Edit: As of 01/31/2023 the scripts that I am using below ARE working. Any patterns of inconsistencies that I find I will report here. Would like to leave this open in case others have findings/advice they are interested in sharing in relation to bash scripting/LastPass CLI/WSL
I am looking to use the LastPass CLI to make some changes to Shared Sites within our LastPass enterprise. I was able to write the scripts (fortunately with some help from others on here), however I am unable to get the commands to work properly within a script.
One of the commands that I WAS having troubles with was lpass share create. This command worked directly from the command line, but I was unable to run this command within a script successfully. I have a very simple script, similar to the one below:
#!/bin/bash
folderpath=$1
lpassCreateStoreFolder(){
lpass share create "$folderpath"
}
lpassLogin(){
echo 'testPWD' | LPASS_DISABLE_PINENTRY=1 lpass login --trust --force tester#test.com
}
lpassLogin
lpassCreateStoreFolder
I've been invoking my script through the PowerShell command line like so:
wsl "path/to/script" "Shared-00 Test LastPass CLI"
Sometimes this command works within the script and other times it does not. When I tried running this script around mid December, I had no success at all. The script would run through all the way, the CLI would even give me a response
Folder Shared-00 Test LastPass CLI created.
and the LastPass Admin Console logs show me a report of "Create Shared Folder". The problem is when I go to my LastPass Vault, the Shared Folder was rarely/if ever created. Running the command without a script, directly from the command line worked almost 100% of the time. I initially chalked this up to inconsistencies on their end, but now I am experiencing these same problems with a different command.
Similarly I have been using the lpass edit command to make edits to sites within our LastPass vault. Once again, I have a relatively simple script to make the edit to the site:
#!/bin/bash
lpassId=$1
lpassSetNotes(){
printf "Notes:\n What are your notes?\nThese are my notes" | lpass edit --non-interactive --sync=now "$lpassId"
}
lpassLogin(){
echo 'testPWD' | LPASS_DISABLE_PINENTRY=1 lpass login --trust --force test#test.com
}
lpassLogin
lpassSetNotes
and have been invoking this script through Powershell like so:
wsl "path/to/script" "000LastPassID000"
like the lpass share create command, running the script does not produce the desired output. The script runs all the way through and my changes are reflected in the logs, but when I go to the vault the site itself is never changed. The command DOES however work when I run it from the command line directly within WSL.
I am relatively new to writing Bash scripts/the Linux operating system, so I'm not entirely sure if this something wrong on my end or just the vendor's tool that I am utilizing producing inconsistencies. Any help would be appreciated, I know this issue might be hard to replicate without a LastPass account
Example LastPass CLI calls that work directly from command line in WSL
lpass share create "Shared-00 Testing LastPass CLI"
printf "Notes:\n What are your notes?\nThese are my notes" | lpass edit --non-interactive --sync=now "$lpassId"
References
LastPass CLI
CLI Manual
CLI GitHub
I would like to receive a shell command from a user, and run it as a Linux user with no real privileges.
Today I'm doing this: sudo -u {username} 'sh' '-c' $'{user_command}'
Is this safe?
Manually escaping the ' sounds fragile. I would put the command into a file and execute that file as a script. This avoids command injection by design.
Further note that even an unprivileged account will have read access to many files on the host system, like /etc/passwd or information from /proc. If they would run ps for example, they could see commands from other users.
Therefore I would recommend to run the command in a container. Install docker and run:
# let's say you stored the command in "user.sh" ...
docker run -v "${PWD}:/scripts" -it image_name bash /scripts/user.sh
Another thing which is relevant for security is that people could try to (a) DOS the host machine or (b) DOS other machines or attack them in a different way. For (a), make sure you put pretty strict resource constraints on the docker machine (mem, cpu, number of procs, etc...). For (b), disallow network access for the container.
It's possible to open ports, network files, and there are plug-ins that allow for running guest or host [shell] commands during Vagrant's Provisioning process.
What I'd like to do is be able to (perhaps through a bash alias) run a command in the Vagrant guest/VM, and have this execute a command on the host, ideally with a variable being passed on the command line.
Example: In my host I run the Atom editor (same applies to TextMate, whatever). If I want to work on a shared file in the VM, I have to manually open that file from over in the host, either by opening it directly in the editor, or running the 'atom filename' shell command.
