I went on who.is to find a domain name to buy. It was currently in use, so I waited till it expired, but as soon as it had a domain name parker went and sat on it.
Is it possible for people to see how many whois requests have been made to this site. I want to know if they saw me looking at it and then took it because they saw someone interested in it so they could scam me.
The domain name is a very unpolular one, it doesnt seem to have ever had any visitors so I don't know how they found it otherwise.
There are a number of reasons why a domain gets picked up right after expiration. Somebody could have already put a request to buy it. Here's a resource to get you stated on getting domains after they expire.
For what it's worth, I don't believe your situation had anything to do with you having searched for the domain before.
http://www.pixelmade.com/blog/domain-names/how-buy-expired-domain-name
Related
Ruby on rails dev here.
This question has been asked before. Here, here and here.
The problem is that they did not make the right question or the solution given was somewhat shallow.
I ´ll be as specific as I can.
The Goal
I want get the user´s contact e-mail and not the account e-mail. Two different things. :)
Some users leave their email on the contact button. It´s public.
My goal is to make a software that can extract e-mails, but for now, only extracting one e-mail from one single account will be more than enough to have my MVP going.
here is an example below on how instagram let users share their e-mail.
The Problem
It only shows in app :( If it were to be shown on the browser as well, it would be a walk in the park. The contact button that has the e-mail and phone number does not show in the browser.
**The Good Part*
There is some solutions to it.
This guy has a figured it out using the API, but I don´t quite understand how he did it. The downside is that all solution wants to sell you a product.
The focus of this company lies on extracting instagram e-mails and it seems legit.
Last but not least, this dude is using appium to extract those juicy e-mails. The third won´t really work for me because it seems too messy. Having to use a android emulator will be my last resort.
Thanks for helping and happy new year.
Set up mitmproxy on your machine.
Set up the certificates on your phone and use your machine as the gateway.
Analyze the traffic.
Reverse engineer the API (to log in and get info about user profiles) and then use it in your Ruby/Python/whatever code.
How? Easiest method?
Tried using postman on desktop, googles OAuth2 playground and google help pages to try make sense of what to do. Ended up using GAM as this is the easiest and gives the most helpful responses.
I have tried changing this from multiple places and i always get the error:
ERROR: 400: #UserInIllegalDomain Invitation cannot be created for user in this domain - failedPrecondition
the command:
gam update course 8077159861 owner hiddenusername#longleypark.ac.uk
(username is DEFINITELY correct ive just hidden it as its not vital information)
Any help would be much appreciated, from what i can tell some guides said to add longleypark.ac.uk to whitelisted domain under classroom but because this is the primary domain for this g suite it says you cant add your current domain so this isnt an option.
I believe the google API is broken. If anyone can prove otherwise would be a great help.
Google API support haven't managed to give me any proper response, keep saying they will test and let me know but I haven't been informed of any results yet.
Google forums support has informed me once a user account is deleted and 20 days have passed the account becomes unrecoverable which means any classrooms they are the owner of become "orphans" which means "limited functionality" and the inability to change the owner ever again, the only solution is to recreate the classroom from scratch, unfortunately along with the original account all the documents submitted to that classroom are also lost.
There are NO ways around this even though the ownerId field for a classroom really should be editable from some sort of database management tool or admin console/API.
I have run into this problem today. Thought using the API I'd be able to swap the ownerId, but no.
Bizarre that Google don't let you do this as a Google Workspace admin. We know have 3 GCSE sets which are unusable with 3 months of the 2 year course left. Very frustrating.
I'm trying to get reCaptcha working on my website.
I found out I have to register my domain for this first, since I already have a google account this is quite easy, but the very last checkbox made me think:
How does google determine who the owners are?
And what kind of alerts will those be? E-Mails?
I'm a bit worried that some random person will get an E-Mail one day not knowing what to do with it since I'm not the only one working on that domain. And if they just mean my google account I'm registering this with...that doesn't make sense because they should've written "you" instead of owners then. - although your site is making this even more confusing. :D
I'm aware this is not directly a programming question.
I'm open for suggestions for a better Stack-exchange platform to ask this question at, there are too many - I couldn't find any other that seem to fit.
In the reCAPTCHA admin settings, there is a textbox where you can enter a list of email addresses for owners. This will grant them access to manage the reCAPTCHA settings and send them alerts, if enabled.
After creating both a Chrome Web Store listing as well as a duplicate listing tuned for the Google Apps Marketplace, I have filled out the Marketplace Listing Review Request. I've had to edit the second listing several times as I've uncovered issues like not including the app member in the manifest, and I have no idea of the overall status of the request. Is there a way to find out?
My big concern is that something is still not right or that I might have missed a step or done something else wrong in the process of submitting the listing. Since there's no obvious validation around the Marketplace Listing Review request, I'm not 100% sure if I'm doing it perfectly. This is my first listing. Help?
First step would be to provide your Chrome Web Store Item ID as jonathanberi mentioned. Once you do that I can take a look at the application for you.
The reality is that we don't check and test new GAM applications every single day. It's more accurate to say that your application will be checked within 1-2 weeks from publication. If there are any issues, I or someone else on the curation team, will reach out to you to let you know of the problem and it's severity. Most of the time the issues aren't serious enough to warrant immediate removal from the Google Apps Marketplace and simply need to be fixed within a 30 day time frame.
