I'm currently using Oracle SQL Developer 4.0.1.14, doing something like this:
UPDATE mytable SET myfield = 'myvalue' WHERE myotherfield = 234;
INSERT INTO mytable (myfield , myotherfield) VALUES ('abc', 123);
INSERT INTO mytable (myfield , myotherfield) VALUES ('abd', 124);
...
... and many many more lines.
If one runs the whole script, one only sees output like this:
8 rows updated.
1 rows inserted.
1 rows inserted.
...
In a small script, this is not a problem, since you can easily see, which line caused which output. But if you think on a script with 1k lines, to find a "0 rows updated." and which command caused, it ends up in frustration.
So I would rather want an output like this:
> UPDATE mytable SET myfield = 'myvalue' WHERE myotherfield = 7393;
8 rows updated.
> INSERT INTO mytable (myfield , myotherfield) VALUES ('abc', 123);
1 rows inserted.
> INSERT INTO mytable (myfield , myotherfield) VALUES ('abd', 124);
1 rows inserted.
...
I know, this is possible in Sql*Plus when running a script in verbose mode. But this should also be possible in SQL Dev, shouldn't it?
I would highly appreciate if one could tell me how.
Thanks a lot!
try to use set echo on (sqlplus command which works in sql developer too), e.g.
create table t(a varchar2(100));
set echo on
update t set a = 0;
update t set a = 0;
update t set a = 0;
output is (after F5 - run script)
table T created.
> update t set a = 0
0 rows updated.
> update t set a = 0
0 rows updated.
> update t set a = 0
0 rows updated.
Related
In T-SQL I used to debug in script or stored procedure like below (very simple example), to check the data of the tables :
declare #my_variable nvarchar(4) = 'test';
....
update t
set t.my_column = case when t.my_column_3 = 1
then 1 + 1
when t.my_column_4 = 2
then 2 + 2
...
end
from my_table t
where t.column_2 = 'test';
--check the updated data
select t.my_column, t.my_column_2, t.my_column_3, t.my_column_4
from my_table t
where t.column_2 = 'test';
update t
set t.my_column_5 = case when t.my_column_6 + t.my_column_7 = t.my_column_8
then 'OK'
else 'NOT OK'
end,
....
from my_table t
where t.column_2 = 'test_2';
--check the updated data
select t.my_column_5, t.my_column_6, t.my_column_7, t.my_column_8
from my_table t
where t.column_2 = 'test_2';
etc..
I know that in Oracle is quite different but is there a similar way to check the data of some tables in a middle of a pl/sql script.
I did some research and apparently we can use dbms_output but it's not as simple as a select * from my_table like in T-SQL.
Also sometimes, after running a pl/sql script (manipulate the data etc), I need to display the datas of two or more tables in my script (for controlling purpose) is it possible ?
All suggestions are welcome.
Thank you.
I (using Oracle 12c, PL/SQL) need to update an existing table TABLE1 based on information stored in a table MAP. In a simplified version, MAP looks like this:
COLUMN_NAME
MODIFY
COLUMN1
N
COLUMN2
Y
COLUMN3
N
...
...
COLUMNn
Y
COLUMN1 to COLUMNn are column names in TABLE1 (but there are more columns, not just these). Now I need to update a column in TABLE1 if MODIFY in table MAP contains a 'Y' for that columns' name. There are other row conditions, so what I would need would be UPDATE statements of the form
UPDATE TABLE1
SET COLUMNi = value_i
WHERE OTHER_COLUMN = 'xyz_i';
where COLUMNi runs through all the columns of TABLE1 which are marked with MODIFY = 'Y' in MAP. value_i and xyz_i also depend on information stored in MAP (not displayed in the example).
The table MAP is not static but changes, so I do not know in advance which columns to update. What I did so far is to generate the UPDATE-statements I need in a query from MAP, i.e.
SELECT <Text of UPDATE-STATEMENT using row information from MAP> AS SQL_STMT
FROM MAP
WHERE MODIFY = 'Y';
Now I would like to execute these statements (possibly hundreds of rows). Of course I could just copy the contents of the query into code and execute, but is there a way to do this automatically, e.g. using EXECUTE IMMEDIATE? It could be something like
BEGIN
EXECUTE IMMEDIATE SQL_STMT USING 'xyz_i';
END;
only that SQL_STMT should run through all the rows of the previous query (and 'xyz_i' varies with the row as well). Any hints how to achieve this or how one should approach the task in general?
