I've done everything, and it's payed off.
Trying to compile a mex file from MATLAB using the Windows 7.1 SDK.
~ I've created an compiled my C source code on GCC
~ I've created a MEX file that links and compiles fine via GCC on both Linux and OS X. Does not crash MATLAB, gateway function works fine
~ After much confusion, I switched my dev platform form 64-bit to x86 Win7
~ I've found .dll built files, but they do not link. Linking libs in MATLAB using MATLAB's linker flags will default to .lib, so...
~ I've found--after much googling--simple, pre-compiled x86 GSL .lib's and source files and linked them with MATLAB, eliminating any gsl_blas.h-and-it's-dependencies unrecognized external symbol errors
~ I've re-written every single variable declaration in my source code such that it is C89 standard compatible
~ I've set linker flags appropriately to avoid LIBCMT and any other LIB conflicts
~ I've installed the 2010 and 2012 VC C Runtime libraries
~ I've checked to make sure I have msvcrt.dll and msvcp60.dll in my System files
~ I've followed multiple tutorials online on how supposedly link everything together, most of which had nothing broken links or un-replicable results. I didn't find much to go off of for Cygwin or MinGW.
~ I've tried using the Lcc-win32 2.4.1 compiler
If I was doing basic matrix and vector operations, I'd be set, but unfortunately the various decomposition routines I'm utilizing require parts from the cblas library, which I linked as well, but I get ~30 errors all reporting the same thing...
cblas.lib(ctrsv.obj) : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol __libm_sse2_sqrt_precise
Here's my MATLAB command.
mex -largeArrayDims -IC:\gsl\include -LC:\gsl\lib -lgsl -lcblas LINKFLAGS="$LINKFLAGS /NODEFAULTLIB:libcmt.lib" file1.c file2.c
So, out of options and frustrated out of my mind, I (naturally) come to stack overflow. Anyone have any idea how to solve this one? The only thing I've foudn on google points to wineHQ errors, not very helpful.
And, if possible, I'd rather not try to compile first on VS201X. I have access to whatever version I need, if necessary, but to me that just seems like a redundant step. Maybe I'm spoiled with Unix-based file system management and linking, though.
It's easy to compile the GSL library under MinGW, in fact the process of compiling from sources is exactly identical to that in Linux. Here are the steps I took:
Setup MinGW for Windows. I am using MinGW-w64 but there is also the popular TDM-GCC distribution which comes with a friendly web-installer.
Obtain GSL sources, and extract the tarball (gsl-1.16.tar.gz is the latest as of now)
Compile as usual, I've used the following commands:
$ ./configure --host=x86_64-w64-mingw32 --prefix=/mingw/local --enable-shared --enable-static
$ make
$ make install
It should take several minutes to finish. Maybe you can enable parallel builds to speed up compilation (make -j)
You'll end up with the necessary files installed in /mingw/local with the usual structure underneath (bin, lib, include).
Finally you can compile an example program with:
$ export PATH=/mingw/local:$PATH
$ gcc `gsl-config --cflags` -o main main.c `gsl-config --libs`
Of course if you prefer using Visual C++ as compiler, people out there have prepared solutions to build GSL using Visual Studio (either manually created project files, or using a build system like CMake and the like). See this question for such projects.
A third option is using Cygwin.
Related
I installed boost following instructions here: https://phylogeny.uconn.edu/tutorial-v2/part-1-ide-project-v2/setting-up-the-boost-c-library-v2/#
works in Visual Studio, but doesn't work when compiling using mingw g++ in windows cmd.
Editor is vim.
source code is like:
#include <boost/algorithm/string.hpp>
...
compiling like this:
> g++ -o test test.cpp
test.cpp:7:10: fatal error: boost/algorithm/string.hpp: No such file or directory
#include <boost/algorithm/string.hpp>
How can I make my mingw g++ available for boost?
You used the config from the page:
import option ;
using msvc ;
option.set keep-going : false ;
libraries = --with-program_options --with-regex --with-filesystem --with-system ;
using msvc should probably tell you something. It uses the MSVC toolchain. Because these are not interoperable (different C++ runtime libraries, for starters, different ABI likely), you can't link to those libraries.
Header Only
If, like the code you showed, you only require headers, then that is no issue, just add the include path to your compiler flags, as the tutorial also told you:
So either typing command line options directly:
g++ -I C:\boost_1_65_0
Or adding to a variable in your build script(s), like Makefile:
CPPFLAGS+=-I C:\boost_1_65_0
Or CMake:
INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES(C:\boost_1_65_0)
With Linking
To use pre-built shared libraries, you need to build different versions for mingw. See e.g. these steps: https://gist.github.com/zrsmithson/0b72e0cb58d0cb946fc48b5c88511da8
I installed from that last week (context) and it worked fine. (I also ended up going no-IDE with Vim, though VsCode was ok as well)
Check that it is using the mingw toolchain (e.g. mgw81) which also means that mgw81 shoud be part of the library filenames. Following just that tutorial already gives you this, but your previously existing configs might interfere if you're not careful.
