Starting of the Apache tomcat server before integration test - maven

I've been looking for an solution for the last 4 days and raised this question as a bounty but still not getting my answer.
Where i've succeeded with the help pf pom.xml file:-
a) Starting the tomcat server manually using command i.e mvn tomcat7:run. This command also
help me deploying of my war file to tomcat server and starting the server.
b) Running my integration tests using testng.xml file configuration on eclipse.
Where i'm failed with the help pf pom.xml file:-
a) Automatically starting of tomcat server.
b) Running all the integration tests.
c) Stopping of tomcat server.
This question is posted by me but couldn't find the answer
Starting apache server before integration testing not working
Please help where i'm wrong.

Minimal POM
Here is a minimal POM file that I used to achieve what you want. If it doesn't work for you, please post the output of mvn -X clean verify like #BrennaFlood said. Configurations for tomcat7-maven-plugin and maven-failsafe-plugin taken from http://tomcat.apache.org/maven-plugin-2.2/run-mojo-features.html#Use_it_with_selenium_mojo and http://maven.apache.org/surefire/maven-failsafe-plugin/usage.html, respectively.
<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0
http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd">
<modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
<groupId>org.example</groupId>
<artifactId>tomcat-with-failsafe</artifactId>
<version>0.0.1-SNAPSHOT</version>
<packaging>war</packaging>
<properties>
<project.build.sourceEncoding>UTF-8</project.build.sourceEncoding>
<maven.compiler.source>1.7</maven.compiler.source>
<maven.compiler.target>1.7</maven.compiler.target>
</properties>
<prerequisites>
<maven>2.2.1</maven>
</prerequisites>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.testng</groupId>
<artifactId>testng</artifactId>
<version>6.8.8</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.tomcat.maven</groupId>
<artifactId>tomcat7-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.2</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>tomcat7-run</id>
<goals>
<goal>run-war-only</goal>
</goals>
<phase>pre-integration-test</phase>
<configuration>
<fork>true</fork>
</configuration>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>tomcat7-shutdown</id>
<goals>
<goal>shutdown</goal>
</goals>
<phase>post-integration-test</phase>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-failsafe-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.17</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<goals>
<goal>integration-test</goal>
<goal>verify</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
</project>

It looks like you have tomcat start and stop bound to pre-integration-test and post-integration-test phases, but the TestNG stuff is being run during the test phase, which comes before the integration-test phases. Like the other responder said - you should be running:
mvn clean verify -X
... so that you're catching all the phases up through post-integration-test (and catching all the debug information for troubleshooting), but you should also bind your TestNG components to the integration-test phase.

I just want to add this for anyone that is looking to use maven + tomcat7 + testng. Basically my scenario is that some of our IT test needs the running application so they can send some REST call, but some of the IT does not require the server, I split the test cases in two different suites one for the IT that requires the server in the ServerRequiredIT.xml and others in NonServerRequiredIT.xml, based on that I create two profiles as it follows.
<profiles>
<profile>
<id>run-its</id>
<properties>
<build.profile.id>integration-test</build.profile.id>
<skip.integration.tests>false</skip.integration.tests>
<skip.unit.tests>true</skip.unit.tests>
</properties>
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.tomcat.maven</groupId>
<artifactId>tomcat7-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.0</version>
<configuration>
<path>/</path>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>start-tomcat</id>
<phase>pre-integration-test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>run</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<fork>true</fork>
</configuration>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>stop-tomcat</id>
<phase>post-integration-test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>shutdown</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-failsafe-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.19.1</version>
<configuration>
<argLine>-Xmx2048m</argLine>
<printSummary>true</printSummary>
<redirectTestOutputToFile>true</redirectTestOutputToFile>
<systemProperties>
<property>
<name>log4j.configuration</name>
<value>file:${project.build.testOutputDirectory}/resources/log4j-surefire.properties</value>
</property>
</systemProperties>
<suiteXmlFiles>
<suiteXmlFile>src/test/scripts/ServerRequiredIT.xml</suiteXmlFile>
</suiteXmlFiles>
</configuration>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
</profile>
<profile>
<id>testNG-tests</id>
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.19.1</version>
<configuration>
<argLine>-Xmx2048m</argLine>
<printSummary>true</printSummary>
<redirectTestOutputToFile>true</redirectTestOutputToFile>
<systemProperties>
<property>
<name>log4j.configuration</name>
<value>file:${project.build.testOutputDirectory}/resources/log4j-surefire.properties</value>
</property>
</systemProperties>
<suiteXmlFiles>
<suiteXmlFile>src/test/scripts/NonServerRequiredIT.xml</suiteXmlFile>
</suiteXmlFiles>
</configuration>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
</profile>
</profiles>
To run the profiles I use mvn test -P 'nameOfProfile'. Important thing here is what the documentation said
The Failsafe Plugin is designed to run integration tests while the
Surefire Plugin is designed to run unit tests
Hope that helps.

