Low Power Mode on the TI MSP430 - performance

I am using the MSP430F2274 and trying to understand better the uses of Low Power mode.
In my program I am also using the SimplicTi API in order for two devices (one is the AP which is being connected by the other ,ED) to communicate.
AP - Access Point , which is also connected to a PC via the UART in order to recive a string from the user.
ED - End Device , simply connetes to the AP (with the SimplicTi protocol) and waits for messages form it.
I want to be sure I understand the low power mode uses , and to see how it "comes along" with the SimplicTi API.
The "flow" of the AP is as follows (after it is "linked" to the ED , see the code bellow):
#pragma vector = USCIAB0RX_VECTOR
__interrupt void USCI0RX_ISR(void)
{
// **A)** extract the "RXed" character (8 bits received from user) , use the while
// in order to be sure all the 8 bits are "desirialized" into a byte
while (!(IFG2 & UCA0RXIFG));
input_char = UCA0RXBUF; // input_char is global variable.
// **B)** if we received the "Enter" character , which indicates the
// end of the string
if(input_char == '\r' && input_count > 0)
{
TACCR0 = 10; // **F)**
TACTL = TASSEL_1 + MC_1; // ACLK, up mode
// **E)** Enter LPM3, interrupts enabled !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
__bis_SR_register(LPM3_bits + GIE);
}//end if Enter
// **C)** Any other char of the user's string when we
// have not got more than the maximum amount of bytes(chars)
else if (((FIRST_CHAR <= input_char && input_char <= LAST_CHAR) || ('a' <= input_char && input_char <= 'z')) && (input_count < INPUT_MAX_LENGTH))
{
input[input_count++] = input_char;
}
} //end of UART RX INTERRUPT
The TIMERA0 Interrupt Handler is the following code:
#pragma vector=TIMERA0_VECTOR
__interrupt void Timer_A(void)
{
if (i == strlen(morse)) // **D)** morse is a global array of chars who holds the string that we wish to send
{
SMPL_Send(sLID[0], (uint8_t*)EOT, 1); // EOT is the last char to send
TACTL = MC_0; //disable TimerA0
}
else if (!letterSpace)
{
char ch = morse[i++];
SMPL_Send(sLID[0], (char*)ch, 1);
switch(ch)
{
case '.':
{
TACCR0 = INTERVAL * 3;
letterSpace = 1;
break;
}
case '-':
{
TACCR0 = INTERVAL * 3 * 3;
letterSpace = 1;
break;
}
} // switch
} // else if
} //end TIMERA0 interrupt handler
The thing is like that:
I use the TIMERA0 handler in order to send each byte after a different amount of type , whether the char was transformed into a "-" or a "."
To do so I set the timer accordingly to a different value ( 3 times larger for "-").
Finnaly when I am done transmitting the whole string (D) , I disable the timer.
NOTE : The following method is performed at the begining of the AP code in order to configure the UART:
void UARTinit()
{
P3SEL = 0x30; // P3.4 and P3.5 as the UART TX/RX pins: P3SEL |= BIT4 + BIT5;
UCA0CTL1 |= UCSSEL_2; // SMCLK
// pre scale 1MHz/9600 =~ 104.
UCA0BR0 = 104;
UCA0BR1 = 0;
// 8-bit character and Modulation UCBRSx = 1
UCTL0 |= CHAR;
UCA0MCTL = UCBRS0;
UCA0CTL1 &= ~UCSWRST; // **Initialize USCI state machine**
IE2 |= UCA0RXIE; // Enable UART INPUT interrupt
} // end of UARTinit
So my questions are:
1) Just to be sure, in A) where I am "polling" the Rx buffer of the UART , is it necceary or is it just good practise for "any case" , cause AFAIK the UART handler gets called once the UART module recived the whole BYTE (as I configured it)?
2) In the main program of the AP , the last instruction is the one that "puts" it into LPM0 with interrupts enables : __bis_SR_register(LPM0_bits + GIE);
When for LPM0:
CPU is disable
ACLK and SMCLK remain active
MCLK is disabled
And for LPM3:
CPU is disable
MCLK and SMCLK are disabled
ACLK remains active
As I see it ,I can not enter LPM3 cause the AP needs the SMCLK clock not to be disable? (cause the UART uses it)
Is that correct?
3) In F) , is it a proper way to call the TIMERA0 handler ? I perfrom TACRR0 = 10 , cause it is a small value which the timer will reach "in no time" just so it will enter the TIMERA0 handler to perform the task of sending the bytes of the string.
4) For the "roll back" in the AP: As I see it , the "flow" is like that:
enters LPM0 (main) --> UART gets interrputed --> exit LPM0 and goes to the UART handler --> when it is done reciving the bytes (usually 5) it enters LPM3 --> the timer finishes counting to TACRR0 value (which is 10) --> the TIMERA0 handler gets called --> when the TIMERA0 handler done sending the last byte it disables the timer (TACTL0 = MC_0;) --> we "roll back" to the instruction which got us to LPM3 within the UART handler --> ??
Now , does ?? is "rolling back" to the instrcution which took us to LPM0 within the main program , OR do we "stay here" (in the instruction that entered us to LPM3 within the UART handler E) ?
If we do stay on E) , do I need to change it to LPM0 cause , again, the UART uses the SMCLK which is NOT active in LPM3 but indeed active in LPM0 ?
5) Any other comments will be super !!
Thanks allot,
Guy.

