I gave an English explanation of my problem below but it is a visual issue so if you don't want to read it all just look at the picture at the bottom).
I'm working on building a reverse polish notation calculator for my class and I just completed having the button controls on my GUI be able to append their values to the edit control which works fine, but the caret is doing something weird and I can't find any information on it.
I send a custom message to the edit control in which it finds the length of the current text in the control and then places the caret at the end of the text so I can then add what text needs to be added (it is right aligned with ES_RIGHT), which again works just fine, but when the caret is in the right most place it can be, it is placed practically right through the middle of most any number.
This only seems to happen in the right most place the caret can be (i.e. anywhere else the caret sits directly to the right of the preceding char, as it should) and I have tried replacing the caret all the way to the right using code, placing it using my keyboard/mouse, and tried adjusting the dimensions of the window in hopes that it was just an offset of the width I defined for it that caused the last place to be off slightly, but the problem persists and it makes it hard to read the last char in the text field.
Relevant Code:
LRESULT CALLBACK EditBoxClass::WinProc( HWND hWnd, UINT msg, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam )
{
switch( msg )
{
case WM_COMMAND:
break;
case WM_APPEND_EDIT:
/* Get current length of text in the box */
index = new int( GetWindowTextLength (hWnd) );
SetFocus( hWnd );
/* Set the caret to the end of the text in the box */
SendMessage( hWnd, EM_SETSEL, (WPARAM)index, (LPARAM)index );
/* "Replace" the selection (the selection is actually targeting
nothing and just sits at the end of the text in the box)
with the passed in TCHAR* from the button control that
sent the WM_APPEND_EDIT message */
SendMessage( hWnd, EM_REPLACESEL, 0, lParam );
break;
}
return CallWindowProc( EditClassStruct.GetOldProc(), hWnd, msg, wParam, lParam );
}
Picture of problem:
After facing the same problem and presenting my first approach in this answer, I'll now provide two well working solutions. I think there is no other way to fix this glitch properly (unless you're a Microsoft programmer who is responsible for this part of the WinAPI).
I was wondering how to fix this problem on edit controls created with ES_MULTILINE but this glitch seems to be only a problem on single-line edit controls (tested on Windows 7 64-bit). Enabling Visual Styles is also helpful but the problem still remains (the offset is at least not so obvious).
Explanation
Normally, when the caret is at the farthest right position it's x value (provided by GetCaretPos ()) should be equal to the rect.right value provided by EM_GETRECT (when the edit control was created with ES_RIGHT). Due to unknown reasons this is not the case. So you have to check if the caret position is at least in the near of the rect.right value (but not farther away than the last letter is wide). So you have two possibilities to fulfill this task:
You must calculate the width of the outer right character using GetTextExtentPoint32 (), subtract it from the rect.right value provided by calling SendMessage () with EM_GETRECT and check whether the x position of the caret is bigger than the result or not OR
You must calculate the margin between the rect.right value and the outer right caret position (3 in my case) and use this value as a hardcoded offset to do a simple check.
After those steps (regardless which one you have chosen) you have to reposition the caret when necessary.
1. Approach (recommended)
case WM_LBUTTONDOWN: {
TRACKMOUSEEVENT tme = {sizeof (tme), TME_LEAVE, hwnd, HOVER_DEFAULT};
TrackMouseEvent (&tme);
}
break;
case WM_KEYDOWN:
case WM_MOUSELEAVE:
case WM_SETCURSOR: {
DefSubclassProc (hwnd, message, wParam, lParam);
DWORD end;
SendMessage (hwnd, EM_GETSEL, (WPARAM) NULL, (LPARAM) &end);
int len = GetWindowTextLength (hwnd);
if (end < len || len <= 0)
return TRUE;
wchar_t *buffer = new wchar_t[len + 1];
GetWindowText (hwnd, buffer, len + 1);
wchar_t lastChar[] = {buffer[len - 1], '\0'};
delete[] buffer;
SIZE size;
HDC hdc = GetDC (hwnd);
if (hdc == NULL)
return TRUE;
GetTextExtentPoint32 (hdc, lastChar, 1, &size);
ReleaseDC (hwnd, hdc);
POINT pt;
RECT rect;
GetCaretPos (&pt);
SendMessage (hwnd, EM_GETRECT, (WPARAM) 0, (LPARAM) &rect);
if ((rect.right - size.cx) <= pt.x)
SetCaretPos (rect.right, pt.y);
return TRUE;
}
break;
2. Approach (improved original version)
case WM_LBUTTONDOWN: {
TRACKMOUSEEVENT tme = {sizeof (tme), TME_LEAVE, hwnd, HOVER_DEFAULT};
TrackMouseEvent (&tme);
}
break;
case WM_KEYDOWN:
case WM_MOUSELEAVE:
case WM_SETCURSOR: {
DefSubclassProc (hwnd, message, wParam, lParam);
POINT pt;
RECT rect;
GetCaretPos (&pt);
SendMessage (hwnd, EM_GETRECT, (WPARAM) 0, (LPARAM) &rect);
if ((rect.right - pt.x) <= 3)
SetCaretPos (rect.right, pt.y);
return TRUE;
}
break;
You have to subclass the edit controls. Then use this code in their window procedures and enjoy.
