I have a function which I want to run on every executed Linq query on a DbContext to modify the expression tree before execution. I've been having a look at the IDbCommandTreeInterceptor interface but that doesn't seem to provide an expression tree (which I suppose is understandable since it may not have been a Linq query by the time it gets to this point).
Is there any way I can intercept and modify all expressions before execution?
nb. This has to be Linq tree modification because I have already built a framework for modifying Linq trees which was originally for Linq to SQL.
Creating a proxy for the LINQ provider to intercept every LINQ expression execution (as suggested in the comments) is still a good solution. In fact, I'm playing around with this stuff within this project, which explicitly supports EF6 including EF6 async queries. You can create a standard .NET ExpressionVisitor to make an interception:
intercepted = query.Rewrite(new MyInterceptor());
But the question also demands "to run on every executed Linq query on a DbContext", and that will be the tricky part. One approach can be some kind of abstraction of DbContext / DbSet, so your code does not directly access DbSet objects. And inside the implementation of this abstraction the interception can happen...
Another approach (and I think that answers this question best) would be a proxy for DbSet, which calls the LINQ proxy for queries, which enables interception. First, we have to inherit from DbSet:
public class DbSetProxy<TEntity> : DbSet<TEntity>,
IQueryable<TEntity>,
IDbAsyncEnumerable<TEntity>
where TEntity : class
{
private readonly DbSet<TEntity> set;
private readonly DbQuery<TEntity> query;
private readonly IQueryable<TEntity> intercepted;
public DbSetProxy(DbSet<TEntity> set)
: this(set, set)
{
}
public DbSetProxy(DbSet<TEntity> set, DbQuery<TEntity> query)
{
this.set = set;
this.query = query;
// use NeinLinq or any other LINQ proxy library
intercepted = query.Rewrite(new MyInterceptor());
}
}
Then, it's necessary to overwrite all the members to call the actual DbSet for non query stuff:
(Note: It's unfortunately necessary to overwrite every DbSet member, because inheriting DbSet is only designed for test stubs. Thus, just inheriting DbSet breaks the DbSet.)
public override DbQuery<TEntity> AsNoTracking()
{
return new DbSetProxy<TEntity>(set, query.AsNoTracking());
}
public override DbQuery<TEntity> AsStreaming()
{
return new DbSetProxy<TEntity>(set, query.AsStreaming());
}
public override DbQuery<TEntity> Include(string path)
{
return new DbSetProxy<TEntity>(set, query.Include(path));
}
public override TEntity Add(TEntity entity)
{
return set.Add(entity);
}
public override IEnumerable<TEntity> AddRange(IEnumerable<TEntity> entities)
{
return set.AddRange(entities);
}
public override TEntity Attach(TEntity entity)
{
return set.Attach(entity);
}
public override TEntity Create()
{
return set.Create();
}
public override TDerivedEntity Create<TDerivedEntity>()
{
return set.Create<TDerivedEntity>();
}
public override TEntity Find(params object[] keyValues)
{
return set.Find(keyValues);
}
public override Task<TEntity> FindAsync(params object[] keyValues)
{
return set.FindAsync(keyValues);
}
public override Task<TEntity> FindAsync(CancellationToken cancellationToken, params object[] keyValues)
{
return set.FindAsync(cancellationToken, keyValues);
}
public override TEntity Remove(TEntity entity)
{
return set.Remove(entity);
}
public override IEnumerable<TEntity> RemoveRange(IEnumerable<TEntity> entities)
{
return set.RemoveRange(entities);
}
public override DbSqlQuery<TEntity> SqlQuery(string sql, params object[] parameters)
{
return set.SqlQuery(sql, parameters);
}
public override ObservableCollection<TEntity> Local
{
get { return set.Local; }
}
public override bool Equals(object obj)
{
return set.Equals(obj);
}
public override int GetHashCode()
{
return set.GetHashCode();
}
public override string ToString()
{
return set.ToString();
}
Finally, we've to make use of the interception object:
IEnumerator<TEntity> IEnumerable<TEntity>.GetEnumerator()
{
return intercepted.GetEnumerator();
}
IEnumerator IEnumerable.GetEnumerator()
{
return intercepted.GetEnumerator();
}
Type IQueryable.ElementType
{
get { return intercepted.ElementType; }
}
Expression IQueryable.Expression
{
get { return intercepted.Expression; }
}
IQueryProvider IQueryable.Provider
{
get { return intercepted.Provider; }
}
IDbAsyncEnumerator<TEntity> IDbAsyncEnumerable<TEntity>.GetAsyncEnumerator()
{
return ((IDbAsyncEnumerable<TEntity>)intercepted).GetAsyncEnumerator();
}
IDbAsyncEnumerator IDbAsyncEnumerable.GetAsyncEnumerator()
{
return ((IDbAsyncEnumerable<TEntity>)intercepted).GetAsyncEnumerator();
}
And, at last, we can use an ordinary DbContext. We only have to overwrite its Set method to inject our proxy:
public class MyContext : DbContext
{
public DbSet<Entity> Entities { get; set; }
public override DbSet<TEntity> Set<TEntity>()
{
return new DbSetProxy<TEntity>(base.Set<TEntity>());
}
}
Related
I am working on an MVC project where controller actions deal with Assets. Different controllers take in the assetId parameter in different way: Some controllers simply get int assetId, other int id, and other using a complex object AssetDTO dto (which contains a property that holds the assetId)
I am writing an ActionFilter that is added to the action method and is provided with the actionParameter name where I can get the asset value.