1) This will work
2) When you config this:
UCA0CTL1 |= UCSSEL_2; // SMCLK
This mean that UART used SMCLK, SMCLK will stop when you make MCU turn to LPM3;so that
UART will not work, you should config UART use ACLK, this will make UART work in LPM3 mode.
3) ...
4) ...
5) See 2
I hope this will help you

Related

SPI implementation stuck on “while(!spi_is_tx_empty(WINC1500_SPI));”

I'm currently implementing a driver for the WINC1500 to be used with an ATMEGA32 MCU and it's getting stuck on this line of "while(!spi_is_tx_empty(WINC1500_SPI));". The code builds and runs but it won't clear what's inside in this function to proceed through my code and boot up the Wifi Module. I've been stuck on this problem for weeks now with no progress and don't know how to clear it.
static inline bool spi_is_tx_empty(volatile avr32_spi_t *spi)
{
// 1 = All Transmissions complete
// 0 = Transmissions not complete
return (spi->sr & AVR32_SPI_SR_TXEMPTY_MASK) != 0;
}
Here is my implementation of the SPI Tx/Rx function
void m2mStub_SpiTxRx(uint8_t *p_txBuf,
uint16_t txLen,
uint8_t *p_rxBuf,
uint16_t rxLen)
{
uint16_t byteCount;
uint16_t i;
uint16_t data;
// Calculate the number of clock cycles necessary, this implies a full-duplex SPI.
byteCount = (txLen >= rxLen) ? txLen : rxLen;
// Read / Transmit.
for (i = 0; i < byteCount; ++i)
{
// Wait for transmitter to be ready.
while(!spi_is_tx_ready(WINC1500_SPI));
// Transmit.
if (txLen > 0)
{
// Send data from the transmit buffer
spi_put(WINC1500_SPI, *p_txBuf++);
--txLen;
}
else
{
// No more Tx data to send, just send something to keep clock active.
// Here we clock out a don't care byte
spi_put(WINC1500_SPI, 0x00U);
// Not reading it back, not being cleared 16/1/2020
}
// Reference http://asf.atmel.com/docs/latest/avr32.components.memory.sdmmc.spi.example.evk1101/html/avr32_drivers_spi_quick_start.html
// Wait for transfer to finish, stuck on here
// Need to clear the buffer for it to be able to continue
while(!spi_is_tx_empty(WINC1500_SPI));
// Wait for transmitter to be ready again
while(!spi_is_tx_ready(WINC1500_SPI));
// Send dummy data to slave, so we can read something from it.
spi_put(WINC1500_SPI, 0x00U); // Change dummy data from 00U to 0xFF idea
// Wait for a complete transmission
while(!spi_is_tx_empty(WINC1500_SPI));
// Read or throw away data from the slave as required.
if (rxLen > 0)
{
*p_rxBuf++ = spi_get(WINC1500_SPI);
--rxLen;
}
else
{
spi_get(WINC1500_SPI);
}
}
Debug output log
Disable SPI
Init SPI module as master
Configure SPI and Clock settings
spi_enable(WINC1500_SPI)
InitStateMachine()
INIT_START_STATE
InitStateMachine()
