I have a class A, which I would like to anonymously extend and add a class method to the child class. E.g.:
class A
end
Class.new A do
def self.new_class_method
puts 'I am a class method'
end
end.new_class_method
=> I am a class method
The above example works well, unless you want to access some variables outside of the def self.new_class_method block. E,g,
greeting = 'hello'
Class.new A do
def self.new_class_method
puts greeting + ' I am a class method'
end
end.new_class_method
=> NameError: undefined local variable or method `greeting'
I am using Ruby 1.8.7, which is sad because I believe Ruby 1.9+ contains an analog to define_method which adds a class method. Does anyone have a work around for 1.8.7?
I have tested the below in Ruby 1.8.7 :-
greeting = 'hello'
class A
end
Class.new A do
meta_klass = class << self; self ;end
meta_klass.send(:define_method, :new_class_method) do
puts greeting + ' I am a class method'
end
end.new_class_method
# >> hello I am a class method
As Ruby 1.8.7 doesn't support Object#singleton_class, I used meta_klass = class << self; self ;end. This method is available since 1.9.2, I think.
You can also use extend() to pry open an object's singleton class. Calling extend(module) adds the methods in the module to the calling object's(i.e. the receiver's) singleton class. So if you call extend(module) when self=A, i.e. inside class A, then the module's methods will be inserted into A's singleton class, and the methods in A's singleton class are also known as class methods of A:
class A
end
greeting = "hello"
Class.new(A) do
extend(
Module.new do
define_method(:greet) do
puts greeting
end
end
)
end.greet
--output:--
hello
And you can rewrite that like this (although then it's not as tricky):
class A
end
greeting = "hello"
Class.new(A) do
m = Module.new do
define_method(:greet) do
puts greeting
end
end
extend(m)
end.greet
...which isn't much different than:
class A
end
greeting = "hello"
m = Module.new do
define_method(:greet) do
puts greeting
end
end
Class.new(A) do
extend(m)
end.greet
...which moves the closure out of the class, and doesn't seem very tricky at all because it only opens up two scope gates instead of three.
Also note, extend() is a public method, so it doesn't require the trickery of a private method, i.e. where you can't specify an explicit receiver, so you have to create a context in which self is the object you want to call the private method on. In other words, you can specify an explicit receiver for extend(). How about the class that is returned by Class.new(A)?
class A
end
greeting = "hello"
Class.new(A).extend(
Module.new do
define_method(:greet) do
puts greeting
end
end
).greet
--output:--
hello
Hey, tacking on ".greet" there works! Uh oh, that has the makings of a one liner:
class A
end
greeting = "hello"
Class.new(A).extend(Module.new {define_method(:greet) {puts greeting} }).greet
--output:--
hello
Yeech!
More generally,
class A
end
class Object
def meta_def name, &blk
(class << self; self; end).instance_eval { define_method name, &blk }
end
end
greeting = 'hello'
Class.new A do
meta_def :new_class_method do
puts greeting + ' I am a class method'
end
end.new_class_method
#=> hello I am a class method
If you find this useful, don't thank me, thank some lucky stiff (which I saw mentioned by Jay Fields).
Not sure if this will solve your problem, but changing Greeting to uppercase (making it a constant) would work...
class A
end
Greeting = 'hello'
Class.new A do
def self.new_class_method
puts Greeting + ' I am a class method'
end
end.new_class_method
Related
Can somebody help me distinguish When we create methods inside class << self block and when we define normal methods.