Action Method:
[AssetIdFilter("assetId")]
public ActionResult Index(int assetId)
{
...
}
The attribute is defined as:
public class AssetIdFilterAttribute : ActionFilterAttribute
{
public string _assetIdParameterKey { get; set; }
public AssetIdFilterAttribute (string assetIdParameterKey)
{
_assetIdParameterKey = assetIdParameterKey;
}
public override void OnActionExecuting(ActionExecutingContext filterContext)
{
int assetId;
if (Int32.TryParse(filterContext.ActionParameters[_assetIdParameterKey].ToString(), out assetId))
{
......
}
}
This works as expected, but will only work when the assetId is provided as a primitive. I am not sure what to do when the assetId is provided within a complex object into the action method.
Will I need to parse each object differently depending on the type? I am hoping I can specify some kind of dot-notation in the AssetIdFilter to tell it where the assetId is located: dto.assetId
Any way I can use dynamics? or reflection?? ect.???
and here dynamic comes to the rescue.you can change the actionFilterAttribute to be :
public override void OnActionExecuting(ActionExecutingContext filterContext)
{
dynamic assetIdHolder = filterContext.ActionParameters[_assetIdParameterKey];
if (assetIdHolder.GetType().IsPrimitive)
{
//do whatever with assetIdHolder
}
else
{
//do whatever with assetIdHolder.assetId
}
}
cheers!
Well, yes, you answered your question. One way would be to use dot notation:
//simple case:
[AssetId("id")]
public ActionResult Index(string id) {
//code here
}
//complex case:
[AssetId("idObj", AssetIdProperty = "SubObj.id")]
public ActionResult index(IdObject idObj) {
//code here
}
And AssetIdAttribute is as follows:
public class AssetIdAttribute : ActionFilterAttribute
{
public string _assetIdParameterKey { get; set; }
public string AssetIdProperty { get; set; }
public AssetIdFilterAttribute(string assetIdParameterKey)
{
_assetIdParameterKey = assetIdParameterKey;
}
public override void OnActionExecuting(ActionExecutingContext filterContext)
{
int assetId;
var param = filterContext.ActionParameters[_assetIdParameterKey];
int.TryParse(GetPropertyValue(param, this.AssetIdProperty).ToString(), out assetId);
//you code continues here.
}
private static string GetPropertyValue(object souce, string property)
{
var propNames = string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(property) || !property.Contains('.') ? new string[] { } : property.Split('.');
var result = souce;
foreach (var prop in propNames)
{
result = result.GetType().GetProperty(prop).GetValue(result);
}
return result.ToString();
}
}
The code does not have null checks when calling ToString and when calling GetProperty though. Also, it does not check the success of TryParse. Please apply these corrections when used.
Maybe this code could be written using dynamic, but at the end dynamic usage is compiled into object using reflection (something like what I have done here), thus no big difference to me.
Also, maybe it would be more clear to have a parameter like "idObj.SubObj.id", but that again depends on the preference, and the code will become a little bit more complex.
