i have an array as follows
'topic' =>
array (
'id' => 13,
'title' => 'Macros',
'content' => '<p>Macros. This is the updated content.</p>
',
'created_at' => '2014-02-28 18:36:55',
'updated_at' => '2014-05-14 16:42:14',
'category_id' => '5',
'tags' => 'tags',
'referUrl' => '',
'user_id' => 3,
'videoUrl' => '',
'useDefaultVideoOverlay' => 'true',
'positive' => 0,
'negative' => 1,
'context' => 'macros',
'viewcount' => 60,
'deleted_at' => NULL,
)
I would like to use this array and convert/cast it into the Topic Model . Is there a way this can be done.
thanks
Try creating a new object and passing the array into the constructor
$topic = new Topic($array['topic']);
For creating models from a single item array:
$Topic = new Topic();
$Topic->fill($array);
For creating a collection from an array of items:
$Topic::hydrate($result);
Here is a generic way to do it, not sure if there is a Laravel-specific method -- but this is pretty simple to implement.
You have your Topic class with its properties, and a constructor that will create a new Topic object and assign values to its properties based on an array of $data passed as a parameter.
class Topic
{
public $id;
public $title;
public function __construct(array $data = array())
{
foreach($data as $key => $value) {
$this->$key = $value;
}
}
}
Use it like this:
$Topic = new Topic(array(
'id' => 13,
'title' => 'Marcos',
));
Output:
object(Topic)#1 (2) {
["id"]=>
int(13)
["title"]=>
string(6) "Marcos"
}
It seems that you have data of an existing model there, so:
First, you can use that array to fill only fillable (or not guarded) properties on your model. Mind that if there is no fillable or guarded array on the Topic model you'll get MassAssignmentException.
Then manually assign the rest of the properties if needed.
Finally use newInstance with 2nd param set to true to let Eloquent know it's existing model, not instantiate a new object as it would, again, throw an exception upon saving (due to unique indexes constraints, primary key for a start).
.
$topic = with(new Topic)->newInstance($yourArray, true);
$topic->someProperty = $array['someProperty']; // do that for each attribute that is not fillable (or guarded)
...
$topic->save();
To sum up, it's cumbersome and probably you shouldn't be doing that at all, so the question is: Why you'd like to do that anyway?
Look at these two available methods in L5 newInstance and newFromBuilder
e.g with(new static)->newInstance( $attributes , true ) ;
I would likely create the new instance of the object and then build it that way, then you can actually split some useful reusable things or defaults into the model otherwise what's the point in pushing an array into a model and doing nothing with it - very little besides for normalization.
What I mean is:
$topic = new Topic();
$topic->id = 3489;
$topic->name = 'Test';
And the model would simply be a class with public $id;. You can also set defaults so if you had like resync_topic or whatever property, you can set it as 0 in the model rather than setting 0 in your array.
I came across this question looking for something else. Noticed it was a bit outdated and I have another way that I go about handling the OPs issue. This might be a known way of handling the creation of a model from an array with more recent versions of Laravel.
I add a generic constructor to my class/model
public function __construct(array $attributes = [])
{
parent::__construct($attributes);
}
Then when I want to create a new instance of the model from an array I make a call like this
$topic = new Topic($attrs);
// Then save it if applicable
$topic->save(); // or $topic->saveOrFail();
I hope someone finds this helpful.
Related
I'm having an odd error with saving an encrypted array in Laravel. The model never updates even when save() is called.
There are no console or SQL errors.
When the encryption is disabled, there are no errors and the model updates successfully.
In a Controller, I'm calling the model like so:
$userData = UserData::where('user_id', $user_id)->first();
I then pull the array:
$encryptedData = $userData->app_data;
And I want to add to this array e.g.