EDIT: As response to the comments, a bit more background how this problem emerges. I receive an empty n x m Matrix (empty except row and column names, think of them as first row and first column) quarterly and need to populate the empty fields from another process.
The structure of the initial matrix changes, i.e. there may be new/deleted columns/rows and existing columns/rows may change their position in the matrix. What I need to do is to take the old version of the matrix, where I already have filled the empty spaces, and translate this into the new version. Then, the populating process merely looks if entries have changed and if so, alters them.
The situation from the question arises after I have translated the old version into the new one, before doing the delta. The new matrix, populated with the old information, is TABLE1. The delta process, over which I have no control, gives me column names and information to be entered into the cells of the matrix (this is table MAP). So I need to find the column in the matrix labeled by the delta process and then to change values in rows (which ones is specified via other information provided by the delta process)
Dynamic SQL it is; here's an example, see if it helps.
This is a table whose contents should be modified:
SQL> select * from test order by id;
ID NAME SALARY
---------- ---------- ----------
1 Little 100
2 200
3 Foot 0
4 0
This is the map table:
SQL> select * from map;
COLUMN CB_MODIFY VALUE WHERE_CLAUSE
------ ---------- ----- -------------
NAME Y Scott where id <= 3
SALARY N 1000 where 1 = 1
Procedure loops through all columns that are set to be modified, composes the dynamic update statement and executes it:
SQL> declare
2 l_str varchar2(1000);
3 begin
4 for cur_r in (select m.column_name, m.value, m.where_clause
5 from map m
6 where m.cb_modify = 'Y'
7 )
8 loop
9 l_str := 'update test set ' ||
10 cur_r.column_name || ' = ' || chr(39) || cur_r.value || chr(39) || ' ' ||
11 cur_r.where_clause;
12 execute immediate l_str;
13 end loop;
14 end;
15 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Result:
SQL> select * from test order by id;
ID NAME SALARY
---------- ---------- ----------
1 Scott 100
2 Scott 200
3 Scott 0
4 0
SQL>
e.g, below query:
create table t1 ( age int, name varchar(10) )
insert into t1 values(1, 'name'),(2, 'surname')
copy select * from t1 into 't1.dat' DELIMITERS '|','
','"' null as '';
The copy select cmd returns -1 as the affected row count, although it should return 2 as the value. Not sure why this is so. At many other times, I have seen the same query returning correctly the affected row count.
If I run the same query in the Dbeaver tool Iam using, I see this:
Updated Rows: -1
Query: copy select * from t1 into 't1.dat' DELIMITERS '|','
','"' null as ''
Finish time: Sat Apr 30 16:53:28 IST 2022
I think you have to use an absolute path to the export file, e.g.
copy select * from t1 into '/home/user/t1.dat' DELIMITERS '|','
','"' null as '';
When you see a message like 2 affected rows, it might actually be due to the result summary of the successfully completed INSERT INTO statement. But that doesn't mean the COPY INTO <file> statement is successful though.
The UPSERT operation either updates or inserts a row in a table, depending if the table already has a row that matches the data:
if table t has a row exists that has key X:
update t set mystuff... where mykey=X
else
insert into t mystuff...
Since Oracle doesn't have a specific UPSERT statement, what's the best way to do this?
The MERGE statement merges data between two tables. Using DUAL
allows us to use this command. Note that this is not protected against concurrent access.
create or replace
procedure ups(xa number)
as
begin
merge into mergetest m using dual on (a = xa)
when not matched then insert (a,b) values (xa,1)
when matched then update set b = b+1;
end ups;
/
drop table mergetest;
create table mergetest(a number, b number);
call ups(10);
call ups(10);
call ups(20);
select * from mergetest;
A B
---------------------- ----------------------
10 2
20 1
The dual example above which is in PL/SQL was great becuase I wanted to do something similar, but I wanted it client side...so here is the SQL I used to send a similar statement direct from some C#
MERGE INTO Employee USING dual ON ( "id"=2097153 )
WHEN MATCHED THEN UPDATE SET "last"="smith" , "name"="john"
WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN INSERT ("id","last","name")
VALUES ( 2097153,"smith", "john" )
However from a C# perspective this provide to be slower than doing the update and seeing if the rows affected was 0 and doing the insert if it was.