This code works fine, However, if I run execute a storedprocedure in my unit of work class (or any update, delete, add operation), I'm still getting original the data. Actually, I have already a solution(posted below in controller) but Im sure this is not the most elegant way, I hope someone can help me refactor the code. please help. Thanks
My unit of work
public class UnitOfWork : IUnitOfWork, IDisposable
{
private readonly ObjectContext _context;
private BookRepository _books;
public UnitOfWork(ObjectContext context)
{
if (context == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException("Context was not supplied");
}
_context = context;
}
public IRepository<Book> Books
{
get
{
if (_books== null)
{
_books= new BookRepository (_context);
}
return _books;
}
}
public void UpdateAuthor(int id)
{
_context.ExecuteStoreCommand("sp_UpdateAuthor #param1",
new SqlParameter("param1", id));
}
public void Commit()
{
_context.SaveChanges();
}
Book Repository
public class BookRepository : Repository<Book>
{
public BookRepository (ObjectContext context)
: base(context)
{
}
public override Machine GetById(object id)
{
return _objectSet.SingleOrDefault(s => s.Id== (int)id);
}
}
Generic Repository
public abstract class Repository<T> : IRepository<T>
where T : class, IAuditEntity
{
protected IObjectSet<T> _objectSet;
public Repository(ObjectContext context)
{
_objectSet = context.CreateObjectSet<T>();
}
public abstract T GetById(object id);
public IEnumerable<T> GetAll()
{
return _objectSet;
}
public IEnumerable<T> Query(Expression<Func<T, bool>> filter)
{
return _objectSet.Where(filter);
}
public void Add(T entity)
{
_objectSet.AddObject(entity);
}
public void Remove(T entity)
{
_objectSet.DeleteObject(entity);
}
}
Controller Code
public class HomeController : Controller
{
private IUnitOfWork _unitOfWork;
#region Core Action Methods
public HomeController()
{
this._unitOfWork = new UnitOfWork(((IObjectContextAdapter)new BookContext()).ObjectContext);
}
private IEnumerable<BookViewModel> GetBookdsViewModels(int id)
{
//THE CODE WHERE ITS NOT RETURNING THE UPDATED VLAUES
//var query = _unitOfWork.Books.GetAll().Where(d => d.Id== id);
//I WANT TO CHANGE THIS CODE
ObjectContext objectContext = ((IObjectContextAdapter)new BookContext()).ObjectContext;
ObjectSet<Book> set = objectContext.CreateObjectSet<Book>();
set.MergeOption = MergeOption.OverwriteChanges;
var query = from a in set
where a.Id== id && !a.IsDeleted
select a;
return query
.Select(
c => new BookViewModel
{
Id = c.Id ,
Name = c.Name
});
}
I believe the problem is because you're executing things directly against your database, and then trying to refer back to the local copy that's stored in your repository and they're different.
public void UpdateAuthor(int id)
{
_context.ExecuteStoreCommand("sp_UpdateAuthor #param1",
new SqlParameter("param1", id));
}
When you run this query, you're making a change in your db instead of your local - why dont you do something like this:
public void UpdateAuthor(int id)
{
var book = Books.GetById(id);
/* make changes to your book object */
_unit.Save();
}
If you're wanting to make changes using store procs, you're going to have to dispose of your context, and recreate the repo's so that you're working with data from the DB instead of the local copy.
Expanding on Mark Oreta's answer, you need to ensure your Model is updated after manually executing a stored proc on your database. If you must manually call that stored proc then try this afterward:
_context.Entry<Book>(instanceOfAuthor).Reload();
Which might be:
_context.Entry<Book>(_context.Books.GetById(id)).Reload();
I need to have a CRUd operations on my class (CompetenceSpecific).
Competence has three derived classes - CompetenceFunction, CompetenceArea and CompetenceSpecifc
The error I recieved:
There are no EntitySets defined for the specified entity type 'CompetencyManagement.Domain.Entities.CompetenceFunction'. If 'CompetencyManagement.Domain.Entities.CompetenceFunction' is a derived type, use the base type instead. Parameter name: TEntity
How should I correct this? Please suggest a solution that would solve my problem. Thanks
Please check the code below, I removed some parts of the code for simplicity.
--MODEL
public class Competence
{
public int CompetenceID { get; set; }
public int CourseID { get; set; }
...
