I'm still learning mongodb and node.js.
I was trying to insert bulk amount of data say 100k rows with 80-100 columns. I created an app using express.js for that. I coded in such a a way that the page redirects to another page once upload button is clicked and in the background the app inserts the data into the db.
The issue is that once the inserting starts the app stops responding. Even after the completion of insert the app will be slower for about 2-3 minutes.
I tried this code on
1
Fedora 14
Intel P4 2.80GHz
1.5GiB
2
Fedora 14
i3 3.20GHz
3GiB
How to avoid this problem? Will it work better on a better system?
Code to store the data
MongoClient.connect(MONGODB_URI, function (err, database) {
var collection = database.collection(collectionName);
for (index = 0; index < jsonResult.length; ++index) {
var obj = jsonResult[index];
for (var prop in obj) {
if (headers[prop] == 'Date') {
obj[prop] = new Date(obj[prop].replace(/(\d{2})-(\d{2})-(\d{4})/, "$2/$1/$3"));
} else if (headers[prop] == 'Integer') {
obj[prop] = parseInt(obj[prop]);
} else if (headers[prop] == 'Float') {
obj[prop] = parseFloat(obj[prop]);
}
}
collection.insert(obj, function (err, result) {
if (err) {
console.log(JSON.stringify(err));
}
});
}
});
Note:
jsonResult is the result of reading a file(csv) and converting it
into json
headers is an object that have the key-data type mapping
var headers = {
'iodate': 'date',
'sno': 'integer',
'salary': 'float'
}
Code to read and convert csv to json
var cv_json = require('convert-json'); // required module convert-json (convert-csv,xls,xlsx into json)
cv_json({
input: target_path,
output: null
}, function (err, result) {
if (err) {
console.error(err);
} else {
persists(req, res, result, collectionName, headers); //Function where insert takes place.
}
})
Right now, the "persists()" return imidiately, even though the insert hasn't finished. This is due to the asyncronus nature of javascript/nodejs.
You need to serialize the insert operations so you don't clog the server. Use async.eachSeries()
Your "persists" function should use a callback to notify the caller that it has finished. Somehing like this:
persists(req, res, result, collectionName, headers, callback){
MongoClient.connect(MONGODB_URI, function (err, database) {
var collection = database.collection(collectionName);
async.eachSeries(jsonResult,
function(obj, cb){
for (var prop in obj) {
if (headers[prop] == 'Date') {
obj[prop] = new Date(obj[prop].replace(/(\d{2})-(\d{2})-(\d{4})/,"$2/$1/$3"));
} else if (headers[prop] == 'Integer') {
obj[prop] = parseInt(obj[prop]);
} else if (headers[prop] == 'Float') {
obj[prop] = parseFloat(obj[prop]);
}
}
collection.insert(obj, function (err, result) {
cb(err);
});
},
function(err){
callback();
}
);
});
}
And then to use it
persists(req, res, result, collectionName, headers, function(){
console.log("insert finished");
});
Related
I am trying to cache specific urls and each url has md5 hash and If the urls updated with new md5 i want to remove the current cache and add the new one.
cached url: http://www.mysite.lo/cards/index.php?md5=f51c2ef7795480ef2e0b1bd24c9e07
function shouldFetch(event) {
if ( event.request.url.indexOf( '/cards/') == -1 ) {
return false;
}
return true;
}
self.addEventListener('fetch', function(event) {
if (shouldFetch(event)) {
event.respondWith(
caches.match(event.request).then(function(response) {
if (response !== undefined) {
return response;
} else {
return fetch(event.request).then(function (response) {
let responseClone = response.clone();
caches.open('v1').then(function (cache) {
cache.put(event.request, responseClone);
});
return response;
}).catch(function (err) {
return caches.match(event.request);
});
}
})
);
}
});
I know we can use caches.delete() and so on, but I want to call it only if the md5 updated from the new request.
Thanks
You can accomplish roughly what you describe with the following, which makes use of the ignoreSearch option when calling cache.matchAll():
self.addEventListener('fetch', (event) => {
const CACHE_NAME = '...';
const url = new URL(event.request.url);
if (url.searchParams.has('md5')) {
event.respondWith((async () => {
const cache = await caches.open(CACHE_NAME);
const cachedResponses = await cache.matchAll(url.href, {
// https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2016/09/cache-query-options
ignoreSearch: true,
});
for (const cachedResponse of cachedResponses) {
// If we already have the incoming URL cached, return it.
if (cachedResponse.url === url.href) {
return cachedResponse;
}
// Otherwise, delete the out of date response.
await cache.delete(cachedResponse.url);
}
// If we've gotten this far, then there wasn't a cache match,
// and our old entries have been cleaned up.
const response = await fetch(event.request);
await cache.put(event.request, response.clone());
return response;
})());
}
// Logic for non-md5 use cases goes here.
