I'm using puppet as a provisioner for Vagrant, and am coming across an issue where Puppet will hang for an extremely long time when I do a "vagrant provision". Building the box from scratch using "vagrant up" doesn't seem to be a problem, only subsequent provisions.
If I turn puppet debug on and watch where it hangs, it seems to stop at various, seemingly arbitrary, points the first of which is:
Info: Applying configuration version '1401868442'
Debug: Prefetching yum resources for package
Debug: Executing '/bin/rpm --version'
Debug: Executing '/bin/rpm -qa --nosignature --nodigest --qf '%{NAME} %|EPOCH?{% {EPOCH}}:{0}| %{VERSION} %{RELEASE} %{ARCH}\n''
Executing this command on the server myself returns immediately.
Eventually, it gets past this and continues. Using the summary option, I get the following, after waiting for a very long time for it to complete:
Debug: Finishing transaction 70191217833880
Debug: Storing state
Debug: Stored state in 9.39 seconds
Notice: Finished catalog run in 1493.99 seconds
Changes:
Total: 2
Events:
Failure: 2
Success: 2
Total: 4
Resources:
Total: 18375
Changed: 2
Failed: 2
Skipped: 35
Out of sync: 4
Time:
User: 0.00
Anchor: 0.01
Schedule: 0.01
Yumrepo: 0.07
Augeas: 0.12
Package: 0.18
Exec: 0.96
Service: 1.07
Total: 108.93
Last run: 1401869964
Config retrieval: 16.49
Mongodb database: 3.99
File: 76.60
Mongodb user: 9.43
Version:
Config: 1401868442
Puppet: 3.4.3
This doesn't seem very helpful to me, as the amount of time total's 108 seconds, so where have the other 1385 seconds gone?
Throughout, Puppet seems to be hammering the box, using up a lot of CPU, but still doesn't seem to advance. The memory it uses seems to continually increase. When I kick off the command, top looks like this:
Cpu(s): 10.2%us, 2.2%sy, 0.0%ni, 85.5%id, 2.2%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Mem: 4956928k total, 2849296k used, 2107632k free, 63464k buffers
Swap: 950264k total, 26688k used, 923576k free, 445692k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
28486 root 20 0 439m 334m 3808 R 97.5 6.9 2:02.92 puppet
22 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 1.3 0.0 0:07.55 kblockd/0
18276 mongod 20 0 788m 31m 3040 S 1.3 0.6 2:31.82 mongod
20756 jboss-as 20 0 3081m 1.5g 21m S 1.3 31.4 7:13.15 java
20930 elastics 20 0 2340m 236m 6580 S 1.0 4.9 1:44.80 java
266 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.3 0.0 0:03.85 jbd2/dm-0-8
22717 vagrant 20 0 98.0m 2252 1276 S 0.3 0.0 0:01.81 sshd
28762 vagrant 20 0 15036 1228 932 R 0.3 0.0 0:00.10 top
1 root 20 0 19364 1180 964 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.86 init
To me, this seems fine, there's over 2GB of available memory and plenty of available swap. I have a max open files limit of 1024.