}
public class CompetenceFunction : Competence
{
}
--REPOSITORY and interfaces
public interface IRepository<T> where T : class
{
T GetById(object id);
IEnumerable<T> GetAll();
IEnumerable<T> Query(Expression<Func<T, bool>> filter);
void Add(T entity);
void Remove(T entity);
}
public abstract class Repository<T> : IRepository<T>
where T : class
{
protected IObjectSet<T> _objectSet;
public Repository(ObjectContext context)
{
_objectSet = context.CreateObjectSet<T>();
}
...
}
public class CompetenceFunctionRepository : Repository<CompetenceFunction>
{
public CompetenceFunctionRepository(ObjectContext context)
: base(context)
{
}
public override CompetenceFunction GetById(object id)
{
return _objectSet.SingleOrDefault(s => s.CompetenceID == (int)id);
}
}
--UNIT oF WORK
public interface IUnitOfWork
{
IRepository<CompetenceFunction> CompetenceFunctions { get; }
IRepository<CompetenceArea> CompetenceAreas { get; }
IRepository<CompetenceSpecific> CompetenceSpecifics { get; }
void Commit();
}
public class UnitOfWork : IUnitOfWork, IDisposable
{
private CompetenceFunctionRepository _competencefunction;
private CompetenceAreaRepository _competencearea;
private CompetenceSpecificRepository _competencespecifc;
public UnitOfWork(ObjectContext context)
{
if (context == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException("Context was not supplied");
}
_context = context;
}
#region IUnitOfWork Members
public IRepository<CompetenceFunction> CompetenceFunctions
{
get
{
if (_competencefunction == null)
{
_competencefunction = new CompetenceFunctionRepository(_context);
}
return _competencefunction;
}
}
public IRepository<CompetenceArea> CompetenceAreas
{
get
{
if (_competencearea == null)
{
_competencearea = new CompetenceAreaRepository(_context);
}
return _competencearea;
}
}
public IRepository<CompetenceSpecific> CompetenceSpecifics
{
get
{
if (_competencespecifc == null)
{
_competencespecifc = new CompetenceSpecificRepository(_context);
}
return _competencespecifc;
}
}
--Im getting an error in this part of Repository
public Repository(ObjectContext context)
{
_objectSet = context.CreateObjectSet<T>();
}
There are no EntitySets defined for the specified entity type 'CompetencyManagement.Domain.Entities.CompetenceFunction'. If 'CompetencyManagement.Domain.Entities.CompetenceFunction' is a derived type, use the base type instead. Parameter name: TEntity
Here's how I implement in the controller
private IUnitOfWork _unitOfWork;
var a = _unitOfWork.CompetenceFunctions.GetAll();
return View(a);
You have to get derived type by the OfType function, e.g.
context.CreateObjectSet<Competence>().OfType<CompetenceFunction>()
In your case that would mean that there is only a CompetenceRepository that serves all derivatives of Competence.
Edit
(After your comment)
First, UoW is meant for temporarily storing changes that should be dealt with in one batch (like changes to be committed to the database). GetAll and similar functions are repository stuff.
But do you need repositories? I like this post. When beginning to know EF, I would focus on the ins and outs of EF without getting distracted too much by surrounding architecture. E.g. start with services that at the inside communicate directly with the context and expose methods like GetCompetenceFunctions, GetCompetenceAreas (using OfType), and SaveCompetenceFunction, ....
You can address these service methods directly from action methods in the MVC controllers.
While doing the following simple example, I found the following difficulties
As the title says, I am intending to use the Repository pattern while I am storing data in the Azure table storage.now I have couple of classes, Repository.cs, IRepository.cs, DataContext.cs and the Controller.
During my reading I found some info and been doing as follows.
