Multiple tests with autowired MockHttpServletRequest not working? - spring

I use an #Autowired MockHttpServletRequest in some of my Spring tests. TestNG is used as testing framework. If I only have one test method in the class this works fine. However, if there are multiple test methods, only the first run test uses my MockHttpServletRequest. Let me illustrate with an example:
#WebAppConfiguration
#ContextConfiguration({"classpath:applicationContext.xml"})
public class FooTest extends AbstractTestNGSpringContextTests {
#Autowired
private MockHttpServletRequest servletRequest;
#Test
public void test1() {
assertEquals(((ServletRequestAttributes)RequestContextHolder.getRequestAttributes()).getRequest(), servletRequest);
}
#Test
public void test2() {
assertEquals(((ServletRequestAttributes)RequestContextHolder.getRequestAttributes()).getRequest(), servletRequest);
}
}
In this example, test1() passes, but test2() fails! If you run the test methods individually, they both pass. Why does one test fail if they are run together?
I tried to dig in the code, there seems to be some kind of reset of the request attributes after a test method have run, but I didn't find a way to turn it off. My Spring version is 3.2.8.RELEASE.

UPDATE: This has been fixed in Spring Framework 3.2.9, 4.0.4, and 4.1. See SPR-11626 for details.
Well, my friend... you have discovered a bug in the Spring TestContext Framework.
The reason for this behavior is that ServletTestExecutionListener resets the request attributes after each test method, but DependencyInjectionTestExecutionListener does not re-inject dependencies before each test method (by default). When the second test method is executed, the servletRequest field is still referencing the MockHttpServletRequest that was created for the previous test method; whereas, ServletTestExecutionListener creates a new instance of MockHttpServletRequest for each test method and sets it in the request attributes. Thus, the injected request and the one stored in the RequestContextHolder are only the same for the first test method that executes in TestNG.
Since I am the author of this code, I have to personally apologize, but... I'll make sure it gets fixed ASAP. See SPR-11626 for details on the status of the fix. ;)
Note: this bug only applies to TestNG tests; this does not apply to JUnit tests.
As a work-around, you can annotate the affected test methods with #DirtiesContext (or annotate your test class with #DirtiesContext(classMode = ClassMode.AFTER_EACH_TEST_METHOD)). This will allow your tests to pass as you expect.
The use of #DirtiesContext will make Spring close your test ApplicationContext after each test method, and this will likely have a negative impact on the speed of your tests; however, as of Spring 3.2.8 and 4.0.3, this is the only non-custom solution.
Having said that, the following is a much more efficient work-around. Just define this custom TestExecutionListener in your project:
public class AlwaysReinjectDependenciesTestExecutionListener extends AbstractTestExecutionListener {
public void afterTestMethod(TestContext testContext) throws Exception {
testContext.setAttribute(DependencyInjectionTestExecutionListener.REINJECT_DEPENDENCIES_ATTRIBUTE, Boolean.TRUE);
}
}
And then annotate your test class like this:
#TestExecutionListeners(AlwaysReinjectDependenciesTestExecutionListener.class)
That should clear up any issues and keep your test suite running quickly.
Regards,
Sam

Related

Mocking repository / filling db BEFORE container start for app-startup integration test

I'd like to write integration test to verify proper function of #EventListener(ApplicationReadyEvent.class) annnotated method, but I need to setup the data to be found by some repository. The #SQL is executed only before #Test method, ie. after the ApplicationReadyEvent was processed., #MockBean followed by Mockito.when in #Before method is the same, it's reached only after #SpringBootTest finished initialization, namely after ApplicationReadyEvent was processed.
I also tried to provide #TestConfiguration with bean defined as:
#Bean
SomeRepository someRepository() {
SomeRepository someRepository = Mockito.mock(SomeRepository.class);
Mockito.when(someRepository.findById("value")).thenReturn(...);
return someRepository;
}
but this is somewhat insufficient, as the #SpringBootTest still finds actual implementation of this repository (even if I add #AutoConfigureMockMvc) and run crashes with this conflict.
How can I prepare the mocked repository or actual data in test db for this scenario?

JUnit/Mockito: ArgumentCaptor running before the JUnit test executes?

I have JUnit test such as follows:
#Autowired
MyService myservice;
#Before
public void init() {
myservice.doStuff(new MyObj());
}
#Test
public void test() {
ArgumentCaptor<MyObj> captor = ArgumentCaptor.forClass(MyObj.class);
myservice.doStuff(new MyObj());
verify(myservice, atLeastOnce()).doStuff(captor.capture());
captor.getAllValues(); //this returns 2 - one for the #Before and one for right above
}
As mentioned in the commented code, the captor captures both invocation even though the captor is created after the #Before. Why is this and how can I capture only invocation within the test ?
Something looks wrong in this flow, I'll explain and hopefully this will lead you to the solution:
First of all, ArgumentCaptor is used only with mocks. So myservice has to be a mock,
I was expecting to see something like #MockBean on it or maybe #Mock if you're running a plain mockito test without spring.
Now assuming it is a mock, why would you call a method doStuff on the mock in #Before phase. I can understand if you want to setup some global expectations applicable to all the tests in the class in case you have many, but this seems suspicious to me.
Now, when you use the verify what you actually say is:
Mockito, make sure that my mock myservice called method doStuff (at least once) and for futher verification I would like to "capture" the arguments that were passed to the mock while the method invocation (s).
With this approach its understandable that argument capture gets all the information about all the invocations, and I believe its by design.
To make a point clear, #Before method has nothing to do with mockito, its a purely JUnit hook, so by the time it is called by JUnit framework, all mocks are already inialized and are ready to "record" all the relevant information about everything that the code will do to them (method invocations I mean).

