I tried to write a function which will be able to randomly change letters in word except first and last one.
def fun(string)
z=0
s=string.size
tab=string
a=(1...s-1).to_a.sample s-1
for i in 1...(s-1)
puts tab[i].replace(string[a[z]])
z=z+1
end
puts tab
end
fun("sample")
My output is:
p
l
a
m
sample
Anybody know how to make it my tab be correct?
it seems to change in for block, because in output was 'plamp' so it's random as I wanted but if I want to print the whole word (splampe) it doesn't working. :(
What about:
def fun(string)
first, *middle, last = string.chars
[first, middle.shuffle, last].join
end
fun("sample") #=> "smalpe"
s = 'sample'
[s[0], s[1..-2].chars.shuffle, s[-1]].join
# => "slpmae"
Here is my solution:
def fun(string)
first = string[0]
last = string[-1]
middle = string[1..-2]
puts "#{first}#{middle.split('').shuffle.join}#{last}"
end
fun('sample')
there are some problems with your function. First, when you say tab=string, tab is now a reference to string, so, when you change characters on tab you change the string characters too. I think that for clarity is better to keep the index of sample (1....n)to reference the position in the original array.
I suggest the usage of tab as a new array.
def fun(string)
if string.length <= 2
return
z=1
s=string.size
tab = []
tab[0] = string[0]
a=(1...s-1).to_a.sample(s-1)
(1...s-1).to_a.each do |i|
tab[z] = string[a[i - 1]]
z=z+1
end
tab.push string[string.size-1]
tab.join('')
end
fun("sample")
=> "spalme"
Another way, using String#gsub with a block:
def inner_jumble(str)
str.sub(/(?<=\w)\w{2,}(?=\w)/) { |s| s.chars.shuffle.join }
end
inner_jumble("pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis") # *
#=> "poovcanaiimsllinoonroinuicclprsciscuoooomtces"
inner_jumble("what ho, fellow coders?")
#=> "waht ho, folelw coedrs?"
(?<=\w) is a ("zero-width") positive look-behind that requires the match to immediately follow a word character.
(?=\w) is a ("zero-width") positive look-ahead that requires the match to be followed immediately by a word character.
You could use \w\w+ in place of \w{2,} for matching two or more consecutive word characters.
If you only want it to apply to individual words, you can use gsub or sub.
*A lung disease caused by inhaling very fine ash and sand dust, supposedly the longest word in some English dictionaries.
Related
I want to find if the ending of a string overlaps with the beginning of separate string. For example if I have these two strings:
string_1 = 'People say nothing is impossible, but I'
string_2 = 'but I do nothing every day.'
How do I find that the "but I" part at the end of string_1 is the same as the beginning of string_2?
I could write a method to loop over the two strings, but I'm hoping for an answer that has a Ruby string method that I missed or a Ruby idiom.
Set MARKER to some string that never appears in your string_1 and string_2. There are ways to do that dynamically, but I assume you can come up with some fixed such string in your case. I assume:
MARKER = "###"
to be safe for you case. Change it depending on your use case. Then,
string_1 = 'People say nothing is impossible, but I'
string_2 = 'but I do nothing every day.'
(string_1 + MARKER + string_2).match?(/(.+)#{MARKER}\1/) # => true
string_1 = 'People say nothing is impossible, but I'
string_2 = 'but you do nothing every day.'
(string_1 + MARKER + string_2).match?(/(.+)#{MARKER}\1/) # => false
You can use a simple loop and test at the end:
a=string_1.split(/\b/)
idx=0
while (idx<=a.length) do
break if string_2.start_with?(a[idx..-1].join)
idx+=1
end
p a[idx..-1].join if idx<a.length
Since this starts at 0, the longest sub string overlap is found.