I saw somewhere code like this, but I don't know concisely the use cases of them
class Foo
def initialize
end
def bar
end
class << self
def foobar
end
end
end
The methods defined right inside a class block are instance methods:
class Foo
def bar
end
end
Methods defined within class << self inside a class block are class methods:
class Foo
class << self
def baz
end
end
end
Instance methods become available to any instance of a given class:
foo = Foo.new
foo.bar
Whereas class methods can be called directly on the class:
Foo.baz
Attempting to call instance methods on the class or vice versa results in an error:
Foo.bar #=> NoMethodError: undefined method `bar' for Foo:Class
foo.baz #=> NoMethodError: undefined method `baz' for #<Foo:0x00007ffe20055a20>
Another way to define class methods is by prefixing the method name with self.:
class Foo
def self.baz
end
end
You could also define them outside the class block, although this is rarely seen:
def Foo.baz
end
Or likewise:
class << Foo
def baz
end
end
Note that defining methods this way is not limited to classes. You can add methods to arbitrary objects, e.g.:
o = Object.new
def o.hello
"hello from o"
end
o.hello
#=> "hello from o"
Or via:
class << o
def hello
"hello from o"
end
end
Internally, these methods are added to the object's singleton class. It's a special purpose class to hold methods for just that instance:
o.singleton_class.instance_methods(false)
#=> [:hello]
For the Foo class above:
Foo.instance_methods(false) #=> [:bar]
Foo.singleton_class.instance_methods(false) #=> [:baz]
So technically, a class method is just an instance method defined on the class' singleton class.
You may need to read up on Ruby's instance and class methods.
But personally, I'd do
class Foo
class << self
def foobar
end
end
end
instead of
class Foo
def self.foobar
end
end
whenever I want to add some class level attributes, or make a method private etc as
class Foo
private
def self.foobar
end
end
wouldn't work the same as
class Foo
class << self
private
def foobar
end
end
end
Hi I am trying to create a helper for mass defining ruby methods as private class methods. In general one can define a method as a private class method by using private_class_method key work. But I would like to create a helper in the following style:
class Person
define_private_class_methods do
def method_one
end
def method_two
end
end
end
The way I planned to dynamically define this is in the following way, which is not at all working:
class Object
def self.define_private_class_methods &block
instance_eval do
private
&block
end
end
end
any ideas where I might be going wrong?
$ cat /tmp/a.rb
class Object
def self.define_private_class_methods &cb
existing = methods(false)
instance_eval &cb
(methods(false) - existing).each { |m| singleton_class.send :private, m }
end
end
class Person
define_private_class_methods do
def method_one
puts "¡Yay!"
end
end
end
Person.send(:method_one)
Person.public_send(:method_one)
$ ruby /tmp/a.rb
¡Yay!
/tmp/a.rb:18:in `public_send': private method `method_one'
called for Person:Class (NoMethodError)
Did you mean? method
from /tmp/a.rb:18:in `<main>'
Please note, that it’s hard to understand, what you are trying to achieve and possibly there is better, cleaner and more robust way to achieve this functionality.
Similar, yet different (and semantically more correct IMHO) to #mudasobwa's answer:
class Class
def define_private_class_methods(&definition)
class_methods_prior = methods
singleton_class.class_eval(&definition)
(methods - class_methods_prior).each do |method_name|
private_class_method method_name
end
end
end
class Person
define_private_class_methods do
def method_one
1
end
end
end
Person.method_one # !> NoMethodError: private method `method_one' called for Person:Class
Person.send :method_one # => 1
Note: It will not change the accessibility of a class method that you are currently overwriting.
You could define the methods in an anonymous module by passing the block to Module.new, make each instance method in the module private and extend your class with the module:
class Class
def define_private_class_methods(&block)
mod = Module.new(&block)
mod.instance_methods.each { |m| mod.send(:private, m) }
extend(mod)
end
end
This has the desired result:
class Person
define_private_class_methods do
def method_one
123
end
end
end
Person.send(:method_one)
#=> 123
Person.method_one
#=> private method `method_one' called for Person:Class (NoMethodError)
... and as a bonus, it also gives you a super method: (probably of little use)
class Person
def self.method_one
super * 2
end
end
Person.method_one
#=> 456
Of course, you don't have to use extend, you could just as well define the methods manually:
class Class
def define_private_class_methods(&block)
mod = Module.new(&block)
mod.instance_methods.each do |m|
define_singleton_method(m, mod.instance_method(m))
private_class_method(m)
end
end
end
The essential component is the anonymous module, so you have a (temporary) container to define the methods in.
