When I run query select * from table#dblink in PL/SQL Developer,transaction commit/rollback icons are activated, but then if I use Fetch last page these icons are disabled. Why is this happening?
Querying over a db_link flips the 'we have a transaction' switch in the data dictionary
In most tools, you'll get a prompt for COMMIT or an indicator of an open transaction whenever you query against a DB_LINK.
That's because you're doing 'something' that's not clear to us in a different database. Your 'SELECT' could have side effects which require a COMMIT/ROLLBACK, or as Tom would say
'If you are distributed, you would want to commit to finish off anything that was implicitly started on the remote site.'
I think that PL/SQL is trying to remove useless transactions to help avoid session errors. It seems that whenever you press the "Fetch last page" button, PL/SQL Developer runs commit write batch if the statement contains a database link, if there are no transactions currently open in the session, and if the statement does not include FOR UPDATE.
Those are a lot of weird conditions, but they seem to ensure that the program won't commit when it shouldn't. I assume PL/SQL Developer is using commit write batch to use less resources than a normal commit. That guess is based on the number returned by this query increasing when I hit the button. (There's another statistic for user commits, and that number does not increase.)
select value
from v$mystat
join v$statname on v$mystat.statistic# = v$statname.statistic#
where lower(display_name) = 'commit batch performed';
This behavior is a little odd, but it could help prevent some errors in the session. For example, if you later try to run alter session enable parallel dml the session would throw the error ORA-12841: Cannot alter the session parallel DML state within a transaction. By committing the (worthless) transaction, you avoid some of those errors.
I have an Oracle Stored Procedure that does some inserts and updates on a table in DB.
There is no explicit Commit or Rollback statement at the end of the procedure.
However, when I call this SP through a java class, I see that the inserts and updates are committed into the DB.
So can anyone help me understand if we really need a commit statement at the end of the stored procedure in Oracle?
I am not java experience but as far as I know when you close the connection of the database the data are committed (unless if you rollback them). Now to return into your question is when to use the commit in SP.
When you use DML(insert,update,delete) operation in the procedure on a table, the table will be Locked therefore if any other user try to access the locked table, it has to wait till you commit/rollback your operation. so if your procedure was taking time, due to a long loop or bad optimized query then the user will be blocked. So if you had a commit before the DMl, the no blocks will happen.
Other reason, is the undo tablespace, where all the data not committed will wait there till you commit them, so if for example you inserted lot of data (millions), your undo might get full depend on your size and youll get an error.
so short answer , if your procedure doesn't has lot of operations on big tables and it fast then you can pass by the commit , otherwise it better to add commits.
I am getting an ORA-01000 SQL exception. So I have some queries related to it.
Are maximum open cursors exactly related to number of JDBC connections, or are they also related to the statement and resultset objects we have created for a single connection ? (We are using pool of connections)
Is there a way to configure the number of statement/resultset objects in the database (like connections) ?
Is it advisable to use instance variable statement/resultset object instead of method local statement/resultset object in a single threaded environment ?
Does executing a prepared statement in a loop cause this issue ? (Of course, I could have used sqlBatch) Note: pStmt is closed once loop is over.
{ //method try starts
String sql = "INSERT into TblName (col1, col2) VALUES(?, ?)";
pStmt = obj.getConnection().prepareStatement(sql);
pStmt.setLong(1, subscriberID);
for (String language : additionalLangs) {
pStmt.setInt(2, Integer.parseInt(language));
pStmt.execute();
}
} //method/try ends
{ //finally starts
pStmt.close()
} //finally ends
What will happen if conn.createStatement() and conn.prepareStatement(sql) are called multiple times on single connection object ?
Edit1:
6. Will the use of Weak/Soft reference statement object help in preventing the leakage ?
Edit2:
1. Is there any way, I can find all the missing "statement.close()"s in my project ? I understand it is not a memory leak. But I need to find a statement reference (where close() is not performed) eligible for garbage collection ? Any tool available ? Or do I have to analyze it manually ?