You can use the same logic in a .detect block on the same array:
> a[(0..a.length).detect { |idx| string_2.start_with?(a[idx..-1].join) }..-1].join
=> "but I"
Or, as pointed out in comments, you can use the strings vs the array
string_1[(0..string_1.length).detect { |idx| string_2.start_with?(string_1[idx..-1]) }..-1]
Here's a solution that works by comparing the end of string_1 to the start of string_2—using the greatest common length as a starting point—with at least one matching character. It returns the index (from the end of string_1 or the beginning of string_2) if any matching character(s) are found, which can be used to extract the matching portion.
class String
def oindex(other)
[length, other.length].min.downto(1).detect do |i|
end_with?(other[0, i])
end
end
end
string_1 = 'People say nothing is impossible, but I'
string_2 = 'but I do nothing every day.'
if (idx = string_1.oindex(string_2))
puts "Last #{idx} characters match: #{string_1[-idx..-1]}"
end
Here's an alternative that finds all the indexes of the first character of the other string in the string, and uses those indexes as starting points to check for matches:
class String
def each_index(other)
return enum_for(__callee__, other) unless block_given?
i = -1
yield i while i = index(other, i.succ)
end
def oindex(other)
each_index(other.chr).detect do |i|
other.start_with?(self[i..-1]) and break length - i
end
end
end
This should be more efficient than checking every index, especially on longer strings with shorter matches, but I haven't benchmarked it.
Here are a couple of ways to do that. The first converts the two strings to arrays and then compares sequences from those arrays. The second operates on the two strings directly, comparing substrings.
#1 Convert strings to arrays and compare sequences from those arrays
Here's a simple alternative that requires the strings to be converted to arrays of words. It assumes all pairs of words are separated by one space.
def begins_with_ends?(end_str, begin_str)
end_arr = end_str.split
begin_arr = begin_str.split
!!begin_arr.each_index.find { |i| begin_arr[0,i+1] == end_arr[-1-i..-1] }
end
!!obj converts obj to false when it's "falsy" (nil or false) and to true when it's "truthy" (not "falsy"). For example, !!3 #=> true and !!nil #=> false.
end_str = 'People say nothing is impossible, but I when I'
begin_str = 'but I when I do nothing every day.'
begins_with_ends?(end_str, begin_str)
#=> true
Here the match is on the second word "I" in begin_str. Often, however, the last word of end_str only matches (at most) a single word in begin_str
#2 Compare substrings
I've implemented the following algorithm.
Set start_search to 0.
Attempt to match the last word of end_str (value of target) in begin_str, beginning at offset start_search. If no match is found return false; else let idx be the index of start_str where the last character of target appears.
Return true if the string comprised of the first idx characters of begin_str equals the string comprised by the last idx characters of end_str; else set start_search = idx + 2 and repeat step 2.
def begins_with_ends?(end_str, begin_str)
target = end_str[/[[:alnum:]]+\z/]
start_idx = 0
loop do
idx = begin_str.index(/\b#{target}\b/, start_idx)
return false if idx.nil?
idx += target.size
return true if end_str[-idx..-1] == begin_str[0, idx]
start_idx = idx + 2
end
end
begins_with_ends?(end_str, begin_str)
#=> true
This approach recognizes different numbers of spaces between the same two words in both strings (in which case there is no match).
Perhaps something like this would meet your needs?
string_1.split(' ') - string_2.split(' ')
=> ["People", "say", "is", "impossible,"]
Or this is more convoluted, but would give you the exact overlap:
string_2.
chars.
each_with_index.
map { |_, i| string_1.match(string_2[0..i]) }.
select { |s| s }.
max { |x| x.length }.
to_s
=> "but I"
I want to convert all the words(alphabetic) in the string to their abbreviations like i18n does. In other words I want to change "extraordinary" into "e11y" because there are 11 characters between the first and the last letter in "extraordinary". It works with a single word in the string. But how can I do the same for a multi-word string? And of course if a word is <= 4 there is no point to make an abbreviation from it.
class Abbreviator
def self.abbreviate(x)
x.gsub(/\w+/, "#{x[0]}#{(x.length-2)}#{x[-1]}")
end
end
Test.assert_equals( Abbreviator.abbreviate("banana"), "b4a", Abbreviator.abbreviate("banana") )
Test.assert_equals( Abbreviator.abbreviate("double-barrel"), "d4e-b4l", Abbreviator.abbreviate("double-barrel") )
Test.assert_equals( Abbreviator.abbreviate("You, and I, should speak."), "You, and I, s4d s3k.", Abbreviator.abbreviate("You, and I, should speak.") )
Your mistake is that your second parameter is a substitution string operating on x (the original entire string) as a whole.