I want parity, so while inside the VM, I can run 'atom filename', and this will pass the filename to the 'atom $1' script outside of the VM, in the host, and open it in my host editor (Atom).
Note: We use Salt for Vagrant Provisioning, and NFS for mounting, for what it's worth. And of course, ssh with key.
Bonus question: Making this work with .gitconfig as its merge conflict editor (should just work, if the former is possible, right?).
This is a very interesting use case that I haven't heard before. There isn't a native method of handling this in Vagrant, but this functionality was added to Packer in the form of a local shell provisioner. You could open a GitHub issue on the Vagrant project and propose the same feature. Double check the current list of issues, though, because it's possible someone has beaten you to it.
In the meantime, though, you do have a workaround if you're determined to do this...
Create an ssh key pair on your host.
Use Salt to add the private key in /home/vagrant/.ssh on the box.
Use a shell provisioner to run remote ssh commands on the host from the guest.
These commands would take the form of...
ssh username#192.168.0.1 "ls -l ~"
In my experience, the 192.168.0.1 IP always points back to the host, but your mileage may vary. I'm not a networking expert by any means.
I hope this works for you and I think a local shell provisioner for Vagrant would be a reasonable feature.
I want to install a software library (SWIG) on a list of computers (Jenkins nodes). I'm using the following script to automate this somewhat:
NODES="10.8.255.70 10.8.255.85 10.8.255.88 10.8.255.86 10.8.255.65 10.8.255.64 10.8.255.97 10.8.255.69"
for node in $NODES; do
scp InstallSWIG.sh root#$node:/root/InstallSWIG.sh
ssh root#$node sh InstallSWIG.sh
done
This way it's automated, except for the password request that occur for both the scp and ssh commands.
Is there a way to enter the passwords programmatically?
Security is not an issue. I’m looking for solutions that don’t involve SSH keys.
Here’s an expect example that sshs in to Stripe’s Capture The Flag server and enters the password automatically.
expect <<< 'spawn ssh level01#ctf.stri.pe; expect "password:"; send "e9gx26YEb2\r";'
With SSH the right way to do it is to use keys instead.
# ssh-keygen
and then copy the *~/.ssh/id_rsa.pub* file to the remote machine (root#$node) into the remote user's .ssh/authorized_keys file.
You can perform the task using empty, a small utility from sourceforge. It's similar to expect but probably more convenient in this case. Once you have installed it, your first scp will be accomplished by following two commands:
./empty -f scp InstallSWIG.sh root#$node:/root/InstallSWIG.sh
echo YOUR_SECRET_PASSWORD | ./empty -s -c
The first one starts your command in the background, tricking it into thinking it's running in interactive mode on a terminal. The other one sends it data from stdin. Of course, putting your password anywhere on command line is risky due to shell history being preserved, users being able to see it in ps results etc. Not secure either, but a bit better thing would be to store the password in a file and redirect the second command's input from that file instead of using echo and a pipe.
After copying to the server, you can run the script in a similar manner:
./empty -f ssh root#$node sh InstallSWIG.sh
echo YOUR_SECRET_PASSWORD | ./empty -s -c
You could look into setting up passwordless ssh keys for that. Establishing Batch Mode Connections between OpenSSH and SSH2 is a starting point, you'll find lots of information on this topic on the web.
Wes' answer is the correct one but if you're keen on something dirty and slow, you can use expect to automate this.
I've searched around a bit for similar questions, but other than running one command or perhaps a few command with items such as:
ssh user#host -t sudo su -
However, what if I essentially need to run a script on (let's say) 15 servers at once. Is this doable in bash? In a perfect world I need to avoid installing applications if at all possible to pull this off. For argument's sake, let's just say that I need to do the following across 10 hosts:
Deploy a new Tomcat container
Deploy an application in the container, and configure it
Configure an Apache vhost
Reload Apache
I have a script that does all of that, but it relies on me logging into all the servers, pulling a script down from a repo, and then running it. If this isn't doable in bash, what alternatives do you suggest? Do I need a bigger hammer, such as Perl (Python might be preferred since I can guarantee Python is on all boxes in a RHEL environment thanks to yum/up2date)? If anyone can point to me to any useful information it'd be greatly appreciated, especially if it's doable in bash. I'll settle for Perl or Python, but I just don't know those as well (working on that). Thanks!
