I am getting the message:
Puppet::Parser::AST::Resource failed with error ArgumentError: Could not find declared class git at /tmp/vagrant-puppet-1/manifests/site.pp:15 on node vagrant-ubuntu-precise-64.wp.comcast.net
Probably the best idea is to see this in action. I have created a GitHub repo of the exact manifest I am using. It is here:
https://github.com/jamorat/puppet-example
The manifests and git module are there. If you have Vagrant, this can be vagrant up and you will see the error for yourself. Would be cool to either receive an answer here and/or also as a commit (for which credit would still be given here for answer.)
Thank you so much!
You need to configure vagrant with the puppet module path. On a side note, you would also usually keep the manifest and module folder in the same folder, instead of modules inside manifests.
This:
class{ git:
svn => 'installed',
gui => 'installed',
}
is telling puppet to create a resource based on the class named git that has 2 parameters: svn and gui. Such a class declaration doesn't exist anywhere in what you've posted. If it were, it would look something like:
class git ($svn, $gui) {
package {'svn':
ensure => $svn,
}
# Whatever 'gui' is, making package b/c use of "installed"
package {'gui':
ensure => $gui,
}
}
Alternative is to declare a class and include it using the "include" directive.
Recommend a good reading of Language: Classes
Related
I have a base package that gives my functionality (wireguard-tools, taken from internet).
This package includes no configuration files for the network interfaces (as it should).
Then I created a few packages with this configuration files that are only to be deployed one for each respective image (e.g. image-1 includes wireguard-1-conf while image-2 includes wireguard-2-conf).
I would like to setup SystemD, but I can only do this when I have an interface configured, and it will only happen when the *-conf package is installed.
Unfortunately, the SystemD service file ("wg-quick#.service") is deployed by wireguard-tools package and my dependent package, the *-conf one, cannot see it:
ERROR: Function failed: SYSTEMD_SERVICE_wireguard-1-conf value wg-quick#wg0.service does not exist
I managed to do a dirty workaround but I feel dirtiest doing this in my *-conf recipe:
do_install_append () {
touch ${D}${systemd_system_unitdir}/wg-quick#wg0.service
pkg_postinst_${PN} () {
rm -f $D/${systemd_system_unitdir}/wg-quick#wg0.service
How should I proceed to make it work "the right way"?
Is there an elegant way of making "wg-quick#.service" from wireguard-tools accessible to *-conf?
Thanks in advance.
Additional Info
My *-conf recipes inherit systemd and include wireguard-tools dependency:
inherit systemd
...
DEPENDS_${PN} = "wireguard-tools"
RDEPENDS_${PN} = "wireguard-tools"
I so nothing else worth to mention in my recipes.
I am still facing this issue, when trying to copy git installation files by copying a folder and making it recursive. There is a file called [.exe and it is failing with:
Error: /Stage[main]/Tcagents/File[Copy Team City agent tools]: Failed to generate additional resources using 'eval_generate': Parameter source failed on File[D:/TeamCityTools/git-2.5.0/usr/bin/[.exe]: Could not understand source puppet:///tools/TeamCityTools/git-2.5.0/usr/bin/[.exe: bad URI(is not URI?): puppet:///tools/TeamCityTools/git-2.5.0/usr/bin/[.exe`
While reading other requests, I saw that is is due to the URI library Puppet uses for validating the path. I also found the same issue in https://tickets.puppetlabs.com/browse/PUP-3135 but it is accepted without a solution.
I wonder if there is a workaround you recommend or a fix for this. Using Puppet 4.4.2.
Resource is:
file{'Copy Team City agent tools':
ensure => directory,
path => $tc_tools_path,
source => 'puppet:///tools/TeamCityTools',
recurse => true,
}
Puppet has not still resolved this (https://tickets.puppetlabs.com/browse/PUP-3135).
Im trying to provision my development server using Vagrant and Puppet. Below is some of my Puppet Manifest at this point. The issue im having is that im ending up in a dependency loop which is ofcourse correct. The only problem is that i dont see a way to do it without so therefor i need some help.
Im using the latest version of the box provided by Puppetlabs named puppetlabs/ubuntu-14.04-64-puppet. While adding a PPA to the package manager i receive an error that apt-add-repository is not available. Therefor you need to install the software-properties-common package.
