I have a page that has javascript to convert an input to a MaskedTextBox:
$("#PhoneNumber").kendoMaskedTextBox({
mask: "(000) 000-0000"
});
Other than reference to 'jquery.js', if I include a reference to just 'kendo.ui.core.min.js' the MaskedTextBox works as expected. If I only include a reference to 'kendo.core.min.js' it doesn't work.
I would have thought that the 'kendo.ui.core.min.js' would need 'kendo.core.min.js' but this doesn't appear to be the case.
What is the difference between these two files?
This is a case of unfortunate naming:
kendo.core.min.js contains Kendo UI core functionality that is used everywhere, for both the OSS and commercial product
(e.g. the Observable and Widget classes)
kendo.ui.core.min.js is the complete OSS bundle which includes kendo.core.js and all widgets
So, in the first case, "core" relates to "core functionality", and in the second case, it relates to the product name of Telerik's open source product "Kendo UI Core".
Related
I have just started messing with Telerik Reporting in an MVC C# application.
Since I need to create a dozen of reports, I was asked to create an external style to be aplied to all of them.
I cannot understand how it works, how to set the rules...
Eg I can create a style to affect all HtmlTextBoxes BUT I am trying to create a rule to have all the HtmlTextBoxes contained in the Group Header having (lets say) blue Background, Bold Segoi Font and I cannot.
Any help appreciated
Styles created in a Telerik Report can be exported and then used in other reports.
You can store one or more Styles in an exported file.
The exported information is stored in an XML file.
So you can create your style rules using the Style context menu Right-clicking on the report object.
Style exporting and reusing style sheets
Use various Style Selectors to define how a style will be applied globally to items in a report. Each Style Rule that you create (either in code or using the StyleRule Collection Editor) must be created as one of the basic four selector.
Learn more about style selector.. For me the best one is the "StyleSelector" that behave like a Css Class.
Nb:
You can manage and bind your extenal StyleSheet in code behind.
Or in your calling application.
this.StyleSheet.Clear();
this.ExternalStyleSheets.Add(
new Telerik.Reporting.Drawing.ExternalStyleSheet("baseThemeRpt.xml"));
It can be done using the Descendant Type
In an Xpage running on Domino 9.0.1 I'm using a rich text control with some custom toolbar configuration using the control's "attr" property as it is described here: https://frostillic.us/f.nsf/posts/quick-and-dirty-ckeditor-toolbar-setup-for-xpages
I added the link toolbar template using
<xp:this.attrs>
<xp:attr name="toolbar">
<xp:this.value><![CDATA[[["Link", "Unlink", "Anchor"]]]]></xp:this.value>
</xp:attr>
</xp:this.attrs>
All three buttons are displayed fine, esp. I'm able to define an anchor link target.
But trying to reference the anchor target I find that the Link dialog is somewhat incomplete as I can't define my link to use a relative target on the same page. I tried entering a reference in the dialog's URL field as #myAnchorId, but that results in a link looking like this:
....
Here's an image of the dialog that pops up from my Xpage when I hit the "URL link" button:
And this is what the dialog looks like that I can test from the CKEditor Samples page:
I'm aware that the samples page uses CKEditor V 4, so the dialog is somewhat different, but even V 3.6 should be able to reference anchor links using the dialog.
I already looked up on the installed ckeditor's version; \DominoData\domino\html\ckeditor\version.txt says:
cke_version=3.6.6.2
cke_revision=20130606-1534
Question is: what's missing here? Do I have to somehow modify the dialog?
Oh my, finally got it to work; #IBM: this feature truly could use some proper documentation! I'll mark this answer as a community wiki.
Indeed a different dialog is used here, which btw appears to apply to all the dialogs in use with Domino's CKEditor implementation. The trick in my case is to use one of the custom toolbar items instead of the standard one; up to now I found three of those customized items:
use MenuLink instead of the standard Link item; this item
consists of two sub items ('URL Link' and 'Anchor Link'), each calling its own dialog version; the resulting toolbar definition then looks like this: ['MenuLink', 'Unlink', 'Anchor']
use MenuPaste instead of the standard Paste item; again, this
item consists of two sub items ('Paste' and 'Paste as text'), again
each calling its own dialog version
use LotusSpellChecker to add IBM's own spell checking feature, where CKE's standard spell checker isn't working
I found hints to those three custom items inside my local \DominoData\domino\html\ckeditor\config.js. Don't know if those are all custom items available to day.