In both cases, tracking the mouse event is not absolutely necessary but recommended to completly avoid this glitch. Calling DefSubclassProc () will ensure that the cursor is changed on mouse over.
This may or may not be the cause, but you are misusing EM_SETSEL. You are dynamically allocating (and leaking) an int on the heap and passing a pointer to it as the message parameters, but EM_SETSEL does not expect or use pointers to begin with. So get rid of the dynamic allocation.
Also, the default window proc is not going to know how to handle your WM_APPEND_EDIT message, so there is no point in passing the message to CallWindowProc().
Try this instead:
case WM_APPEND_EDIT:
{
/* Get current length of text in the box */
int index = GetWindowTextLength( hWnd );
SetFocus( hWnd );
/* Set the caret to the end of the text in the box */
SendMessage( hWnd, EM_SETSEL, (WPARAM)index, (LPARAM)index );
/* "Replace" the selection (the selection is actually targeting
nothing and just sits at the end of the text in the box)
with the passed in TCHAR* from the button control that
sent the WM_APPEND_EDIT message */
SendMessage( hWnd, EM_REPLACESEL, 0, lParam );
return 0;
}
That being said, try using EM_GETRECT/EM_SETRECT to expand the right edge of the edit control's formatting rectangle by a few pixels. That should give the caret some extra room to work with.
Related
I was looking into why when running my Windows App, it has a short flash of white background before rendering the actual app (i.e., before WM_ERASEBKGND and WM_PAINT is received).
Now, I just noticed that this problem is also present in the default sample app created by Visual Studio. At least this is the case for me when running under Windows 10,21H1 (in VS2008 & VS2013).
The only thing you have to do, after creating a "new Win32 Project", is change the background color of the window class, e.g., to the color red:
//wcex.hbrBackground = (HBRUSH)(COLOR_WINDOW+1);
wcex.hbrBackground = (HBRUSH) CreateSolidBrush(RGB(255, 0, 0));
And then add a WM_ERASEBKGND with a Sleep to the WndProc:
case WM_PAINT:
hdc = BeginPaint(hWnd, &ps);
// TODO: Add any drawing code here...
EndPaint(hWnd, &ps);
break;
case WM_ERASEBKGND:
Sleep(1000);
return DefWindowProc(hWnd, message, wParam, lParam);
The Sleep exaggerates the problem, causing the white background to show for at least a second.
After that the red background is drawn as expected.
I'm including a short video when running the App with those changes.
For any app, it looks quite unprofessional that the window flashes white before rendering,
especially if the interface is dark.
So my question is: What is causing this behavior?
The background color is set through RegisterClassEx and passed to CreateWindow, before calling ShowWindow(..) So Windows should know that the background color is red. So why does it render it white? Am I missing something?
Ideally, I would like to change this initial background color to something other than white, such as black. But how? I've tried drawing to the window before calling ShowWindow, without luck.
This indeed seems to be a Windows bug as demonstrated by the excellent research by the OP.
The bug is even affecting applications developed by Microsoft.
The question is what is best workaround, especially for products that need to support backwards compatibility even after a fix is released in a specific version of Windows 11 (or Windows 10).
The main problem is that it is the act of making the window visible that makes Windows paint it with the white brush prior to correctly applying the background brush, regardless of what was painted into its DC beforehand. Therefore tricks such as painting into the DC prior to showing the window are unsatisfying, as the white background will still be shown, even if only for a few frames.