I'd like to understand this code. Why is it returning Hello instead of Howdy! ?
class Speaker
#message = "Hello!"
class << self
#message = "Howdy!"
def speak
#message
end
end
end
puts Speaker.speak
First off, your message #message is not an instance variable, or rather not the type of instance variable you may be thinking about: it's a class-level instance var, so an instance variable of Speaker itself, which as an object is an instance of class Class.
Here's a version of the code that does what you're trying to do with a local variable and a closure:
class Speaker
#message = "Hello!"
class << self
message = "Howdy!"
define_method(:speak) { message }
end
end
Speaker.speak
#=> "Howdy!"
And here's some code that illustrates the difference between the class-level instance variable and a "normal" instance variable:
class Speaker
#message = 'Howdy!' # class-level instance variable
def initialize
#message = 'Hello!' # instance variable of Speaker's instances
end
def speak
#message
end
class << self
def speak
#message
end
end
end
Speaker.speak
#=> "Howdy!"
Speaker.new.speak
#=> "Hello!"
Here is your code, except I've defined the class method in the usual way (def self.speak...). As a class method is nothing more than an instance method defined on the class' singleton class, this change is merely a different way of creating the same class method. (If you doubt that, run the code below both ways.) I made that change because I thought it would make my explanation of what is happening clearer. I also added a puts statement.
class Speaker
#message = "Hello!"
def self.speak
puts "self=#{self}"
#message
end
class << self
#message = "Howdy!"
end
end
The first line of the class definition creates a class instance variable #message:
Speaker.instance_variables
#=> [:#message]
Speaker.instance_variable_get(:#message)
#=> "Hello!"
By constrast,
#message = "Howdy!"
creates an instance variable on Speaker's singleton class:
Speaker.singleton_class.instance_variables
#=> [:#message]
Speaker.singleton_class.instance_variable_get(:#message)
#=> "Howdy!"
Now invoke speak on Speaker:
Speaker.speak
# self=Speaker
#=> "Hello!"
As self #=> Speaker, speak is obviously returning the value of the class instance variable.
For speak to return the value of the instance variable defined on Speaker's singleton class we can write the following:
class Speaker
#message = "Hello!"
def self.speak
puts "self=#{self}"
puts "singleton_class = #{singleton_class}"
singleton_class.instance_variable_get :#message
end
class << self
#message = "Howdy!"
end
end
puts Speaker.speak
# self=Speaker
# singleton_class = #<Class:Speaker>
# Howdy!
In the last expression, because self equals Speaker and self is the implied receiver when there is no explicit receiver, "singleton_class is equivalent to Speaker.singleton_class.
The reason this code returns 'Hello' is that it is attempting to change an instance variable in a class << self block.
Class methods are for anything that does not deal with an individual instance of that class - instance variables are tied to individual instances of a class, and we can't change instance variables at a class level.
Instead of using an instance variable in the speak method, we should use a class variable (denoted by ##).
As an example, the following code will return 'Howdy!' -
class Speaker
##message = "Hello!"
class << self
##message = "Howdy!"
def speak
##message
end
end
end
puts Speaker.speak
I found this neat delegator based 'tee' implementation on SO:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/6410202/2379703
And I'm curious what is means for #targets (instance variable) means in the context of a class method:
require 'logger'
class MultiDelegator
def initialize(*targets)
#targets = targets
end
def self.delegate(*methods)
methods.each do |m|
define_method(m) do |*args|
#targets.map { |t| t.send(m, *args) }
end
end
self
end
class <<self
alias to new
end
end
log_file = File.open("debug.log", "a")
log = Logger.new MultiDelegator.delegate(:write, :close).to(STDOUT, log_file)
I get that it defining the methods write/close but #targets isn't even defined at this point since .to (aliased to new) has yet to be called so I'd assume #targets is nil.