INIT_WAIT_FOR_CHIP_RESET_STATE
m2mStub_PinSet_CE
m2mStub_PinSet_RESET
m2mStub_GetOneMsTimer();
SetChipHardwareResetState (CHIP_HARDWARE_RESET_FIRST_DELAY_1MS)
InitStateMachine()
INIT_WAIT_FOR_CHIP_RESET_STATE
if(m2m_get_elapsed_time(startTime) >= 2)
m2mStub_PinSet_CE(M2M_WIFI_PIN_HIGH)
startTime = m2mStub_GetOneMsTimer();
SetChipHardwareResetState(CHIP_HARDWARE_RESET_SECOND_DELAY_5_MS);
InitStateMachine()
INIT_WAIT_FOR_CHIP_RESET_STATE
m2m_get_elapsed_time(startTime) >= 6
m2mStub_PinSet_RESET(M2M_WIFI_PIN_HIGH)
startTime = m2mStub_GetOneMsTimer();
SetChipHardwareResetState(CHIP_HARDWARE_RESET_FINAL_DELAY);
InitStateMachine()
INIT_WAIT_FOR_CHIP_RESET_STATE
m2m_get_elapsed_time(startTime) >= 10
SetChipHardwareResetState(CHIP_HARDWARE_RESET_COMPLETE)
retVal = true // State machine has completed successfully
g_scanInProgress = false
nm_spi_init();
reg = spi_read_reg(NMI_SPI_PROTOCOL_CONFIG)
Wait for a complete transmission
Wait for transmitter to be ready
SPI_PUT(WINC1500_SPI, *p_txBuf++);
--txLen;
Wait for transfer to finish, stuck on here
Wait for transfer to finish, stuck on here
The ATmega32 is an 8-bit AVR but you seem to be using code for the AVR32, a family of 32-bit AVRs. You're probably just using the totally wrong code and you should consult the datasheet of the ATmega32, and search for SPI for the AVR ATmega family.

TWI on ATMega 2560 wait's in infinity loop

I get some stupid error's if I want to try initialise the connection from the TWI master to the bus. The start condition will be send but the processor waits in the infinity loop bevor starting to send the slave address to the bus.
I also have analysed the signals on the bus and one result is that the clock is running but there will be no data send on the bus.
The processor wait's in the line with the marked arrow.
We use the following code to start the and initialise the bus ...
void i2c_master_init() {
TWBR = (uint8_t)TWBR_val;
}
void i2c_master_stop() {
TWCR = (1<<TWINT) | (1<<TWEN) | (1<<TWSTO);
}
uint8_t i2c_master_start(uint8_t address) {
TWCR = 0;
TWCR |= (1<<TWSTA);
TWCR |= (1<<TWEN);
TWCR |= (1<<TWINT);
while( !(TWCR & (1<<TWINT)) ); <--
[...]
}
Currently I don't know, what's going wrong with the code. Or am I doing something else wrong. Can anyone help me?
Thank you in anticipation.
My best guess without hardware on my bench is that you should set all flags to TWI control registry at once by TWCR = (1<<TWINT)|(1<<TWSTA)|(1<<TWEN). Meanwhile you set them one by one in 3 separate operations (multiple clock cycles), while datasheet implicitly says flags must be set together, see also datasheet examples.