Please help me understand it.
Solution
To find the opened cursor in Oracle DB for username -VELU
Go to ORACLE machine and start sqlplus as sysdba.
[oracle#db01 ~]$ sqlplus / as sysdba
Then run
SELECT A.VALUE,
S.USERNAME,
S.SID,
S.SERIAL#
FROM V$SESSTAT A,
V$STATNAME B,
V$SESSION S
WHERE A.STATISTIC# = B.STATISTIC#
AND S.SID = A.SID
AND B.NAME = 'opened cursors current'
AND USERNAME = 'VELU';
If possible please read my answer for more understanding of my solution
ORA-01000, the maximum-open-cursors error, is an extremely common error in Oracle database development. In the context of Java, it happens when the application attempts to open more ResultSets than there are configured cursors on a database instance.
Common causes are:
Configuration mistake
You have more threads in your application querying the database than cursors on the DB. One case is where you have a connection and thread pool larger than the number of cursors on the database.
You have many developers or applications connected to the same DB instance (which will probably include many schemas) and together you are using too many connections.
Solution:
Increasing the number of cursors on the database (if resources allow) or
Decreasing the number of threads in the application.
Cursor leak
The applications is not closing ResultSets (in JDBC) or cursors (in stored procedures on the database)
Solution: Cursor leaks are bugs; increasing the number of cursors on the DB simply delays the inevitable failure. Leaks can be found using static code analysis, JDBC or application-level logging, and database monitoring.
Background
This section describes some of the theory behind cursors and how JDBC should be used. If you don't need to know the background, you can skip this and go straight to 'Eliminating Leaks'.
What is a cursor?
A cursor is a resource on the database that holds the state of a query, specifically the position where a reader is in a ResultSet. Each SELECT statement has a cursor, and PL/SQL stored procedures can open and use as many cursors as they require. You can find out more about cursors on Orafaq.
A database instance typically serves several different schemas, many different users each with multiple sessions. To do this, it has a fixed number of cursors available for all schemas, users and sessions. When all cursors are open (in use) and request comes in that requires a new cursor, the request fails with an ORA-010000 error.
Finding and setting the number of cursors
The number is normally configured by the DBA on installation. The number of cursors currently in use, the maximum number and the configuration can be accessed in the Administrator functions in Oracle SQL Developer. From SQL it can be set with:
ALTER SYSTEM SET OPEN_CURSORS=1337 SID='*' SCOPE=BOTH;
Relating JDBC in the JVM to cursors on the DB
The JDBC objects below are tightly coupled to the following database concepts:
JDBC Connection is the client representation of a database session and provides database transactions. A connection can have only a single transaction open at any one time (but transactions can be nested)
A JDBC ResultSet is supported by a single cursor on the database. When close() is called on the ResultSet, the cursor is released.
A JDBC CallableStatement invokes a stored procedure on the database, often written in PL/SQL. The stored procedure can create zero or more cursors, and can return a cursor as a JDBC ResultSet.
JDBC is thread safe: It is quite OK to pass the various JDBC objects between threads.
For example, you can create the connection in one thread; another thread can use this connection to create a PreparedStatement and a third thread can process the result set. The single major restriction is that you cannot have more than one ResultSet open on a single PreparedStatement at any time. See Does Oracle DB support multiple (parallel) operations per connection?
Note that a database commit occurs on a Connection, and so all DML (INSERT, UPDATE and DELETE's) on that connection will commit together. Therefore, if you want to support multiple transactions at the same time, you must have at least one Connection for each concurrent Transaction.
Closing JDBC objects
A typical example of executing a ResultSet is:
Statement stmt = conn.createStatement();
try {
ResultSet rs = stmt.executeQuery( "SELECT FULL_NAME FROM EMP" );
try {
while ( rs.next() ) {
System.out.println( "Name: " + rs.getString("FULL_NAME") );
}
} finally {
try { rs.close(); } catch (Exception ignore) { }
}
} finally {
try { stmt.close(); } catch (Exception ignore) { }
}
Note how the finally clause ignores any exception raised by the close():
If you simply close the ResultSet without the try {} catch {}, it might fail and prevent the Statement being closed
We want to allow any exception raised in the body of the try to propagate to the caller.