You can run a local script as shown by che and Yang, and/or you can use a Here document:
ssh root#server /bin/sh <<\EOF
wget http://server/warfile # Could use NFS here
cp app.war /location
command 1
command 2
/etc/init.d/httpd restart
EOF
Often, I'll just use the original Tcl version of Expect. You only need to have that on the local machine. If I'm inside a program using Perl, I do this with Net::SSH::Expect. Other languages have similar "expect" tools.
The issue of how to run commands on many servers at once came up on a Perl mailing list the other day and I'll give the same recommendation I gave there, which is to use gsh:
http://outflux.net/unix/software/gsh
gsh is similar to the "for box in box1_name box2_name box3_name" solution already given but I find gsh to be more convenient. You set up a /etc/ghosts file containing your servers in groups such as web, db, RHEL4, x86_64, or whatever (man ghosts) then you use that group when you call gsh.
[pdurbin#beamish ~]$ gsh web "cat /etc/redhat-release; uname -r"
www-2.foo.com: Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 7)
www-2.foo.com: 2.6.9-78.0.1.ELsmp
www-3.foo.com: Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 7)
www-3.foo.com: 2.6.9-78.0.1.ELsmp
www-4.foo.com: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.2 (Tikanga)
www-4.foo.com: 2.6.18-92.1.13.el5
www-5.foo.com: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.2 (Tikanga)
www-5.foo.com: 2.6.18-92.1.13.el5
[pdurbin#beamish ~]$
You can also combine or split ghost groups, using web+db or web-RHEL4, for example.
I'll also mention that while I have never used shmux, its website contains a list of software (including gsh) that lets you run commands on many servers at once. Capistrano has already been mentioned and (from what I understand) could be on that list as well.
Take a look at Expect (man expect)
I've accomplished similar tasks in the past using Expect.
You can pipe the local script to the remote server and execute it with one command:
ssh -t user#host 'sh' < path_to_script
This can be further automated by using public key authentication and wrapping with scripts to perform parallel execution.
You can try paramiko. It's a pure-python ssh client. You can program your ssh sessions. Nothing to install on remote machines.
See this great article on how to use it.
To give you the structure, without actual code.
Use scp to copy your install/setup script to the target box.
Use ssh to invoke your script on the remote box.
pssh may be interesting since, unlike most solutions mentioned here, the commands are run in parallel.
(For my own use, I wrote a simpler small script very similar to GavinCattell's one, it is documented here - in french).
Have you looked at things like Puppet or Cfengine. They can do what you want and probably much more.
For those that stumble across this question, I'll include an answer that uses Fabric, which solves exactly the problem described above: Running arbitrary commands on multiple hosts over ssh.
Once fabric is installed, you'd create a fabfile.py, and implement tasks that can be run on your remote hosts. For example, a task to Reload Apache might look like this:
from fabric.api import env, run
env.hosts = ['host1#example.com', 'host2#example.com']
def reload():
""" Reload Apache """
run("sudo /etc/init.d/apache2 reload")
Then, on your local machine, run fab reload and the sudo /etc/init.d/apache2 reload command would get run on all the hosts specified in env.hosts.
You can do it the same way you did before, just script it instead of doing it manually. The following code remotes to machine named 'loca' and runs two commands there. What you need to do is simply insert commands you want to run there.
che#ovecka ~ $ ssh loca 'uname -a; echo something_else'
Linux loca 2.6.25.9 #1 (blahblahblah)
something_else
Then, to iterate through all the machines, do something like:
for box in box1_name box2_name box3_name
do
ssh $box 'commmands_to_run_everywhere'
done
In order to make this ssh thing work without entering passwords all the time, you'll need to set up key authentication. You can read about it at IBM developerworks.
You can run the same command on several servers at once with a tool like cluster ssh. The link is to a discussion of cluster ssh on the Debian package of the day blog.
Well, for step 1 and 2 isn't there a tomcat manager web interface; you could script that with curl or zsh with the libwww plug in.
For SSH you're looking to:
1) not get prompted for a password (use keys)
2) pass the command(s) on SSH's commandline, this is similar to rsh in a trusted network.
