Umbraco 7 - Alternative URLs - url-rewriting

I am using Umbraco 7 and I need to achieve something which I am not entirely sure of the best way to approach it.
Basically I have vacancies on a website that have URLs currently such as this:
/vacancies/a/almighty-school/live/first-year-teacher/
What I want is for the URL to NOT show the /a and /live part (which are needed for structuring in the administration area), so basically the above URL would be:
/vacancies/almighty-school/first-year-teacher
I am not entirely sure of the best way of doing this, I know about URL Rewriting but am not sure if that could do this and if it could I really am not that clued up on the regular expressions needed to create it.
Any ideas anyone??

Add a property called umbracoUrlAlias, type Textstring, to your document type. Set the value to be "/vacancies/almighty-school/first-year-teacher".
This is a "magic string" that will then allow the document to be accessed via an alternate URL.
You could also set up a ContentService.Saving event to automatically set the value of this on the given node according to some preset rules.

I think the best way to tackle this is to create your own Segment Provider:
When the URL is build up, umbraco will convert every node into a segment. Each published Content has a url segment.
The documentation for manipulating these segments can be found here: http://our.umbraco.org/documentation/Reference/Request-Pipeline/outbound-pipeline

Related

Localization of Domain Models in Neos / Flow

A website I am currently developing with Neos / Flow includes a self-developed shop system implemented as a Flow Plugin. The products, variants and vouchers are kept as domain models.
Since the customer wants to provide their website in different languages I need to find a way to manage translations for the domain objects.
I cannot find a way which is baked into Neos/Flow so my first thought was to simply insert translation identifiers inside the translatable fields (description & stuff like that) which are then used inside the view with the translation viewhelper. This would work totally fine if the customer would not want to edit those fields by themselves.
My next idea was to just implement an extra field for each language-dimension and each translatable field (like description_en; description_es, …). But this would be the worst approach in terms of maintainability and changeability.
I usually worked on TYPO3 projects where translation of domain objects is really easy and working out of the box. So this experience inside Neos is very frustrating.
Does anybody came across a similar problem or even has found a solution to this?
whenever we've got the requirement to have multi-language content so far, we've solved that, by storing the data within the Neos Content Repository. This way language handling aka dimensions work out of the box. Also, building a UI for that records is very easy by using inline editing or the inspector of the content module.
Note, that storing data in the CR does not necessarily means, that you have to store it under the /site root node. You could also add a new root node /products to store your products.
You could have a look at https://github.com/neos/metadata-contentrepositoryadapter where meta data is stored under its own root.
Hope that helps,
Cheers, Daniel
For the record, something like that could also be achieved with the Doctrine Translateable extension in pure Flow:
https://github.com/Atlantic18/DoctrineExtensions/blob/master/doc/translatable.md
See http://flowframework.readthedocs.io/en/stable/TheDefinitiveGuide/PartIII/Persistence.html#on-the-doctrine-event-system on how to activate the extension in Flow.
However, the cleaner aproach indeed is to actually separate domain model and content (unless you build a CMS and the content is your domain ;)

SEO Friendly exposed filter view Drupal 7

Currently url display like this
news/?tid=telecom
I need to alias
news/telecom
using clean URL its works in all pages but in view exposed filters not worked
Have you tried views contextual filters to solve your problem?
You can also solve it using contextual filter. You can use taxonomy term names with this filter by adjusting Specify validation criteria settings. please see this answer Drupal 7 views contextual filters taxonomy name
Currently, it's my belief that the only generic way to solve this issue is either manipulating the URLs at the httpd layer, or using hook_url_inbound_alter and hook_url_outbound_alter. You can read a bit more about the mentioned hooks at this question.
However, if I were to give this another shoot myself, I would attempt a Views specific solution instead, as this problem is common enough that it could be justified to have a module for this.
In hook_views_pre_build, one could take data from a url like "members/valuea/valueb", push these values into $_GET['q'], let views build it's query seeing the get arguments "in the url", then possibly remove them again in hook_views_post_build.
I hope this will help you.