About 10-15 minutes later, still no advance in the console output, but top looks like this:
Cpu(s): 11.2%us, 1.6%sy, 0.0%ni, 86.9%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.3%si, 0.0%s
Mem: 4956928k total, 3834376k used, 1122552k free, 64248k buffers
Swap: 950264k total, 24408k used, 925856k free, 445728k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
28486 root 20 0 1397m 1.3g 3808 R 99.6 26.7 15:16.19 puppet
18276 mongod 20 0 788m 31m 3040 R 1.7 0.6 2:45.03 mongod
20756 jboss-as 20 0 3081m 1.5g 21m S 1.3 31.4 7:25.93 java
20930 elastics 20 0 2340m 238m 6580 S 0.7 4.9 1:52.03 java
8486 root 20 0 308m 952 764 S 0.3 0.0 0:06.03 VBoxService
As you can see, puppet is now using a lot more of the memory, and it seems to continue in this fashion. The box it's building has 5GB of RAM, so I wouldn't have expected it to have memory issues. However, further down the line, after a long wait, I do get "Cannot allocate memory - fork(2)"
Running unlimit -a, I get:
core file size (blocks, -c) 0
data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited
scheduling priority (-e) 0
file size (blocks, -f) unlimited
pending signals (-i) 38566
max locked memory (kbytes, -l) 64
max memory size (kbytes, -m) unlimited
open files (-n) 1024
pipe size (512 bytes, -p) 8
POSIX message queues (bytes, -q) 819200
real-time priority (-r) 0
stack size (kbytes, -s) 10240
cpu time (seconds, -t) unlimited
max user processes (-u) 1024
virtual memory (kbytes, -v) unlimited
file locks (-x) unlimited
Which, again looks fine to me...
To be honest, I'm completely at a loss as to how to go about solving this, or what is causing it.
Any help or insight would be greatly appreciated!
EDIT:
So I managed to fix this eventually... It came down to using recurse with a file directive for a large directory. The target directory in question contained around 2GB worth of files, and puppet took a huge amount of time loading this into memory and doing it's hashes and comparisons. The first time I stood the server up, the directory was relatively empty so the check was quick, but then other resources were placed in it that increased its size massively, meaning subsequent runs took much longer.
The memory error that eventually was thrown was because, I can only assume, Puppet was loading the whole thing into memory in order to do its stuff...
I found a way around using the recurse function, and am now trying to avoid it like the plague...
Yeah, the problem with the recurse parameter on the file type is that it checks every single file's checksum, which on a massive directory adds up real quick.
As Felix suggests, using checksum => none is one way to fix it, another is to accomplish the task you're trying to do (say chmod or chown a whole directory) with an exec performing the native task, with an unless to check if it's already been done.
Something like:
define check_mode($mode) {
exec { "/bin/chmod $mode $name":
unless => "/bin/sh -c '[ $(/usr/bin/stat -c %a $name) == $mode ]'",
}
}
Taken from http://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/1/wiki/File_Permission_Check_Patterns
Related
I am using "samtools calmd" to add MD tag back to BAM file. The size of original BAM is around 50Gb (whole genome sequence by using pacbio HIFI reads). The issue that I encountered is that the speed of "calmd" is incredibly slow! The jobs have already run 12 hours, and only 600MB BAM with MD tag are generated. In this way, 50GB BAM will take 30days to be finished!
Here is the code I used to add MD tag (very normal):
rule addMDTag:
input:
rules.pbmm2_alignment.output
output:
strBAMDir + "/pbmm2/v37/{wcReadsType}/Tmp/rawReads{readsIndex}.MD.bam"
params:
ref = strRef
threads:
16
log:
strBAMDir + "/pbmm2/v37/{wcReadsType}/Log/rawReads{readsIndex}.MD.log"
benchmark:
strBAMDir + "/pbmm2/v37/{wcReadsType}/Benchmark/rawReads{readsIndex}.MD.benchmark.txt"
shell:
"samtools calmd -# {threads} {input} {params.ref} -bAr > {output}"
The version of samtools I used is v1.10.
BTW, I use 16 cores to run calmd, however, it looks like the samtools is still using 1 core to run it:
top - 11:44:53 up 47 days, 20:35, 1 user, load average: 2.00, 2.01, 2.00
Tasks: 1723 total, 3 running, 1720 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 2.8%us, 0.3%sy, 0.0%ni, 96.8%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Mem: 529329180k total, 232414724k used, 296914456k free, 84016k buffers
Swap: 12582908k total, 74884k used, 12508024k free, 227912476k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
93137 lix33 20 0 954m 151m 2180 R 100.2 0.0 659:04.13 samtools
May I know how to make calmd be much faster? Or is there any other tool that can do the same job more efficiently?
Thanks so much
After the collaboration with samtools maintenance team, this issue has been solved.