I'm a student doing research involving extending the TM capabilities of gcc. My goal is to make changes to gcc source, build gcc from the modified source, and, use the new executable the same way I'd use my distro's vanilla gcc.
I built and installed gcc in a different location (not /usr/bin/gcc), specifically because the modified gcc will be unstable, and because our project goal is to compare transactional programs compiled with the two different versions.
Our changes to gcc source impact both /gcc and /libitm. This means we are making a change to libitm.so, one of the shared libraries that get built.
My expectation:
when compiling myprogram.cpp with /usr/bin/g++, the version of libitm.so that will get linked should be the one that came with my distro;
when compiling it with ~/project/install-dir/bin/g++, the version of libitm.so that will get linked should be the one that just got built when I built my modified gcc.
But in reality it seems both native gcc and mine are using the same libitm, /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libitm.so.1.
I only have a rough grasp of gcc internals as they apply to our project, but this is my understanding:
Our changes tell one compiler pass to conditionally insert our own "function builtin" instead of one it would normally use, and this is / becomes a "symbol" which needs to link to libitm.
When I use the new gcc to compile my program, that pass detects those conditions and successfully inserts the symbol, but then at runtime my program gives a "relocation error" indicating the symbol is not defined in the file it is searching in: ./test: relocation error: ./test: symbol _ITM_S1RU4, version LIBITM_1.0 not defined in file libitm.so.1 with link time reference
readelf shows me that /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libitm.so.1 does not contain our new symbols while ~/project/install-dir/lib64/libitm.so.1 does; if I re-run my program after simply copying the latter libitm over the former (backing it up first, of course), it does not produce the relocation error anymore. But naturally this is not a permanent solution.
So I want the gcc I built to use the shared libs that were built along with it when linking. And I don't want to have to tell it where they are every time - my feeling is that it should know where to look for them since I deliberately built it somewhere else to behave differently.
This sounds like the kind of problem any amateur gcc developer would have when trying to make a dev environment and still be able to use both versions of gcc, but I had difficulty finding similar questions. I am thinking this is a matter of lacking certain config options when I configure gcc before building it. What is the right configuration to do this?
My small understanding of the instructions for building and installing gcc led me to do the following:
cd ~/project/
mkdir objdir
cd objdir
../source-dir/configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --prefix=/home/myusername/project/install-dir
make -j2
make install
I only have those config options because they seemed like the ones closest related to "only building the parts I need" and "not overwriting native gcc", but I could be wrong. After the initial config step I just re-run make -j2 and make install every time I change the code. All these steps do complete without errors, and they produce the ~/project/install-dir/bin/ folder, containing the gcc and g++ which behave as described.
I use ~/project/install-dir/bin/g++ -fgnu-tm -o myprogram myprogram.cpp to compile a transactional program, possibly with other options for programs with threads.
(I am using Xubuntu 16.04.3 (64 bit), within VirtualBox on Windows. The installed /usr/bin/gcc is version 5.4.0. Our source at ~/project/source-dir/ is a modified version of 5.3.0.)
You’re running into build- versus run-time linking differences. When you build with -fgnu-tm, the compiler knows where the library it needs is found, and it tells the linker where to find it; you can see this by adding -v to your g++ command. However when you run the resulting program, the dynamic linker doesn’t know it should look somewhere special for the ITM library, so it uses the default library in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu.
Things get even more confusing with ITM on Ubuntu because the library is installed system-wide, but the link script is installed in a GCC-private directory. This doesn’t happen with the default GCC build, so your own GCC build doesn’t do this, and you’ll see libitm.so in ~/project/install-dir/lib64.
To fix this at run-time, you need to tell the dynamic linker where to find the right library. You can do this either by setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH (to /home/.../project/install-dir/lib64), or by storing the path in the binary using -Wl,-rpath=/home/.../project/install-dir/lib64 when you build it.
I'm trying to compile CMake using a non-default GCC installed in /usr/local/gcc530, on Solaris 2.11.
I have LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/gcc530/lib/sparcv9
Bootstrap proceeds fine, bootstrapped cmake successfully compiles various object files, but when it tries to link the real cmake (and other executables), I get pages of "undefined reference" errors to various standard library functions, because, as running the link command manually with -Wl,-verbose shows, the linker links with /usr/lib/64/libstdc++.so of the system default, much older GCC.