If you have a loop over, for example, creating and executing Statements, remember to close each Statement within the loop.
In Java 7, Oracle has introduced the AutoCloseable interface which replaces most of the Java 6 boilerplate with some nice syntactic sugar.
Holding JDBC objects
JDBC objects can be safely held in local variables, object instance and class members. It is generally better practice to:
Use object instance or class members to hold JDBC objects that are reused multiple times over a longer period, such as Connections and PreparedStatements
Use local variables for ResultSets since these are obtained, looped over and then closed typically within the scope of a single function.
There is, however, one exception: If you are using EJBs, or a Servlet/JSP container, you have to follow a strict threading model:
Only the Application Server creates threads (with which it handles incoming requests)
Only the Application Server creates connections (which you obtain from the connection pool)
When saving values (state) between calls, you have to be very careful. Never store values in your own caches or static members - this is not safe across clusters and other weird conditions, and the Application Server may do terrible things to your data. Instead use stateful beans or a database.
In particular, never hold JDBC objects (Connections, ResultSets, PreparedStatements, etc) over different remote invocations - let the Application Server manage this. The Application Server not only provides a connection pool, it also caches your PreparedStatements.
Eliminating leaks
There are a number of processes and tools available for helping detect and eliminating JDBC leaks:
During development - catching bugs early is by far the best approach:
Development practices: Good development practices should reduce the number of bugs in your software before it leaves the developer's desk. Specific practices include:
Pair programming, to educate those without sufficient experience
Code reviews because many eyes are better than one
Unit testing which means you can exercise any and all of your code base from a test tool which makes reproducing leaks trivial
Use existing libraries for connection pooling rather than building your own
Static Code Analysis: Use a tool like the excellent Findbugs to perform a static code analysis. This picks up many places where the close() has not been correctly handled. Findbugs has a plugin for Eclipse, but it also runs standalone for one-offs, has integrations into Jenkins CI and other build tools
At runtime:
Holdability and commit
If the ResultSet holdability is ResultSet.CLOSE_CURSORS_OVER_COMMIT, then the ResultSet is closed when the Connection.commit() method is called. This can be set using Connection.setHoldability() or by using the overloaded Connection.createStatement() method.
Logging at runtime.
Put good log statements in your code. These should be clear and understandable so the customer, support staff and teammates can understand without training. They should be terse and include printing the state/internal values of key variables and attributes so that you can trace processing logic. Good logging is fundamental to debugging applications, especially those that have been deployed.
You can add a debugging JDBC driver to your project (for debugging - don't actually deploy it). One example (I have not used it) is log4jdbc. You then need to do some simple analysis on this file to see which executes don't have a corresponding close. Counting the open and closes should highlight if there is a potential problem
Monitoring the database. Monitor your running application using the tools such as the SQL Developer 'Monitor SQL' function or Quest's TOAD. Monitoring is described in this article. During monitoring, you query the open cursors (eg from table v$sesstat) and review their SQL. If the number of cursors is increasing, and (most importantly) becoming dominated by one identical SQL statement, you know you have a leak with that SQL. Search your code and review.
Other thoughts
Can you use WeakReferences to handle closing connections?
Weak and soft references are ways of allowing you to reference an object in a way that allows the JVM to garbage collect the referent at any time it deems fit (assuming there are no strong reference chains to that object).
If you pass a ReferenceQueue in the constructor to the soft or weak Reference, the object is placed in the ReferenceQueue when the object is GC'ed when it occurs (if it occurs at all). With this approach, you can interact with the object's finalization and you could close or finalize the object at that moment.
Phantom references are a bit weirder; their purpose is only to control finalization, but you can never get a reference to the original object, so it's going to be hard to call the close() method on it.