Can anyone give an explanation as to the logistics of how this code works? Does ruby not even attempt to access/resolve #targets until the method in question is attempted to be called, which would be by the logger after it was instantiated?
The define_method method is called on a class to create an instance method. Inside that method, the self (and the instance variable) are instances of the class.
For example:
class Foo
#bar = "CLASS"
def initialize
#bar = "INSTANCE"
end
def self.make_method
define_method :whee do
p #bar
end
end
end
begin
Foo.new.whee
rescue NoMethodError=>e
puts e
end
#=> undefined method `whee' for #<Foo:0x007fc0719794b8 #bar="INSTANCE">
Foo.make_method
Foo.new.whee
#=> "INSTANCE"
It is correct that you can ask about instance variables that have never been created, at any time:
class Bar
def who_dat
puts "#dat is #{#dat.inspect}"
end
end
Bar.new.who_dat
#=> dat is nil
The same is true of other aspects of the language. As long as the code in the method is syntactically valid, it may be defined, even if invoking it causes a runtime error:
class Jim
def say_stuff
stuff!
end
end
puts "Good so far!"
#=> Good so far!
j = Jim.new
begin
j.say_stuff
rescue Exception=>e
puts e
end
#=> undefined method `stuff!' for #<Jim:0x007f9c498852d8>
# Let's add the method now, by re-opening the class
class Jim # this is not a new class
def stuff!
puts "Hello, World!"
end
end
j.say_stuff
#=> "Hello, World!"
In the above I define a say_stuff method that is syntactically valid, but that calls a method that does not exist. This is find. The method is created, but not invoked.
Then I try to invoke the method, and it causes an error (which we catch and handle cleanly).
Then I add the stuff! method to the class. Now I can run the say_stuff method (on the same instance as before!) and it works just fine.
This last example shows how defining a method does not run it, or require that it would even work when it is run. It is dynamically evaluated each time it is invoked (and only at that time).
I am looking for way to create the according attr_reader methods while setting the values for the according instance variables in the initialize method? For example, the following code:
class SomeClass
attr_reader :hello
def initialize( arg)
#hello = arg
end
end
I am looking for way to write as follows:
class SomeClass
def initialize( arg)
some_method_as_described_in_question( #hello, arg)
end
end
Does a method doing what I have described exist in the Ruby built-in Classes and Modules?
You can open the eigenclass from within the method and set the attribute there:
class SomeClass
def initialize(arg)
(class << self; self; end).send(:attr_reader, :hello)
#hello = arg
end
end
That way each instance's eigenclass will have that attribute reader. But really it only makes sense to do things that way if the attribute name is dynamic, and can vary from instance to instance. If it's always hello, I don't see any drawback to just defining it in the class like your original code block.
For example, if you are dynamically passing in the attribute name, you could do it like this:
class SomeClass
def initialize(attr, arg)
(class << self; self; end).send(:attr_reader, attr.to_sym)
instance_variable_set("##{attr}", arg)
end
end
This is compatible with Ruby 1.8. Taking a tip from #HenrikN in the comment to your question, you can use define_singleton_method in Ruby 1.9:
class SomeClass
def initialize(attr, arg)
define_singleton_method(attr) { instance_variable_get("##{attr}") }
instance_variable_set("##{attr}", arg)
end
end
Not sure if I understand the question, but you can use Struct to get an initializer and accessor methods:
class SomeClass < Struct.new(:hello)
end
x = SomeClass.new("yo")
puts x.hello # "yo"
x.hello = "what up"
puts x.hello # "what up"
require 'ostruct'
p = OpenStruct.new
p.hello = 'world'
p.could_be_anything = 'nothing'
puts p.hello #=> 'world'
puts p.could_be_anything #=> 'nothing'