Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
What is a more elegant way of writing a simple word count function in Swift?
//Returns a dictionary of words and frequency they occur in the string
func wordCount(s: String) -> Dictionary<String, Int> {
var words = s.componentsSeparatedByString(" ")
var wordDictionary = Dictionary<String, Int>()
for word in words {
if wordDictionary[word] == nil {
wordDictionary[word] = 1
} else {
wordDictionary.updateValue(wordDictionary[word]! + 1, forKey: word)
}
}
return wordDictionary
}
wordCount("foo foo foo bar")
// Returns => ["foo": 3, "bar": 1]
Your method was pretty solid, but this makes a couple improvements. I store the value count using Swifts "if let" keyword to check for an optional value. Then I can use count when updating the dictionary. I used the shorthand notation for updateValue (dict[key] = val). I also split the original string on all whitespace instead of just a single space.
func wordCount(s: String) -> Dictionary<String, Int> {
var words = s.componentsSeparatedByCharactersInSet(NSCharacterSet.whitespaceCharacterSet())
var wordDictionary = Dictionary<String, Int>()
for word in words {
if let count = wordDictionary[word] {
wordDictionary[word] = count + 1
} else {
wordDictionary[word] = 1
}
}
return wordDictionary
}
I don't think this is more elegant because the readability is terrible and it requires and extension on Dictionary but it was really fun to write and shows you the potential power of swift:
extension Dictionary {
func merge(with other: [KeyType:ValueType], by merge: (ValueType, ValueType) -> ValueType) -> [KeyType:ValueType] {
var returnDict = self
for (key, value) in other {
var newValue = returnDict[key] ? merge(returnDict[key]!, value) : value
returnDict.updateValue(newValue, forKey: key)
}
return returnDict
}
}
func wordCount(s: String) -> [String:Int] {
return s.componentsSeparatedByString(" ").map {
[$0: 1]
}.reduce([:]) {
$0.merge(with: $1, +)
}
}
wordCount("foo foo foo bar")
I do think that merge extension would be useful in other circumstances though
Couldn't find any traces of a Counter type class in the Collections library.
You can improve the code slightly by using optional chaining.
func wordCount(s: String) -> Dictionary<String, Int> {
var words = s.componentsSeparatedByString(" ")
var wordDictionary = Dictionary<String, Int>()
for word in words {
if wordDictionary[word]? {
wordDictionary[word] = wordDictionary[word]! + 1
} else {
wordDictionary[word] = 1
}
}
return wordDictionary
}
wordCount("foo foo foo bar")
maybe not elegant but was fun to implement
let inString = "foo foo foo bar"
func wordCount(ss: String) -> Dictionary<String, Int> {
var dict = Dictionary<String, Int>()
var tempString = "";var s = ss + " "
for each in s{
if each == " "{ if dict[tempString] {
var tempNumber = Int(dict[tempString]!)
dict[tempString] = Int(tempNumber+1)
tempString = ""
} else {dict[tempString] = 1;tempString = ""}
} else {
tempString += each}}
return dict
}
println(wordCount(inString))
Related
I am trying to implement my own web browser history for WKWebView on iOS, but I can't implement this functionality completely, and each time I obtain trouble.
I can create a history where the user did be and then moving forward and backward inside history.
But I have next trouble, and I think it an only one of many problems on my way.
When I have a history with for example 10 elements, and then I am moving back to element number 5 and then go don't forward but try to open the new link I can't remove element 6-10 and put the new link.
I think my problem that I can't fully understand how history work inside all browsers under the hood, this is not a hard task but I am confused inside this algorithm.
My main data structure for holding history
Help me understand how to work this algorithm inside browsers or maybe exist a good theory about it?
I have solved this problem and realize the full algorithm well, the completed project available here: https://github.com/IhorYachmenov/Custom-browser-history-for-WKWebView.
Algorithm:
struct PlayerHistory {
static var shared = PlayerHistory()
var historyExist: Bool = false
var historyCurrentPosition: Int = 0
var historyLastPositionBeforeUpdatingHistory: Int!
var userHistoryKey: String!
var backPressed: Bool!
var forwardPressed: Bool!
var urlOfPlayer: String!