});
(You could make things slightly more efficient by rearranging some of the cache-manipulation code to bring it out of the critical response path, but that's the basic idea.)
I need the server's response in the right format to allow me to traverse it like a list of MongoDb documents.
The console.log shows the data I want as [{"_id": "0YHYT54", etc.}], so it's all there.
However, it is string, making my attempt to traverse it as a MongoDb document fail.
function clientChanged(selectInput) {
if (selectInput.selectedIndex === -1)
selectInput.selectedIndex = 0;
selectedClientId = selectInput.options[selectInput.selectedIndex].value;
getClientMatters(selectedClientId, (matters) => {
console.log("returned Type: " + typeof matters);
<-- I need to process the returned data here, but it is string.
});
}
function getClientMatters(clientId, cb) {
let xhttp = new XMLHttpRequest();
xhttp.onreadystatechange = function() {
if (this.readyState == 4 && this.status == 200) {
cb(this.response);
}
};
xhttp.open("GET", "../matters/getByClientId?clientId=" + clientId, true);
xhttp.send();
}
Here is my model, which returns the data from the server:
Matters.getOpenMattersByClientId(clientId, function (err, matters) {
if (err) {
return res(err);
} else {
return res.json(matters);
}
});
Also, this is my first attempt at using AJAX to get my MongoDB data. If the above code reveals other issues, any tips would be appreciated.
Im getting this error
TypeError: Cannot read property 'set' of undefined
Code is:
Router.map(function() {
this.route('/payment_return/:invoice_no/:amount/', {
where: 'server',
onBeforeAction: function() {
console.log("result");
result = paypal_return(this.params.invoice_no,this.params.amount,this.params.query.token,this.params.query.PayerID);
console.log(result);
if (result)
{
var tokens = this.params.amount*10;
console.log(tokens);
var playerId = this._id;
Session.set('selectedUser', playerId);
var selectedUser = Session.get('selectedUser');
Meteor.call('updateTokens', selectedUser, tokens);
this.response.end("Payment captured successfully");
}
else
{
this.response.end("Error in processing payment");
}
}
});
});
In, methods.js
Meteor.methods({
'updateTokens': function(selectedUser, tokens){
check(selectedUser, String);
check(tokens, Number);
var currentUserId = Meteor.userId();
if(currentUserId){
Meteor.users.update(selectedUser,
{ $inc: { 'profile.tokens': tokens}});
}
}
})
Basically, trying to update user's token amount after successful payment, but unfortunately it's returning just that error.
Sessions are only available in client side... Not sure where you are trying to call Session, but if Session package is included and you are calling Sessions.set/get on client it should work.
This looks like API call to me, so I will suggest you to use meteorhacks:picker
Then you can add on your server side:
var paymentRoutes= Picker.filter(function(req, res) {
return req.method == "POST"; //OR GET WHATEVER YOU NEED
});
paymentRoutes.route('/payment_return/:invoice_no/:amount/',
function(params, req, res, next) {
//UPDATE TOKEN
});
var paymentRoutes= Picker.filter(function(req, res) {
return req.method == "GET" || "POST";
});
paymentRoutes.route('/payment_return/:invoice_no/:amount/', function(params, req, res, next) {
result = paypal_return(params.invoice_no,params.amount,params.query.token, this.userId);
if (result){
var tokens = this.params.amount*10;
var playerId = this.userId;
Meteor.users.update({_id:playerId},{ $inc: { 'profile.tokens': tokens}});
res.end("Payment captured successfully");
}else{
res.end("Error in processing payment");
}
});
I hope this will be helpful, Cheers
I've been working on this app for a while. I have several other modules that all work fine. I've been having a ton of trouble with this particular module and it's super frustrating. This problem looks super simple. Maybe I'm over thinking it. Hopefully someone will say that I am. :)
In this module, I decided to use methods from my model. This particular one is non-instanced. Here is my model:
/*
* Account.js
*/
module.exports = {
connection: 'islMongo',
attributes: {
name: {
type: 'string',
required: true,
},
},
numberToName: function(accountNumber) {
Account.findOne(accountNumber).exec(function(err, a){
if (err) {
return 'err';
} else {
return 'ok';
}
});
return 'broke';
},
};
I call it from one of my controllers like this:
var accountName = Account.numberToName(params.id);
At this point accountName's value is "broke". I don't understand why it wouldn't either return "err" or "ok". I simplified my actual function here for testing.