Other posts have shown you what to do, and I'd probably use sh too but I'd be tempted to use perl like ssh tomcatuser#server perl -e 'do-everything-on-one-line;' or you could do this:
either scp the_package.tbz tomcatuser#server:the_place/.
ssh tomcatuser#server /bin/sh <<\EOF
define stuff like TOMCAT_WEBAPPS=/usr/local/share/tomcat/webapps
tar xj the_package.tbz or rsync rsync://repository/the_package_place
mv $TOMCAT_WEBAPPS/old_war $TOMCAT_WEBAPPS/old_war.old
mv $THE_PLACE/new_war $TOMCAT_WEBAPPS/new_war
touch $TOMCAT_WEBAPPS/new_war [you don't normally have to restart tomcat]
mv $THE_PLACE/vhost_file $APACHE_VHOST_DIR/vhost_file
$APACHECTL restart [might need to login as apache user to move that file and restart]
EOF
You want DSH or distributed shell, which is used in clusters a lot. Here is the link: dsh
You basically have node groups (a file with lists of nodes in them) and you specify which node group you wish to run commands on then you would use dsh, like you would ssh to run commands on them.
dsh -a /path/to/some/command/or/script
It will run the command on all the machines at the same time and return the output prefixed with the hostname. The command or script has to be present on the system, so a shared NFS directory can be useful for these sorts of things.
Creates hostname ssh command of all machines accessed.
by Quierati
http://pastebin.com/pddEQWq2
#Use in .bashrc
#Use "HashKnownHosts no" in ~/.ssh/config or /etc/ssh/ssh_config
# If known_hosts is encrypted and delete known_hosts
[ ! -d ~/bin ] && mkdir ~/bin
for host in `cut -d, -f1 ~/.ssh/known_hosts|cut -f1 -d " "`;
do
[ ! -s ~/bin/$host ] && echo ssh $host '$*' > ~/bin/$host
done
[ -d ~/bin ] && chmod -R 700 ~/bin
export PATH=$PATH:~/bin
Ex Execute:
$for i in hostname{1..10}; do $i who;done
There is a tool called FLATT (FLexible Automation and Troubleshooting Tool) that allows you to execute scripts on multiple Unix/Linux hosts with a click of a button. It is a desktop GUI app that runs on Mac and Windows but there is also a command line java client.
You can create batch jobs and reuse on multiple hosts.
Requires Java 1.6 or higher.
Although it's a complex topic, I can highly recommend Capistrano.
I'm not sure if this method will work for everything that you want, but you can try something like this:
$ cat your_script.sh | ssh your_host bash
Which will run the script (which resides locally) on the remote server.
Just read a new blog using setsid without any further installation/configuration besides the mainstream kernel. Tested/Verified under Ubuntu14.04.
While the author has a very clear explanation and sample code as well, here's the magic part for a quick glance:
#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# Create a temp script to echo the SSH password, used by SSH_ASKPASS
#----------------------------------------------------------------------
SSH_ASKPASS_SCRIPT=/tmp/ssh-askpass-script
cat > ${SSH_ASKPASS_SCRIPT} <<EOL
#!/bin/bash
echo "${PASS}"
EOL
chmod u+x ${SSH_ASKPASS_SCRIPT}
# Tell SSH to read in the output of the provided script as the password.
# We still have to use setsid to eliminate access to a terminal and thus avoid
# it ignoring this and asking for a password.
export SSH_ASKPASS=${SSH_ASKPASS_SCRIPT}
......
......
# Log in to the remote server and run the above command.
# The use of setsid is a part of the machinations to stop ssh
# prompting for a password.
setsid ssh ${SSH_OPTIONS} ${USER}#${SERVER} "ls -rlt"
Easiest way I found without installing or configuring much software is using plain old tmux. Say you have 9 linux servers. Pick a box as your main. Start a tmux session:
tmux
Then create 9 split tmux panes by doing this 8 times:
ctrl-b + %
Now SSH into each box in each pane. You'll need to know some tmux shortcuts. To navigate, press:
ctrl+b <arrow-keys>
Once your logged in to all your boxes on each pane. Now turn on pane synchronization where it lets you type the same thing into each box:
ctrl+b :setw synchronize-panes on
now when you press any keys, it will show up on every pane. to turn it off, just make on to off. to cycle resize panes, press ctrl+b < space-bar >.
This works alot better for me since I need to see each terminal output as sometimes servers crash or hang for whatever reason when downloading or upgrade software. Any issues, you can just isolate and resolve individually.