However, it is rarely a good idea to attempt to control when the GC is run (Weak, Soft and PhantomReferences let you know after the fact that the object is enqueued for GC). In fact, if the amount of memory in the JVM is large (eg -Xmx2000m) you might never GC the object, and you will still experience the ORA-01000. If the JVM memory is small relative to your program's requirements, you may find that the ResultSet and PreparedStatement objects are GCed immediately after creation (before you can read from them), which will likely fail your program.
TL;DR: The weak reference mechanism is not a good way to manage and close Statement and ResultSet objects.
I am adding few more understanding.
Cursor is only about a statement objecct; It is neither resultSet nor the connection object.
But still we have to close the resultset to free some oracle memory. Still if you don't close the resultset that won't be counted for CURSORS.
Closing Statement object will automatically close resultset object too.
Cursor will be created for all the SELECT/INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE statement.
Each ORACLE DB instance can be identified using oracle SID; similarly ORACLE DB can identify each connection using connection SID. Both SID are different.
So ORACLE session is nothing but a jdbc(tcp) connection; which is nothing but one SID.
If we set maximum cursors as 500 then it is only for one JDBC session/connection/SID.
So we can have many JDBC connection with its respective no of cursors (statements).
Once the JVM is terminated all the connections/cursors will be closed, OR JDBCConnection is closed CURSORS with respect to that connection will be closed.
Loggin as sysdba.
In Putty (Oracle login):
[oracle#db01 ~]$ sqlplus / as sysdba
In SqlPlus:
UserName: sys as sysdba
Set session_cached_cursors value to 0 so that it wont have closed cursors.
alter session set session_cached_cursors=0
select * from V$PARAMETER where name='session_cached_cursors'
Select existing OPEN_CURSORS valuse set per connection in DB
SELECT max(a.value) as highest_open_cur, p.value as max_open_cur FROM v$sesstat a, v$statname b, v$parameter p WHERE a.statistic# = b.statistic# AND b.name = 'opened cursors current' AND p.name= 'open_cursors' GROUP BY p.value;
Below is the query to find the SID/connections list with open cursor values.
SELECT a.value, s.username, s.sid, s.serial#
FROM v$sesstat a, v$statname b, v$session s
WHERE a.statistic# = b.statistic# AND s.sid=a.sid
AND b.name = 'opened cursors current' AND username = 'SCHEMA_NAME_IN_CAPS'
Use the below query to identify the sql's in the open cursors
SELECT oc.sql_text, s.sid
FROM v$open_cursor oc, v$session s
WHERE OC.sid = S.sid
AND s.sid=1604
AND OC.USER_NAME ='SCHEMA_NAME_IN_CAPS'
Now debug the Code and Enjoy!!! :)
Correct your Code like this:
try
{ //method try starts
String sql = "INSERT into TblName (col1, col2) VALUES(?, ?)";
pStmt = obj.getConnection().prepareStatement(sql);
pStmt.setLong(1, subscriberID);
for (String language : additionalLangs) {
pStmt.setInt(2, Integer.parseInt(language));
pStmt.execute();
}
} //method/try ends
finally
{ //finally starts
pStmt.close()
}
Are you sure, that you're really closing your pStatements, connections and results?
To analyze open objects you can implment a delegator pattern, which wraps code around your statemant, connection and result objects. So you'll see, if an object will successfully closed.
An Example for: pStmt = obj.getConnection().prepareStatement(sql);
class obj{
public Connection getConnection(){
return new ConnectionDelegator(...here create your connection object and put it into ...);
}
}
class ConnectionDelegator implements Connection{
Connection delegates;
public ConnectionDelegator(Connection con){
this.delegates = con;
}
public Statement prepareStatement(String sql){
return delegates.prepareStatement(sql);
}
public void close(){
try{
delegates.close();
}finally{
log.debug(delegates.toString() + " was closed");
}
}
}
If your application is a Java EE application running on Oracle WebLogic as the application server, a possible cause for this issue is the Statement Cache Size setting in WebLogic.
