Possible to do an `in` `lookup_type` through the django-filter URL parser? - django-rest-framework

I'm using django-filter with django-rest-framework and I'm trying to instantiate a filter that accepts lists of numbers for filtering the query set down
class MyFilter(django_filters.FilterSet):
ids = django_filters.NumberFilter(name='id',lookup_type='in')
class Meta:
model = MyModel
fields = ('ids',)
class MyModelViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
queryset = MyModel.objects.all()
serializer_class = MyModelSerializer
filter_class = MyFilter
If I pass in a comma separated list of integers, the filter is ignored altogether.
If I pass in a single integer, it gets through django-filter into django's form validator and complains:
'Decimal' object is not iterable
Is there a way to create a django-filter object which can handle a list of integers and properly filter down the queryset?

For better or worse, I created a custom filter for this:
class IntegerListFilter(django_filters.Filter):
def filter(self,qs,value):
if value not in (None,''):
integers = [int(v) for v in value.split(',')]
return qs.filter(**{'%s__%s'%(self.name, self.lookup_type):integers})
return qs
Which is used like:
class MyFilter(django_filters.FilterSet):
ids = IntegerListFilter(name='id',lookup_type='in')
class Meta:
model = MyModel
fields = ('ids',)
class MyModelViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
queryset = MyModel.objects.all()
serializer_class = MyModelSerializer
filter_class = MyFilter
Now my interface accepts comma-delimited lists of integers.

I know this is an old post, but there is now a better solution. The change that makes it correct is posted here.
They added a BaseInFilter and a BaseRangeFilter. The documentation is here.
Big picture, BaseFilter checks for CSV, and then when mixed with another filter it does what you are asking. Your code can now be written like:
class NumberInFilter(filters.BaseInFilter, filters.NumberFilter):
pass
class MyModelViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
ids = NumberInFilter(name='id', lookup_expr='in')
class Meta:
model = MyModel
fields = ['ids']

Here's a complete solution:
from django_filters import Filter, FilterSet
from rest_framework.filters import DjangoFilterBackend
from rest_framework.viewsets import ModelViewSet
from .models import User
from .serializers import UserSerializer
class ListFilter(Filter):
def filter(self, qs, value):
if not value:
return qs
self.lookup_type = 'in'
values = value.split(',')
return super(ListFilter, self).filter(qs, values)
class UserFilter(FilterSet):
ids = ListFilter(name='id')
class Meta:
model = User
fields = ['ids']
class UserViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
serializer_class = UserSerializer
queryset = User.objects.all()
filter_backends = (DjangoFilterBackend,)
filter_class = UserFilter

According to a post in the django-filter issues:
from django_filters import Filter
from django_filters.fields import Lookup
class ListFilter(Filter):
def filter(self, qs, value):
return super(ListFilter, self).filter(qs, Lookup(value.split(u","), "in"))
I have personally used this without any issue in my projects, and it works without having to create a per-type filter.

Based on #yndolok answer I have come to a general solution. I think filtering by a list of ids is a very common task and therefore should be included in the FilterBackend:
class ListFilter(django_filters.Filter):
"""Class to filter from list of integers."""
def filter(self, qs, value):
"""Filter function."""
if not value:
return qs
self.lookup_type = 'in'
try:
map(int, value.split(','))
return super(ListFilter, self).filter(qs, value.split(','))
except ValueError:
return super(ListFilter, self).filter(qs, [None])
class FilterBackend(filters.DjangoFilterBackend):
"""A filter backend that includes ListFilter."""
def get_filter_class(self, view, queryset=None):
"""Append ListFilter to AutoFilterSet."""
filter_fields = getattr(view, 'filter_fields', None)
if filter_fields:
class AutoFilterSet(self.default_filter_set):
ids = ListFilter(name='id')
class Meta:
model = queryset.model
fields = list(filter_fields) + ["ids"]
return AutoFilterSet
else:
return super(FilterBackend, self).get_filter_class(view, queryset)