I²C Master Write with PIC18F45K50 : keeps SCL low

I'm writing my own I²C Master Write function according to Microchip's datasheet. I'm using MPLAB X. I generated the configuration with the Code Configurator, but here are the interesting bits :
// R_nW write_noTX; P stopbit_notdetected; S startbit_notdetected; BF RCinprocess_TXcomplete; SMP Standard Speed; UA dontupdate; CKE disabled; D_nA lastbyte_address;
SSP1STAT = 0x80;
// SSPEN enabled; WCOL no_collision; CKP Idle:Low, Active:High; SSPM FOSC/4_SSPxADD_I2C; SSPOV no_overflow;
SSP1CON1 = 0x28;
// SBCDE disabled; BOEN disabled; SCIE disabled; PCIE disabled; DHEN disabled; SDAHT 100ns; AHEN disabled;
SSP1CON3 = 0x00;
// Baud Rate Generator Value: SSP1ADD 80;
SSP1ADD = 0x50;
// clear the master interrupt flag
PIR1bits.SSP1IF = 0;
// enable the master interrupt
PIE1bits.SSP1IE = 1;
So : Standard Speed, 100ns hold time, Master Mode, clokck frequency about 50kHz.
I tried to follow the procedure described p238 of the datasheet :
http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/30000684B.pdf
Here's my code :
#include "mcc_generated_files/mcc.h"
#include <stdio.h>
#define _XTAL_FREQ 16000000
#define RTS_PIN PORTDbits.RD3
#define CTS_PIN PORTDbits.RD2
#define LED_PIN PORTAbits.RA1
#define RX_FLAG PORTAbits.RA2
uint8_t c;
// Define putch() for printf())
void putch(char c)
{
EUSART1_Write(c);
}
void main(void)
{
// Initialize the device
SYSTEM_Initialize();
while (1)
{
// Generate a START condition by setting Start Enable bit
SSP1CON2bits.SEN = 1;
// Wait for START to be completed
while(!PIR1bits.SSPIF);
// Clear flag
PIR1bits.SSPIF = 0;
// Load the address + RW byte in SSP1BUF
// Address = 85 ; request type = WRITE (0)
SSP1BUF = 0b10101010;
// Wait for ack
while (SSP1CON2bits.ACKSTAT);
// Wait for MSSP interrupt
while (!PIR1bits.SSPIF);
// Load data (0x11) in SSP1BUF
SSP1BUF = 0x11;
// Wait for ack
while (SSP1CON2bits.ACKSTAT);
// Generate a STOP condition
SSP1CON2bits.PEN = 1;
// Wait for STOP to be completed
while(!PIR1bits.SSPIF);
// Clear flag
PIR1bits.SSPIF = 0;
// Wait for 1s before sending the next byte
__delay_ms(1000);
}
}
The slave device is an Arduino which I have tested with another Arduino (Master) to make sure it's working correctly.
My problem is : analysing the SDA/SCL signals with a logic analyser, when I start the PIC I get 2 correct messages, that's with correct address send and byte transmission, but at the end of the second SCL is held LOW, which makes all other writings bad (can't have a proper START condition if SCL is held LOW). BTW, at the end of the first transmission, SCL is held LOW for like 3ms, but then comes HIGH again without any reason.
Can anyone here point what I'm doing wrong ? Did I forget something ?
Thanx in advance.
Best regards.
Eric
PS : when testing the slave with another Arduino as the Master, SCL is set HIGH as soon as the transmission is over.
One thing I'm noticing is that after sending the slave address you are waiting for the ACK (ACKSTAT) then waiting for the SSPIF Interrupt Flag, but you are not checking for SSPIF after the data byte. You are only checking ACKSTAT. Maybe try waiting for and clearing the SSPIF before setting PEN to assert the stop conditon?
Have you checked the state of the SSPCON and SSPSTAT registers when this behavior occurs, that might help narrow down where the problem lies.
Thanx a lot for your answer !
I cleared SSP1IF after loading the data byte, and now it's working fine !
I think I understand now what was happening : the datasheet indicates that ACKSTAT is the only register bit that reacts on the rising edge of SCL, instead of the falling edge for the other bits. So in my code, I generate the STOP condition too early, and that might make it inoperative. Thus no STOP condition is generated, SCL is stuck LOW, and the next transmission cannot be started.
Furthermore, when I wait for the STOP condition to be completed, the SSP1IF flag is still set, so he doesn't actually wait and jumps directly to the delay() function. I don't know if that matters as he waits anyway, but it could matter if ever I tried to send packets one after the other.
So I here's the function I wrote, and which is working :
(BTW it can take up to 255 data bytes)
void MasterWrite(char _size, char* _data)
{
// Generate a START condition by setting Start Enable bit
SSP1CON2bits.SEN = 1;
// Wait for START to be completed
while(!PIR1bits.SSPIF);
// Clear flag
PIR1bits.SSPIF = 0;
// Load the address + RW byte in SSP1BUF
// Address = 85 ; request type = WRITE (0)
SSP1BUF = 0b10101010;
// Wait for ack
while (SSP1CON2bits.ACKSTAT);
// Wait for MSSP interrupt
while (!PIR1bits.SSPIF);
// Clear flag
PIR1bits.SSPIF = 0;
for (int i=0; i<_size; i++)
{
// Load data in SSP1BUF
SSP1BUF = *(_data+i);
// Wait for ack
while (SSP1CON2bits.ACKSTAT);
// Wait for MSSP interrupt
while (!PIR1bits.SSPIF);
// Clear flag
PIR1bits.SSPIF = 0;
}
// Generate a STOP condition
SSP1CON2bits.PEN = 1;
// Wait for STOP to be completed
while(!PIR1bits.SSPIF);
// Clear flag
PIR1bits.SSPIF = 0;
}
Thanx a lot again for your help !
Best regards.
Eric