If the Statement Cache Size setting for a particular data source is about equal to, or greater than, the Oracle database maximum open cursor count setting, then all of the open cursors can be consumed by cached SQL statements that are held open by WebLogic, resulting in the ORA-01000 error.
To address this, reduce the Statement Cache Size setting for each WebLogic datasource that points to the Oracle database to be significantly less than the maximum cursor count setting on the database.
In the WebLogic 10 Admin Console, the Statement Cache Size setting for each data source can be found at Services (left nav) > Data Sources > (individual data source) > Connection Pool tab.
I too had faced this issue.The below exception used to come
java.sql.SQLException: - ORA-01000: maximum open cursors exceeded
I was using Spring Framework with Spring JDBC for dao layer.
My application used to leak cursors somehow and after few minutes or so, It used to give me this exception.
After a lot of thorough debugging and analysis, I found that there was the problem with the Indexing, Primary Key and Unique Constraints in one of the Table being used in the Query i was executing.
My application was trying to update the Columns which were mistakenly Indexed.
So, whenever my application was hitting the update query on the indexed columns, The database was trying to do the reindexing based on the updated values. It was leaking the cursors.
I was able to solve the problem by doing Proper Indexing on the columns which were used to search in the query and applying appropriate constraints wherever required.
I faced the same problem (ORA-01000) today. I had a for loop in the try{}, to execute a SELECT statement in an Oracle DB many times, (each time changing a parameter), and in the finally{} I had my code to close Resultset, PreparedStatement and Connection as usual. But as soon as I reached a specific amount of loops (1000) I got the Oracle error about too many open cursors.
Based on the post by Andrew Alcock above, I made changes so that inside the loop, I closed each resultset and each statement after getting the data and before looping again, and that solved the problem.
Additionaly, the exact same problem occured in another loop of Insert Statements, in another Oracle DB (ORA-01000), this time after 300 statements. Again it was solved in the same way, so either the PreparedStatement or the ResultSet or both, count as open cursors until they are closed.
Did you set autocommit=true? If not try this:
{ //method try starts
String sql = "INSERT into TblName (col1, col2) VALUES(?, ?)";
Connection conn = obj.getConnection()
pStmt = conn.prepareStatement(sql);
for (String language : additionalLangs) {
pStmt.setLong(1, subscriberID);
pStmt.setInt(2, Integer.parseInt(language));
pStmt.execute();
conn.commit();
}
} //method/try ends {
//finally starts
pStmt.close()
} //finally ends
query to find sql that opened.
SELECT s.machine, oc.user_name, oc.sql_text, count(1)
FROM v$open_cursor oc, v$session s
WHERE oc.sid = s.sid
and S.USERNAME='XXXX'
GROUP BY user_name, sql_text, machine
HAVING COUNT(1) > 2
ORDER BY count(1) DESC
This problem mainly happens when you are using connection pooling because when you close connection that connection go back to the connection pool and all cursor associated with that connection never get closed as the connection to database is still open.
So one alternative is to decrease the idle connection time of connections in pool, so may whenever connection sits idle in connection for say 10 sec , connection to database will get closed and new connection created to put in pool.
Using batch processing will result in less overhead. See the following link for examples:
http://www.tutorialspoint.com/jdbc/jdbc-batch-processing.htm
In our case, we were using Hibernate and we had many variables referencing the same Hibernate mapped entity. We were creating and saving these references in a loop. Each reference opened a cursor and kept it open.
We discovered this by using a query to check the number of open cursors while running our code, stepping through with a debugger and selectively commenting things out.
As to why each new reference opened another cursor - the entity in question had collections of other entities mapped to it and I think this had something to do with it (perhaps not just this alone but in combination with how we had configured the fetch mode and cache settings). Hibernate itself has had bugs around failing to close open cursors, though it looks like these have been fixed in later versions.
Since we didn't really need to have so many duplicate references to the same entity anyway, the solution was to stop creating and holding onto all those redundant references. Once we did that the problem when away.
