I’m developing an asp.net application for video uploading in YouTube which uses IIS server. A refresh token is needed for successfully uploading. The following code shows the method which should generate new file with authentication access and refresh tokens in a file path passed as argument:
private void SetRefreshToken(string refresh_token_path)
{
ClientSecrets secrets = new ClientSecrets()
{
ClientId = this.clientId,
ClientSecret = this.clientSecret
};
UserCredential credentials;
try
{
// Approach 1
credentials = GoogleWebAuthorizationBroker.AuthorizeAsync(
secrets,
new[]
{
YouTubeService.Scope.YoutubeReadonly,
YouTubeService.Scope.YoutubeUpload,
YouTubeService.Scope.Youtube,
YouTubeService.Scope.YoutubeForceSsl,
YouTubeService.Scope.Youtubepartner,
YouTubeService.Scope.YoutubepartnerChannelAudit
},
"user",
CancellationToken.None,
new FileDataStore(refresh_token_path)
).Result;
// Approach 2
//IAuthorizationCodeFlow flow = new GoogleAuthorizationCodeFlow(
// new GoogleAuthorizationCodeFlow.Initializer
// {
// ClientSecrets = secrets,
// Scopes = new[] {
// YouTubeService.Scope.YoutubeReadonly,
// YouTubeService.Scope.YoutubeUpload,
// YouTubeService.Scope.Youtube,
// YouTubeService.Scope.YoutubeForceSsl,
// YouTubeService.Scope.Youtubepartner,
// YouTubeService.Scope.YoutubepartnerChannelAudit
// },
// DataStore = new FileDataStore(refresh_token_path, true)
// });
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
System.IO.File.WriteAllText(#"D:\error.txt", string.Format("{0}{1}{2}", ex.Message, Environment.NewLine, ex.StackTrace));
}
}
When I start it, if I use Approach 1 - through "GoogleWebAuthorizationBroker.AuthorizeAsync" method, the execution flow freezes in the method. If I use Approach 2 - through "GoogleAuthorizationCodeFlow.Initializer" the code flow continues without throwing any exceptions but in fact there is no created file in the specified file path "refresh_token_path".
When I start this code in a test console application it works fine in both cases.
Could you, please, give me an appointment what is the reason for this and how could I fix it?
Thanks in advance!
i am trying to call web Api that returns a list of object but it always throws an error : Internal Server Error
my code as below:
Web API
// GET: api/UploadFileStructures
[ResponseType(typeof( IEnumerable<UploadFileStructure>))]
public IHttpActionResult GetUploadFileStructuresByMovieId(int MovieDetailId)
{
IEnumerable<UploadFileStructure> uploaFileStructures= db.UploadFileStructures.Where(u=>u.MovieDetailId== MovieDetailId).AsEnumerable();
return Ok(uploaFileStructures);
}
Http Request:
using (var client = new HttpClient(handler))
{
//client.BaseAddress = UsersLogin;
client.DefaultRequestHeaders.Accept.Clear();
client.DefaultRequestHeaders.Accept.Add(new MediaTypeWithQualityHeaderValue("application/json"));
var response = client.GetAsync(String.Format(GetUploadFileStructuresByMovieIdUrl, MovieDetailId)).Result;
if (response.IsSuccessStatusCode)
{
UploadFileStructureDtls= response.Content.ReadAsAsync<IQueryable<UploadFileStructure>>().Result;
}
}
response.IsSuccessStatusCode is returing false and response returning " Internal Server Error"
The problem is on this line of your server code:
IEnumerable<UploadFileStructure> uploaFileStructures= db.UploadFileStructures.Where(u=>u.MovieDetailId== MovieDetailId).AsEnumerable();
If you set a breakpoint there, you should be able to see the actual error message that is generated.
I use the resource owner flow with IdentityServer3 and send get token request to identity server token endpoint with username and password in javascript as below:
function getToken() {
var uid = document.getElementById("username").value;
var pwd = document.getElementById("password").value;
var xhr = new XMLHttpRequest();
xhr.onload = function (e) {
console.log(xhr.status);
console.log(xhr.response);
var response_data = JSON.parse(xhr.response);
if (xhr.status === 200 && response_data.access_token) {
getUserInfo(response_data.access_token);
getValue(response_data.access_token);
}
}
xhr.open("POST", tokenUrl);
var data = {
username: uid,
password: pwd,
grant_type: "password",
scope: "openid profile roles",
client_id: 'client_id'
};
var body = "";
for (var key in data) {
if (body.length) {
body += "&";
}
body += key + "=";
body += encodeURIComponent(data[key]);
}
xhr.setRequestHeader("Authorization", "Basic " + btoa(client_id + ":" + client_secret));
xhr.setRequestHeader("Content-Type", "application/x-www-form-urlencoded");
xhr.send(body);
}
The access token is returned from identity server and user is authenticated. Then I use this token to send request to my Web Api.
The problem is that when I check if the user is assigned a role, I find the claim doesn't exist.