$encryptedData['new'] = 'axy';
$encryptedData['time'] = time();
I then update the model and save it:
$userData->app_data = $encryptedData;
$userData->save();
However, here is where the problem starts. The model does not update. It remains as if nothing happens. Hence if I refresh(), I get the same data as if I had never added the two new entries. When I log it, it looks like this:
Array
(
[token] => xyz
[access_token] => abc
)
After the addition of two new entries:
Array
(
[token] => xyz
[access_token] => abc
[new] => 'axy'
[time] => 1234
)
And after the save() and refresh():
Array
(
[token] => xyz
[access_token] => abc
)
The model looks like this:
namespace App;
use Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\Model;
use Illuminate\Support\Facades\Crypt;
use Illuminate\Contracts\Encryption\DecryptException;
class UserData extends Model
{
protected $fillable = [
'user_id', 'app_data'
];
protected $casts = [
'user_id' => 'int',
'app_data' => 'array'
];
public function getAppDataAttribute($value)
{
try {
return decrypt($value);
}
catch (DecryptException $e) {
return $value;
}
}
public function setAppDataAttribute($value)
{
$this->attributes['app_data'] = encrypt($value);
}
}
Why are my additions to the array not being saved?
Edit: The strangeness continues
If I call:
UserData::where('id', $userData->id)->update(['app_data' => $encryptedData]);
Then the model does update and does not encrypt, HOWEVER, when I refresh and log the new 'app_data' field, it is returned as a JSON string and not an array as before. I need to cast/decode it to an array each time I want to use it.
Couple of things to look for.
1) The Laravel encrypter uses the app key. Make sure you have one in your .env file. If not, run php artisan key:generate
2) I assume the array is correctly formatted like this:
Array
(
'token' => 'xyz', // You have a = here and no commas after any other value
'access_token' => 'abc'
)
3) Depending on what you are storing this as, you can test by serializing the array before encrypting it:
$arr = serialize($encryptedData); // After you have added new data to the array
$userData->app_data = $arr;
$userData->save();
This is automatic in Laravel, but may give you a help hunting the bug. Test with your mutator using encryptString() and manually unserialize / decryptString() to see if any odd behavior by stepping through the values as they are mutated.
I'm new to Yii and struggling to get my head around a few things.
I have model with this function:
public static function findNonGeo()
{
$query = new CallerIdentityQuery(get_called_class());
$query->select([
'cidref', 'caller_id', 'expiry', 'conf_call',
'type', 'redirect', 'destination', 'status', 'start_date',
'statusDesc' => new \yii\db\Expression("CASE status
WHEN 0 THEN 'Deactivated'
WHEN 1 THEN 'Active'
WHEN 2 THEN 'Inactive'
WHEN 3 THEN 'Unregistered'
ELSE 'Permanently Deleted' END")])
->where(['status' => '1'])
->andWhere(['type' => 'N'])
->andWhere(['custref' => Yii::$app->user->identity->typedIdentity->getId()]);
return $query;
}
And in my controller I call this method like so:
$model = CallerIdentity::findNonGeo()->where(['cidref' => $id])->one();
but when the data is returned its like its just ignoring the
->andWhere(['type' => 'N'])
because I can view records that aren't of type 'N'.
so I'm having to do in my controller, maybe I'm doing something wrong or just not understanding it but I don't get it:
$model = CallerIdentity::findNonGeo()->where(['cidref' => $id])->andWhere(['type'=>'N'])->one();
another thing when using findOne($id):
$model = CallerIdentity::findOne($id);
null is returned.
Would appreciate any form of explanation/info.
When using where you're setting the where part of the query, not adding to it. So in the findNonGeo function you're building the required where parts. But with CallerIdentity::findNonGeo()->where(['cidref' => $id]) you're removing the already added where parts.
Try like this:
CallerIdentity::findNonGeo()->andWhere(['cidref' => $id])->one();
by using andWhere you'll keep the other parts and just add another one to it.
Hi well the problem I am facing seemed to be very simple at first but turned into a real nightmare now.
I was asked to add an attribute (namely point) to all the products (which was done pretty simple using the admin panel) and have its total as a cart attribute which rules can be set upon!?
I am quite positive that cart attributes are defined in:
class Mage_SalesRule_Model_Rule_Condition_Address extends Mage_Rule_Model_Condition_Abstract
{
public function loadAttributeOptions()
{
$attributes = array(
'base_subtotal' => Mage::helper('salesrule')->__('Subtotal'),
'total_qty' => Mage::helper('salesrule')->__('Total Items Quantity'),
'weight' => Mage::helper('salesrule')->__('Total Weight'),
'payment_method' => Mage::helper('salesrule')->__('Payment Method'),
'shipping_method' => Mage::helper('salesrule')->__('Shipping Method'),
'postcode' => Mage::helper('salesrule')->__('Shipping Postcode'),
'region' => Mage::helper('salesrule')->__('Shipping Region'),
'region_id' => Mage::helper('salesrule')->__('Shipping State/Province'),
'country_id' => Mage::helper('salesrule')->__('Shipping Country'),
);
$this->setAttributeOption($attributes);
return $this;
}
<...>
So if I overwrite this model and add an item to that array I will get the attribute shown in rule definition admin panel. It seems that all these attributes has a matching column in sales_flat_quote_address table except for total_qty and payment_method!
