web audio filter response - filter

I have a simple filter.
var filter = ctx.createBiquadFilter();
filter.type = 'highpass';
filter.frequency.setValueAtTime(10,ctx.currentTime);
I would like to see its frequency response using getFrequencyResponse
window.setInterval(function() {
var frequencyHz = new Float32Array(1),
magResponse = new Float32Array(1),
phaseResponse = new Float32Array(1);
frequencyHz[0] = 10;
filter.getFrequencyResponse(frequencyHz,magResponse,phaseResponse);
console.log(magResponse);
},100);
I expect to see [0.9565200805664062] which is the correct response for 10Hz, but instead I see [0.0008162903832271695] which is the response for 350Hz, the default frequency value.
I can only get a sensible response if I manually set the value, whereas if I use param methods such as setValueAtTime, the filter response ignores them and spits out the default. In other words, getFrequencyResponse seems to only work if the filter values are set manually, preventing filter analysis when the values are set by automation. If this is true, this seems like more than a small problem with the api.
Someone please try something near to this, and if it works (doubtful) please post the code.

Actually, no, it should be taking effect, but because you're causing an instantaneous value change at the NEXT processing block (that's what ".currentTime" means), that change has not yet been processed - so you're seeing the default value. You should see, for example, getFrequencyResponse changes over time for a setLinearRamp.

Related

Any ar js multimarkers learning tutorial?

I have been searching for ar.js multimarkers tutorial or anything that explains about it. But all I can find is 2 examples, but no tutorials or explanations.
So far, I understand that it requires to learn the pattern or order of the markers, then it stores it in localStorage. This data is used later to display the image.
What I don't understand, is how this "learner" is implemented. Also, the learning process is only used once by the "creator", right? The output file should be stored and then served later when needed, not created from scratch at each person's phone or computer.
Any help is appreciated.
Since the question is mostly about the learner page, I'll try to break it down as much as i can:
1) You need to have an array of {type, URL} objects.
A sample of creating the default array is shown below (source code):
var markersControlsParameters = [
{
type : 'pattern',
patternUrl : 'examples/marker-training/examples/pattern-files/pattern-hiro.patt',
},
{
type : 'pattern',
patternUrl : 'examples/marker-training/examples/pattern-files/pattern-kanji.patt',
}]
2) You need to feed this to the 'learner' object.
By default the above object is being encoded into the url (source) and then decoded by the learner site. What is important, happens on the site:
for each object in the array, an ArMarkerControls object is created and stored:
// array.forEach(function(markerParams){
var markerRoot = new THREE.Group()
scene.add(markerRoot)
// create markerControls for our markerRoot
var markerControls = new THREEx.ArMarkerControls(arToolkitContext, markerRoot, markerParams)
subMarkersControls.push(markerControls)
The subMarkersControls is used to create the object used to do the learning. At long last:
var multiMarkerLearning = new THREEx.ArMultiMakersLearning(arToolkitContext, subMarkersControls)
The example learner site has multiple utility functions, but as far as i know, the most important here are the ArMultiMakersLearning members which can be used in the following order (or any other):
// this method resets previously collected statistics
multiMarkerLearning.resetStats()
// this member flag enables data collection
multiMarkerLearning.enabled = true
// this member flag stops data collection
multiMarkerLearning.enabled = false
// To obtain the 'learned' data, simply call .toJSON()
var jsonString = multiMarkerLearning.toJSON()
Thats all. If you store the jsonString as
localStorage.setItem('ARjsMultiMarkerFile', jsonString);
then it will be used as the default multimarker file later on. If you want a custom name or more areas - then you'll have to modify the name in the source code.
3) 2.1.4 debugUI
It seems that the debug UI is broken - the UI buttons do exist but are nowhere to be seen. A hot fix would be using the 'markersAreaEnabled' span style for the div
containing the buttons (see this source bit).
It's all in this glitch, you can find it under the phrase 'CHANGES HERE' in the arjs code.