[Authorize]
// GET api/values
public IEnumerable<string> Get()
{
var id = RequestContext.Principal as ClaimsPrincipal;
bool geek = id.HasClaim("role", "Geek"); // false here
bool asset_mgr = id.HasClaim("role", "asset_manager"); // false here
return new string[] { "value1", "value2" };
}
Here is how the client is defined in identity server.
new Client
{
ClientName = "Client",
ClientId = "client_id",
Flow = Flows.ResourceOwner,
RequireConsent = false,
AllowRememberConsent = false,
AllowedScopes = new List<string>
{
"openid",
"profile",
"roles",
"sampleApi"
},
AbsoluteRefreshTokenLifetime = 86400,
SlidingRefreshTokenLifetime = 43200,
RefreshTokenUsage = TokenUsage.OneTimeOnly,
RefreshTokenExpiration = TokenExpiration.Sliding,
ClientSecrets = new List<Secret>
{
new Secret("4C701024-0770-4794-B93D-52B5EB6487A0".Sha256())
},
},
and this is how the user is defined:
new InMemoryUser
{
Username = "bob",
Password = "secret",
Subject = "1",
Claims = new[]
{
new Claim(Constants.ClaimTypes.GivenName, "Bob"),
new Claim(Constants.ClaimTypes.FamilyName, "Smith"),
new Claim(Constants.ClaimTypes.Role, "Geek"),
new Claim(Constants.ClaimTypes.Role, "Foo")
}
}
How can I add claims to the access_token in this case? Thanks a lot!
I have just spent a while figuring this out myself. #leastprivilege's comment on Yang's answer had the clue, this answer is just expanding on it.
It's all down to how the oAuth and OIDC specs evolved, it's not an artefact of IdentityServer (which is awesome).
Firstly, here is a fairly decent discussion of the differences between identity tokens and access tokens: https://github.com/IdentityServer/IdentityServer3/issues/2015 which is worth a read.
With Resource Owner flow, like you are doing, you will always get an Access Token. By default and per the spec, you shouldn't include claims in that token (see the above link for why). But, in practice, it is very nice when you can; it saves you extra effort on both client and server.
What Leastprivilege is referring to is that you need to create a scope, something like this:
new Scope
{
Name = "member",
DisplayName = "member",
Type = ScopeType.Resource,
Claims = new List<ScopeClaim>
{
new ScopeClaim("role"),
new ScopeClaim(Constants.ClaimTypes.Name),
new ScopeClaim(Constants.ClaimTypes.Email)
},
IncludeAllClaimsForUser = true
}
And then you need to request that scope when you ask for the token. I.e. your line
scope: "openid profile roles", should change to scope: "member", (well, I say that - scopes play a dual role here, as far as I can see - they are also a form of control, i.e. the client is asking for certain scopes and can be rejected if it is not allowed those but that is another topic).
Note the important line that eluded me for a while, which is Type = ScopeType.Resource (because Access Tokens are about controlling access to resources). This means it will apply to Access Tokens and the specified claims will be included in the token (I think, possibly, against spec but wonderfully).
Finally, in my example I have included both some specific claims as well as IncludeAllClaimsForUser which is obviously silly, but just wanted to show you some options.
I find I can achieve this by replacing the default IClaimsProvider of IdentityServerServiceFactory.
The cusomized IClaimsProvider is as below:
public class MyClaimsProvider : DefaultClaimsProvider
{
public MaccapClaimsProvider(IUserService users) : base(users)
{
}
public override Task<IEnumerable<Claim>> GetAccessTokenClaimsAsync(ClaimsPrincipal subject, Client client, IEnumerable<Scope> scopes, ValidatedRequest request)
{
var baseclaims = base.GetAccessTokenClaimsAsync(subject, client, scopes, request);
var claims = new List<Claim>();
if (subject.Identity.Name == "bob")
{
claims.Add(new Claim("role", "super_user"));
claims.Add(new Claim("role", "asset_manager"));
}
claims.AddRange(baseclaims.Result);
return Task.FromResult(claims.AsEnumerable());
}
public override Task<IEnumerable<Claim>> GetIdentityTokenClaimsAsync(ClaimsPrincipal subject, Client client, IEnumerable<Scope> scopes, bool includeAllIdentityClaims, ValidatedRequest request)
{
var rst = base.GetIdentityTokenClaimsAsync(subject, client, scopes, includeAllIdentityClaims, request);
return rst;
}
}
Then, replace the IClaimsProvider like this:
// custom claims provider
factory.ClaimsProvider = new Registration<IClaimsProvider>(typeof(MyClaimsProvider));
The result is that, when the request for access token is sent to token endpoint the claims are added to the access_token.
Not only that I tried other methods, I tried all possible combinations of scopes etc. All I could read in the access token was "scope", "scope name", for Resource Flow there were no claims I have added period.
I had to do all this
Add custom UserServiceBase and override AuthenticateLocalAsync since I have username/password there and I need both to fetch things from the database
Add claims that I need in the same function (this on itself will not add claim to Access Token, however you will able to read them in various ClaimsPrincipal parameters around)
Add custom DefaultClaimsProvider and override GetAccessTokenClaimsAsync where ClaimsPrincipal subject contains the claims I previously set, I just take them out and put again into ølist of claims for the result.