Now the problem is what should I do to have my new attribute be calculated and evaluated in rules processing? should I add a column to this table and update its value upon cart changes?
Any insight on how to do this would be of great value thanks.
I finally managed to accomplish the task and just for future reference I explain the procedure here.
The class mentioned in the question (ie: Mage_SalesRule_Model_Rule_Condition_Address) is the key to the problem. I had to rewrite it and for some odd reason I couldn't get what I needed by extending it so my class extended its parent class (ie: Mage_Rule_Model_Condition_Abstract).
As I said I added my attribute to $attributes like this:
'net_score' => Mage::helper('mymodule')->__('Net Score')
I also modified getInputType() method and declared my attribute as numeric
now what does the trick is the validate() method:
public function validate(Varien_Object $object)
{
$address = $object;
if (!$address instanceof Mage_Sales_Model_Quote_Address) {
if ($object->getQuote()->isVirtual()) {
$address = $object->getQuote()->getBillingAddress();
}
else {
$address = $object->getQuote()->getShippingAddress();
}
}
if ('payment_method' == $this->getAttribute() && ! $address->hasPaymentMethod()) {
$address->setPaymentMethod($object->getQuote()->getPayment()->getMethod());
}
return parent::validate($address);
}
as you can see it prepares an instance of Mage_Sales_Model_Quote_Address and sends it to its parent validate method. you can see that this object ($address) does not have payment_method by default so this method creates one and assigns it to it. So I did the same, simply I added the following code before the return:
if ('net_score' == $this->getAttribute() && ! $address->hasNetScore()) {
$address->setNetScore( /*the logic for retrieving the value*/);
}
and now I can set rules upon this attribute.
Hope that these information saves somebody's time in the future.
I'm using Datamapper ORM for CodeIgniter I have rules 'serialized' and get_rules 'unserialized' for a field in my model. This field will store serialized data and when I retrieve back, get_rules will unserialize it.
However, after calling save(), I'm trying to re-access the field, but it still return serialized string, instead of array.
Is there any way to re-call or refresh my object so that the get_rules is called again and the field now return array?
Here's my model:
class User extends DataMapper{
public $validation = array(
'password' => array(
'label' => 'Password',
'rules' => array('encrypt')
),
'preferences' => array(
'rules' => array('serialize'),
'get_rules'=> array('unserialize')
)
);
function __construct($id = NULL)
{
parent::__construct($id);
}
function post_model_init($from_cache = FALSE)
{
}
public function _encrypt($field)
{
if (!empty($this->{$field}))
{
$this->{$field} = md5($this->{$field});
}
}
}
Datamapper ORM, afaik, will only use the get_rules when actually performing a get(). A few things you could try:
Given the following
$a = new Fruit();
$a->name = 'grapes';
$a->colors = serialize(array("purple","green"));
$a->save();
1. Create a new datamapper object and re-fetch:
$b = new Fruit();
$b->where('id', $a->id)->get();
$colors = $b->colors;
2. unserialize() the field yourself...
$colors = unserialize($a->colors);
3. You might even be able to use get_clone()
//not tested...
$b = $a->get_clone();
$colors = $b->colors;
This has been fixed here: https://bitbucket.org/wanwizard/datamapper/commits/db6ad5f2e10650b0c00c8ef9b7176d49a8e85163
Get the latest Datamapper library from bitbucket.