One method that seems to work well is to make the window visible, but fully transparent, paint the background, and then make the window opaque. We also need to animate the activation of the window, so it doesn't just pop in. For example, we can hijack WM_SHOWWINDOW for this:
case WM_SHOWWINDOW:
{
if (!GetLayeredWindowAttributes(hWnd, NULL, NULL, NULL))
{
SetLayeredWindowAttributes(hWnd, 0, 0, LWA_ALPHA);
DefWindowProc(hWnd, WM_ERASEBKGND, (WPARAM)GetDC(hWnd), lParam);
SetLayeredWindowAttributes(hWnd, 0, 255, LWA_ALPHA);
AnimateWindow(hWnd, 200, AW_ACTIVATE|AW_BLEND);
return 0;
}
return DefWindowProc(hWnd, message, wParam, lParam);
}
break;
Full sample code:
#include "framework.h"
#include "WindowsProject1.h"
#define MAX_LOADSTRING 100
HINSTANCE hInst;
WCHAR szTitle[MAX_LOADSTRING];
WCHAR szWindowClass[MAX_LOADSTRING];
ATOM MyRegisterClass(HINSTANCE hInstance);
BOOL InitInstance(HINSTANCE, int);
LRESULT CALLBACK WndProc(HWND, UINT, WPARAM, LPARAM);
INT_PTR CALLBACK About(HWND, UINT, WPARAM, LPARAM);
HINSTANCE mInstance;
int APIENTRY wWinMain(_In_ HINSTANCE hInstance,
_In_opt_ HINSTANCE hPrevInstance,
_In_ LPWSTR lpCmdLine,
_In_ int nCmdShow)
{
UNREFERENCED_PARAMETER(hPrevInstance);
UNREFERENCED_PARAMETER(lpCmdLine);
mInstance = hInstance;
LoadStringW(hInstance, IDS_APP_TITLE, szTitle, MAX_LOADSTRING);
LoadStringW(hInstance, IDC_WINDOWSPROJECT1, szWindowClass, MAX_LOADSTRING);
MyRegisterClass(hInstance);
if (!InitInstance (hInstance, nCmdShow))
{
return FALSE;
}
HACCEL hAccelTable = LoadAccelerators(hInstance, MAKEINTRESOURCE(IDC_WINDOWSPROJECT1));
MSG msg;
while (GetMessage(&msg, nullptr, 0, 0))
{
if (!TranslateAccelerator(msg.hwnd, hAccelTable, &msg))
{
TranslateMessage(&msg);
DispatchMessage(&msg);
}
}
return (int) msg.wParam;
}
ATOM MyRegisterClass(HINSTANCE hInstance)
{
WNDCLASSEXW wcex;
wcex.cbSize = sizeof(WNDCLASSEX);
wcex.style = CS_HREDRAW | CS_VREDRAW | CS_CLASSDC;
wcex.lpfnWndProc = WndProc;
wcex.cbClsExtra = 0;
wcex.cbWndExtra = 0;
wcex.hInstance = hInstance;
wcex.hIcon = LoadIcon(hInstance, MAKEINTRESOURCE(IDI_WINDOWSPROJECT1));
wcex.hCursor = LoadCursor(nullptr, IDC_ARROW);
wcex.hbrBackground = CreateSolidBrush(RGB(255, 0, 0));
wcex.lpszMenuName = MAKEINTRESOURCEW(IDC_WINDOWSPROJECT1);
wcex.lpszClassName = szWindowClass;
wcex.hIconSm = LoadIcon(wcex.hInstance, MAKEINTRESOURCE(IDI_SMALL));
return RegisterClassExW(&wcex);
}
BOOL InitInstance(HINSTANCE hInstance, int nCmdShow)
{
hInst = hInstance;
HWND hWnd = CreateWindowExW(WS_EX_LAYERED, szWindowClass, szTitle, WS_OVERLAPPEDWINDOW,
CW_USEDEFAULT, 0, CW_USEDEFAULT, 0, nullptr, nullptr, hInstance, nullptr);
if (!hWnd)
{
return FALSE;
}
ShowWindow(hWnd, nCmdShow);
UpdateWindow(hWnd);
return TRUE;
}
LRESULT CALLBACK WndProc(HWND hWnd, UINT message, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam)
{
switch (message)
{
case WM_COMMAND:
{
int wmId = LOWORD(wParam);
switch (wmId)
{
case IDM_ABOUT:
DialogBox(hInst, MAKEINTRESOURCE(IDD_ABOUTBOX), hWnd, About);
break;
case IDM_EXIT:
DestroyWindow(hWnd);
break;
default:
return DefWindowProc(hWnd, message, wParam, lParam);
}
}
break;
case WM_SHOWWINDOW:
{
if (!GetLayeredWindowAttributes(hWnd, NULL, NULL, NULL))
{
SetLayeredWindowAttributes(hWnd, 0, 0, LWA_ALPHA);
DefWindowProc(hWnd, WM_ERASEBKGND, (WPARAM)GetDC(hWnd), lParam);
SetLayeredWindowAttributes(hWnd, 0, 255, LWA_ALPHA);
AnimateWindow(hWnd, 200, AW_ACTIVATE|AW_BLEND);
return 0;
}
return DefWindowProc(hWnd, message, wParam, lParam);
}
break;
case WM_PAINT:
{
PAINTSTRUCT ps;
HDC hdc = BeginPaint(hWnd, &ps);
ReleaseDC(hWnd, hdc);
EndPaint(hWnd, &ps);
}
break;
case WM_DESTROY:
PostQuitMessage(0);
break;
default:
return DefWindowProc(hWnd, message, wParam, lParam);
}
return 0;
}
INT_PTR CALLBACK About(HWND hDlg, UINT message, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam)
{
UNREFERENCED_PARAMETER(lParam);
switch (message)
{
case WM_INITDIALOG:
return (INT_PTR)TRUE;
case WM_COMMAND:
if (LOWORD(wParam) == IDOK || LOWORD(wParam) == IDCANCEL)
{
EndDialog(hDlg, LOWORD(wParam));
return (INT_PTR)TRUE;
}
break;
}
return (INT_PTR)FALSE;
}
A more controversial answer could be that this is simply a bug in Windows.