Related

Inconsistent behaviour between maven-surefire and tycho-surefire, with jacoco not generating reports

I'm working on creating a pom for a project and adding test cases to it. The project is an eclipse plugin.
Compiling the project with tycho works just fine, the only problem is during testing:
If I run both maven-surefire-plugin tests and tycho-surefire-plugin-tests, the former performs all the tests as expected, while the latter gives the following error:
Execution test of goal org.eclipse.tycho:tycho-surefire-plugin:1.7.0:test failed: Tycho build extension not configured for MavenProject
I would be perfectly fine to just add <skipTests>true</skipTests> to the tycho-surefire-plugin while keeping maven-surefire-plugin on; the problem is even that way, jacoco refuses to create the coverage site, with the following (non error) message:
Skipping JaCoCo execution due to missing execution data file.
I tried to look for solutions of both, but any combination of the solutions I found doesn't lead me to having a working coverage site.
Maven really makes me quite confused, especially with tycho around, so I'd apreciate any explanation on top of the actual fix.
Here is my pom:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<project xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd" xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
<groupId>mygroupid</groupId>
<artifactId>myartifactid</artifactId>
<name>myname</name>
<packaging>eclipse-test-plugin</packaging>
<properties>
<tycho-version>1.7.0</tycho-version>
</properties>
<parent>
<groupId>parentgroupid</groupId>
<artifactId>parent</artifactId>
<version>0.9.5</version>
</parent>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.junit.jupiter</groupId>
<artifactId>junit-jupiter-api</artifactId>
<version>5.6.2</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.junit.jupiter</groupId>
<artifactId>junit-jupiter-engine</artifactId>
<version>5.6.2</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.jacoco</groupId>
<artifactId>jacoco-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>0.8.5</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>javassist</groupId>
<artifactId>javassist</artifactId>
<version>3.12.1.GA</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
<build>
<testSourceDirectory>src/test/java/</testSourceDirectory>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.12.4</version>
<configuration>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>test</id>
<phase>test</phase>
<configuration>
<includes>
<include>**/Test_*.java</include>
</includes>
</configuration>
<goals>
<goal>test</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.eclipse.tycho</groupId>
<artifactId>tycho-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
<version>${tycho-version}</version>
<configuration>
<skipTests>true</skipTests>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>test</id>
<phase>test</phase>
<configuration>
<includes>
<include>**/Test_*.java</include>
</includes>
</configuration>
<goals>
<goal>test</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.jacoco</groupId>
<artifactId>jacoco-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>0.8.5</version>
<configuration>
<output>file</output>
<append>true</append>
<includes>
<include>**/path_to_source/**/*</include>
</includes>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>jacoco-initialize</id>
<goals>
<goal>prepare-agent</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>jacoco-site</id>
<phase>test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>report</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.5.1</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>compiletests</id>
<phase>test-compile</phase>
<goals>
<goal>testCompile</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
</project>
And here is my parent pom:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<project>
<modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
<groupId>parentgroupid</groupId>
<artifactId>parent</artifactId>
<version>0.9.5</version>
<packaging>pom</packaging>
<modules>
<module>moduleid</module>
</modules>
<properties>
<tycho-version>1.7.0</tycho-version>
</properties>
<repositories>
<repository>
<id>eclipse-2020-06</id>
<layout>p2</layout>
<url>http://download.eclipse.org/releases/2020-06</url>
</repository>
</repositories>
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.eclipse.tycho</groupId>
<artifactId>tycho-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>${tycho-version}</version>
<extensions>true</extensions>
<configuration>
<includeAllDependencies>true</includeAllDependencies>
</configuration>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
</project>
Of course there won't be any test result for the JaCoCo due to you are using very old Surefire version 2.12.4. This version was not created for JUnit5.
Use the latest version 3.0.0-M5 and see the tutorial.
If you want to have tiny POM, remove the dependency junit-jupiter-engine due to you do not need to have an access to the JUnit internals in your test code. The Surefire will download it shortly before the test runtime.
Your POM has several errors. Let's start with the root cause and then other priorities from high to low.
Whole problem is that Surefire does not know about JaCoCo. You have to tel "him" this way (see jacoco.agent) which "wires" both. Pls ead the documentation in the JaCoCo project:
<properties>
<jvm.args.tests>-Xmx2048m -Xms1024m -XX:SoftRefLRUPolicyMSPerMB=50 -Djava.awt.headless=true -Djdk.net.URLClassPath.disableClassPathURLCheck=true</jvm.args.tests>
<properties>
...
<artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
<configuration>
<argLine>${jvm.args.tests} ${jacoco.agent}</argLine>
</configuration>
...
The next error is with the way how you use plugins. The plugin jacoco-maven-plugin must be used only in the plugins section. The problem is that you use it also in the dependencies section. You do not want to have it on the classpath. It is job of the property jacoco.agent to put the jacoco agent on the test classpth only but there the JaCoCo plugin must start before the Surefire plugin.
The next thing i do not understand is the config of the compiler. Why you have this?
<executions>
<execution>
<id>compiletests</id>
<phase>test-compile</phase>
<goals>
<goal>testCompile</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
I have second question regarding the packaging. I have never seen this one. It isn't a standard packaging.
<packaging>eclipse-test-plugin</packaging>
Has the Eclipse plugin any special binary form of the archive file?