This is because apparently CMake tries to find curses/ncurses libraries (even if I tell it BUILD_CursesDialog:BOOL=OFF), finds them in /usr/lib/64, and adds -L/usr/lib/64 to build/Source/CMakeFiles/cmake.dir/link.txt, which causes the linker to use libstdc++.so from there, and not my actual GCC's own.
I found a workaround: I can get the path to proper libraries from $CC -m64 -print-file-name=libstdc++.so then put it with -L into LDFLAGS when running ./configure, and all works well then.
Is there a less hacky way? It's really weird that I can't tell GCC to prioritize its own libraries.
Also, is there some way to have CMake explain where different parts of a resulting command line came from?
I have downloaded Bellhop, which is an underwater acoustic simulator written in Fortran. It can be found here with the Makefile.
Question 1: I would like to know if it is possible to compile Fortran code, including everything needed, so a user without gfortran installed, can run it.
I have read here the following:
static linking
This section does not apply to Windows users, except for Cygwin users with gcc4-4.3.2-2 or later.
gfortran is composed of two main parts: the compiler, which creates the executable program from your code, and the library, which is used when you run your program afterwards. That explains why, if gfortran is installed in a non-standard directory, it may compile your code fine but the executable may fail with an error message like library not found. One way to avoid this (more ideas can be found on the binaries page) is to use the so-called "static linking", available with option -static gfortran then put the library code inside the program created, thus enabling it to run without the library present (like, on a computer where gfortran is not installed). Complete example is:
gfortran -static myfile.f -o program.exe
Reading this, I suppose that it is possible to do what I'm asking but I'm not very familiarized with fortran and makefiles. I don't understand this:
put the library code inside the program created
Question 2: How can I put the library code inside the program? Where can I find the library? What does "inside the program" means?
I'm running OSX 10.9.4 and gfortran
I solved my problem about compiling Fortran code with gfortran using static libraries.
As #M.S.B. said, using static-libgfortran worked for me under MacOS.
If somebody is having issues with linking the libquadmath.0.dylb library, remove libquadmath.0.dylib and libquadmath.dylib from /usr/local/gfortran/lib/
This doest the trick. Further information can be found here
I think the meaning of the bold part is actually
gfortran then puts the library code inside the
program created
That means using -static should be enough, there is no additional step. Just be advised you will need a static version of all the libraries that you link with.
I know this is very old tracker, but maybe somebody will be still interested in the solution that works.
Let's say we have code:
! fort_sample.f90
program main
write (*,*) 'Hello'
stop
end
First, compile the stuff:
gfortran -c -o fort_sample.o fort_sample.f90
Then, link stuff
ld -o ./fort_sample -no_compact_unwind \
-arch x86_64 -macosx_version_min 10.12.0 \
-lSystem \
/usr/local/gfortran/lib/libgfortran.a \
/usr/local/gfortran/lib/libquadmath.a \
/usr/local/gfortran/lib/gcc/x86_64-apple-darwin16/6.3.0/libgcc.a \
fort_sample.o
You can execute it
./fort_sample
Hello
You can notice that quadmath is no longer there
> otool -L fort_sample
fort_sample:
/usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 1238.51.1)
I guess this is what you were looking for in a first place. No removing dylibs, no symbolic links, etc.
The current version of the option is -static-libgfortran. This means that the Fortran specific libraries of gfortran will be included into the executable. These are libraries are automatically found for a good installation of gfortran. This should produce an executable that should run on other computers with the same OS, even if that computer doesn't have gfortran installed. This option likely doesn't statically link all libraries, so there is some risk that some other shared library used on your computer won't be available on the other computer.
I have a project written in gcc - bison -flex on Linux environment. All the project is implemented into a *.so file and is called from python-tkinter graphic surface.
There is a need to run it on windows. However I'd avoid to install all the windows equivalent of gcc - bison -flex programs.
Is it possible to force gcc IN LINUX ENVIRONMENT to compile WINDOWS DLL instead of *.so? It could make life easier to use the same technics as I do now: just do calls from python-tkinter graphic surface.
You can, of course, cross-compile it.
You'll need some packages installed, though.
Your normal project would be able to build if you use the MINGW equivalent of GCC for the target architecture.
Also, take a look at this:
Manual for cross-compiling a C++ application from Linux to Windows?
The linking can be kind of troublesome though, since it could come a time where softlinking fails due to versions. In that case you'll need to create some symbolic links to the correct version.
The output of the compilation process should be with -o DYNAMIC-LIBRARIE-NAME.dll and of course use the -shared flag.
Hope it gives you some pointers..
Regards.