintQuery) use ($sessionId){
$query->where('session', $sessionId);
};
return $query->with(['folder' => $constraint])
->whereHas('folder', $constraint);
->where('type', 'single');
}
And then again on your controller you will have something like this:
$selectedImages = ImageSession::sessionFolder(Session::getId())
->get();
Just a side note I haven't tested this code, so if you just copy and paste it it's possible that you find some errors.
I have seen the similar Q asked here but did not find any suitable answer and hence asking again. If you know any thread please guide me to it,
I have
Model User and Model Property and both have Address
class Address {
protected $fillable = ['address','city','state','zip'];
public function addressable(){
return $this->morphTo();
}
}//Address
class User extends Eloquent {
protected $fillable = ['first_name','last_name', 'title'];
public function address(){
return $this->morphMany('Address', 'addressable');
}
}//User
class Property extends Eloquent {
protected $fillable = ['name','code'];
public function address(){
return $this->morphMany('Address', 'addressable');
}
}//Property
Is there any way to UpdateIfNotCreate type method for address to update as well associate with User/Property?
Taylor Otwell's official answer,
$account = Account::find(99);
User::find(1)->account()->associate($account)->save();
is NOT working as I am getting an exception
message: "Call to undefined method Illuminate\Database\Query\Builder::associate()"
type: "BadMethodCallException"
The way I have solved the issue is as follows:
$data = Input::all();
if($data['id'] > 0){
$address_id = $data['id']; unset($data['id']);
$address = Address::find($address_id)->update($data);
}//existing
else{
$address = new Address($data);
User::find($user_id)->address()->save($address);
}//add new
I could use the different Routes ( PUT to /update{id} and POST to / )
but in my case both new and existing records are coming to same route ( /update )
Can you guys please recommend the better way to go about this?
Thx,
It's pretty straightforward:
// get only applicable fields
$input = Input::only('address','city','state','zip');
// get existing or instantiate new address
$address = Address::firstOrNew($input);
// associate the address with the user
// btw I would rather call this relation addresses if it's morhpmany
User::find($userId)->addresses()->save($address);
Not sure where you got Taylor's answer, but I don't think it was supposed for this case. It couldn't work anyway.