Instead of using the form of gsub where the second parameter is a substitution string, use the form of gsub where the second parameter is a block (listed, for example, third on this page). Now you are receiving each substring into your block and can operate on that substring individually.
def short_form(str)
str.gsub(/[[:alpha:]]{4,}/) { |s| "%s%d%s" % [s[0], s.size-2, s[-1]] }
end
The regex reads, "match four or more alphabetic characters".
short_form "abc" # => "abc"
short_form "a-b-c" #=> "a-b-c"
short_form "cats" #=> "c2s"
short_form "two-ponies-c" #=> "two-p4s-c"
short_form "Humpty-Dumpty, who sat on a wall, fell over"
#=> "H4y-D4y, who sat on a w2l, f2l o2r"
I would recommend something along the lines of this:
class Abbreviator
def self.abbreviate(x)
x.gsub(/\w+/) do |word|
# Skip the word unless it's long enough
next word unless word.length > 4
# Do the same I18n conversion you do before
"#{word[0]}#{(word.length-2)}#{word[-1]}"
end
end
end
The accepted answer isn't bad, but it can be made a lot simpler by not matching words that are too short in the first place:
def abbreviate(str)
str.gsub(/([[:alpha:]])([[:alpha:]]{3,})([[:alpha:]])/i) { "#{$1}#{$2.size}#{$3}" }
end
abbreviate("You, and I, should speak.")
# => "You, and I, s4d s3k."
Alternatively, we can use lookbehind and lookahead, which makes the Regexp more complex but the substitution simpler:
def abbreviate(str)
str.gsub(/(?<=[[:alpha:]])[[:alpha:]]{3,}(?=[[:alpha:]])/i, &:size)
end
Say that we want to count the number of words in a document. I know we can do the following:
text.each_line(){ |line| totalWords = totalWords + line.split.size }
Say, that I just want to add some exceptions, such that, I don't want to count the following as words:
(1) numbers
(2) standalone letters
(3) email addresses
How can we do that?
Thanks.
You can wrap this up pretty neatly:
text.each_line do |line|
total_words += line.split.reject do |word|
word.match(/\A(\d+|\w|\S*\#\S+\.\S+)\z/)
end.length
end
Roughly speaking that defines an approximate email address.
Remember Ruby strongly encourages the use of variables with names like total_words and not totalWords.
assuming you can represent all the exceptions in a single regular expression regex_variable, you could do:
text.each_line(){ |line| totalWords = totalWords + line.split.count {|wrd| wrd !~ regex_variable }
your regular expression could look something like:
regex_variable = /\d.|^[a-z]{1}$|\A([^#\s]+)#((?:[-a-z0-9]+\.)+[a-z]{2,})\Z/i
I don't claim to be a regex expert, so you may want to double check that, particularly the email validation part
In addition to the other answers, a little gem hunting came up with this:
WordsCounted Gem
Get the following data from any string or readable file:
Word count
Unique word count
Word density
Character count
Average characters per word
A hash map of words and the number of times they occur
A hash map of words and their lengths
The longest word(s) and its length
The most occurring word(s) and its number of occurrences.
Count invividual strings for occurrences.
A flexible way to exclude words (or anything) from the count. You can pass a string, a regexp, an array, or a lambda.
Customisable criteria. Pass your own regexp rules to split strings if you prefer. The default regexp has two features:
Filters special characters but respects hyphens and apostrophes.