Uptodate solution:
from django_filters import rest_framework as filters
name-->field_name
lookup_type-->lookup_expr
class IntegerListFilter(filters.Filter):
def filter(self,qs,value):
if value not in (None,''):
integers = [int(v) for v in value.split(',')]
return qs.filter(**{'%s__%s'%(self.field_name, self.lookup_expr):integers})
return qs
class MyFilter(filters.FilterSet):
ids = IntegerListFilter(field_name='id',lookup_expr='in')
class Meta:
model = MyModel
fields = ('ids',)
class MyModelViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
queryset = MyModel.objects.all()
serializer_class = MyModelSerializer
filter_class = MyFilter

As I have answered here DjangoFilterBackend with multiple ids, it is now pretty easy to make a filter that accepts list and validates the contents
For Example:
from django_filters import rest_framework as filters
class NumberInFilter(filters.BaseInFilter, filters.NumberFilter):
pass
class MyFilter(filters.FilterSet):
id_in = NumberInFilter(field_name='id', lookup_expr='in')
class Meta:
model = MyModel
fields = ['id_in', ]
This will accept a list of integers from a get parameter. For example /endpoint/?id_in=1,2,3

Related

DRF Serialize 2 fields into array

DRF v3.12.4
class AModel(models.Model):
field_0 = models.CharField()
field_1 = models.FloatField()
field_2 = models.FloatField()
Have such a model, and I need to serialize it (read-only) in such way:
{ "field_0": "FIELD0", "arr": [ 1.0, 2.0 ]}
For now, I make the next solution:
class BSerializer(serializer.Serializer):
def to_representation(self, data):
return [data.field_1, data.field_2]
class ASerilizer(serializers.Serializer):
arr = BSerializer(source='*')
class Meta:
model = AModel
fields = ['field_0', 'arr']
It's work, but I also use drf-spectacular and of course, it can't analyze the overriding method. I'm trying #extend_schema_serializer on BSerilizer, but it does not work.
Is it possible without overriding the to_representation method?
So, the question is it possible for such a case to use a serializer without overriding the to_representation method, ListSerializer for example? Or maybe someone knows why #extend_schema_serializer does not work?
Thx
If you want just use arr field as a read_only field, you can use serializer's SerializerMethodField:-
from rest_framework import serializers
class ASerilizer(serializers.Serializer):
arr = serializers.SerializerMethodField()
class Meta:
model = AModel
fields = ['field_0', 'arr']
def get_arr(self, instance):
return [instance.field_1, instance.field_2]
For more information you can refer from here https://www.django-rest-framework.org/api-guide/fields/#serializermethodfield

How to get the current logged-in user for schema? (django graphql api)

my goal: I am trying to return all the fields of the posts if the user has an id of 1, and I want to return only 3 fields if else.
My problem is: in the query or mutations I can do info.context.user.id but in the schema I can't do that.
Here in my following code you can noticed his undefined variable current_loggedin_user which I don't know how to get its value.
import graphene
from graphene_django import DjangoObjectType
from . import models
from django.conf import settings
class Posts(DjangoObjectType):
class Meta:
model = models.ExtendUser
if (current_logedin_user.id==1):
field = '__all_'
else:
fields = ['username', 'id', 'imageUrl']
You need to include all fields that are visible to anyone to the schema, and then customize the resolver methods for the fields that you want to hide for some users. For example:
class Posts(DjangoObjectType):
class Meta:
model = models.ExtendUser
def resolve_restricted_field(self, info):
if info.context.user.id == 1:
return self.restricted_field
return None
For more examples, see How to limit field access on a model based on user type on Graphene/Django?
Try something like this
class Posts(DjangoObjectType):
class Meta:
model = models.ExtendUser
class Query(ObjectType):
fields = graphene.List(Posts)
def resolve_fields(self, info, **kwargs):
if info.context.user.pk == 1:
return ExtendUser.objects.all()
return ExtendUser.objects.values_list('username', 'id', 'imageUrl', flat=True)