IRepository.cs
public interface IRepository<T> where T: TableServiceEntity
{
T GetById(int Id);
IQueryable<T> GetAll();
}
and the DataContext.cs
public class DataContext<T>:TableServiceContext where T:TableServiceEntity
{
public DataContext(CloudStorageAccount storageaccount, StorageCredentials credentials)
: base(storageaccount.TableEndpoint.AbsoluteUri, credentials)
{
// _storageAccount = storageaccount;
var storageAccount = CloudStorageAccount.Parse(RoleEnvironment.GetConfigurationSettingValue(KEY_STORAGE));
storageAccount.CreateCloudTableClient().CreateTableIfNotExist(tableName);
}
public IQueryable<T> DeviceTable
{
get { return CreateQuery<T>(tableName); }
}
}
plus some part of the controller(I have already data in the table which I created before)
public class DeviceMeController : Controller
{
private IRepository<Entity>_repository;
public Controller() : this(new Repository<Entity>())
{
}
public Controller(IRepository<Entity> repository)
{
_repository = repository;
}
public ActionResult Index()
{
var List = _repository.GetAll();
return View(deviceList);
}
and the the Implementation of the interface Reposistory.cs, here is where I have an error and got lost somewhere
public class Repository<T>:IRepository<T> where T:TableServiceEntity
{
private DataContext<T> _serviceContext;
// here get tablename as pararameter;
// so the Enities call this function
public Repository()
{
// the same context for multiple tables ?
}
// perhaps it should take the table Name
public void Add(T item)
{
_serviceContext.AddObject(TableName,item);
_serviceContext.SaveChangesWithRetries();
}
public IQueryable<T> GetAll()
{
var results = from c in _serviceContext.Table
select c;
return results;
Error is about the null reference, the debugger shows the variable results is null?
In the end I need to know few things.
what should I do in the Repository.cs constructor? I believe the Datacontext.cs class has to be in a separate class ...
any Hint here
Hy,
first of all I presume you left out some code, because I don't see how you get your context in your repository. But supposing you do set it correctly, (injection?) taking into account the way you desinged your datacontext the repository doesn't need to know the table name because it is set in the following lines of code:
public IQueryable<T> DeviceTable
{
get { return CreateQuery<T>(Constants.DeviceTableName); }
}
So when you create a query based on the IQueryable DeviceTable, the table name is already set.
The thing is I don't see the need for your context class, especially as it can only bring over a single entity type (it is generic and based on an entity).
A basic layout of my Repository for Azure Table Storage is:
public abstract class CloudRepository<TEntity> : ICloudRepository<TEntity>
{
private TableServiceContext _tableServiceContext;
private string _tableName;
public string TableName
{
get { return _tableName ?? ( _tableName = typeof(TEntity).Name.Replace("Entity", string.Empty).ToLower()); }
}
public CloudStorageAccount StorageAccount
{
get
{
return CloudStorageAccount.Parse(RoleEnvironment.GetConfigurationSettingValue("StorageConnectionString"));
}
}
public CloudTableClient TableClient
{
get
{
CloudTableClient cloudTableClient = StorageAccount.CreateCloudTableClient();
cloudTableClient.CreateTableIfNotExist(TableName);
return cloudTableClient;
}
}
public TableServiceContext ServiceContext
{
get
{
return _tableServiceContext ?? (_tableServiceContext = TableClient.GetDataServiceContext());
}
}
public IEnumerable<TEntity> FindAll()
{
return ServiceContext.CreateQuery<TEntity>(TableName).ToList();
}
}
Hope this helps you.
Not sure if what I am trying is possible or not, but I'd like to reuse a linq expression on an objects parent property.
With the given classes:
class Parent {
int Id { get; set; }
IList<Child> Children { get; set; }
string Name { get; set; }
}
class Child{
int Id { get; set; }
Parent Dad { get; set; }
string Name { get; set; }
}
If i then have a helper
Expression<Func<Parent,bool> ParentQuery() {
Expression<Func<Parent,bool> q = p => p.Name=="foo";
}
I then want to use this when querying data out for a child, along the lines of:
using(var context=new Entities.Context) {
var data=context.Child.Where(c => c.Name=="bar"
&& c.Dad.Where(ParentQuery));
}
I know I can do that on child collections:
using(var context=new Entities.Context) {
var data=context.Parent.Where(p => p.Name=="foo"
&& p.Childen.Where(childQuery));
}
but cant see any way to do this on a property that isnt a collection.
This is just a simplified example, actually the ParentQuery will be more complex and I want to avoid having this repeated in multiple places as rather than just having 2 layers I'll have closer to 5 or 6, but all of them will need to reference the parent query to ensure security.
If this isnt possible, my other thought was to somehow translate the ParentQuery expression to be of the given type so effectively:
p => p.Name=="foo";
turns into:
c => c.Dad.Name=="foo";
but using generics / some other form of query builder that allows this to retain the parent query and then just have to build a translator per child object that substitutes in the property route to the parent.
