I have setup drag and drop headings to group by the relevant column from jQgrid Grouping Drag and Drop
It works great however I am trying to display the column name before the value i.e.
Client : Test data data
Client : Test2 data data
I've been going around in circles if any one could help.
if i take the same code used for the dynamic group by which should be the (column Name)
I end up with The Column data not the column name.
$('#' + gridId).jqGrid('groupingGroupBy', getheader());
function getheader() {
var header = $('#groups ol li:not(.placeholder)').map(function () {
return $(this).attr('data-column');
}).get();
return header;
}
if i use the same function in group text I get data not the column name.
I've come from C# and I am very new to jQuery.
If any one could help it would be greatly appreciated.
Kind Regards,
Ryan
First of all the updated demo provides the solution of your problem:
Another demo contains simplified demo which demonstrates just how one could display the grouping header in the form Column Header: Column data in the grouping header instead of Column data used as default.
The main idea of the solution is the usage of formatDisplayField property of groupingView which I suggested originally in the answer. The current version of jqGrid support the option. If one would use for example the options
grouping: true,
groupingView: {
groupField: ["name", "invdate"],
groupColumnShow: [false, false],
formatDisplayField: [
customFormatDisplayField,
customFormatDisplayField
]
}
where customFormatDisplayField callback function are defined as
var customFormatDisplayField = function (displayValue, value, colModel) {
return colModel.name + ": " + displayValue;
}
will display almost the results which you need, but it will uses name property of colModel instead of the corresponding name from colNames. To makes the final solution one use another implementation of customFormatDisplayField:
var getColumnHeaderByName = function (colName) {
var $self = $(this),
colNames = $self.jqGrid("getGridParam", "colNames"),
colModel = $self.jqGrid("getGridParam", "colModel"),
cColumns = colModel.length,
iCol;
for (iCol = 0; iCol < cColumns; iCol++) {
if (colModel[iCol].name === colName) {
return colNames[iCol];
}
}
},
customFormatDisplayField = function (displayValue, value, colModel, index, grp) {
return getColumnHeaderByName.call(this, colModel.name) + ": " + displayValue;
};
Related
I have a datatable and the 5th column of this table contains several labels. I also have a separate labels list with checkboxes, where user can select multiple labels and filter the table. I found the following way to filter the table:
table.column(5).search('value1|value2', true, false).draw();
This returns all the rows, that contain value1 OR value2, but I need to return the rows that contain both, value1 AND value2, but I could not find anything about this. I tried something like this as an experiment, but it did not work:
table.column(5).search('value1&value2', true, false).draw();
How do I search the datatable with an AND condition?
As andrewJames suggested in the comment, I used the Datatables search plug-in and created a custom filter function:
$('.labels-filter-button').unbind().click(function(){
$.fn.dataTable.ext.search.push(function (settings, data, dataIndex) {
let selectedLabels = $('#labelsFilterSelector').val();
let content = data[5];
let rowIncludes = true;
for (var i = 0; i < selectedLabels.length; i++) {
if (content.indexOf(selectedLabels[i]) == -1){
rowIncludes = false;
}
}
return rowIncludes;
});
table.draw();
$.fn.dataTable.ext.search.pop();
});
Works like a charm on any number of inputs.
I'm trying to export dc.js filtered table data using FileSaver.js.
I use the code below based on this which is fine except it export all fields (but filtered ok) whereas I would just need table specific fields which are are only a few of the fields plus 2 calculated.
d3.select('#download')
.on('click', function() {
var blob = new Blob([d3.csv.format(dateDim.top(Infinity))], {type: "text/csv;charset=utf-8"});
saveAs(blob, DateT + '.csv');
});
Is there a way I can point to the table rather that dimension?
Thanks.
EDIT: Working code below
d3.select('#download')
.on('click', function() {
var data = MYTABLEDIM.top(Infinity);
{
data = data.map(function(d) {
var row = {};
MYTABLENAME.columns().forEach(function(c) {
row[MYTABLENAME._doColumnHeaderFormat(c)] = MYTABLENAME._doColumnValueFormat(c, d);
});
return row;
});
}
var blob = new Blob([d3.csv.format(data)], {type: "text/csv;charset=utf-8"});
saveAs(blob, 'data.csv');
});
Good question.
It is actually possible to format the data according to the column definitions, by using some undocumented methods of the data table.
I've updated the example with a radio button to choose which data to download.