Caching options

As I see Smarty uses caching ‘by template’.
Can I somehow provide an URL to it, so it would cache pages by the URL given?
Can I get is_cached() to work with that given URL?
And compare last_mtime of the cached file with some of my data and then say «it’s time to update the cache»?
As default Smarty uses file based caching while storing php-like files in the $cache_dir.
You can implement a custom cache function and register it, but that depends on your desire how deep you want to dive into Smarty.
A way easier approach would be to just add a bit of the urls name to the template filename, so in your template directory for example might look like.
/your/templates/url1.index.tpl
/your/templates/url2.index.tpl
...and then use Smartys caching according to your needs.

ignoring last uri segment via mod_rewrite or CodeIgniter

I was just wondering if it is possible to ignore the last URI segment of my application via either mod_rewrite or CodeIgniter. I don't want a redirect away or a remove the URI segment. I just want my app to not know it exists. So in the browser the client will see:
http://example.com/keep/keep/ignore/
but the app is only aware of:
http://example.com/keep/keep/
The idea is, if JavaScript detects /ignore/ in the URI, it will trigger an action.
/ignore/ may appear as 1st, 2nd, 3rd or 4th segment, but will only ever appear as the final one and may sometimes not appear at all.
I found some info online about ignoring sub-directories with mod-rewrite, but none of them really work like this.
**
Incase any CodeIgniters suggest passing it as an unused extra parameter to my method - The app has far too many controllers and far too many wildcard routes for this to work site wide.
I think a mod_rewrite solution would be best if possible. If not, perhaps it can be done with a CodeIgniter pre-controller hook or something, but I'm not sure how that would work.
EDIT: How I got it to work
For anyone else who would ever like to know the same thing - in the end I overwrote _explode_segments() in MY_URI to not include this segment.
With the URI class you can check and detect what URI's are and what they have.
$this->uri->segment(n)
Check out the user guide: http://codeigniter.com/user_guide/libraries/uri.html

SEO URL Structure

Based on the following example URL structure:
mysite.com/mypage.aspx?a=red&b=green&c=blue
Pages in the application use ASP.net user controls and some of these controls build a query string. To prevent duplicate keys being created e.g. &pid=12&pid=10, I am researching methods of rewriting the URL:
a)
mysite.com/mypage.aspx/red/green/blue
b)
mysite.com/mypage.aspx?controlname=a,red|b,green|c,blue
Pages using this structure would be publishing content that I would like to get indexed and ranked - articles and products (8,000 products to start, with thousands more being added later)
My gut instinct tells me to go with the first method, but would it would be overkill to add all that infrastructure if the second method will accomplish my goal of getting pages indexed AND ranked.
So my question, looking at the pro's and con's, Google Ranking, time to implement etc. which method should I use?
Thanks!
From an SEO perspective you want to try and avoid the querystring, so getting it into the URL and a short form URL is going to get you a better "bang for the buck" on the implementation side of things.
Therefore, I'd recommend the first.
Why don't use MVC pattern, this way all your link will be SEO ready. Check here, you will find what is MVC and also some implementation in .net!
You can easily make SEO-friendly URLs with the help of Helicon Ape (the software which allows having basic Apache functionality on your IIS server). You'll need mod_rewrite I guess.
If you get interested, I can help you with the rules.
Can you explain in more detail your current architecture and what the parameters all mean? There's nothing really wrong with query strings if it's truly dynamic content. Rewriting ?a=red&b=green&c=blue to /red/green/blue is kinda pointless and it's unclear from the URL what might be on the page.
The key is to simplify as much as possible. Split the site into categories and give each "entity" one URL.
For example, if you are selling products, use one URL per product, with keywords in the URL - e.g. mysite.com/products/red-widget or mysite.com/products/12-red-widget if you need the product ID.

Resources