Plays nicely with diacritics (UTF and unicode characters): "São Paulo" is treated as ["São", "Paulo"] and not ["S", "", "o", "Paulo"].
Opens and reads files. Pass in a file path or a url instead of a string.
Have you ever started answering a question and found yourself wandering, exploring interesting, but tangential issues, or concepts you didn't fully understand? That's what happened to me here. Perhaps some of the ideas might prove useful in other settings, if not for the problem at hand.
For readability, we might define some helpers in the class String, but to avoid contamination, I'll use Refinements.
Code
module StringHelpers
refine String do
def count_words
remove_punctuation.split.count { |w|
!(w.is_number? || w.size == 1 || w.is_email_address?) }
end
def remove_punctuation
gsub(/[.!?,;:)](?:\s|$)|(?:^|\s)\(|\-|\n/,' ')
end
def is_number?
self =~ /\A-?\d+(?:\.\d+)?\z/
end
def is_email_address?
include?('#') # for testing only
end
end
end
module CountWords
using StringHelpers
def self.count_words_in_file(fname)
IO.foreach(fname).reduce(0) { |t,l| t+l.count_words }
end
end
Note that using must be in a module (possibly a class). It does not work in main, presumably because that would make the methods available in the class self.class #=> Object, which would defeat the purpose of Refinements. (Readers: please correct me if I'm wrong about the reason using must be in a module.)
Example
Let's first informally check that the helpers are working correctly:
module CheckHelpers
using StringHelpers
s = "You can reach my dog, a 10-year-old golden, at fido#dogs.org."
p s = s.remove_punctuation
#=> "You can reach my dog a 10 year old golden at fido#dogs.org."
p words = s.split
#=> ["You", "can", "reach", "my", "dog", "a", "10",
# "year", "old", "golden", "at", "fido#dogs.org."]
p '123'.is_number? #=> 0
p '-123'.is_number? #=> 0
p '1.23'.is_number? #=> 0
p '123.'.is_number? #=> nil
p "fido#dogs.org".is_email_address? #=> true
p "fido(at)dogs.org".is_email_address? #=> false
p s.count_words #=> 9 (`'a'`, `'10'` and "fido#dogs.org" excluded)
s = "My cat, who has 4 lives remaining, is at abbie(at)felines.org."
p s = s.remove_punctuation
p s.count_words
end
All looks OK. Next, put I'll put some text in a file:
FName = "pets"
text =<<_
My cat, who has 4 lives remaining, is at abbie(at)felines.org.
You can reach my dog, a 10-year-old golden, at fido#dogs.org.
_
File.write(FName, text)
#=> 125
and confirm the file contents:
File.read(FName)
#=> "My cat, who has 4 lives remaining, is at abbie(at)felines.org.\n
# You can reach my dog, a 10-year-old golden, at fido#dogs.org.\n"
Now, count the words:
CountWords.count_words_in_file(FName)
#=> 18 (9 in ech line)
Note that there is at least one problem with the removal of punctuation. It has to do with the hyphen. Any idea what that might be?
Something like...?
def is_countable(word)
return false if word.size < 2
return false if word ~= /^[0-9]+$/
return false if is_an_email_address(word) # you need a gem for this...
return true
end
wordCount = text.split().inject(0) {|count,word| count += 1 if is_countable(word) }
Or, since I am jumping to the conclusion that you can just split your entire text into an array with split(), you might need:
wordCount = 0
text.each_line do |line|
line.split.each{|word| wordCount += 1 if is_countable(word) }
end
I answered my own question. Forgot to initialize count = 0
I have a bunch of sentences in a paragraph.
a = "Hello there. this is the best class. but does not offer anything." as an example.
To figure out if the first letter is capitalized, my thought is to .split the string so that a_sentence = a.split(".")
I know I can "hello world".capitalize! so that if it was nil it means to me that it was already capitalized
EDIT
Now I can use array method to go through value and use '.capitalize!