How to run multiple jmeter .jmx tests with multiple input files using jmeter.maven.plugin

I need to be able to run jmeter tests from jenkins using mvn and jmeter-maven-plugin.
Here is the file setup:
test_dev.jmx
test_dev.txt
test_dev_regression.jmx
test_dev_regression.txt
Here is the pom file used by the mvn command (below):
<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd">
<modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
<groupId>com.example</groupId>
<artifactId>JmeterTest</artifactId>
<version>0.0.1-SNAPSHOT</version>
<name>JMeter Example </name>
<properties>
<input.jmx.folder>${project.basedir}/src/test/jmeter</input.jmx.folder>
<input.jmx.file>test_${Environment}.jmx</input.jmx.file>
<input.csv>${project.basedir}/src/test/jmeter/test_${Environment}.txt</input.csv>
</properties>
<build>
<sourceDirectory>src</sourceDirectory>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
<version>3.8.1</version>
<configuration>
<source>1.8</source>
<target>1.8</target>
</configuration>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>com.lazerycode.jmeter</groupId>
<artifactId>jmeter-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.9.0</version>
<configuration>
<propertiesUser>
<threadgroup00.dataFile>${input.csv}</threadgroup00.dataFile>
</propertiesUser>
<testFilesIncluded>
<!-- If spcified, only particular file will be processed. -->
<jMeterTestFile>${input.jmx.file}</jMeterTestFile>
</testFilesIncluded>
<testResultsTimestamp>false</testResultsTimestamp>
<!-- This will pick up all the jmx file at below folder. -->
<testFilesDirectory>${input.jmx.folder}</testFilesDirectory>
<generateReports>true</generateReports>
<resultsFileFormat>csv</resultsFileFormat>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>jmeter-tests</id>
<phase>test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>jmeter</goal>
<goal>results</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>junit</groupId>
<artifactId>junit</artifactId>
<version>3.8.1</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
</project>
And here is the command we are using to run the tests:
mvn verify -DEnvironment=$TEST_ENVIRONMENT
As you can see, currently there are no regression tests being run. I'd like to add the regression test and it's input file into this pom so that both tests get run one after the other. The hang-up for me is the <threadgroup00.dataFile> property. What needs to be specified here to use another input file for the regression test? Or is there another way to run multiple tests with multiple inputs using this framework?
Thanks in advance!
As of version 3.0.0 you should now be able to do this, an example execution block showing the setup is:
<executions>
<execution>
<id>configuration-one</id>
<goals>
<goal>configure</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<resultsFileFormat>xml</resultsFileFormat>
</configuration>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>configuration-two</id>
<goals>
<goal>configure</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<resultsFileFormat>csv</resultsFileFormat>
</configuration>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>performance test one</id>
<goals>
<goal>jmeter</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<selectedConfiguration>configuration-one</selectedConfiguration>
<testFilesIncluded>
<jMeterTestFile>test1.jmx</jMeterTestFile>
</testFilesIncluded>
</configuration>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>performance test two</id>
<goals>
<goal>jmeter</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<selectedConfiguration>configuration-two</selectedConfiguration>
<testFilesIncluded>
<jMeterTestFile>test2.jmx</jMeterTestFile>
</testFilesIncluded>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
The IT test showing this behaviour (Which the above execution example was taken from) is available at here.