In JMeter, How do i loop until a result is found

I have a request in Jmeter that I need to loop until I find the result I am looking for. I have read a few bits about a while controller but found them unhelpful as they seem to glance over vital information or are using an older version of Jmeter
I'm currently using Jmeter 5.0, and I have attempted to implement a while controller but failed as I think I do not understand how to properly handle the response, or even grab it, and then use it as a comparison to assert if the item exists.
I get a response from the HTTP request call response that looks a little somthing like this:
{"data":{"getIDs":{"Page": 1,"PageSize": 25,"PageCount": 1,"isFirstPage": true,"batches":[{"id":"b601a257-13fe-4de3-b779-a5922e89765a"},{"id":"b601a257-13fe-4de3-b779-a5922e89765b"},{"id":"b601a257-13fe-4de3-b779-a5922e89765c"}]}}
I need to recall the endpoint until I have found the ID I am looking for or cancel after 10 attempts
So after a bit of fumbling around I, I figured on my own answer that seems to work well. But I would suggest looking at other sources before taking mine as gospel.
The basic structure looks as follows:
Within a thread I set the variables then create the while loop as the next step. Within the While loop I created a counter then added the request I wanted to loop after. To make the loop work for me, I have three items sat under the request.
A Response Assertion: this check for a 200 status as the call should never fail
A Constant Timer: There is a delay between polls of the end point
A JSR223 Assertion: groovy code used ensure the while loop logic is handled
User Defined Variables:
Here i have setup two variables:
DONE: Done is a string value I alter if my JSR223 Assertion finds the values I'm looking for in the HTTP request
MyValue (this is dynamically driven in my actual test, for demo purpose, I’m just declaring a value to look for i.e. 12345)
While Controller:
I still feel i may not understand this correctly, however after some googling I came across the following code that works for me despite some errors in the JMeter console:
${__javaScript(("${DONE}" != "yep" && ${Counter} < 10),)}
This code is saying that the while loop will continue until either of these two conditions are met:
DONE, the variable created earlier, is equal to the value yep
Counter is less than 10 (Counter is declared beneath the while loop)
Counter:
this was a simple configuration step that just worked once I understood it needed to be within the while loop, i configured the following:
Starting value = 1
Increment = 1
Exported Variable Name = Counter
Ticked 'Track Counter independently for each user'
Ticked 'Reset counter on each thread group iteration'
(Exported Variable Name: you can call this whatever you want, I’ve named it counter for the purpose of this demo)
JSR223 Assertion:
This is a simple script assertion that just uses a Boolean and a couple of if statements to assert the state of the test.
import org.apache.commons.lang3.StringUtils;
def done = vars.get("DONE");
String response = prev.getResponseDataAsString(); //retrieves the http request response as text
String MyValue = vars.get("MyValue");
def counter = vars.get("Counter");
//Find Substring within response string and stor result as boolean
String container = response;
String content = MyValue;
boolean containerContainsContent = StringUtils.containsIgnoreCase(container, content);
//Check if the true condition is met and change the value so the loop exits
if (containerContainsContent == true){
log.info("------------------------Got Here");
vars.put("DONE", "yep");
}
//Force test to fail after 10 loops
if (Counter.toString() == "10"){
assert 1 == 2
}

vars.put function not writing the desired value into the jmeter parameter

Below is the code which i have been trying to address the below UseCase in JMETER.Quick help is appreciated.
Usecase:
A particular text like "History" in a page response needs to be validated and the if the text counts is more than 50 a random selection of the options within the page needs to be made.And if the text counts is less than 50 1st option needs to be selected.
I am new to Jmeter and trying to solve this usingJSR223 POST processor but somehow stuck at vars.put function where i am unable to see the desired number being populated within the V paramter.
Using a boundary extractor where match no 1 should suffice the 1st selection and 0 should suffice the random selection.
def TotalInstanceAvailable = vars.get("sCount_matchNr").toInteger()
log.info("Total Instance Available = ${TotalInstanceAvailable}");
def boundary_analyzer =50;
def DesiredNumber,V
if (TotalInstanceAvailable < boundary_analyzer)
{
log.info("I am inside the loop")
DesiredNumber = 0;
log.info("DesiredNumber= ${DesiredNumber}");
vars.put("V", DesiredNumber)
log.info("v= ${V}");
}
else{
DesiredNumber=1;
log.info("DesiredNumber=${DesiredNumber}");
vars.put("V", "DesiredNumber")
log.info("v= ${V}");
}
def sCount = vars.get("sCount")
log.info("Text matching number is ${sCount_matchNr}")
You cannot store an integer in JMeter Variables using vars.put() function, you either need to cast it to String first, to wit change this line:
vars.put("V", DesiredNumber)
to this one
vars.put("V", DesiredNumber as String)
alternatively you can use vars.putObject() function which can store literally everything however you will be able to use the value only in JSR223 Elements by calling vars.getObject()
Whenever you face a problem with your JMeter script get used to look at jmeter.log file or toggle Log Viewer window - in absolute majority of cases you will find the root cause of your problem in the log file:

Using JobQueue to continuously refresh a message

I'm building a Telegram bot that uses ConversationHandler to prompt the user for a few parameters and settings about how the bot should behave. This information is stored in some global variables since it needs to be available and editable by different functions inside the program. Every global variable is a dictionary in which each user is associated with its own value. Here's an example:
language = {123456: 'English', 789012: 'Italian'}
where 123456 and 789012 are user ids obtained from update.message.from_user.id inside each function.
After all the required information has been received and stored, the bot should send a message containing a text fetched from a web page; the text on the web page is constantly refreshed, so I want the message to be edited every 60 seconds and updated with the new text, until the user sends the command /stop.
The first solution that came to my mind in order to achieve this was something like
info_message = bot.sendMessage(update.message.chat_id, text = "This message will be updated...")
...
def update_message(bot, update):
while True:
url = "http://example.com/etc/" + language[update.message.from_user.id]
result = requests.get(url).content
bot.editMessageText(result, chat_id = update.message.chat_id, message_id = info_message.message_id)
time.sleep(60)
Of course that wouldn't work at all, and it is a really bad idea. I found out that the JobQueue extension would be what I need. However, there is something I can't figure out.
With JobQueue I would have to set up a callback function for my job. In my case, the function would be
def update_message(bot, job):
url = "http://example.com/etc/" + language[update.message.from_user.id]
result = requests.get(url).content
bot.editMessageText(result, chat_id = update.message.chat_id, message_id = info_message.message_id)
and it would be called every 60 seconds. However this wouldn't work either. Indeed, the update parameter is needed inside the function in order to fetch the page according to the user settings and to send the message to the correct chat_id. I'd need to pass that parameter to the function along with bot, job, but that doesn't seem to be possible.
Otherwise I would have to make update a global variable, but I thought there must be a better solution. Any thoughts? Thanks.
I had the same issue. A little digging into the docs revealed that you can pass job objects a context parameter which can then be accessed by the callback function as job.context.
context (Optional[object]) – Additional data needed for the callback function. Can be accessed through job.context in the callback. Defaults to None
global language
language = {123456: 'English', 789012: 'Italian'}
j=updater.job_queue
context={"chat_id":456754, "from_user_id":123456, "message_id":111213}
update_job = job(update_message, 60, repeat=True, context=context)
j.put(update_job, next_t=0.0)
def update_message(bot, job):
global language
context=job.context
url = "http://example.com/etc/" + language[context["from_user_id"]]
result = requests.get(url).content
bot.editMessageText(result,
chat_id = context["chat_id"],
message_id = context["message_id"])

SendKeys() is adding default value (issue) + datetime value sent

basically the issue is taking place at the moment when I send some value which is appended to a default value '01/01/2000' somehow. I've tried different ways to do this without succeed, I've used these exact lines in other script and it worked but I don't know why this isn't working here. Please find below the last code I used followed by the picture with the issue displayed.
var targetStartDate = browser.driver.findElement(by.id('StartDate'));
targetStartDate.clear().then(function () {
targetStartDate.sendKeys('09/01/2016');
})
example of the issue
Thanks in advance for any response.
You can try issuing clear() call before sending keys:
targetStartDate.clear();
targetStartDate.sendKeys('09/01/2016');
The other option would be to select all text in the input prior to sending keys:
// protractor.Key.COMMAND on Mac
targetStartDate.sendKeys(protractor.Key.chord(protractor.Key.CONTROL, "a"));
targetStartDate.sendKeys('09/01/2016');
I have encountered this same issue before. There is an input mask formatting the input in the field. In order to solve this, you must write your test as if it were the actual user, with the formatting in mind:
var targetStartDate = browser.driver.findElement(by.id('StartDate'));
// Remove the forward slashes because the input field takes care of that.
var inputDate = '09012016';
targetStartDate.clear();
// Loop through each character of the string and send it to the input
// field followed by a delay of 250 milliseconds to give the field
// enough time to format the input as you keep sending keys.
for (var i = 0; i < inputDate.length; i++) {
targetStartDate.sendKeys(inputDate[i]);
browser.driver.sleep(250);
}
Depending on the latency of the site and performance, you may either need to decrease the 250 millisecond delay, or be able to decrease it.
Hope this helps!

Resources