An alternative to MERGE (the "old fashioned way"):
begin
insert into t (mykey, mystuff)
values ('X', 123);
exception
when dup_val_on_index then
update t
set mystuff = 123
where mykey = 'X';
end;
Another alternative without the exception check:
UPDATE tablename
SET val1 = in_val1,
val2 = in_val2
WHERE val3 = in_val3;
IF ( sql%rowcount = 0 )
THEN
INSERT INTO tablename
VALUES (in_val1, in_val2, in_val3);
END IF;
insert if not exists
update:
INSERT INTO mytable (id1, t1)
SELECT 11, 'x1' FROM DUAL
WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT id1 FROM mytble WHERE id1 = 11);
UPDATE mytable SET t1 = 'x1' WHERE id1 = 11;
None of the answers given so far is safe in the face of concurrent accesses, as pointed out in Tim Sylvester's comment, and will raise exceptions in case of races. To fix that, the insert/update combo must be wrapped in some kind of loop statement, so that in case of an exception the whole thing is retried.
As an example, here's how Grommit's code can be wrapped in a loop to make it safe when run concurrently:
PROCEDURE MyProc (
...
) IS
BEGIN
LOOP
BEGIN
MERGE INTO Employee USING dual ON ( "id"=2097153 )
WHEN MATCHED THEN UPDATE SET "last"="smith" , "name"="john"
WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN INSERT ("id","last","name")
VALUES ( 2097153,"smith", "john" );
EXIT; -- success? -> exit loop
EXCEPTION
WHEN NO_DATA_FOUND THEN -- the entry was concurrently deleted
NULL; -- exception? -> no op, i.e. continue looping
WHEN DUP_VAL_ON_INDEX THEN -- an entry was concurrently inserted
NULL; -- exception? -> no op, i.e. continue looping
END;
END LOOP;
END;
N.B. In transaction mode SERIALIZABLE, which I don't recommend btw, you might run into
ORA-08177: can't serialize access for this transaction exceptions instead.
I'd like Grommit answer, except it require dupe values. I found solution where it may appear once: http://forums.devshed.com/showpost.php?p=1182653&postcount=2
MERGE INTO KBS.NUFUS_MUHTARLIK B
USING (
SELECT '028-01' CILT, '25' SAYFA, '6' KUTUK, '46603404838' MERNIS_NO
FROM DUAL
) E
ON (B.MERNIS_NO = E.MERNIS_NO)
WHEN MATCHED THEN
UPDATE SET B.CILT = E.CILT, B.SAYFA = E.SAYFA, B.KUTUK = E.KUTUK
WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN
INSERT ( CILT, SAYFA, KUTUK, MERNIS_NO)
VALUES (E.CILT, E.SAYFA, E.KUTUK, E.MERNIS_NO);
I've been using the first code sample for years. Notice notfound rather than count.
UPDATE tablename SET val1 = in_val1, val2 = in_val2
WHERE val3 = in_val3;
IF ( sql%notfound ) THEN
INSERT INTO tablename
VALUES (in_val1, in_val2, in_val3);
END IF;
The code below is the possibly new and improved code
MERGE INTO tablename USING dual ON ( val3 = in_val3 )
WHEN MATCHED THEN UPDATE SET val1 = in_val1, val2 = in_val2
WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN INSERT
VALUES (in_val1, in_val2, in_val3)
In the first example the update does an index lookup. It has to, in order to update the right row. Oracle opens an implicit cursor, and we use it to wrap a corresponding insert so we know that the insert will only happen when the key does not exist. But the insert is an independent command and it has to do a second lookup. I don't know the inner workings of the merge command but since the command is a single unit, Oracle could execute the correct insert or update with a single index lookup.
I think merge is better when you do have some processing to be done that means taking data from some tables and updating a table, possibly inserting or deleting rows. But for the single row case, you may consider the first case since the syntax is more common.
A note regarding the two solutions that suggest:
1) Insert, if exception then update,
or
2) Update, if sql%rowcount = 0 then insert
The question of whether to insert or update first is also application dependent. Are you expecting more inserts or more updates? The one that is most likely to succeed should go first.
If you pick the wrong one you will get a bunch of unnecessary index reads. Not a huge deal but still something to consider.
Try this,
insert into b_building_property (
select
'AREA_IN_COMMON_USE_DOUBLE','Area in Common Use','DOUBLE', null, 9000, 9
from dual
)
minus
(
select * from b_building_property where id = 9
)
;
From http://www.praetoriate.com/oracle_tips_upserts.htm:
"In Oracle9i, an UPSERT can accomplish this task in a single statement:"
INSERT
FIRST WHEN
credit_limit >=100000
THEN INTO
rich_customers
VALUES(cust_id,cust_credit_limit)
INTO customers
ELSE
INTO customers SELECT * FROM new_customers;
Question:
Is it possible to have a column name in a select statement changed based on a value in it's result set?