For reference, (aside from the existing GIFs from Windows 10 that I already posted) here are recordings of the sample app running with and without background erase in Windows XP, Windows 7 and Windows 11.
Windows XP:
Windows XP: Without WM_ERASEBKGND/WM_PAINT: OK (no white background)
Windows XP: With WM_ERASEBKGND: OK (no white background)
Windows 7:
Windows 7: Without WM_ERASEBKGND/WM_PAINT: NOT OK (white background)
Windows 7: With WM_ERASEBKGND: NOT OK (white background)
Windows 7: With WM_ERASEBKGND + Sleep: NOT OK (white background)
Windows 7 with Aero disabled:
Windows 7 with Aero disabled: Without WM_ERASEBKGND/WM_PAINT: OK (no white background)
Windows 7 with Aero disabled: With WM_ERASEBKGND: OK (no white background)
Windows 7 with Aero disabled: With WM_ERASEBKGND + Sleep: OK (no white background)
Windows 11 (with Animation disabled):
Windows 11: Without WM_ERASEBKGND/WM_PAINT: NOT OK (white background)
Windows 11: With WM_ERASEBKGND: OK (no white background)
Windows 11: With WM_ERASEBKGND + Sleep: NOT OK (white background)
I've added Sleep to tests where it was hard to see the issue.
To sum up:
Windows XP: No issue. Everything seems to work as expected.
Windows 7: Issue occurs when Aero is enabled (Windows 7
theme), but not when it is disabled (Classic theme).
Windows 10: Issue occurs for all tests.
Windows 11: Issue occurs, but works without Sleep added.
Most likely since this was running on a faster machine.
So although I cannot conclude anything solid from these tests, it does look like this behavior was introduced in Windows 7 with Aero.
If someone can debunk this claim, please comment below.
I've hit this issue recently. I tried mnistic's solution using layered windows and transparency but it caused problems with rendering pane captions in the MFC app I'm working on. However, I've found a simple solution which appears to work nicely without any need for animation, changing window styles, etc.:
The Desktop Window Manager API enables a window to be "cloaked", so that it isn't shown on the screen but is still internally composited, i.e. still accumulates the results of drawing operations. You can turn "cloaking" on by:
BOOL cloak = TRUE;
DwmSetWindowAttribute(hwnd, DWMWA_CLOAK, &cloak, sizeof(cloak));
To avoid the white flash on first showing the window, do the above before calling ShowWindow(). Then do the initial UpdateWindow() to get correct content drawn. Finally, turn "cloaking" off using:
BOOL cloak = FALSE;
DwmSetWindowAttribute(hwnd, DWMWA_CLOAK, &cloak, sizeof(cloak));
to get the final window content displayed.
This should work on all Windows versions which have a Desktop Windows Manager, so Windows Vista and up.
Did some more poking, so here is a different potential answer.
I realized that even if I completely discard WM_PAINT and WM_ERASEBKGND (i.e., return 0 in WM_PAINT and return TRUE in WM_ERASEBKGND), I can still get the app to draw the red background by manually resizing the window!
Here is a clip to illustrate:
This means that Windows does indeed know and respect hbrBackground, which is great! For some odd reason it just doesn't clear it to that, but to white instead.
(Incidentally, I went through all the system colors in the registry (HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Control Panel\Colors HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Control Panel\Desktop\Colors) with a "255 255 255" setting and forcibly changed them to see if that would change the initial white background. But no luck. This makes me conclude that the white background is not a system color.)
Anyway, the above lead me to try to programmatically resize the window after ShowWindow. But since I don't want it to flicker on open, do the ShowWindow off-screen.
So here is the code that would replace regular ShowWindow(..):
int x0 = GetSystemMetrics(SM_XVIRTUALSCREEN);
int x1 = GetSystemMetrics(SM_CXVIRTUALSCREEN);
RECT rect;
GetWindowRect(hWnd, &rect);
// resize and move off-screen
SetWindowPos(hWnd, NULL, x1-x0, 0, 0, 0, SWP_NOREDRAW );
// show window
ShowWindow(hWnd,nCmdShow);
// restore and redraw
SetWindowPos(hWnd, NULL, rect.left, rect.top, rect.right-rect.left, rect.bottom-rect.top, 0 );
Now, I would call this a hack. Yet, it does not rely on WM_ERASEBKGND nor WM_PAINT, so there should be less of a timing issue.
Also, the window shows up exactly like a regular ShowWindow(...) would, just with the correct hbrBackground, which is what I wanted.
Here is what it looks like # 25Hz:
Notice that there is no flash of white background.
Please note that I've tried to write the code to cater for virtual desktop/multi-monitor, but haven't actually tested that.
But unfortunately everything is not fine and dandy. As I was writing this answer, I did quite a few trial runs with OBSStudio recording # 60Hz, and went through the footage. There I found one that simply shows trash inside the window frame on open (apparently from Chrome), for just one frame. Here is a slowed-down replay:
I'm stumped. Perhaps that is the real issue ?