DRF - in filter, use field-value instead of default pk / id

I'm trying to use DRF's filters so that the URL query is like so:
/roadname/?road=M5
not like so
/roadinfo/?road=1
I can't seem to do it when I've got a ForeignKey relationship.
I've tried using lookup_field with no luck (although not sure how this would work for multiple filter fields anyway - I don't think that's the answer). I've tried using a get_queryset() method in views as in the second example in the documentation. A comment I came across suggested that this is bad RESTApi practice - is it? How would a user know to type in '1' to get results for 'M5' in a front-end client?
I've set up two really simple models (and serializers, views, etc.) to try these out as below.
If I use RoadName, I have to type the name into the filter search box (rather than having a dropdown), but the url query is how I want it.
If I use RoadInfo (which has a ForeignField to RoadName), I get a drop down in the filter box, but the url query uses the ForeignKey pk.
My question: How can I set it so that when I use RoadInfo, the query uses the field value rather than the id/pk?
Models
from django.db import models
class RoadName(models.Model):
road = models.CharField(max_length=50)
def __str__(self):
return str(self.road)
class RoadInfo(models.Model):
road = models.ForeignKey(RoadName, on_delete='CASCADE')
# other data
def __str__(self):
return str(self.road)
Serializers
from traffic.models import *
from rest_framework import serializers
class RoadNameSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
road = serializers.CharField()
class Meta:
model = RoadName
exclude = ('id',)
class RoadInfoSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
road = RoadNameSerializer()
class Meta:
model = RoadInfo
exclude = ('id',)
Views
from traffic.serializers import *
from traffic.models import *
from django_filters import rest_framework as filters
from rest_framework import viewsets
class RoadNameViewSet(viewsets.ReadOnlyModelViewSet):
""" List of all traffic count Counts """
queryset = RoadName.objects.all()
serializer_class = RoadNameSerializer
filter_backends = (filters.DjangoFilterBackend,)
filterset_fields = '__all__'
class RoadInfoViewSet(viewsets.ReadOnlyModelViewSet):
""" List of all traffic count Counts """
queryset = RoadInfo.objects.all()
serializer_class = RoadInfoSerializer
filter_backends = (filters.DjangoFilterBackend,)
filterset_fields = '__all__'
The data M5 on the road attribute of RoadName model. It can be filtered by road__road from RoadInfo model.
So, Try /roadname/?road__road=M5

django rest_framework serializer parameter

I am using django rest_framework to provide jsGrid json data.
As the rest_framwork example, I create a object fit the jsGrid format
class jsGridResp(object):
def __init__(self, data, itemsCount):
self.data = data
self.itemsCount = itemsCount
and the class based view, create a get function
class RateListViewSet(mixins.CreateModelMixin,
mixins.UpdateModelMixin,
mixins.DestroyModelMixin,
generics.GenericAPIView):
"""
API endpoint that allows user to be viewed or edited
"""
queryset = RateList.objects.all().order_by('-create_date')
serializer_class = RateListSerializer
def get_object(self):
queryset = self.filter_queryset(self.get_queryset())
obj = queryset.get(pk=self.request.POST["id"])
self.check_object_permissions(self.request, obj)
return obj
def get(self, request, format=None):
pageIndex = request.GET.get('pageIndex')
pageSize = request.GET.get('pageSize')
sortField = request.GET.get('sortField', 'id')
sortOrder = request.GET.get('sortOrder', 'asc')
sortOrder = "" if sortOrder == "asc" else "-"
rows = RateList.objects.all().order_by("{}{}".format(sortOrder, sortField))
itemsCount = rows.count()
paginator = Paginator(rows, pageSize)
try:
rows = paginator.page(pageIndex)
except PageNotAnInteger:
rows = paginator.page(1)
except EmptyPage:
rows = paginator.page(paginator.num_pages)
result = jsGridResp(data=rows, itemsCount=itemsCount)
serializer = RateListGetSerializer(result)
json = JSONRenderer().render(serializer.data)
return Response(json)
then I create two serializer to serialize the data
class RateListSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = RateList
fields = ('id', 'rate_code', 'hr01', 'hr02', 'hr03', 'hr04', 'hr05', 'hr06',
'hr07', 'hr08', 'hr09', 'hr10', 'hr11', 'hr12', 'hr13', 'hr14',
'hr15', 'note', 'create_date', 'update_date')
read_only_fields = ('create_date', 'update_date')
def update(self, instance, validated_data):
result = instance.update(id=instance.id, **validated_data)
return result
def destroy(self, instace, validated_data):
return "{seccuess: true}"
class RateListGetSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
itemsCount = serializers.IntegerField()
data = RateListSerializer(many=True)
but I have many model need to do like these.
can I use just one serializer to serialize all model.
I want to create a jsGridGetSerializer can pass in a model parameter, so I don't need to create many simple serialzer to do the same thing.
Is this possible?
If I understand your problem correctly, you want a generic serializer which accepts a Model variable as a parameter in its Meta class.
One way to do this is to pass in the model name as a url keyword argument, then catching it in views.py. Then you can override the Meta model via overriding the get_serializer_class:
serializers.py
class GenericSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = None
views.py
class GenericViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
def get_queryset(self):
model = self.kwargs.get('model')
return model.objects.all()
def get_serializer_class(self):
GenericSerializer.Meta.model = self.kwargs.get('model')
return GenericSerializer