I had this problem with my datasource in WildFly and Tomcat, connecting to a Oracle 10g.
I found that under certain conditions the statement wasn't closed even when the statement.close() was invoked.
The problem was with the Oracle Driver we were using: ojdbc7.jar. This driver is intended for Oracle 12c and 11g, and it seems has some issues when is used with Oracle 10g, so I downgrade to ojdbc5.jar and now everything is running fine.
I faced the same issue because I was querying db for more than 1000 iterations.
I have used try and finally in my code. But was still getting error.
To solve this I just logged into oracle db and ran below query:
ALTER SYSTEM SET open_cursors = 8000 SCOPE=BOTH;
And this solved my problem immediately.
I ran into this issue after setting the prepared statement cache size to a large value. Apparently, when prepared statements are kept in cache, the cursor stays open.
I have a JDBC-based application which uses XA datasources and transactions which span multiple connections, connected to an Oracle database. The app sometimes needs to make some queries using join with a table from another (Oracle) server using a shared DbLink. The request works if I don't do it too often, but after 4 or 5 requests in rapid succession I get an error (ORA-02020 - too many links in use). I did some research, and the suggested remedy is to call "ALTER SESSION CLOSE DATABASE LINK ". If I call this request after the query that joins the DbLnk table, I get the error ORA-2080 (link is in use). If I call it before the query, I get ORA-2081 (link closed). Does this call do any good at all? The JDBC connection is closed long before the transaction commit (which is managed either by servlet or by EJB container, depending on the circumstances). I get the impression that when the connection closes, Oracle marks the link as closed, but it takes a minute or two for it to return to the pool of available links. I understand I could enlarge the pool of links (using the open_links property in the config file), but that won't guarantee that I won't have the same problem under a heavier load. Is there something I can do differently to get the dblinks to close more rapidly?
Any distributed SQL, even a select, will open a transaction that must be closed before you can close the database link. You need to either rollback or commit before you call ALTER SESSION CLOSE DATABASE LINK.
But it sounds like you've already got something else handling your transactions. If it's not possible to manually rollback or commit, you should try to increase the number of open links. The OPEN_LINKS parameter is the maximum number of links per session. The number of links you need isn't really dependent on the load, it should be based on the maximum number of distinct remote databases.
Edit:
The situation you describe in your comment shouldn't happen. I don't understand enough about your system to know what's really happening with the transactions. Anyway, if you can't figure out exactly what the system is doing maybe you can replace "alter session close database link" with a procedure like this:
create or replace procedure rollback_and_close_db_links authid current_user is
begin
rollback;
for links in (select db_link from v$dblink) loop
execute immediate 'alter session close database link '||links.db_link;
end loop;
end;
/
You'll probably need this grant:
grant select on v_$dblink to [relevant user];
I tried to put it in a sentence but it is better to give an example:
SELECT * FROM someTable WHERE id = someID;
returns no rows
...
some time passes (no inserts are done to the table and no ID updates)
...
SELECT * FROM someTable WHERE id = someID;
returns one row!
Is it possible that some DB mechanism prevents first SELECT to return row?
Oracle log has no errors.
No transactions are rolled back when two selects are executed.
You can't see uncommitted data in another session. When did the commit happen?
EDIT1: Are you the only one using this database? Or did/do you have multiple sessions?
I think in another session you or someone else has inserted this row, you do your select and you don't see this row. After that a commit happens in the other session (maybe implicit because a session is closed) and then you see this row when you select again.
I can think of other explanations, but I first want to know are you only one using this database.
With read consistency as provided by Oracle, you should not see a row appear like that. If you are running in some mode with automatic commits, so that each statement is a self-contained transaction, then read consistency is not being violated. Which program are you using to access the database? I agree with the other observations; the row should not appear if your session is not inserting it and no other session is active at the same time. I don't know of a DBMS that indulges in spontaneous data generation.
Don't you have scheduled jobs in that Oracle?