I did some more testing, and want to post a potential answer to this question.
Now, this is mainly based on the suggestion by #JonathanPotter, so full credit to him. And while it doesn't really fix the problem, it does alleviate it quite a bit.
Now, ideally, it would be great if Windows would simply render the window with the correct initial background color, but no matter how hard I've tried, I can only get it to update the background color by utilizing WM_ERASEBKGND or WM_PAINT.
So it seems that the time delay between showing the window (i.e. using ShowWindow), and the actual clearing of the background (WM_ERASEBKGND) is the crux of the problem. Hence, it makes sense to profile it. I've done so by recording the time difference between calling ShowWindow and reaching WM_ERASEBKGND using QueryPerformanceCounter.
So on an i7-4960HQ CPU # 2.60GHz running Window 10, the time between ShowWindow and WM_ERASEBKGND is between 100 - 317ms. It fluctuates quite a bit. This is with a vanilla Win32 Sample App, built in Release without any Sleeps or anything like that, but using a red hbrBackground to show the issue. This means that the white background is clearly visible for a few frames before the red background is drawn. Here is an animated gif captured # 25Hz: The white background is visible for 3 frames in that animation.
Now the potential fix is to use a combination of SetWindowPos and RedrawWindow before showing the window.
For my tests I simply added these two lines before calling ShowWindow(..):
SetWindowPos(hWnd, NULL, 0,0,0,0, SWP_NOMOVE | SWP_NOSIZE | SWP_NOREDRAW);
RedrawWindow(hWnd, NULL, 0, RDW_INVALIDATE | RDW_ERASE);
Although RedrawWindow does not seem to make any difference.
Profiling again, the time between ShowWindow and WM_ERASEBKGND is now 10 - 23ms. A 10x speed-up!
Again, an animated gif captured (with SetWindowPos) # 25Hz:
This clearly shows that the flash of white background is gone, and thus the problem is fixed. It's like night and day.
Now, I would argue that this is not a fix, but rather a workaround. Since the underlying problem of Windows using a white background color is still there.
And since this is a timing issue, I can easily imagine that the white background could show up again, say if the system was sluggish or busy doing other stuff.
Similarly, having a faster system means you that you are less likely to see this in the first place, effectively hiding the issue.
But simply setting a breakpoint in WM_ERASEBKGND will still show you a white window.
Also, I have no explanation for the speed-up. I tracked the number of messages in the message pump, and they are the same in both scenarios.
Now, I'm still hoping for a better fix. I find it hard to believe that the Microsoft engineers found it cool to fill all freshly created Windows with a hardcoded 0xFFFFFF, so I'm hoping that this color is actually read from somewhere, and thus possible to change, so the initial background matches the hbrBackground.
Please feel free to post alternative answers, questions, or suggestions.
I will of course update this thread if I figure out anything else.
I'm saving/restoring my window position using GetWindowPlacement/SetWindowPlacement on Windows 10. My application is DPI aware. The issue occurs when SetWindowPlacement is both sizing and moving the window from monitor #1 with one DPI to monitor #2 with a different DPI. The coordinates have been saved as the correct size for monitor #2 in the WINDOWPLACEMENT structure.
The window is first resized during SetWindowPlacement while it's still on monitor #1. Then window is moved to monitor #2, which causes a WM_DPICHANGED message to fire, saying the window size should be changed. The suggested size is incorrect since it's changing the size of the window which was already the correct size for monitor #2.
What is the correct way to solve this? Should I be setting a flag before SetWindowPlacement to ignore WM_DPICHANGED messages until that call is done? Are there cases where that will cause me to miss a message I shouldn't be ignoring?
Thanks
Edit: Attached repro for #SongZhu-MSFT.
In this test case I'm using a Surface Studio 2 as my primary monitor, running at 4500x3000, using 175% scaling. On the right of that monitor, aligned to the bottom is a 1920x1080 monitor set to 100% scaling. This code attempts to open the monitor on the right monitor with a set size, however a DPICHANGE message comes through during the SetWindowPlacement() call which causes the size to be adjusted incorrectly, unless I manually avoid it. Sample code is edited from:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/learnwin32/windows-hello-world-sample
#ifndef UNICODE
#define UNICODE
#endif
#include <windows.h>
LRESULT CALLBACK WindowProc(HWND hwnd, UINT uMsg, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam);
int WINAPI wWinMain(HINSTANCE hInstance, HINSTANCE, PWSTR pCmdLine, int nCmdShow)
{
// Register the window class.
const wchar_t CLASS_NAME[] = L"Sample Window Class";
WNDCLASS wc = { };
wc.lpfnWndProc = WindowProc;
wc.hInstance = hInstance;
wc.lpszClassName = CLASS_NAME;
RegisterClass(&wc);
// Create the window.
HWND hwnd = CreateWindowEx(
0, // Optional window styles.