So, long story short, no news is good news for GAM publications. If you don't hear anything from us within 2-3 weeks of your publication date, you can safely assume that your application has met all of our listing requirements.
I had the same problems and spoke to some very helpful folks at Google. Here is a summary of what they said:
Time taken to hear back: For new submissions their SLA for reviewing is 8 business days, but they usually do better than that.
Time taken for your app to show up on Google Apps Marketplace: 12-24 hours. When they approve an item it is automatically send to the public store, however it takes time to be shown in the Google Apps Marketplace search results due to cache propagation as time is taken for their robots to find it, index it and get it ready. (as of Jan 2017)
I employ email validation to grant people full use of the site. The trouble is, sometimes these emails get spam-boxed, or never arrive, so I get many people complaining that they cannot confirm their account.
Was wondering if there are other (creative) ways to offer secondary validation option to users who didnt get the validation. Its a free site, so I dont want to ask for credit cards, or mobile #s.
The purpose of this is to make abuse of the site less rampant, since we ban a lot of people, and they come back with dozens of accounts to prove something. Spam/robot registrations are not an issue (right now).
What we started doing recently was letting members send us an email to a special email address. We give them a hash code, and all they have to do is put that code somewhere in the subject or the body of the email, and send it to us. We have a cron job running in the background that gets those emails, parses the subject/body looking for the hash, and if found activates the account.
It doesn't work 100%, because some ISPs also block their users from sending us emails, but no solution would work 100%.
Based on your comment in Rob S.' answer, it sounds more like you want to identify situations where the same browser is creating multiple accounts rather than confirm that what's at the other end is human.
Dropping a cookie in the user's browser can be very helpful in finding the repeat offenders, especially those not savvy enough to clear their cookies or visit while in private mode. Some forum software like vBulletin does this and can notify the administrators when it happens.
Another alternative might be browser fingerprinting, which is where you use a bunch of the information provided in the HTTP exchange. An example of this is the EFF's Panopticlick.
Just got a "fun" new way to annoy your banned people a bit.
once you ban them (I guess you close the account and ban the IP). Then log their browser agent string with their IP and screen resolution.
If there is a match when showing the website to them. Just remove the registration link/page. Dont even show the link to the page, as it might piss them off. Dont explain why its gone. Just keep it gone, eg. for 3 weeks or 2 month.
That way they dont have a cookie on the browser to remove, they cant find the registration so they cant know WHY they cant make a new account.
Secondly, if on a school or something (dont know how old they are), the other existing users will still be able to login to their accounts as its ONLY registration that has been removed. Not login.
How about that? is that clever enough?
Basically what you're looking to do is separate the humans from the robots. There are two primary ways to do this:
1) Require users signing up to check boxes and type a word spelled out in an image captcha. These are usually very difficult tasks for a computer to complete.
2) Allow users to sign-up using their account from a different site such as OpenID or Google assuming that anyone who has one of these accounts is a real person.
I recommend combining both methodologies.
Good luck!
There are unlimited ways of doing this.
You mention mobiles and free, but if you have access to a SMS-gateway, you can receive SMS-messages for free (but might need to pay some sort of monthly subscription though). But show a dynamically generated code the the current user. Store this code in "his session" and do an ajax check each 15-30 sec to see if the sms-code was received by the gateway. If so, accept the account and let them registrate. This would requiere the gateway + your users to have a personal mobile. Enough about mobiles...
Make a question or more that is randomly generated. Use pictures/tokens instad of tekst so that the user has to press the correct image in correct order to perform some sort of answer.
Could be like a jackpot-machine with 3 cells where the images are randomly placed and generated inside dynamic named files, so that robots cant analyse the names to guess the right answer.
You mention e-mails to be easy to spoof. Yes indeed, but what if the emails would come lets say each week containing some sort of "important info" that the user would need to read/use on the website to continue. Once the account hasnt been used for a certain time (lets say 3 month, kill it)... and you could also say to have a "free account" you must accept that we send you 1 mail pr. month that you need to activate within 1 week. If you dont, we are free to close/delete your account details.
... and many more
I dont know what you want to "protect", but if its for gaming, then dont let the gamers have "extra levels/weapons" until they have provided a certain amount of these codes OR paid for access OR validated by phone or something.
Thats my first 3 ideas, I think the possibilities are unlimited. The main issue here is, make it too hard to validate yourself and the users go away unless your site is REALLY worth it.
You might think of the much used "Free forever (but limited)" approach way of selling stuff these days on the net. The users can make as many accounts they want, but the licens is still only "single/small/basic". Once you get more experienced, you get more features or you might just upgrade by paying... at this time you know WHO is real and WHO isnt.
My point is, dont over protect. Just design with the mind of spammers will always find a way in, no matter how good you protect it. Those giving up first are your real users/customers.
I would rather spend time on making this product/website/game so great that EVERYONE wants to pay for an account after a while.
Lastly from real life... there are COMPANIES in China with kids employeed to play World of Warcraft with one purpose. Harvest virtual gold and sell it on Ebay to other western players who pays with real dollars. Its not allowed according to the gamelicens and their accounts/gameslicenses are constantly getting banned. But it gives them so much income so they have calculated with this and they just buy new licences and continue.
So if EVEN Blizard(WoW creators)
doesnt have enough power/money to keep
fakes out of the game, how do you
expect to do much better? :o)
Usefull answer?