The calmd will be super slow if the bam was unsorted. Therefore, always make sure the BAM has been sorted before run calmd.
See the details below:
Are your files name sorted, and does your reference have more than one entry?
If so calmd will be switching between references all the time,
which means it may be doing a lot of reference loading and not much MD calculation.
You may find it goes a lot faster if you position-sort the input, and then run it through calmd.
I have a process which slowly consumes more RAM until it eventually hits its cgroup limit and is OOM killed, and I'm trying to figure out why.
Oddly, go's runtime seems to think not much RAM is used, whereas the OS seems to think a lot is used.
Specifically, looking at runtime.MemStats (via the extvar package) I see:
"Alloc":51491072,
"TotalAlloc":143474637424,
"Sys":438053112,
"Lookups":0,
"Mallocs":10230571,
"Frees":10195515,
"HeapAlloc":51491072,
"HeapSys":388464640,
"HeapIdle":333824000,
"HeapInuse":54640640,
"HeapReleased":0,
"HeapObjects":35056,
"StackInuse":14188544,
"StackSys":14188544,
"MSpanInuse":223056,
"MSpanSys":376832,
"MCacheInuse":166656,
"MCacheSys":180224,
"BuckHashSys":2111104,
"GCSys":13234176,
"OtherSys":19497592
But from the OS perspective:
$ ps auxwf
USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND
root 178 0.0 0.0 3996 3372 pts/0 Ss 17:33 0:00 bash
root 246 0.0 0.0 7636 2828 pts/0 R+ 17:59 0:00 \_ ps auxwf
root 1 166 2.8 11636248 5509288 ? Ssl 17:24 57:15 app server -api-public
So, the OSS reports an RSS of 5380 MiB, but the Sys field in MemStats shows only 417 MiB. My understanding is these fields should be approximately the same.
GC is running, as confirmed by setting GODEBUG=gctrace=1,madvdontneed=1. For example, I see output like:
gc 6882 #2271.137s 0%: 0.037+2.2+0.087 ms clock, 3.5+0.78/37/26+8.4 ms cpu, 71->72->63 MB, 78 MB goal, 96 P
The numbers vary a bit depending on the process, but they are all <100 MB, whereas the OS is reporting >1GB (and growing, until eventual OOM).
madvdontneed=1 was a shot in the dark but seems to make no difference. I wouldn't think the madvise parameters would be relevant, since it doesn't seem there's any need to return memory to the kernel, as the Go runtime doesn't think it's using much memory anyway.
What could explain this discrepancy? Am I not correctly understanding the semantics of these fields? Are there mechanisms that would result in the growth of RSS (and an eventual OOM kill) but not increase MemStats.Sys?
Relatively old Dell R620 server (32 cores / 128GB RAM) was working perfect for years with Ubuntu. Plain OS install, no Virtualization.
2 system disks in mirror (XFS)
6 RAID 5 disks for /var (XFS)
server is used for a nightly check of a MySQL Xtrabackup file.
Before the format and move to Centos 7 the process would finish by 08:00, Now running late at noon.
99% of the job is opening a large tar.gz file.
htop : there are only two processes doing something :
1. gzip -d : about 20% CPU
2. tar zxf Xtrabackup.tar.gz : about 4-7% CPU
iotop : it's steady at around 3M/s (Read) / 20-25 M/s (Write) which is about 25% of what i would expect at minimum.
Memory : Used : 1GB of 128GB
Server is fully updated both OS / HW / Firmware including the disks firmware.
IDRAC shows no problems.
Bottom line : Server is not working hard (to say the least) but performance is way off.