CLASS_NAME, // Window class
L"Learn to Program Windows", // Window text
WS_OVERLAPPEDWINDOW, // Window style
// Size and position
CW_USEDEFAULT, CW_USEDEFAULT, 1280, 720,
NULL, // Parent window
NULL, // Menu
hInstance, // Instance handle
NULL // Additional application data
);
if (hwnd == NULL)
{
return 0;
}
WINDOWPLACEMENT wp = {};
wp.length = sizeof(wp);
wp.showCmd = 1;
wp.ptMaxPosition.x = -1;
wp.ptMaxPosition.y = -1;
wp.ptMinPosition.x = -1;
wp.ptMinPosition.y = -1;
wp.rcNormalPosition.left = 4510;
wp.rcNormalPosition.top = 2320;
wp.rcNormalPosition.right = wp.rcNormalPosition.left + 1850;
wp.rcNormalPosition.bottom = 2909;
::SetWindowPlacement((HWND)hwnd, &wp);
ShowWindow(hwnd, nCmdShow);
// Run the message loop.
MSG msg = { };
while (GetMessage(&msg, NULL, 0, 0))
{
TranslateMessage(&msg);
DispatchMessage(&msg);
}
return 0;
}
LRESULT CALLBACK WindowProc(HWND hwnd, UINT uMsg, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam)
{
switch (uMsg)
{
case WM_DESTROY:
PostQuitMessage(0);
return 0;
case WM_DPICHANGED:
{
int dpi = HIWORD(wParam);
{
RECT* const prcNewWindow = (RECT*)lParam;
SetWindowPos(hwnd,
NULL,
prcNewWindow->left,
prcNewWindow->top,
prcNewWindow->right - prcNewWindow->left,
prcNewWindow->bottom - prcNewWindow->top,
SWP_NOZORDER | SWP_NOACTIVATE);
}
return 0;
}
case WM_PAINT:
{
PAINTSTRUCT ps;
HDC hdc = BeginPaint(hwnd, &ps);
// All painting occurs here, between BeginPaint and EndPaint.
FillRect(hdc, &ps.rcPaint, (HBRUSH) (COLOR_WINDOW+1));
EndPaint(hwnd, &ps);
}
return 0;
}
return DefWindowProc(hwnd, uMsg, wParam, lParam);
}
And the .manifest I'm using.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<assembly xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v1" manifestVersion="1.0">
<application xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v3">
<windowsSettings>
<dpiAwareness xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/SMI/2016/WindowsSettings">PerMonitorV2,permonitor</dpiAwareness>
<dpiAware xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/SMI/2005/WindowsSettings">true/pm</dpiAware>
</windowsSettings>
</application>
</assembly>
I encountered the same issue in a slightly different context: saving and restoring the positions of other applications' windows (i.e. when un-docking a laptop all windows move to the primary display, but when re-docking we'd like them to go back where they were).
Since I don't control the third-party application windows, neither of #Sunius' suggestions work: I cannot make them ignore WM_DPICHANGED, nor can I know whether they will indeed react to WM_DPICHANGED -- if they aren't actually DPI-aware applications then pre-adjusting the window size is unnecessary and counterproductive.
My solution so far is a little clumsy, but simple and effective: when moving windows between different-DPI monitors, simply call SetWindowPlacement() twice. The first call will put it on the right monitor, but possibly with the wrong size, but the second call will immediately fix the size since it's already in the correct position.
The only catch here is that GetDpiForWindow() appeared to be unreliable for some applications, especially if the window remained minimized (I think Windows internally doesn't update the window's DPI setting for its new monitor if it's minimized). So instead I had to use MonitorFromWindow() and then GetDpiForMonitor() to detect when a window is going to change DPI, in order to trigger the second SetWindowPlacement().
There are two ways to solve this:
Before calling SetWindowPlacement, set a flag like s_IsInsideWindowMove to true, and if it's set when WM_DPICHANGED fires, do not follow the suggestion to resize the window. Once SetWindowPlacement returns, set the flag back to false;
Calculate the size passed to SetWindowPlacement as if you were placing it on the monitor with the same DPI as the monitor the window is currently on. For instance, if you're moving the window from DPI 144 to DPI 192 monitor and you want the end result size to be 800x600, ask SetWindowPlacement for a size of 600x450.
We use the first option as it's just easier to reason about and implement.
I'm working in Windows 10 and I am trying to write a C++ program that intercepts all touch screen input, however some input is still getting through.
My code calls RegisterPointerInputTarget with PT_TOUCH to intercept touch input. This mostly seems to work, however the results are inconsistent. As a test I have added code that uses SendInput to move the mouse slowly to the right whenever touch input is detected. With my program running I can, for example, open up MS Paint and touch the screen. So long as I hold my finger still on the cursor moves slowly to the right as expected. The moment I move my finger however, the cursor snaps to the position under my finger, just as it would if my program were not running at all.
To give another example, if I try the same thing in visual studio, again the cursor moves slowly to the right until I move my finger at which point the cursor follows my fingers' movement but slowly, lagging be behind it with a significant delay.