Here is the code that transforms and download the data as it is encoded in the table:
d3.select('#download')
.on('click', function() {
var data = nameDim.top(Infinity);
data = data.map(function(d) {
var row = {};
table.columns().forEach(function(c, i) {
// if you're using the "original method" for specifying columns,
// use i to index an array of names, instead of table._doColumnHeaderFormat(c)
row[table._doColumnHeaderFormat(c)] = table._doColumnValueFormat(c, d);
});
return row;
});
var blob = new Blob([d3.csv.format(data)], {type: "text/csv;charset=utf-8"});
saveAs(blob, 'data.csv');
});
Basically, when the table radio is selected, we'll transform the data row-by-row using the same functions that the table uses to format its data.
The rows will be in the order of the original data, not sorted like the table. (And strictly speaking, the columns may not be in the same order either). That would be a bigger endeavor, and might require new features in dc.js. But this works without any changes. Hope it helps!
I have implemented a Web - Application which features a GridPanel which can be grouped or ungrouped and where the rows should be sorted alphanumerically (like the standard grid sorting function does) but with the exception that some rows which represent summary rows should not be sorted at all and should stay at the same row position.
To archieve this i wanted to write a custom row sorting function for the gridpanel. Can someone give me a hint how to archive this ? (overwrite which functions, how to implement). Or does anybody know literature, tutorials, examples etc. or could share source code on how this can be done ?
I am using ExtJs Version 3.4.
Many thanks in advance.
Cheers,
Seha
To sort the store data that underlies a gridpanel, the Ext.data.Store.sort() method is used. You can override that method in your particular store instance.
The other possibility is to set remoteSort to true and sort the data on the server.
Here is some sample code that worked for me in ExtJS 3.4.
You can use this in a GridPanel or EditorGridPanel, I placed it in the constructor using an inherited class, but you should be able to add it if you are instantiating a vanilla grid as well, just make sure you are not using the global variable scope.
Make sure the grid variable contains a reference to your grid (after it has been defined).
// Apply column 'sortBy' overrides
var column, columns = grid.getColumnModel() && grid.getColumnModel().config;
var sortColumns = {}, sortByInfo = {};
if (columns && columns.length) {
for (var i = 0; i < columns.length; i++) {
column = columns[i];
// Do we have a 'sortBy' definition on a column?
if (column && column.dataIndex && column.sortBy) {
// Create two hashmap objects to make it easier
// to find this data when sorting
// (using 'if (prop in object)' notation)
sortColumns[column.dataIndex] = column.sortBy;
sortByInfo[column.sortBy] = column.dataIndex;
}
}
if (!$.isEmptyObject(sortColumns)) {
// Override the 'getSortState()' helper on the store, this is needed to
// tell the grid how its currently being sorted, otherwise it
// will get confused and think its sorted on a different column.
grid.store.getSortState = function() {
if (this.sortInfo && this.sortInfo.field in sortByInfo)
return { field: sortByInfo[this.sortInfo.field], direction: this.sortInfo.direction || 'ASC' };
return this.sortInfo;
}
// Override the default sort() method on the grid store
// this one uses our own sorting information instead.
grid.store.sort = function(field, dir) {
var sort = this.constructor.prototype.sort;
if (field in sortColumns) {
return sort.call(this, sortColumns[field], dir);
} else {
return sort.call(this, field, dir);
}
}
}
}
Then just add a sortBy entry to your column definition:
colModel: new Ext.grid.ColumnModel({
defaults: {
sortable: true
},
columns: [
{
header: 'Name',
dataIndex: 'name',
width: 350
}, {
header: 'Code',
dataIndex: 'code_summary',
sortBy: 'code_sort_order',
width: 100
}, {
header: 'Start Date',
dataIndex: 'start_date',
width: 85
}]
}),
PS: dont forget to add the field you are sorting on (code_sort_order) to your data store.
According to the documentation it's possible to write own function for creating custom input element for cell:
<script>
function myelem (value, options) {
var el = document.createElement("input");
el.type="text";
el.value = value;
return el;
}
function myvalue(elem, operation, value) {
if(operation === 'get') {
return $(elem).find("input").val();
} else if(operation === 'set') {
$('input',elem).val(value);
}
}
jQuery("#grid_id").jqGrid({
...
colModel: [
...
{name:'price', ..., editable:true, edittype:'custom', editoptions: {custom_element: myelem, custom_value:myvalue} },
...
]
...