Any ideas would be appreciated.
vmstat
procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- ------cpu-----
r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa st
2 2 0 469072 0 130362040 0 0 57 341 0 0 0 0 98 2 0
0 2 0 456916 0 130374568 0 0 3328 24576 1176 3241 2 1 94 4 0
You have blocked processes and also io operations (around 20MB/s). And this mean for me you have few processes which concurrently access disc resources. What you can do to improve the performance is instead of
tar zxf Xtrabackup.tar.gz
use
gzip -d Xtrabackup.tar.gz|tar xvf -
The second add parallelism and can benefit from multy processor, You can also benefit from increase of the pipe (fifo) buffer. Check this answer for some ideas
Also consider to tune filesystem where are stored output files of tar
I am fairly new to Docker and am trying to run an image and when I do I would usually get “inside” the image if that makes sense, where i can access different directories that i have made inside.
However, when I have done it recently I have gotten the following output:
top - 15:49:10 up 2:36, 0 users, load average: 0.65, 0.70, 0.71
Tasks: 1 total, 1 running, 0 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
%Cpu(s): 5.9 us, 2.8 sy, 0.2 ni, 89.2 id, 1.8 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.1 si, 0.0 st
KiB Mem : 3930660 total, 370676 free, 1749516 used, 1810468 buff/cache
KiB Swap: 4076540 total, 4076540 free, 0 used. 1550316 avail Mem
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
1 root 20 0 36536 2968 2604 R 0.0 0.1 0:00.05 top -b -c
top - 15:49:13 up 2:36, 0 users, load average: 0.65, 0.70, 0.71
Tasks: 1 total, 1 running, 0 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
%Cpu(s): 3.0 us, 2.6 sy, 0.0 ni, 94.2 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.2 si, 0.0 st
KiB Mem : 3930660 total, 366860 free, 1753244 used, 1810556 buff/cache
KiB Swap: 4076540 total, 4076540 free, 0 used. 1546536 avail Mem
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
1 root 20 0 36536 2968 2604 R 0.0 0.1 0:00.05 top -b -c^
from the following docker command:
sudo docker run -i -t ubuntu-latest
I am running docker 17.12 on ubuntu 16.04. At this time If I could receive a solution without having to post the dockerfile I will, due to certain information being present in the file.
Any feedback would be greatly appreciated
when a container launches it executes a binary which can be defined within the image or overridden with the cli using the entrypoint and command arguments.
see https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/builder/#cmd vs https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/builder/#entrypoint
In this case it looks like you've launched your container to run 'top' automatically which is why it's launching and executing top as pid 1 instead of an interactive bash session. If you could paste just your Dockerfile Entrypoint and CMD args it would be possible to know exactly what's happening but you should be able to override them via the cli with:
sudo docker run --entrypoint /bin/bash -i -t ubuntu-latest
Is there a shell command to know about how much memory is being used at a particular moment and details of how much each process is using, how much virtual memory is left etc?
For "each process", how about top:
PhysMem: 238M wired, 865M active, 549M inactive, 1652M used, 395M free.
VM: 162G vsize, 1039M framework vsize, 124775(0) pageins, 9149(0) pageouts.
PID COMMAND %CPU TIME #TH #WQ #POR #MREG RPRVT RSHRD RSIZE VPRVT VSIZE PGRP PPID STATE UID
7233 top 5.7 00:00.53 1/1 0 24 33 1328K 264K 1904K 17M 2378M 7233 3766 running 0
e.g.:
rprvt Resident private address space size.
rshrd Resident shared address space size.
rsize Resident memory size.
vsize Total memory size.
vprvt Private address space size.
Let's also hear it for the old classic, vmstat.
$ vmstat
procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- ----cpu----
r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa
0 0 30160 15884 418680 281936 0 0 406 22 6 3 1 1 93 5
Depends on your operating system. In Linux, free answers two out of your three questions.
~> free
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 904580 895128 9452 0 63700 777728
-/+ buffers/cache: 53700 850880
Swap: 506036 0 506036
"Swap" refers to virtual memory.
If you're on Linux, give ps_mem.py a try.
If you are on an up-to-date Linux, cat /proc/$pid/smaps is the business.
If you are on OSX, check https://superuser.com/questions/97235/how-much-swap-is-a-given-mac-application-using.