The code to set up my window looks like this;
BOOL InitInstance(HINSTANCE hInstance, int nCmdShow)
{
hInst = hInstance; // Store instance handle in our global variable
static const char* class_name = "DUMMY_CLASS";
WNDCLASSEX wx = {};
wx.cbSize = sizeof(WNDCLASSEX);
wx.lpfnWndProc = WndProc; // function which will handle messages
wx.hInstance = hInst;
wx.lpszClassName = class_name;
HWND hWnd = 0;
if (RegisterClassEx(&wx)) {
hWnd = CreateWindowEx(0, class_name, "dummy_name", 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, HWND_MESSAGE, NULL, NULL, NULL);
}
if (!hWnd)
{
return FALSE;
}
ShowWindow(hWnd, nCmdShow);
UpdateWindow(hWnd);
if (RegisterTouchWindow(hWnd, 0) &&
RegisterPointerInputTarget(hWnd, PT_TOUCH))
{
...
and my message handling code looks like this;
LRESULT CALLBACK WndProc(HWND hWnd, UINT message, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam)
{
switch (message)
{
case WM_TOUCH:
{
INPUT Inputs[1] = { 0 };
Inputs[0].type = INPUT_MOUSE;
Inputs[0].mi.dx = 1;
Inputs[0].mi.dy = 0;
Inputs[0].mi.dwFlags = MOUSEEVENTF_MOVE;
SendInput(1, Inputs, sizeof(INPUT));
Ideally this test code would simply move the cursor for any touch input. Any help in fixing or just understanding this would be greatly appreciated!
I have made some progress with this but have hit other, related, problems I will ask about in a separate question. I will add a comment here when that question is live. The key to sorting out this initial issue however was to make sure I am returning 0, without calling DefWindowProc from all WM_POINTERENTER, WM_POINTERLEAVE, WM_POINTERUP, WM_POINTERDOWN, WM_POINTERUPDATE and WM_TOUCH messages, and to put my SendInput call into the code processing the WM_UPDATE message.
I want to subclass the edit control into a specific case of a masked edit - something that accepts five characters of user input, and displays colons after the first and third characters. I can imagine two basic approaches to this.
I could have the text that the edit control stores be the text I want displayed. In this case, I would need to set the text to L" : : " to begin with, and override the messages that detect user input so I could copy it into the correct slots in that string. However, I don't know how to be sure which messages those are. I assume WM_KEYDOWN is one, but if there are others, and I don't think of them all, input that triggers the messages I missed would incorrectly defer to the edit control's default handling.
Alternatively, I could have the text that the edit control stores be the text the user enters - no colons. In that case, I would need to override the way the control is displayed so I could to generate a string that includes colons based on the stored text, and draw that when drawing the control. I assume this would mean replacing the WM_PAINT handling. The problem with that is that it would seem to require redefining everything about how the control looks myself, when the text is the only part I want to change. I'm not confident I could do that perfectly, and I would certainly rather not.
How should I approach this?
Edit: I've tried overriding WM_PAINT like this:
INT_PTR CALLBACK MaskedEditProc(HWND hwndDlg, UINT message, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam,
UINT_PTR uIdSubclass, DWORD_PTR dwRefData)
{
if (message == WM_PAINT)
{
WCHAR userInput[6];
Edit_GetText(hwndDlg, userInput, 6);
WCHAR displayString[]{L" : : "};
int userInputLength{ Edit_GetTextLength(hwndDlg) };
switch (userInputLength)
{
case 5:
displayString[6] = userInput[4];
case 4:
displayString[5] = userInput[3];
case 3:
displayString[3] = userInput[2];
case 2:
displayString[2] = userInput[1];
case 1:
displayString[0] = userInput[0];
}
Edit_SetText(hwndDlg, displayString);
DefSubclassProc(hwndDlg, message, wParam, lParam);
Edit_SetText(hwndDlg, userInput);
return TRUE;
}
return DefSubclassProc(hwndDlg, message, wParam, lParam);
}
This seems to basically work, except for some reason it causes the displayed text to flicker.