For example, if a year value in a result set is less than 1950, name the column OldYear, otherwise name the column NewYear. The year value in the result set is guaranteed to be the same for all records.
I'm thinking this is impossible, but here was my failed attempt to test the idea:
select 1 as
(case
when 2 = 1 then "name1";
when 1 = 1 then "name2")
from dual;
You can't vary a column name per row of a result set. This is basic to relational databases. The names of columns are part of the table "header" and a name applies to the column under it for all rows.
Re comment: OK, maybe the OP Americus means that the result is known to be exactly one row. But regardless, SQL has no syntax to support a dynamic column alias. Column aliases must be constant in a query.
Even dynamic SQL doesn't help, because you'd have to run the query twice. Once to get the value, and a second time to re-run the query with a different column alias.
The "correct" way to do this in SQL is to have both columns, and have the column that is inappropriate be NULL, such as:
SELECT
CASE WHEN year < 1950 THEN year ELSE NULL END AS OldYear,
CASE WHEN year >= 1950 THEN year ELSE NULL END AS NewYear
FROM some_table_with_years;
There is no good reason to change the column name dynamically - it's analogous to the name of a variable in procedural code - it's just a label that you might refer to later in your code, so you don't want it to change at runtime.
I'm guessing what you're really after is a way to format the output (e.g. for printing in a report) differently depending on the data. In that case I would generate the heading text as a separate column in the query, e.g.:
SELECT 1 AS mydata
,case
when 2 = 1 then 'name1'
when 1 = 1 then 'name2'
end AS myheader
FROM dual;
Then the calling procedure would take the values returned for mydata and myheader and format them for output as required.
You will need something similar to this:
select 'select ' || CASE WHEN YEAR<1950 THEN 'OLDYEAR' ELSE 'NEWYEAR' END || ' FROM TABLE 1' from TABLE_WITH_DATA
This solution requires that you launch SQLPLUS and a .sql file from a .bat file or using some other method with the appropriate Oracle credentials. The .bat file can be kicked off manually, from a server scheduled task, Control-M job, etc...
Output is a .csv file. This also requires that you replace all commas in the output with some other character or risk column/data mismatch in the output.
The trick is that your column headers and data are selected in two different SELECT statements.
It isn't perfect, but it does work, and it's the closest to standard Oracle SQL that I've found for a dynamic column header outside of a development environment. We use this extensively to generate recurring daily/weekly/monthly reports to users without resorting to a GUI. Output is saved to a shared network drive directory/Sharepoint.
REM BEGIN runExtract1.bat file -----------------------------------------
sqlplus username/password#database #C:\DailyExtracts\Extract1.sql > C:\DailyExtracts\Extract1.log
exit
REM END runExtract1.bat file -------------------------------------------
REM BEGIN Extract1.sql file --------------------------------------------
set colsep ,
set pagesize 0
set trimspool on
set linesize 4000
column dt new_val X
select to_char(sysdate,'MON-YYYY') dt from dual;
spool c:\DailyExtracts\&X._Extract1.csv
select '&X-Project_id', 'datacolumn2-Project_Name', 'datacolumn3-Plant_id' from dual;
select
PROJ_ID
||','||
replace(PROJ_NAME,',',';')-- "Project Name"
||','||
PLANT_ID-- "Plant ID"
from PROJECTS
where ADDED_DATE >= TO_DATE('01-'||(select to_char(sysdate,'MON-YYYY') from dual));
spool off
exit
/
REM ------------------------------------------------------------------
CSV OUTPUT (opened in Excel and copy/pasted):
old 1: select '&X-Project_id' 'datacolumn2-Project_Name' 'datacolumn3-Plant_id' from dual
new 1: select 'MAR-2018-Project_id' 'datacolumn2-Project_Name' 'datacolumn3-Plant_id' from dual
MAR-2018-Project_id datacolumn2-Project_Name datacolumn3-Plant_id
31415 name1 1007
31415 name1 2032
32123 name2 3302
32123 name2 3384
32963 name3 2530
33629 name4 1161
34180 name5 1173
34180 name5 1205
...
...
etc...
135 rows selected.