And I know I can check if something is .strip.capitalize!.nil?
But I can't seem to output how many were capitalized.
EDIT
a_sentence.each do |sentence|
if (sentence.strip.capitalize!.nil?)
count += 1
puts "#{count} capitalized"
end
end
It outputs:
1 capitalized
Thanks for all your help. I'll stick with the above code I can understand within the framework I only know in Ruby. :)
Try this:
b = []
a.split(".").each do |sentence|
b << sentence.strip.capitalize
end
b = b.join(". ") + "."
# => "Hello there. This is the best class. But does not offer anything."
Your post's title is misleading because from your code, it seems that you want to get the count of capitalized letters at the beginning of a sentence.
Assuming that every sentence is finishing on a period (a full stop) followed by a space, the following should work for you:
split_str = ". "
regex = /^[A-Z]/
paragraph_text.split(split_str).count do |sentence|
regex.match(sentence)
end
And if you want to simply ensure that each starting letter is capitalized, you could try the following:
paragraph_text.split(split_str).map(&:capitalize).join(split_str) + split_str
There's no need to split the string into sentences:
str = "It was the best of times. sound familiar? Out, damn spot! oh, my."
str.scan(/(?:^|[.!?]\s)\s*\K[A-Z]/).length
#=> 2
The regex could be written with documentation by adding x after the closing /:
r = /
(?: # start a non-capture group
^|[.!?]\s # match ^ or (|) any of ([]) ., ! or ?, then one whitespace char
) # end non-capture group
\s* # match any number of whitespace chars
\K # forget the preceding match
[A-Z] # match one capital letter
/x
a = str.scan(r)
#=> ["I", "O"]
a.length
#=> 2
Instead of Array#length, you could use its alias, size, or Array#count.
You can count how many were capitalized, like this:
a = "Hello there. this is the best class. but does not offer anything."
a_sentence = a.split(".")
a_sentence.inject(0) { |sum, s| s.strip!; s.capitalize!.nil? ? sum += 1 : sum }
# => 1
a_sentence
# => ["Hello there", "This is the best class", "But does not offer anything"]
And then put it back together, like this:
"#{a_sentence.join('. ')}."
# => "Hello there. This is the best class. But does not offer anything."
EDIT
As #Humza sugested, you could use count:
a_sentence.count { |s| s.strip!; s.capitalize!.nil? }
# => 1
This code capitalizes the first letter of each word in a string.
Eg "this is a sentence" becomes "This Is A Sentence".
def capitalize_words(string)
words = string.split(" ")
idx = 0
while idx < words.length
word = words[idx]
word[0] = word[0].upcase
words[idx] = word #this line of code can be made redundant, but why?
idx += 1
end
return words.join(" ")
end
In the while statement, I don't understand why the third line is unnecessary. The second line sets the first letter of a word to capital:
word[0] = word[0].upcase
how does the while statement know to refer back to the previous line
word = words[idx]
to put the new capitalised-letter word back into the words array? I thought that when codes are executed, it always works in a forward fashion, please let me know if this understanding is incorrect.
It's because word variable holds reference for object - the same object that is in words array. So if you modify this object, the object in array is modified also, because it's the same.
BTW what you're trying to do here can be done much easier:
string.split(' ').map(&:capitalize).join(' ')
As Stefan suggested: Keep in mind that capitalize not only converts first character to uppercase, but also converts all remaining chars to lowercase. If this is not what you want, you can also do:
string.split(' ').map { |word| word.slice(0, 1).upcase + word.slice(1..-1) }
or use Stefan's solution with regexp:
string.gsub(/\b\w/) { |ch| ch.upcase }
Keep in mind that \b in regexp will 'split' your word not only by spaces, but by any word boudary.
If you are only using ruby then use answer as per #Marek's answer :
string.split(' ').map(&:capitalize).join(' ')
and If you are using Ruby with Rails then use this:
"this is a sentence".titleize