Multiple testfiles and MockRestServiceServer, expecting calls from other testfile

I've build a service with two endpoints, and I want to cover both endpoints with integration tests. To prevent these integrationtests from reaching other services, I'm using the MockRestServiceServer class to mock calls and responses to other HTTP services.
TestOperationA:
#RunWith(SpringRunner.class)
#SpringBootTest
#ActiveProfiles({"integration"})
#ComponentScan(basePackages = "nl.xyz")
public class OperationAIntegrationTest {
MockRestServiceServer mockServer;
#Autowired
RestTemplate restTemplate;
#Autowired
OperationA operationA;
#Before
public void setup() {
this.mockServer = MockRestServiceServer.bindTo(restTemplate).bufferContent().ignoreExpectOrder(true).build();
this.mockServer.reset();
}
#After
public void finish() {
// Verify all method calls are run after the testcase.
this.mockServer.verify();
this.mockServer.reset();
}
And then testcases contain stuff like:
this.mockServer.expect(requestTo(ENDPOINT_OAUTH))
.andExpect(method(HttpMethod.POST))
.andRespond(withSuccess(objectMapper.writeValueAsString(oAuthToken), MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON));
I do the same for OperationBIntegrationTest. This includes the binding to restTemplate!
Now the problem is that if I run all testcases seperately, everything succeeds. If I run all the testcases from OperationA ór OperationB, they all succeed. But when I run all the testcases so the integrationtests from OperationA and OperationB are executed in sequence, the testcases from OperationB fail. Even though I see that Spring Boot gets started anew when the testing framework jumps to the second testing file.
I'm thinking that the MockRestServiceServer does not get cleaned up or I'm doing something wrong with the binding to RestTemplate. I tried the .reset() and .verify() combinations by placing them in #Before and #After, but with no effect. Does anybody know why this is happening?
Apparently, some stuff was happening in the background causing certain variables and methods not being updated anymore since a previous test already updated it. When I don't dirty the application context (by having more MockBean's for example) then everything is allright.
So the ones adjusting the values in the background should be marked dirty.

Where can I use #Transactional

Can someone explain me why this will work:
#Transactional
#Test
public void test() {
save();
}
public void save() {
Scenario scenar = new Scenario();
sessionFactory.getCurrentSession().save(scenar);
}
And this won't, because it won't find a transaction:
#Test
public void test() {
save();
}
#Transactional
public void save() {
Scenario scenar = new Scenario();
sessionFactory.getCurrentSession().save(scenar);
}
Thank you!
Spring #Transactional annotation works using Spring AOP. This means, that when a bean that contains a method with that annotation is injected as a dependency for a different bean, it gets wrapped in a proxy. This proxy has the same interface as the bean, but performs additional actions before a method is invoked (wrapping it in a transaction in this case). You can think of it as a sort of a decorator. You can even see the proxy being invoked when you debug your application.
Now, when the method that you annotate with #Transactional is called from the same class, there is no (at least, no easy) way to inject the proxy. There just isn't a way to replace the object referenced by the "this" keyword in Java.
More reading on Spring AOP proxies.
As you have a method annotated as #Test I assume this is part of a Junit Test class.
Spring developpers know that test methods usually do not implement interfaces, and as such cannot support JDK proxying. So they specially support #Transactional annotation on a #Test method. The doc says :
Enabling and disabling transactions
Annotating a test method with #Transactional causes the test to be run within a transaction that will, by default, be automatically rolled back after completion of the test. If a test class is annotated with #Transactional, each test method within that class hierarchy will be run within a transaction. Test methods that are not annotated with #Transactional (at the class or method level) will not be run within a transaction. Furthermore, tests that are annotated with #Transactional but have the propagation type set to NOT_SUPPORTED will not be run within a transaction.

How can a test 'dirty' a spring application context?

The spring framework documentation states:
In the unlikely case that a test may
'dirty' the application context,
requiring reloading - for example, by
changing a bean definition or the
state of an application object -
Spring's testing support provides
mechanisms to cause the test fixture
to reload the configurations and
rebuild the application context before
executing the next test.
Can someone elaborate this? I am just not getting it. Examples would be nice.
Each JUnit test method is assumed to be isolated, that is does not have any side effects that could cause another test method to behave differently. This can be achieved by modifying the state of beans that are managed by spring.
For example, say you have a bean managed by spring of class MySpringBean which has a string property with a value of "string". The following test method testBeanString will have a different result depending if it is called before or after the method testModify.
#RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
#ContextConfiguration(locations={"/base-context.xml"})
public class SpringTests {
#Autowired
private MySpringBean bean;
#Test public void testModify() {
// dirties the state of a managed bean
bean.setString("newSring");
}
#Test public void testBeanString() {
assertEquals("string", bean.getString());
}
}
use the #DirtiesContext annotation to indicate that the test method may change the state of spring managed beans.

Resources