// Function only for first loading inside <viewDidLoad or another method from app LifeCycle>.
mutating func getUrlForFirstLoading(initURL: String, key: String) -> String {
urlOfPlayer = initURL
guard HistoryStorage.shared.getHistoryFromUserDefaults() != nil else {
updateFirstElement(key: key, url: initURL)
return initURL
}
guard HistoryStorage.shared.getHistoryFromUserDefaults()![key] != nil else {
return initURL
}
let position = HistoryStorage.shared.getHistoryFromUserDefaults()![key]!.count - 1
historyExist = true
historyCurrentPosition = position
userHistoryKey = key
let initUrlFromHistoryStorage = HistoryStorage.shared.getHistoryFromUserDefaults()![key]!.last!.url
return initUrlFromHistoryStorage
}
// Create new or update exist history, use this method indsede <decidePolicyForNavigation>.
mutating func updatePlayerHistory(backlisk: [String], key: String) {
var history = [WebViewHistory]()
for i in backlisk {
history.append(WebViewHistory(i))
}
if (historyExist == true) {
// If old history exist need compound both and then to save.
let oldHistory = HistoryStorage.shared.getHistoryFromUserDefaults()![key]
let oldAndNewHostoryTogether = oldHistory! + history
var keyValuePair = Dictionary<String, [WebViewHistory]>()
keyValuePair.updateValue(oldAndNewHostoryTogether, forKey: key)
HistoryStorage.shared.removeHistory()
HistoryStorage.shared.saveHistory(keyValuePair)
setCurrentPosition(url: backlisk.last!, key: key)
} else {
var keyValuePair = Dictionary<String, [WebViewHistory]>()
keyValuePair.updateValue(history, forKey: key)
historyExist = true
HistoryStorage.shared.removeHistory()
HistoryStorage.shared.saveHistory(keyValuePair)
setCurrentPosition(url: backlisk.last!, key: key)
}
}
// Before using this method check if result don't equals nil. Use this method for navigation beetween history
func moveThroughHistory(key: String, direction: Bool) -> String? {
guard historyExist != false else {
return nil
}
let history = HistoryStorage.shared.getHistoryFromUserDefaults()![key]!
if (direction == true) {
let index = historyCurrentPosition + 1
guard index != history.count else { return nil }
return history[index].url
} else {
let index = historyCurrentPosition - 1
guard index > 0 else { return history[0].url }
return history[index].url
}
}
// Method <setCurrentPosition> each time set position at history
mutating func setCurrentPosition(url: String, key: String) {
guard HistoryStorage.shared.getHistoryFromUserDefaults() != nil else { return }
guard HistoryStorage.shared.getHistoryFromUserDefaults()![key] != nil else { return }
let history = HistoryStorage.shared.getHistoryFromUserDefaults()![key]
let index = history?.firstIndex(of: WebViewHistory(url))
guard index != nil else {
historyCurrentPosition = 0
return
}
historyCurrentPosition = index!
}
// <removeUnusedPeaceOfHistory> need use when user want open new page staying inside the middle of history
mutating func removeUnusedPeaceOfHistory(key: String) {
guard HistoryStorage.shared.getHistoryFromUserDefaults() != nil else {
return
}
guard HistoryStorage.shared.getHistoryFromUserDefaults()![key] != nil else {
return
}
var history = HistoryStorage.shared.getHistoryFromUserDefaults()![key]!
let startIndex = historyCurrentPosition + 1
let endIndex = history.endIndex - 1
let countOfAllElements = history.count
guard startIndex != countOfAllElements else { return }
let range = startIndex...endIndex
history.removeSubrange(range)
var keyValuePair = Dictionary<String, [WebViewHistory]>()
keyValuePair.updateValue(history, forKey: key)
HistoryStorage.shared.removeHistory()
HistoryStorage.shared.saveHistory(keyValuePair)
}
// Use <updateFirstElement> inside <getUrlForFirstLoading> if history doesn't exist
private mutating func updateFirstElement(key: String, url: String) {
var history = [WebViewHistory]()
history.insert(WebViewHistory(url), at: 0)
var keyValuePair = Dictionary<String, [WebViewHistory]>()
keyValuePair.updateValue(history, forKey: key)
HistoryStorage.shared.saveHistory(keyValuePair)
historyExist = true
historyCurrentPosition = 0
}
// Use <webViewWillBeClosedSaveHistory> when WKWebView should be closed, if the user moves through history new position will be saved.
mutating func webViewWillBeClosedSaveHistory(key: String) {
let history = HistoryStorage.shared.getHistoryFromUserDefaults()![key]!
let currentPosition = historyCurrentPosition + 1
guard currentPosition != history.count else { return }
removeUnusedPeaceOfHistory(key: key)
}
}
I have two ArrayLists of different Data classes as given below:
class Record{
var id: Long = 0
var RecordId: Int = 0
var Record: String? = null
var title: String? = null
var description: String? = null
var longDate: Long = 0
}
class Type{
var id: Long = 0
var typeId: Int = 0
var subTypeId: Int = 0
var typeString: String? = null
var longDate: Long = 0
}
var recordsList: ArrayList<Record>
var typesList: ArrayList<Type>
Now, I want a merged list of these two which will be sorted based on a common field in both the Objects i.e. longDate. I have tried .associate , sortedBy, sortedWith(compareBy<>) etc. but could not achieve the desired result.