Passing argument from view to Custom RelatedField serializer

How can I pass an argument to a serializers.RelatedField class from views.py. I need to pass language_id to query Language.objects model within that RelatedField.
I am not sure if I took a right approach to this issue. What I want to achieve is to present information about genres associated to a movie from database model about depending on the language. The MovieGenre model has genre ID field which I want to replace with actual Genre name.
My serialiser.py
class GenreField(serializers.RelatedField):
def to_representation(self, value, language_id=1):
genre_name = GenresVideo.objects.get(genre_id=value, language_id=language_id)
return genre_name.name
class MovieGenresSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
genre_id = GenreField(read_only=True)
class Meta:
model = MoviesGenres
As you see, here I query Language.objects with default value but I would like to pass it from views (language_id).
My views.py:
class MovieGenresTestViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
lookup_field = 'movie'
queryset = MoviesGenres.objects.all()
serializer_class = MovieGenresSerializer
def list(self, request, language_pk):
queryset = MoviesGenres.objects.all()
serializer = MovieGenresSerializer(queryset, many=True)
return Response(serializer.data)
def retrieve(self, request, movie, language_pk):
queryset = MoviesGenres.objects.filter(movie=movie)
serializer = MovieGenresSerializer(queryset, many=True)
return Response(serializer.data)
And my urls.py:
router.register(r'lang', LanguagesViewSet, base_name='lang')
mov_gen = routers.NestedSimpleRouter(router, r'lang', lookup='language')
mov_gen.register(r'mg', MovieGenresTestViewSet, base_name='mg')
url(r'^api/', include(genre_spec.urls))
My models.py
class Languages(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(unique=True, max_length=255)
short_name = models.CharField(unique=True, max_length=4, blank=True, null=True)
active = models.BooleanField(default="")
class Meta:
managed = False
db_table = 'languages'
ordering = ('id',)
class GenresVideo(models.Model):
genre_id = models.IntegerField()
language = models.ForeignKey('Languages')
name = models.CharField(max_length=255, blank=True, null=True)
class Meta:
managed = False
db_table = 'genres_video'
unique_together = (('genre_id', 'language'),)
ordering = ('genre_id',)
class MoviesGenres(models.Model):
movie = models.ForeignKey(Movies)
genre_id = models.IntegerField()
class Meta:
managed = False
db_table = 'movies_genres'
unique_together = (('movie', 'genre_id'),)
Through the urls routes, I can get a correct response from API including the language_id. I just need to pass it to the view somehow.
Thanks a lot for help!
I'll try to answer to your first question, with the easiest implementation possible: SerializerMethodField. Because we will get the language id via the context passed to the serializer, we should either generate the context for the serializer, or let the framework do that for us.
Now to the problem at hand: you aren't filtering the queryset (MoviesGenres) by language per se. Thus, we can avoid overwriting the list and retrieve methods. Nevertheless, the router mechanism will inject in kwargs for the view method the language_pk parameter - that's the parameter that we will retrieve from within the serializer context:
class MovieGenresSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
genre = searializers.SerializerMethodField()
class Meta:
model = MoviesGenres
def get_genre(self, instance):
# get the language id from the view kwargs
language_id = self.context['view'].kwargs['language_pk']
# get the genre
try:
genre_name = GenresVideo.objects.get(genre_id=instance.genre_id, language_id=language_id).name
except GenresVideo.DoesNotExist:
genre_name = None
# return the formatted output
return genre_name
class MovieGenresTestViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
lookup_field = 'movie'
queryset = MoviesGenres.objects.all()
serializer_class = MovieGenresSerializer

Resources