I'm using Symfony 2.1 forms with PropelBundle and I'm trying to refactor a form that had a drop-down list of objects (to select from) to instead use a jquery autocomplete field (working with AJAX). For the dropdown list I was using the following code (which worked perfectly for the drop-down) in my form type:
$builder->add('books', 'collection', array(
'type' => 'model',
'options' => array(
'class' => 'MyVendor\MyBundle\Model\Book',
'property' => 'title',
),
'allow_add' => true,
'allow_delete' => true,
'by_reference' => false,
'required' => false,
));
For the sake of giving a little context, let's say we are creating a new "Reader" object and that we would like to select the Reader's favorite books from a list of available "Book" objects. A collection type is used so that many "favorite books" can be selected in the new "Reader" form. Now, I would like to change the above to use autocomplete. For doing so, I tried to implement a Data Transformer to be able to get a Book object from a simple text field that could be used for the Autocomplete function to pass the Book ID as indicated in the answer to this Question. However, I was not able to figure out how to make the Data Transformer work with a collection type and Propel classes. I created a BookToIdTransformer class as indicated in the Symfony Cookbook and tried the following in the "ReaderType" file:
$transformer = new BookToIdTransformer();
$builder->add(
$builder->create('books', 'collection', array(
'type' => 'text',
'allow_add' => true,
'allow_delete' => true,
'by_reference' => false,
'required' => false,
))->addModelTransformer($transformer)
);
With the above, I get a "Call to undefined method: getId" exception (apparently the Transformer expects a PropelCollection of Books, not a single Book object..). Does anyone know how to go about it? or let me know if there are other ways to implement the autocomplete in Symfony using Propel and allowing for selecting multiple objects (e.g. a collection of books)?
The solution I ultimately went for is slightly different from my previous answer. I ended up using a "text" field type instead of a "collection" field type in my "ReaderType" form, since I ended up using the Loopj Tokeninput jQuery plugin which allows for selecting multiple objects (e.g. "Favorite Book") to associate to my main object (e.g. "Reader" object) in the form. Considering that, I created a "Data Transformer" for transforming the objects' ids passed (in a comma separated list in the text field) into a Propel Object Collection. The code is shared as follows, including a sample ajax object controller.
The key part of the "ReaderType" form looks as follows:
$transformer = new BooksToIdsTransformer();
$builder->add(
$builder->create('books', 'text', array(
'required' => false,
))->addModelTransformer($transformer)
);
The "Data Transformer" file looks like this:
// src/MyVendor/MyBundle/Form/DataTransformer/BooksToIdsTransformer.php
namespace MyVendor\MyBundle\Form\DataTransformer;
use \PropelObjectCollection;
use Symfony\Component\Form\DataTransformerInterface;
use Symfony\Component\Form\Exception\UnexpectedTypeException;
use MyVendor\MyBundle\Model\BookQuery;
class BooksToIdsTransformer implements DataTransformerInterface
{
public function transform($books)
{
if (null === $books) {
return "";
}
if (!$books instanceof PropelObjectCollection) {
throw new UnexpectedTypeException($books, '\PropelObjectCollection');
}
$idsArray = array();
foreach ($books as $book) {
$idsArray[] = $book->getId();
}
$ids = implode(",", $idsArray);
return $ids;
}
public function reverseTransform($ids)
{
$books = new PropelObjectCollection();
if ('' === $ids || null === $ids) {
return $books;
}
if (!is_string($ids)) {
throw new UnexpectedTypeException($ids, 'string');
}
$idsArray = explode(",", $ids);
$idsArray = array_filter ($idsArray, 'is_numeric');
foreach ($idsArray as $id) {
$books->append(BookQuery::create()->findOneById($id));
}
return $books;
}
}
The ajax controller that returns a json collection of "books" to the Tokeninput autocomplete function is as follows:
namespace MyVendor\MyBundle\Controller;
use Symfony\Bundle\FrameworkBundle\Controller\Controller;
use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Request;
use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Response;
use MyVendor\MyBundle\Model\BookQuery;
class ClassAjaxController extends Controller
{
public function bookAction(Request $request)
{
$value = $request->get('q');
$books = BookQuery::create()->findByName('%'.$value.'%');
$json = array();
foreach ($books as $book) {
$json[] = array(
'id' => $book->getId(),
'name' => $book->getName()
);
}
$response = new Response();
$response->setContent(json_encode($json));
return $response;
}
}
And finally, the router in the "routing.yml" file:
ajax_book:
pattern: /ajax_book
defaults: { _controller: MySiteBundle:ClassAjax:book }