EDIT:
IBM's Domino Designer Xpages User Guide mentions another means of customizing the toolbar; the section unfortunately is incorrect in describing the options for the toolbarType attribute: be aware that all named types must start with capital letters, e.g. Basic, Slim, Medium, Large, Full, while the also mentioned Lite type isn't working at all; mistyping or using a non-existing value results in the editor not being displayed at all.
The link dialog that you're using is not the default one, so you should check how to modify it or replace it with the default one.
I'm going to develop joomla 3.1 component.
I have checked lend tutorial. And some people ask us to go through com_weblinks component which is fully written in new MVC style.
Can you please explain img and alt attribute in menu tag and its contents submenu section in weblinks.xml.
And also can you explain link in com_weblinks_categories (option=com_categories&extension=com_weblinks)? How it work? What is the purpose of extension parameter?
<submenu>
<!--
Note that all & must be escaped to & for the file to be valid
XML and be parsed by the installer
-->
<menu link="option=com_weblinks" view="links" img="class:weblinks"
alt="Weblinks/Links">com_weblinks_links</menu>
<menu link="option=com_categories&extension=com_weblinks"
view="categories" img="class:weblinks-cat" alt="Weblinks/Categories">com_weblinks_categories</menu>
</submenu>
And also anyone explain this check condition and parameters and its pattern in controller.php
$this->checkEditId('com_weblinks.edit.weblink', $id)
Thanks a lot
When it comes to articles, banners, weblinks, newsfeed, contacts etc, they use categories. The categories component is not only used for articles but all of the mentioned above. So when you go to view the weblinks, the URL will be option=com_weblinks however when viewing the category, it will use the parent component that's used for it option=com_categories. The child extension is then defined after like so:
option=com_categories&extension=com_weblink
As for the checkEditID function, have a look at this. It's basically a method to check whether or not the ID is in the edit list.
If you look on the Joomla 2.5 menu, you will see small icons on the left hand side of each menu item which I believe img="class:weblinks-cat" is supposed to be used for, however they don't show on Joomla 3.1. I'm not sure why but can always find out why.
Weblinks is most definitely not written in the newest mvc style used by Lendr, if you are coming from 1.5 it is written in the style you should use for 2.5. That style (now known as legacy) also works in J3, but if you extend the base classes you need to rename them.
I've created an alternative layout for one of my articles which can be applied successfully, but as has been highlighted in various forums: if you view the article using the Single Article menu type the alternative layout doesn't get applied because of an XML override.
I have a Joomla site that is setup for Sales and Support where the article info such as date, hits etc is useful but on the marketing side none of that is needed, hence an alternative layout would work well.
I want to know how to enable my alternative layout using the Single Article menu type - I've already got the layout how I want it (testing it by having it overwrite default.php) but want to set it up as marketing.php instead and only have it applied to what is needed.
You're probably not going to like this answer because you have already written you're alternate view. If you were rewriting it to begin with, why would you not write in a way that the side bar parameters (date, hits, ect) are within a container that is only loaded conditionally. This way you would only have one view to worry about and a lot less headaches.
I've moved from Plone 3.1 to Plone 4.1 a site using zope.formlib for a number of non-archetypes content types, and including some customizations of the widgets.
Now I notice several changes in the layout of the edit forms, such as:
a tooltip replacing the field description (formHelp class)
larger text boxes, exceeding the border of the page body
duplicate descriptions in the checkbox widgets.
Since I'm not able to find relevant changes in the python modules and the page templates, I suspect that said changes mostly depend on the kss machinery, I'm not familiar with.
Any suggestions on what to focus on, in trying to obviate undesired changes?
I'd suggest to take the opportunity and to switch from zope.formlib to the most up to date z3c.form.
More info:
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/z3c.form
http://packages.python.org/z3c.form/
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/plone.app.z3cform