});
</script>
Is it possible to access rowObject from custom_element (myelem) function, because I have to create different controls (input, select) depending on rowObject data (e.g rowObject.type)?
You are right, it could be practical to have rowObject parameter which not exist. As a workaround I could suggest to use options parameter of the custom_element (in your example myelem) function.
If custom control for editing will be created the object having id and name properties will be used as the options parameter. The id will be id of the new created elements and the name is the value from the name property of colModel of the corresponding column. You can use the fact that the id value will be constructed from the rowid and it will be appended by underscore and the column name (the name property). So the options.id is rowid + '_' + options.name and you can easy get the value of current rowid. Then using getRowData you can get rowObject, which you need. Instead of getRowData you can use getCell of cause.
I'm displaying a table with multiple rows and columns. I'm using a JQUERY plugin called uiTableFilter which uses a text field input and filters (shows/hides) the table rows based on the input you provide. All you do is specify a column you want to filter on, and it will display only rows that have the text field input in that column. Simple and works fine.
I want to add a SECOND text input field that will help me narrow the results down even further. So, for instance if I had a PETS table and one column was petType and one was petColor -- I could type in CAT into the first text field, to show ALL cats, and then in the 2nd text field, I could type black, and the resulting table would display only rows where BLACK CATS were found. Basically, a subset.
Here is the JQUERY I'm using:
$("#typeFilter").live('keyup', function() {
if ($(this).val().length > 2 || $(this).val().length == 0)
{
var newTable = $('#pets');
$.uiTableFilter( theTable, this.value, "petType" );
}
}) // end typefilter
$("#colorFilter").live('keyup', function() {
if ($(this).val().length > 2 || $(this).val().length == 0)
{
var newTable = $('#pets');
$.uiTableFilter( newTable, this.value, "petColor" );
}
}) // end colorfilter
Problem is, I can use one filter, and it will display the correct subset of table rows, but when I provide input for the other filter, it doesn't seem to recognize the visible table rows that are remaining from the previous column, but instead it appears that it does an entirely new filtering of the original table. If 10 rows are returned after applying one filter, the 2nd filter should only apply to THOSE 10 rows. I've tried LIVE and BIND, but not working.
Can anyone shed some light on where I'm going wrong? Thanks!
The uiTableFilter plugin doesn't support what you're trying to do. A quick look at the source reveals this:
elems.each(function(){
var elem = jQuery(this);
jQuery.uiTableFilter.has_words(getText(elem), words, false)
? matches(elem)
: noMatch(elem);
});
and that expands to (essentially) this:
elems.each(function(){
var elem = jQuery(this);
jQuery.uiTableFilter.has_words(getText(elem), words, false)
? elem.show()
: elem.hide();
});
So all it does is spin through all the rows, .show() those that match, and .hide() those that don't; uiTableSorter doesn't pay attention to the current shown/hidden state of the rows and there's no way to tell it to filter on multiple columns.
If you really need your desired functionality then you can modify the plugin's behavior (the code is pretty small and simple) or just write your own. Here's a stripped down and simplified version that supports multiple filters and is a more conventional jQuery plugin than uiTableFilter:
(function($) {
$.fn.multiFilter = function(filters) {
var $table = $(this);
return $table.find('tbody > tr').each(function() {
var tr = $(this);
// Make it an array to avoid special cases later.
if(!$.isArray(filters))
filters = [ filters ];
howMany = 0;
for(i = 0, f = filters[0]; i < filters.length; f = filters[++i]) {
var index = 0;
$table.find('thead > tr > th').each(function(i) {
if($(this).text() == f.column) {
index = i;
return false;
}
});
var text = tr.find('td:eq(' + index + ')').text();
if(text.toLowerCase().indexOf(f.word.toLowerCase()) != -1)
++howMany;
}
if(howMany == filters.length)
tr.show();
else
tr.hide();
});
};
})(jQuery);
I'll leave error handling and performance as an exercise for the reader, this is just an illustrative example and I wouldn't want to get in the way of your learning. You could wire it up something like this:
$('#type').keyup(function() {
$('#leeLooDallas').multiFilter({ column: 'petType', word: this.value });
});
$('#color').keyup(function() {
$('#leeLooDallas').multiFilter([
{ column: 'petType', word: $('#type').val() },
{ column: 'petColor', word: this.value }
]);
});
And here's a live example (which assumes that you're going to enter something in "type" before "color"): http://jsfiddle.net/ambiguous/hdFDt/1/