The only problem is that before installing this package, you need to run apt-get update. The second problem is that the manifest wont accept it and it will try to add the PPA before so that, ofcourse which is a logic conclusion, it only has to update the package manager once. But by picking this last solution i will end up in a loop which triggers an error:
==> default: Error: Failed to apply catalog: Found 1 dependency cycle:
==> default: (Exec[add-apt-repository-ppa:ondrej/php-7.0] => Class[Apt::Update] => Exec[apt_update] => Class[Apt::Update] =>
Package[git] => Class[Systempackages] => Apt::Ppa[ppa:ondrej/php-7.0]
=> Exec[add-apt-repository-ppa:ondrej/php-7.0])
class systempackages {
package { [ 'git', 'curl', 'acl', 'unattended-upgrades', 'vim', 'software-properties-common']:
ensure => "installed",
require => [
Class['apt::update'],
],
}
}
/*===========================================*/
## System
Exec { path => [ "/bin/", "/sbin/" , "/usr/bin/", "/usr/sbin/" ] }
class{'systempackages':}
# APT
class { 'apt':
update => {
frequency => 'always',
},
}
apt::ppa { 'ppa:ondrej/php-7.0':
before => Package['php7.0-cli'],
require => Class['systempackages'],
}
# PHP
package {'php7.0-cli':
ensure => 'installed',
}
Given that this is on vagrant, I suggest installing package software-properties-common manually as part of your Vagrantfile.
Something like config.vm.provision "shell", inline: "apt-get update && apt-get install software-properties-common should work.
The circular dependency reflects the fact that Puppet is not a provisioning system. It can be used by a provisioning system or in conjunction with one, but it depends on a fairly substantial software stack being available before it can get off the ground. If Package 'software-properties-common' is necessary for full functioning of the Apt subsystem, then your best bet is to rely on your provisioning system to install it, so that it is available before Puppet ever runs, and to avoid declaring any relationship between that package and the classes and resources of the Apt module.
You are also impacted by the puppetlabs-apt module being quite good about declaring the relationships needed to ensure proper order of application. This is a double-edged sword, however: people cause themselves trouble with surprising frequency by declaring their own relationships with classes or defined types from that module that conflict with the ones it declares itself. In particular, it is asking for trouble to have your Apt::ppa resource require a class containing resources that themselves require any class or resource from the Apt module.
In any case, class apt::update is not a public class of the module. The main implication is that code outside the module should not reference it in any way. You should instead rely on the value you provided for class parameter $apt::update to instruct Puppet to perform an apt-get update at a suitable time.
I'm working on a infrastructure where some servers don't have access to the internet, so I have to push the packages to the local repo before declaring them to be installed on Chef.
However we've been on a situation where Chef failed to install a package since the package wasn't there on some boxes and it has been successful on some other boxes.
What I want to do is to run a Ruby/RSpec test before applying Chef config on the nodes to make sure the packages declared on the recipes do actually exist on the repo.
In order to do that I need to be able to list all the packages exists in the our recipes.
My question is: Is there anyway to list all the declared packages in Chef? I had a quick look at Chef::Platform and ChefSpec but unfortunately couldn't find anything useful to my problem.
Do you have any idea where is the best place to look at?
If you use ChefSpec you can find all the packages by calling chef_run.find_resources(:package) inside some test. See the source code. Like this:
require 'chefspec'
describe 'example::default' do
let(:chef_run) { ChefSpec::Runner.new.converge(described_recipe) }
it 'does something' do
chef_run.find_resources(:package)...
end
end
You could install one or more of the community ohai plugins. For example the following will return information about installed sofware:
debian
Redhat
windows
Once the plugins are enabled they will add additional node attributes that will be searchable from chef-server.
I have been attempting to setup a chef recipe which installs ruby using RVM and then uses the application_ruby cookbook to configure the application, however I keep running into the error
NameError: Cannot find a resource for bundle_options on ubuntu version 12.04
I am using the following code
application "application setup" do
owner "ubuntu"
group "ubuntu"
repository "https://github.com/me/myapplication.git" // Real address removed
path rails_app_path
revision "master"
rails do
bundler true
precompile_assets true
bundler_deployment true
end
end
I noticed that the bundle_options was recently added, https://github.com/opscode-cookbooks/application_ruby/commit/e7719170a661a957796e8e5d58ba8f4ecd937487 however I am unable to track down if this is causing the issue. I have included
depends "application"
depends "application_ruby"
in my metadata.rb and made sure all my dependencies are installed so I am unsure what I am doing wrong at this point.
According to documentation bundle_options is an attribute of the rails resource, not a resource itself.
The only correct way of using it is INSIDE the "rails" block, so you got the message because you either used it as :
an attribute of the application resource (but outside of the "rails" block)
standalone resource (outside of any resource).
Message you mentioned is being displayed when nonexistent resource is being referenced. e.g. if you had tried to execute following code on your system:
nonexistent_resource "failure gonna happen" do
some_attribute "whatever_value"
end
you would've got a message
NameError: Cannot find a resource for nonexistent_resource on Ubuntu version 12.04
I ran into this problem today as well. It appears the problem is that commit e771917 forgot to add the necessary getter for the bundle_option. Someone filed a PR to fix it (https://github.com/poise/application_ruby/pull/44), but it has not yet been merged. I can confirm that when I made that change locally, this error went away. The forked branch in the PR is located at https://github.com/mauriciosilva/application_ruby/tree/bundle_options_fix.