Edit 2: I set the control's text to L"0:00:00" from its parent window, and gave it the following window procedure:
INT_PTR CALLBACK MaskedEditProc(HWND hwndDlg, UINT message, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam,
UINT_PTR uIdSubclass, DWORD_PTR dwRefData)
{
switch (message)
{
case WM_CUT:
return 0;
case WM_PASTE:
return 0;
case WM_KEYDOWN:
if (wParam == VK_DELETE)
{
WORD caretPosition{ LOWORD(SendMessage(hwndDlg,EM_GETSEL,0,0)) };
switch (caretPosition)
{
case 7:
return 0;
case 1:
case 4:
SendMessage(hwndDlg, EM_SETSEL, caretPosition + 1, caretPosition + 2);
break;
default:
SendMessage(hwndDlg, EM_SETSEL, caretPosition, caretPosition + 1);
}
return DefSubclassProc(hwndDlg, WM_CHAR, '0', 0);
}
case WM_CHAR:
if (wParam == '\b')
{
WORD caretPosition{ LOWORD(SendMessage(hwndDlg,EM_GETSEL,0,0)) };
switch (caretPosition)
{
case 0:
return 0;
case 2:
case 5:
SendMessage(hwndDlg, EM_SETSEL, caretPosition - 2, caretPosition - 1);
break;
default:
SendMessage(hwndDlg, EM_SETSEL, caretPosition - 1, caretPosition);
}
return DefSubclassProc(hwndDlg, WM_CHAR, '0', 0);
}
else if (iswdigit(wParam))
{
WORD caretPosition{ LOWORD(SendMessage(hwndDlg,EM_GETSEL,0,0)) };
switch (caretPosition)
{
case 1:
case 4:
SendMessage(hwndDlg, EM_SETSEL, caretPosition + 1, caretPosition + 2);
break;
default:
SendMessage(hwndDlg, EM_SETSEL, caretPosition, caretPosition + 1);
}
}
}
return DefSubclassProc(hwndDlg, message, wParam, lParam);
}
This seems to work as intended, though my backspace key has always been broken, so I haven't tested that part. The control is also set not to accept non-digit input, so I don't think the fact that I don't handle those here should break anything.
I suggest you handle only WM_CHAR (and possibly custom messages related to your masking). Leave the arrow keys alone, let the edit control handle them and in your WM_CHAR handler query for the caret placement. In your WM_CHAR when the placement would normally reach a colon send a EM_SETSEL that skips to the next character location.
I want to find all the top-level windows (children of the desktop) beneath a given point on the desktop. I can't find an API for this.
My scenario is that I'm dragging a window across the screen and want to drop it into another (known) window. I can hit test the bounds of the target window ok, but that doesn't tell me whether it's occluded by another (unknown) window. Using WindowFromPoint and friends won't work, because the window being dragged is necessarily directly under the mouse. So I'm wondering if I can obtain all windows at the mouse position, and review them to see whether one of the windows I'm tracking is directly beneath the window I'm dragging.
Is there a way to do this without resorting to EnumDesktopWindows/GetWindowRect on every mouse drag? Or perhaps there's another solution I'm missing.
If you ask kindly, WindowFromPoint will ignore your window (the one currently being dragged) and return the next window. This is what Internet Explorer does when you drag a tab.
To do that:
Handle WM_NCHITTEST in window being dragged
Return HTTRANSPARENT during dragging. Call default window proc otherwise.
WindowFromPoint will ignore HTTRANSPARENT windows, but only those belonging to the calling thread. This shouldn't be a problem for you, because you should be calling WindowFromPoint from the window owner thread anyway.
Make sure there're no child windows at point passed to WindowFromPoint, or handle WM_NCHITTEST for these child windows as well.
Troubleshooting (if you still get your window from WindowFromPoint)
Test GetCurrentThreadID() == GetWindowThreadProcessId(WindowFromPoint(), 0) to ensure you're calling from correct thread
In WM_NCHITTEST, test that hwnd parameter equals what you get from WindowFromPoint()
Example (the area within rectangle returns the underlying window from WindowFromPoint):
LRESULT CALLBACK WndProc(HWND hWnd, UINT message, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam)
{
static const RECT s_TransparentRect = {100, 100, 200, 200};
switch (message)
{
case WM_NCCREATE:
SetTimer(hWnd, 1, 100, 0);
break;
case WM_TIMER:
{
POINT cursorPos;
GetCursorPos(&cursorPos);
TCHAR buffer[256];
_snwprintf_s(buffer, _countof(buffer), _TRUNCATE, _T("WindowFromPoint: %08X\n"), (int)WindowFromPoint(cursorPos));
SetWindowText(hWnd, buffer);
}
break;
case WM_PAINT:
{
PAINTSTRUCT ps;
BeginPaint(hWnd, &ps);
Rectangle(ps.hdc, s_TransparentRect.left, s_TransparentRect.top, s_TransparentRect.right, s_TransparentRect.bottom);
EndPaint(hWnd, &ps);
}
break;
case WM_NCHITTEST:
{
POINT cursorPos;
GetCursorPos(&cursorPos);
MapWindowPoints(HWND_DESKTOP, hWnd, &cursorPos, 1);
if (PtInRect(&s_TransparentRect, cursorPos))
return HTTRANSPARENT;
}
break;
}
return DefWindowProc(hWnd, message, wParam, lParam);
}
Right, you already know what WindowFromPoint() is going to return, should be the one you are dragging. Then use GetWindow() with uCmd = GW_HWNDNEXT to get the one below it in the Z-order. GetWindowRect() to get its bounds, IntersectRect() to compute the overlap.
Keep calling GetWindow() to find more windows that might be overlapped. Until it returns NULL or the overlap is good enough. If not then you'll normally favor the one that has the largest result rectangle from IntersectRect().