EDIT:
Following on from comments by #David morton
Initially that looks like I can just change from Expression to a delegate function and then call
.Where(ParentQuery()(c.Dad));
However I am using this in a wider repository pattern and cant see how I can use this with generics and predicate builders - I dont want to retrieve rows from the store and filter on the client (web server in this case). I have a generic get data method that takes in a base expression query. I then want to test to see if the supplied type implements ISecuredEntity and if it does append the securityQuery for the entity we are dealing with.
public static IList<T> GetData<T >(Expression<Func<T, bool>> query) {
IList<T> data=null;
var secQuery=RepositoryHelperers.GetScurityQuery<T>();
if(secQuery!=null) {
query.And(secQuery);
}
using(var context=new Entities.Context()) {
var d=context.GetGenericEntitySet<T>();
data=d.ToList();
}
return data;
}
ISecuredEntity:
public interface ISecuredEntity : IEntityBase {
Expression<Func<T, bool>> SecurityQuery<T>();
}
Example Entity:
public partial class ExampleEntity: ISecuredEntity {
public Expression<Func<T, bool>> SecurityQuery<T>() {
//get specific type expression and make generic
Type genType = typeof(Func<,>).MakeGenericType(typeof(ExampleEntity), typeof(bool));
var q = this.SecurityQuery(user);
return (Expression<Func<T, bool>>)Expression.Lambda(genType, q.Body, q.Parameters);
}
public Expression<Func<ExampleEntity, bool>> SecurityQuery() {
return e => e.OwnerId==currentUser.Id;
}
}
and repositoryHelpers:
internal static partial class RepositoryHelpers {
internal static Expression<Func<T, bool>> SecureQuery<T>() where T : new() {
var instanceOfT = new T();
if (typeof(Entities.ISecuredEntity).IsAssignableFrom(typeof(T))) {
return ((Entities.ISecuredEntity)instanceOfT).SecurityQuery<T>();
}
return null;
}
}
EDIT Here is the (eventual) solution
I ended up going back to using expressions, and using LinqKit Invoke. Note: for EF I also had to call .AsExpandable() on the entitySet
The key part is being able to call:
Product.SecureFunction(user).Invoke(pd.ParentProduct);
so that I can pass in the context into my parent query
My end classes look like:
public interface ISecureEntity {
Func<T,bool> SecureFunction<T>(UserAccount user);
}
public class Product : ISecureEntity {
public Expression<Func<T,bool>> SecureFunction<T>(UserAccount user) {
return SecureFunction(user) as Expression<Func<T,bool>>;
}
public static Expression<Func<Product,bool>> SecureFunction(UserAccount user) {
return f => f.OwnerId==user.AccountId;
}
public string Name { get;set; }
public string OwnerId { get;set; }
}
public class ProductDetail : ISecureEntity {
public Expression<Func<T,bool>> SecureFunction<T>(UserAccount user) {
return SecureFunction(user) as Expression<Func<T,bool>>;
}
public static Func<ProductDetail,bool> SecureFunction(UserAccount user) {
return pd => Product.SecureFunction(user).Invoke(pd.ParentProduct);
}
public int DetailId { get;set; }
public string DetailText { get;set; }
public Product ParentProduct { get;set; }
}
Usage:
public IList<T> GetData<T>() {
IList<T> data=null;
Expression<Func<T,bool>> query=GetSecurityQuery<T>();
using(var context=new Context()) {
var d=context.GetGenericEntitySet<T>().Where(query);
data=d.ToList();
}
return data;
}
private Expression<Func<T,bool>> GetSecurityQuery<T>() where T : new() {
var instanceOfT = new T();
if (typeof(Entities.ISecuredEntity).IsAssignableFrom(typeof(T))) {
return ((Entities.ISecuredEntity)instanceOfT).SecurityQuery<T>(GetCurrentUser());
}
return a => true; //returning a dummy query
}
}
Thanks for the help all.
You're overthinking it.
First, don't return an Expression<Func<Parent, bool>>, that'll require you to compile the expression. Return simply a Func<Parent, bool> instead.
Next, it's all in how you call it:
context.Children.Where(c => c.Name == "bar" && ParentQuery()(c.Dad));
context.Parents.Where(ParentQuery());