Edit:
I have other calls that work properly. For instance:
updateBalance: function(account, amount, callback) {
/* Accepts account id or account object */
(function _lookupAccount(afterLookup) {
if (typeof account === 'object') return afterLookup(null, account);
Account.findOne(account)
.exec(afterLookup);
})(function (err, a) {
if (err) return callback(err);
if (!a) {
err = new Error();
err.message = "Couldn't find account.";
err.status = 400;
return callback(err);
}
a.balance = parseInt(a.balance) + parseInt(amount);
a.save(callback);
});
},
Is called like this:
Account.updateBalance(params.account, -2000);
The definition has a callback, but I don't actually use one because it isn't needed. The method works fine.
Sails.js documentation provides example methods that don't use callbacks. They simply return the requested data.
// Attribute methods
getFullName: function (){
return this.firstName + ' ' + this.lastName;
},
isMarried: function () {
return !!this.spouse;
},
isEligibleForSocialSecurity: function (){
return this.age >= 65;
},
encryptPassword: function () {
}
And called like this:
if ( rick.isMarried() ) {
// ...
}
Which is what I am trying to do with my method at the top of this post. It seems like the exec() portion of Account.findOne() isn't even being called.
Sails.js & Node.js are asynchronous. So in simple words they don't wait for response from database, but when they got date they call a callback. So you need to read about Queries and callbacks and what is callback hell (you should never do that).
And now get back to your problem.
/*
Account.js
*/
//...
numberToName: function(accountNumber, callback) {
// if you want some additional logic you can create function here and call callback in it
Account.findOne(accountNumber).exec(callback);
}
//...
Tip: callbacks first param is always error.
// AccountController
method: function(req, res){
var id = req.param('id'); // if its int you should parseInt()
var callback = function(error, account){
if(error)
res.send('error');
else
res.send(account.name);
};
Account.numberToName(id, callback);
}
I have 2 lists in my application and the user is supposed to drag and drop items from one list to another.
When the user drops an element from one of the lists to the other list a request has to be made to the server side code to update a field in the database (SelectedForDiscussion).
This is the code in my controller:
$scope.$watch("questionsDiscuss", function (value) {
var question = $.Enumerable.From($scope.questionsDiscuss).Where(function (item) { return !item.SelectedForDiscussion }).FirstOrDefault()
if (question != undefined) {
questionSelectionService.UpdateQuestionSelectionStatus(question.Id, true)
.then(function (output) {
var question = $.Enumerable.From($scope.questionsDiscuss)
.Where(function (item) { return item.Id == output.data.questionId })
.FirstOrDefault();
var index = $.Enumerable.From($scope.questionsDiscuss).IndexOf(question);
if (question != undefined)
if (output.data.result != "success") {
$scope.questionsDiscuss.splice(index, 1);
$scope.questionsReceived.splice(0, 0, question);
}
else {
question.SelectedForDiscussion = true;
$scope.questionsDiscuss[index] = question;
}
});
}
else {
var question = $.Enumerable.From($scope.questionsReceived).Where(function (item) { return item.SelectedForDiscussion }).FirstOrDefault();
if (question != undefined) {
questionSelectionService.UpdateQuestionSelectionStatus(question.Id, false)
.then(function (output) {
var question = $.Enumerable.From($scope.questionsReceived)
.Where(function (item) { return item.Id == output.data.questionId })
.FirstOrDefault();
var index = $.Enumerable.From($scope.questionsReceived).IndexOf(question);
if (question != undefined)
if (output.data.result != "success") {
$scope.questionsReceived.splice(index, 1);
$scope.questionsDiscuss.splice(0, 0, question);
}
else {
question.SelectedForDiscussion = false;
$scope.questionsReceived[index] = question;
}
});
}
}
}, true);
I have 4 javascript breakpoint placed at the following lines within Firebug:
2 of them at the following lines:
if (question != undefined) {
One at:
var question = $.Enumerable.From($scope.questionsDiscuss)
.Where(function (item) {
return item.Id == output.data.questionId
})
.FirstOrDefault();
And the other at:
var question = $.Enumerable.From($scope.questionsReceived)
.Where(function (item) {
return item.Id == output.data.questionId
})
.FirstOrDefault();
The following happens:
The breakpoints at:
if (question != undefined) {
are always reached.
The breakpoint at
var question = $.Enumerable.From($scope.questionsDiscuss)
.Where(function (item) {
return item.Id == output.data.questionId
})
.FirstOrDefault();
is also reached.
The other is never reached.
Both responses are OK(response code 200).
Everything should work perfectly but the then clause in the second promise is never reached.
Can anyone tell me what I am doing wrong?
The serverside appplication is an ASP.NET MVC application written in C#.
Edit 1:
I figured out why this was happening and I have a work around for it. I am stil interested in an actual solution.