Here, also there is one point to note is that while comparing the two lists it is possible that one on them may be empty.
This will produce a List<Any> with all items sorted by longDate:
(recordsList + typesList)
.sortedBy {
when (it) {
is Record -> it.longDate
is Type -> it.longDate
else -> error("")
}
}
Or you might consider creating an interface that has val longDate: Long that both of these classes implement. Then you wouldn't need the when expression, and your List would be of the type of the interface.
Something like this should work, but I personally think that it is quite the code smell. There is no guarantee that Record.longDate is truly the same type as Type.longDate (we know that it is, since we create the model, but the compiler would never know).
val result = (recordsList + typesList).sortedBy {
when(it){
is Record -> it.longDate
is Type -> it.longDate
else -> error("incompatible list element $it")
}
}
And it would work something like this: (I've removed some parameters from the models as they don't really count here)
fun main() {
val recordsList = listOf(Record().apply { longDate = 5 }, Record().apply { longDate = 3})
val typesList = listOf(Type().apply { longDate = 3 }, Type().apply { longDate = 2 })
val result = (recordsList + typesList).sortedBy {
when(it){
is Record -> it.longDate
is Type -> it.longDate
else -> error("incompatible list element $it")
}
}
result.forEach{
println(it.toString())
}
}
class Record{
var longDate: Long = 0
override fun toString(): String {
return "Record(longDate=$longDate)"
}
}
class Type{
var longDate: Long = 0
override fun toString(): String {
return "Type(longDate=$longDate)"
}
}
This will output:
Type(longDate=2)
Record(longDate=3)
Type(longDate=3)
Record(longDate=5)
Doing it in a more generic way, so that you can create a fun where you state which property to be used from each object type would most likely use reflection, which I'd avoid at all costs.
So I would definitely consider if one object can inherit the other, or create an interface, or anything else.
I'll end with 2 questions: why no constructors? why ArrayList and not list?
I am doing this for a class, so I am not looking for someone to code this for me, just for a little guidance. Using Swift3 in Xcode 8. I fixed the previous errors and I think I'm making progress but...
class Cat {
var catName, catBreed, catColor: String
var catAge, catWeight: Int
init(name:String, age:Int, weight:Int, breed:String, color:String)
{
catName = name
catAge = age
catWeight = weight
catBreed = breed
catColor = color
}
func calculateAge (catAge: Int) -> Int
{
var humanYears = 0
if catAge == 1 {
humanYears = 15
} else if catAge == 2 {
humanYears = 24
} else if catAge > 2 {
humanYears = (24 + (catAge * 4))
}
print ("Your cat is \(humanYears) human years old!")
return humanYears
}
func createCats(name: String, age: Int, weight: Int, breed: String, color: String) -> String
{
let humanYears = calculateAge(catAge: age)
let catInfo : String = "\(name) is a \(color) \(breed) who weights \(weight) named \(name), and he is \(humanYears) human years old."
print (catInfo)
return catInfo
}
}
Cat.createCats()
I get an error at Cat.createCats() stating use of instance member 'createCats' on type 'Cat'; did you mean to use a value of type 'Cat' instead?
I have tried putting Cat in the (), I have tried naming all of my variables in there...
As I see in your code , you are re-declaring the variable "humanYears".
One is immediate after Class and second is in the function "calculateAge" . Edit your function "calculate" as below :
func calculateAge (catAge: Int) -> Int {
if catAge == 1 {
humanYears = 15
} else if catAge == 2 {
humanYears = 24
} else if catAge > 2 {
humanYears = (24 + (catAge * 4))
}
return humanYears
}
I figured out what I was doing wrong, thanks to you guys and another post on Stack Overflow that I searched up. Just in case it helps anyone here, I will post my final code below. My biggest issue was that I was trying to call the function before I created an instance of the class. This is not the finished version of the solution, but I was excited that I got it working so I wanted to post it.