Trigger Countdown with 433 MHz transmission

I would like to use an arduino to read 433 MHz transmission from multiple Soil Moisture Sensors. Since I can never be sure all transmissions reach the receiver I'd like to set a countdown from the moment the first transmission is received. If another transmission is received, the countdown starts again.
After a defined amount of time (e.g. 10 Minutes) without any more signals or if all signals have been received (e.g 4 Sensors) the receiving unit should stop and come to decision based on the data it got to the point.
For transmitting and receiving I am using the <RCSwitch.h>library.
The loop of the receiving unit and one Sensor looks like this:
#include <RCSwitch.h>
RCSwitch mySwitch = RCSwitch();
void Setup(){
Serial.begin(9600);
mySwitch.enableReceive(4);
}
void loop() {
if (mySwitch.available()) {
int value = mySwitch.getReceivedValue();
if (value == 0) {
lcd.clear();
Serial.print("Unknown encoding");
}
else {
Serial.print(mySwitch.getReceivedValue());
Serial.print("%");
}
The full code includes some differentiation mechanism for all sensors but I figured that might not be relevant for my question.
Question:
What's the best way to do this without a real time clock module. As far as I know I can't wait by using delay(...)since then I won't receive any data while the processor waiting.
You can use millis() as a clock. It returns the number of milliseconds since the arduino started.
#define MINUTES(x) ((x) * 60000UL)
unsigned long countStart = 0;
void loop()
{
if (/*read from module ok*/)
{
countStart = millis();
// sanity check, since millis() eventually rolls over
if (countStart == 0)
countStart = 1;
}
if (countStart && ((millis() - countStart) > MINUTES(10)))
{
countStart = 0;
// trigger event
}
}
Arduino's internal timers can also be used in this situation. If a long time period is needed, it's better to use 16bit counter (usually timer1) at 1024 prescaler (largest available). If the largest time interval of timer is greater than time required, then a counter have to be added in order to keep track of 1 minute interval.
For example, for 1-minute interval, initialize registers as:
TCCR1A = 0; //Initially setting every register as 0x0000
TCCR1B = 0;
TCNT1 = 0;
OCR1A = 468750; // compare match register 16MHz/1024/2/frequency(hz)
TCCR1B |= (1 << WGM12); // Timer compare mode
TCCR1B |= (1 << CS10) | (1 << CS10); // 1024 prescaler
TIMSK1 |= (1 << OCIE1A); // enable timer compare interrupt
These configuration of timer will give interrupt time of 1 minute. And upon timer completion ISR TIMER1_COMPA_vect will be run. You can play around with value of OCR1A for different interrupt periods.
Main advantage of using interrupts is that they don't block any task and can will be executed instantaneously (if interrupts are not disabled explicitly).