The problem is angularjs throws an error then swallows it when calling $http for the second time. The error is:
digest alredy in progress
I think this is because in my directive I have this code:
dndfunc = function (scope, element, attrs) {
// contains the args for this component
var args = attrs.dndBetweenList.split(',');
// contains the args for the target
var targetArgs = $('#' + args[1]).attr('dnd-between-list').split(',');
// variables used for dnd
var toUpdate;
var target;
var startIndex = -1;
// watch the model, so we always know what element
// is at a specific position
scope.$watch(args[0], function (value) {
toUpdate = value;
}, true);
// also watch for changes in the target list
scope.$watch(targetArgs[0], function (value) {
target = value;
}, true);
// use jquery to make the element sortable (dnd). This is called
// when the element is rendered
$(element[0]).sortable({
items: 'div',
start: function (event, ui) {
// on start we define where the item is dragged from
startIndex = ($(ui.item).index());
},
stop: function (event, ui) {
var newParent = ui.item[0].parentNode.id;
// on stop we determine the new index of the
// item and store it there
var newIndex = ($(ui.item).index());
var toMove = toUpdate[startIndex];
// we need to remove him from the configured model
toUpdate.splice(startIndex, 1);
if (newParent == args[1]) {
// and add it to the linked list
target.splice(newIndex, 0, toMove);
} else {
toUpdate.splice(newIndex, 0, toMove);
}
// we move items in the array, if we want
// to trigger an update in angular use $apply()
// since we're outside angulars lifecycle
scope.$apply(targetArgs[0]);
scope.$apply(args[0]);
},
connectWith: '#' + args[1]
})
}
And there are 2 calls to apply at the end which trigger a new digest cycle I think.
Anyway I fixed it by adding this call before the calls to apply:
if (scope.updateLists != undefined)
scope.updateLists();
And moved all the code from the watch into the updateLists function.
Also because people have mentioned the service as having something to do with it I am pasting the relevant code within it:
GetQuestionsReceived: function (eid, criteria, page, rows) {
var promise = this.GetQuestionsReceivedInternal(eid,criteria, page, rows).then(function (response) {
// The return value gets picked up by the then in the controller.
return response;
});
// Return the promise to the controller
return promise;
},
GetQuestionsReceivedInternal: function (eid, criteria, page, rows) {
return $http({ method: 'GET',
url: '../QuestionManagement/GetQuestions?eventId='+eid+'&page=1&rows=5&'+serialize(criteria)
}).
success(function (data, status, headers, config) {
// this callback will be called asynchronously
// when the response is available
results = data;
}).
error(function (data, status, headers, config) {
// called asynchronously if an error occurs
// or server returns response with an error status.
if (window.console && console.log) {
console.log("Could not obtain questions received. Error:" + data + "Status:" + status + "Headers:" + headers + "Config:" + config);
}
});
},
GetQuestionsDiscuss: function (eid,criteria, page, rows) {
var promise = this.GetQuestionsDiscussInternal(eid,criteria, page, rows).then(function (response) {
// The return value gets picked up by the then in the controller.
return response;
});
// Return the promise to the controller
return promise;
},
GetQuestionsDiscussInternal: function (eid,criteria, page, rows) {
return $http({ method: 'GET',
url: '../QuestionManagement/GetQuestions?eventId=' + eid + '&page=1&rows=5&' + serialize(criteria)
}).
success(function (data, status, headers, config) {
// this callback will be called asynchronously
// when the response is available
response = data;
}).
error(function (data, status, headers, config) {
// called asynchronously if an error occurs
// or server returns response with an error status.
if (window.console && console.log) {
console.log("Could not obtain questions received. Error:" + data + "Status:" + status + "Headers:" + headers + "Config:" + config);
}
});
},
You have two very similar blocks of code, which could be generalized and placed in a function wrapper, leaving behind a very simple calling function.
If you can get everything into that form, then I think you will find it easier to debug.
Here is an attempt to do so :
function updateSelectionStatus(qA, qB, bool) {
var en = $.Enumerable.From(qA);
var question = en.Where(function (item) {
return bool ? !item.SelectedForDiscussion : item.SelectedForDiscussion;
}).FirstOrDefault();
if(question) {
questionSelectionService.UpdateQuestionSelectionStatus(question.Id, bool).then(function (output) {
if (output.data.result == "success") {
question.SelectedForDiscussion = bool;
}
else {
qA.splice(en.IndexOf(question), 1);
qB.unshift(question);
}
});
}
return question;
}
$scope.$watch("questionsDiscuss", function (value) {
if (!updateSelectionStatus($scope.questionsDiscuss, $scope.questionsReceived, true) {
updateSelectionStatus($scope.questionsReceived, $scope.questionsDiscuss, false);
}
}, true);
I may have made some false assumptions and simplified too much (eg. purging the inner $.Enumerable.From, which appears to reselect the same question as the outer), so you may well need to rework my code.
I'm advocating a principle here, rather than offering a solution.