Thanks again for all of your help,
class Cat
{
func calculateAge (catAge: Int) -> String
{
var humanYears = 0
if catAge == 1 {
humanYears = 15
} else if catAge == 2 {
humanYears = 24
} else if catAge > 2 {
humanYears = (24 + (catAge * 4))
}
return "Your cat is \(humanYears) human years old!"
}
func createCats(name: String = "Fluffy", age: Int = 1, weight: Int = 3, breed: String = "tabby", color: String = "brown") -> String
{
var catInfo : String
let humanYears = calculateAge(catAge: age)
catInfo = "\(name) is a \(color) \(breed) who weights \(weight) pounds named \(name), and he is \(humanYears) human years old."
print (catInfo)
return catInfo
}
}
let firstCat = Cat()
firstCat.createCats()
let secondCat = Cat()
secondCat.createCats(name: "bob")
In my Android app, I am trying to sort Bus route tags in order 1, 2, 3..etc.
For that I am using this
Collections.sort(directions, Comparator { lhs, rhs ->
var obj1 = lhs.short_names.firstOrNull() ?: ""
var obj2 = rhs.short_names.firstOrNull() ?: ""
if (obj1 === obj2) {
obj1 = lhs.headsigns.firstOrNull() ?: ""
obj2 = rhs.headsigns.firstOrNull() ?: ""
if (obj1 === obj2) {
return#Comparator 0
}
obj1.compareTo(obj2)
} else {
obj1.compareTo(obj2)
}
The issue I am having is this sorts them, but will run into the issue of
1, 2, 3, 30, 31, 4, 5
How should I change this to get the correct ordering.
If you need just a simple number comparison you can do it like that.
directions.sortWith(Comparator { lhs, rhs ->
val i1 = lhs.toInt()
val i2 = rhs.toInt()
when {
i1 < i2 -> -1
i1 > i2 -> 1
else -> 0
}
})
As hotkey pointed out the code above can be replaced with almost identical implementation that looks much simplier.
directions.sortBy { it.toInt() }
The general version of this algorithm is called alphanum sorting and described in details here. I made a Kotlin port of this algorithm, which you can use. It's more complicated than what you need, but it will solve your problem.
class AlphanumComparator : Comparator<String> {
override fun compare(s1: String, s2: String): Int {
var thisMarker = 0
var thatMarker = 0
val s1Length = s1.length
val s2Length = s2.length
while (thisMarker < s1Length && thatMarker < s2Length) {
val thisChunk = getChunk(s1, s1Length, thisMarker)
thisMarker += thisChunk.length
val thatChunk = getChunk(s2, s2Length, thatMarker)
thatMarker += thatChunk.length
// If both chunks contain numeric characters, sort them numerically.
var result: Int
if (isDigit(thisChunk[0]) && isDigit(thatChunk[0])) {
// Simple chunk comparison by length.
val thisChunkLength = thisChunk.length
result = thisChunkLength - thatChunk.length
// If equal, the first different number counts.
if (result == 0) {
for (i in 0..thisChunkLength - 1) {
result = thisChunk[i] - thatChunk[i]
if (result != 0) {
return result
}
}
}
} else {
result = thisChunk.compareTo(thatChunk)
}
if (result != 0) {
return result
}
}
return s1Length - s2Length
}
private fun getChunk(string: String, length: Int, marker: Int): String {
var current = marker
val chunk = StringBuilder()
var c = string[current]
chunk.append(c)
current++
if (isDigit(c)) {
while (current < length) {
c = string[current]
if (!isDigit(c)) {
break
}
chunk.append(c)
current++
}
} else {
while (current < length) {
c = string[current]
if (isDigit(c)) {
break
}
chunk.append(c)
current++
}
}
return chunk.toString()
}
private fun isDigit(ch: Char): Boolean {
return '0' <= ch && ch <= '9'
}
}
To use this Comparator just call
directions.sortWith(AlphanumComparator())
If you don't need it to be coded in Kotlin you can just take an original Java version on Dave Koelle's page. And the Kotlin version of the algorithm can be also found on GitHub.
Until Swift 2 I used this extension to remove multiple whitespaces:
func condenseWhitespace() -> String {
let components = self.componentsSeparatedByCharactersInSet(NSCharacterSet.whitespaceAndNewlineCharacterSet()).filter({!Swift.isEmpty($0)})
return " ".join(components)
}
but with Swift 2 now I get the error
Cannot invoke 'isEmpty' with an argument list of type '(String)'
How could I now remove multiple spaces with Swift 2?