I guess this last step might be done overriding GetProfileDataAsync in the custom UserServiceBase, but the above just worked so I did not want to bother.
The general problem is not how to set claims, it is where you populate them. You have to override something somewhere.
This here worked for me since I needed data from a database, someone else should populate claims elsewhere. But they are not going to magically appear just because you nicely set Scopes and Claims Identity Server configurations.
Most of the answers say not a word about where to set the claim values properly. In each particular override you have done, the passed parameters, when they have claims, in the function are attached to identity or access token.
Just take care of that and all will be fine.
I'm developing a Dart application that will need authentication and session control. I'm trying shelf_auth to do that, but the examples doesn't seem to work or, more likely, I'm not implementing them the right way.
In short, this is what I want to happen:
An user opens the application on the browser.
The user enters the login information (login and password), which are POSTED to the server.
If the provided information is valid, the application generates a session code that is passed to the client and stored on the DB (server-side). This code will be sent with every transaction to the server-side.
The package shelf_auth has some examples, but I don't know which one to follow. So my question is: how could I do that with shelf_auth? I'm not asking for anyone to code this for me, but just to point me to the right direction.
EDIT: The example that I was trying out was this: example_with_login_and_jwt_session.dart. Seems that it's lacking CORS headers (this question helped me fixing it) and, even providing valid information, it responds "Unauthorized".
This is how I'm POSTING the information:
import "dart:html";
void main() {
Map _queryParameters = {
"username": "fred",
"password": "blah"
};
var _button = querySelector("#login_button");
_button.onClick.listen((MouseEvent e) {
e.preventDefault();
var requisition = new HttpRequest();
Uri uri = new Uri(path: "http://localhost:8080/login", queryParameters: _queryParameters);
requisition.open("POST", uri.toString());
requisition.setRequestHeader("content-type", "application/x-www-form-urlencoded");
requisition.onLoadEnd.listen((_) {
print(requisition.response.toString());
});
requisition.send();
});
}
I got it working with this client code
import "dart:html";
void main() {
Map _queryParameters = {"username": "fred", "password": "blah"};
var _button = querySelector("#login_button");
_button.onClick.listen((MouseEvent e) async {
e.preventDefault();
var requisition = new HttpRequest();
Uri uri = new Uri(
path: "http://localhost:8080/login/");
requisition.onLoadEnd.listen((_) {
print(requisition.response.toString());
});
HttpRequest request = await HttpRequest.postFormData(
"http://localhost:8080/login/", _queryParameters
//,withCredentials: true
);
print(request.response);
});
}
The example server expects the credentials in the body instead of query parameters and I set withCredentials: true so authentication cookies are sent with the request. Worked without withCredentials.
I have a problem with using the RestSharp client on the Windows Phone device. Starting form the beginning, I have the ASP.NET Web Api service hosted online. I have a request user address: POST: http://my-service-url.com/token where I send Email and Password as a body parameters and I get 201 status code and a cookie in the response. When I do it in fiddler everything works fine. I also have the functional test for my API which is using the RestSharp which is also working correctly:
[Given(#"I fill email and password with correct data and I click log in button")]
public void GivenIFillEmailAndPasswordWithCorrectDataAndIClickLogInButton()
{
//Delete user if he exists
_testUserHelper.DeleteTestUser(TestEmail);
//Create new activated user
Assert.IsTrue(_testUserHelper.CreateTestUser(TestEmail, TestPassword));
//Prepare client
var client = new RestClient(CarRentalsConstants.HostAddress);
var restRequest = new RestRequest("api/token", Method.POST) { RequestFormat = DataFormat.Json };
//Add parameters to request
restRequest.AddBody(new { Email = TestEmail, Password = TestPassword });
//Perform request
_response = client.Execute(restRequest);
}
[When(#"the log in login process finishes")]
public void WhenTheLogInLoginProcessFinishes()
{
Assert.AreEqual(HttpStatusCode.Created, _response.StatusCode, _response.Content);
Assert.IsNotNull(_response.Cookies.SingleOrDefault(q => q.Name == ".ASPXAUTH"););
}
The one above works properly, and the cookie is in the response object.
Now what I try to do on my windows phone looks like this:
var restRequest = new RestRequest("token", Method.POST) {RequestFormat = DataFormat.Json};
restRequest.AddBody(new {Email = email, Password = password});
myWebClient.ExecuteAsync(restRequest, (restResponse, handle) =>
{
switch (restResponse.StatusCode)
{
case HttpStatusCode.Created:
{
var cookie = restResponse.Cookies.SingleOrDefault(q => q.Name == ".ASPXAUTH");
successLogicDelegate(cookie);
}
break;
case HttpStatusCode.BadRequest:
{
HandleBadRequest(restResponse.Content, failureLogicDelegate);
}
break;
default:
msgBox.Show(StringResources.ServerConnectionError);
failureLogicDelegate(null);
break;
}
});
And in this case, the response returns the "Created" status code, but the cookie is then set to null. I have no idea what is happening here, but I am fairly certain that server is sending this cookie, so where does it get lost?
Any help will be really appreciated.