Writing SSPBUF from variable in I2C slave protocol in PIC18

I am writing an I2C slave routine for PIC18F25K80 and I am stuck on a weird problem.
This is my routine:
void interrupt interruption_handler() {
PIE1bits.SSPIE = 0; // Disable Master Synchronous Serial Port Interrupt
if (PIR1bits.SSPIF != 1) {
//This is not I2C interruption;
PIE1bits.SSPIE = 1; // Enable Master Synchronous Serial Port Interrupt
return;
}
//Treat overflow
if ((SSPCON1bits.SSPOV) || (SSPCON1bits.WCOL)) {
dummy = SSPBUF; // Read the previous value to clear the buffer
SSPCON1bits.SSPOV = 0; // Clear the overflow flag
SSPCON1bits.WCOL = 0; // Clear the collision bit
SSPCON1bits.CKP = 1;
board_state = BOARD_STATE_ERROR;
} else {
if (!SSPSTATbits.D_NOT_A) {
//Slave address
debug(0, ON);
//Read address
address = SSPBUF; //Clear BF
while(BF); //Wait until completion
if (SSPSTATbits.R_NOT_W) {
SSPCON1bits.WCOL = 0;
unsigned char a = 0x01;
SSPBUF = a;//0x01 works //Deliver first byte
asm("nop");
}
} else {
if (SSPSTATbits.BF) {
dummy = SSPBUF; // Clear BF (just in case)
while(BF);
}
if (SSPSTATbits.R_NOT_W) {
//Multi-byte read
debug(1, ON);
SSPCON1bits.WCOL = 0;
SSPBUF = 0x02; //Deliver second byte
asm("nop");
} else {
//WRITE
debug(2, ON);
}
}
transmitted = TRUE;
SSPCON1bits.CKP = 1;
PIR1bits.SSPIF = 0;
PIE1bits.SSPIE = 1; // Enable Master Synchronous Serial Port Interrupt
}
}
It works like a charm if I set constant values on SSPBUF. For example, if you do:
SSPBUF = 0x01;
(...)
SSPBUF = 0x02;
I get the two bytes on the master. I can even see the wave forms of the bytes being transmitted on the oscilloscope. Quite fun!
But when I try to set SSPBUF using a variable like:
unsigned char a = 0x01;
SSPBUF = a;
I get zero on the master.
It is driving me crazy.
Some hypothesis I've discarded:
Watchdog timer is messing up interrupting in the middle of the protocol: It is not. It is disabled and the problem happens in both SSPBUF assignments
I need to wait until BF goes low to continue: I don't. AFAIK, you setup the SSPBUF, clear SSPIF, set CKP and return from interruption to take care of life in 4Mhz while the hardware send data in few Khz. It will interrupt you again when it finishes.
It makes no sense to me. How good it is if you cannot define an arbitrary value using a variable?
Please gurus out there, enlighten this poor programmer.
Thanks in advance.
It has something to do with how the compiler generates the code and some undocumented/unknown PIC restriction around SSPBUF (it is an special register anyway).
I found out that it works when the compiler uses movwf and does not work when the compiler uses movff.
I moved the question to another forum because I realized the audience there is more adequate.
You will find more details here:
https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/251763/writing-sspbuf-from-variable-in-i2c-slave-protocol-in-pic18/251771#251771
Try move declaration : "unsigned char a = 0x01;"
to the beginning of the function or try define it as volatile global variable.
take into accunte that SSPBUF is both read and write buffer.check if there are conditions that may cause I2C module to reset this buffer.

Resources