Thnx!
In Swift 2, join has become joinWithSeparator and you call it on the array.
In filter, isEmpty should be called on the current iteration item $0.
To replace whitespaces and newline characters with unique space characters as in your question:
extension String {
func condenseWhitespace() -> String {
let components = self.componentsSeparatedByCharactersInSet(NSCharacterSet.whitespaceAndNewlineCharacterSet())
return components.filter { !$0.isEmpty }.joinWithSeparator(" ")
}
}
let result = "Hello World.\nHello!".condenseWhitespace() // "Hello World. Hello!"
Because your function does not take any parameter you could make it a property instead:
extension String {
var condensedWhitespace: String {
let components = self.componentsSeparatedByCharactersInSet(NSCharacterSet.whitespaceAndNewlineCharacterSet())
return components.filter { !$0.isEmpty }.joinWithSeparator(" ")
}
}
let result = "Hello World.\nHello!".condensedWhitespace // "Hello World. Hello!"
In Swift 3 there's even more changes.
Function:
extension String {
func condenseWhitespace() -> String {
let components = self.components(separatedBy: NSCharacterSet.whitespacesAndNewlines)
return components.filter { !$0.isEmpty }.joined(separator: " ")
}
}
let result = "Hello World.\nHello!".condenseWhitespace()
Property:
extension String {
var condensedWhitespace: String {
let components = self.components(separatedBy: NSCharacterSet.whitespacesAndNewlines)
return components.filter { !$0.isEmpty }.joined(separator: " ")
}
}
let result = "Hello World.\nHello!".condensedWhitespace
In Swift 4.2 NSCharacterSet is now CharacterSet, and you can omit and use dot syntax:
extension String {
func condenseWhitespace() -> String {
let components = self.components(separatedBy: .whitespacesAndNewlines)
return components.filter { !$0.isEmpty }.joined(separator: " ")
}
}
let result = "Hello World.\nHello!".condenseWhitespace() // "Hello World. Hello!"
Split string to array and then join again in not memory efficient. Its Takes lot of memory. The best way in this case is to scan the given string and perform operations on that. Regular Expression is the advance way to scan a text. For the above conclusion the the solution is given below:
Swift 4.x
extension String {
func removeExtraSpaces() -> String {
return self.replacingOccurrences(of: "[\\s\n]+", with: " ", options: .regularExpression, range: nil)
}
}
Usages
let startingString = "hello world! \n\n I am here!"
let processedString = startingString.removeExtraSpaces()
print(processedString)
Output:
processedString => "hello world! I am here!"
You can Do more according to your own requirements but thing I am pointing out here is to use regular expressions with string rather then create arrays which will consume lot of memory.
Cleanest version. Documented, memory efficient, extremely easy to use.
extension String {
/// Returns a condensed string, with no extra whitespaces and no new lines.
var condensed: String {
return replacingOccurrences(of: "[\\s\n]+", with: " ", options: .regularExpression, range: nil)
}
/// Returns a condensed string, with no whitespaces at all and no new lines.
var extraCondensed: String {
return replacingOccurrences(of: "[\\s\n]+", with: "", options: .regularExpression, range: nil)
}
}
Usage:
let a = " Hello\n I am a string ".condensed
let b = " Hello\n I am a string ".extraCondensed
Output:
a: "Hello I am a string"
b: "HelloIamastring"
SWIFT 3: Cleaner version
extension String {
var condensedWhitespace: String {
let components = self.components(separatedBy: .whitespacesAndNewlines)
return components.filter { !$0.isEmpty }.joined(separator: " ")
}
}
Here is mine: How it's actually worked.
extension String {
func removeExtraSpaces() -> String {
var data = ""
var numberOfSpace = 0
let items = self.getComponents(separatedBy: " ")
for item in items{
if item == " "{
numberOfSpace = numberOfSpace + 1
}else{
numberOfSpace = 0
}
if numberOfSpace == 1 || numberOfSpace == 0 {
data = data + item
//data.append(item)
}
}
return data
}
}
Usages
var message = "What is the purpose of life?"
message = message.removeExtraSpaces()
print(message)
Output:
What is the purpose of life?
var str = "Hello World.\nHello!"
if let regex = try? NSRegularExpression(pattern: "\\s+", options:NSRegularExpression.Options.caseInsensitive)
{
str = regex.stringByReplacingMatches(in: str, options: [], range: NSMakeRange(0, str.count), withTemplate: " ")
}