I have used spring sockjs server implementation for websockets. It supports messages upto 2kb but above that the websocket connection breaks -gives an 1006 error. If I reduce the message size, then it runs ok.
I went through the docs as well as classes, but could get a place where I can increase this limit. Have asked in spring forum as well but no reply.
Any Idea?
Any stack traces in the server logs? What server? And what transport is being used (websocket, xhr-streaming, other?) For the WebSocket transport you may be hitting default limits on the message buffer. Have you seen the section on Configuring the WebSocket Engine in the documentation?
Got it resolved, the way spring document has mentioned, did not worked for me -tomcat would not pick the parameters from there. Finally getting hold of ServletServerContainerFactoryBean (which is always singleton) and setting the properties there worked for me. Details:
How to increase output buffer for spring sockjs websocket server implementation.
Related
I'm using spring boot 2.3.3.RELEASE with websocket support and RabbitMQ as external broker with stomp support.
The issue is that the client keeps on getting a heartbeat message "\n" every +-15 secs even though the client negotiated the heatbeat as "0, 30000" during the CONNECT request as suggested in this documentation on heart-beat header support with stomp in RabbitMQ. By turning on trace log I was able to find that ExecutorSubscribableChannel has a run() method that gets executed by a ThreadPoolExecutor every +-15 secs, which in turn sends that heartbeat message. I'm not sure if its a bug or I'm missing some configuration on my side. Any help would be appreciated.
I was able to solve this with help on feedback provided on the issue that I opened in spring-framework GitHub. Here is the link.
I'm trying to setup a broker relay in Spring with RabbitMQ being the broker. Things work as intended when all events originate from my browser, however, sometimes I have events generated on the server side dynamically. I want to send these too to RabbitMQ to take advantage of things like durable topics or TTL for messages. As far as my understanding goes, using SimpleMessagingTemplate.convertAndSend() and convertAndSendToUser both end up sending the event to the browser instead of broker.
As of now, I'm trying to create a new stomp client to rabbitmq and send events through that. But I can't help feel it to be a bit hacky. Is there a way to get a hold on the stomp client used by Spring and forward my messages easily? Or am I missing something here?
Any help is appreciated, thanks!
Took a while but turns out you don't need to get a hold of the internal stomp client (it's actually an internal TcpClient from Reactor Netty though) or anything like that. Following are the steps you need to do when you want a little bit of customization:
Spring uses #EnableWebSocketMessageBroker to configure the broker or you can extend DelegatingWebSocketMessageBrokerConfiguration. I ended up extending it, it makes little difference though.
In configureMessageBroker(MessageBrokerRegistry registry), use the registry and enable stomp relay and the important part: for the registry in the same method, add ChannelInterceptors. You can get the stomp command and process it as required. The idea is identical to Spring Intercetpors. Add the headers needed inside that.
final StompHeaderAccessor headerAccessor = StompHeaderAccessor.wrap(message);
StompCommand command = headerAccessor.getCommand();
Then finally, recreate the message for sending.
MessageBuilder.createMessage(new byte[0], accessor.getMessageHeaders());
Lastly, you can test if things are actually going to RabbitMQ management console to observe if messages are actually being sent.
So using JMS and ActiveMQ, I can be sure that my message sent from my Spring Boot application using JmsTemplate will reach it's destination application even if that destination application is down at the time I send the message to ActiveMQ. As when the destination application starts up, it grabs the message from the queue. Great!
However.
What happens if my Spring Boot application tries to send a JMS message to a queue on the ActiveMQ server, but the ActiveMQ server is down at that point or the network is down and I get a connection refused exception?
What is the recommended way to make sure my application keeps trying to re-sends the message to ActiveMQ until it is successful? Is this something I have to develop into my application myself? Are there any nifty Spring tools or annotations which do this for me? Any advice on best practice or how I should be handling this scenario?
You can try Spring-Retry. Has lots of fine grain controls for it:
http://www.baeldung.com/spring-retry
https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-retry
If it is critical that you don't lose this message, you will want to save it to some alternative persistent store (e.g. filesystem, local mq server) along with whatever retry code you come up with. But for those occasional network glitches or a very temporary mq shutdown/restart, Spring-Retry alone should do the trick.
Couple of approaches I can think of
1. You can set up another ActiveMq as fallback. In your code you don't have to do anything, just change your broker url from
activemq.broker.url=tcp://amq01.blah.blah.com:61616
to
activemq.broker.url=failover:(tcp://amq01.blah.blah.com:61616,tcp://amq02.blah.blah.com:61616)?randomize=false
The rest is automatically taken care of. i.e. when one of them is down, the messages are sent to other.
Another approach is to send to a internal queue (like seda, direct) when activemq is down and read from there.
Adding failover to the url is one appropriate way.
And another reasonable way is to making sure activemq always online , as activemq has the master-slave mode(http://activemq.apache.org/masterslave.html) to get high availability.
I have a jms server running on weblogic and I need another application running on another server (weblogic as well) to listen to JMS topics sent by the JMS server mentioned before. The fact is that I don't know how to do that. I mean, what do I need on the consumer application side? Thansk in advance.
I know it´s a little old, but could help other people trying to achieve the same.
First you need to enable Cross-Domain Security on both domains envolved on your JMS communication. Please see specific documentation here: https://docs.oracle.com/middleware/1221/wls/SECMG/domain.htm#SECMG402
For reading a message from a JMS resource, there are a ton of examples you can search online, but basically you should rely on Weblogic´s t3 protocol. Here is a relativelly recent example using Spring Boot: Connect to remote jms queue with Spring Boot
I want my system to guarantee there is no data loss even if the system is shutting down.
What this mean is that the system must not miss the request message. So, I will change the way that accept http reqeust. Now, I am using http gateway/webservice gateway in spring integration. But, This isn't receive the message even if the system dies. So, I want to add the queue between the http client and the http receiver. So, I want to use a queue channel. Here is the question.
① I have to install other queue program such as activemq or rabbitmq and have to connect to the queue channel in spring integration?
② and which one is the best combination with spring integration? I heard that rabbit mq is the best one.
please give me a elaborate explanation. thanks.
First of all you description isn't clear...
If you don't want to lose messages from the QueueChannel use some Persistence MessageStore, like JdbcChannelMessageStore:
http://docs.spring.io/spring-integration/docs/latest-ga/reference/html/system-management-chapter.html#message-store
From other side there are channel wrappers for the AMQP as well as for JMS:
http://docs.spring.io/spring-integration/docs/latest-ga/reference/html/amqp.html#d4e5846
http://docs.spring.io/spring-integration/docs/latest-ga/reference/html/jms.html#jms-channel
Which really provide the same persistence durability, fault tollerant options for your use-case.
Re. activemq VS rabbitmq. I can say by my own expiriance that the last one is better, by configuration, usage from Spring Integration (Spring AMQP is under the shell). And its performance is really better.
All other info you can find in the Internet.