Configuring jacoco for integration and unit test reporting in Sonarqube with Powermock

I am using Sonarqube to keep track of both unit and integration test coverage for a multi-module Maven project.
This was the existing profile in the parent pom.xml that was used to generate the Sonarqube report locally before I made the change:
Profile that generates all unit test coverage locally in Sonarqube
<profiles>
<profile>
<id>coverage</id>
<properties>
<maven.compiler.source>1.8</maven.compiler.source>
<maven.compiler.target>1.8</maven.compiler.target>
<sonar.jacoco.reportPaths>${project.basedir}/../target/jacoco.exec</sonar.jacoco.reportPaths>
<sonar.projectName>plan-advantage-serverless-${project.artifactId}</sonar.projectName>
<sonar.projectKey>${project.groupId}-MPA-${project.artifactId}</sonar.projectKey>
<sonar.exclusions>file:**/generated-sources/**,**/*Model.java,**/models/**/*</sonar.exclusions>
<sonar.test.exclusions>**/test/*</sonar.test.exclusions>
<sonar.java.coveragePlugin>jacoco</sonar.java.coveragePlugin>
<sonar.dynamicAnalysis>reuseReports</sonar.dynamicAnalysis>
<sonar.language>java</sonar.language>
<project.build.sourceEncoding>UTF-8</project.build.sourceEncoding>
<project.reporting.outputEncoding>UTF-8</project.reporting.outputEncoding>
</properties>
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.jacoco</groupId>
<artifactId>jacoco-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>0.8.2</version>
<configuration>
<append>true</append>
<excludes>
<exclude>**/test/*</exclude>
</excludes>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>default-instrument</id>
<goals>
<goal>instrument</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>default-restore-instrumented-classes</id>
<goals>
<goal>restore-instrumented-classes</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
<version>3.3</version>
<configuration>
<source>1.8</source>
<target>1.8</target>
<showWarnings>true</showWarnings>
<compilerArgs>
<arg>-Xlint:all</arg>
<arg>-Xlint:-processing</arg>
</compilerArgs>
</configuration>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.22.0</version>
<configuration>
<argLine>-XX:-UseSplitVerifier</argLine>
<systemPropertyVariables>
<jacoco-agent.destfile>${sonar.jacoco.reportPaths}</jacoco-agent.destfile>
</systemPropertyVariables>
</configuration>
<dependencies>
<!-- needed for powermock to run correctly with surefire-->
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.surefire</groupId>
<artifactId>surefire-junit47</artifactId>
<version>2.22.0</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.sonarsource.scanner.maven</groupId>
<artifactId>sonar-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>3.5.0.1254</version>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
</profile>
This is generating the expected test coverage (sans integration tests) in
Sonarqube locally when I run mvn clean install -P coverage sonar:sonar.
I've so far been able to get integration coverage added as a proof of concept using the following addition
to the parent pom.xml:
pom.xml that includes integration test coverage in Sonarqube but excludes some unit tests
<properties>
<maven.compiler.source>1.8</maven.compiler.source>
<maven.compiler.target>1.8</maven.compiler.target>
<project.build.sourceEncoding>UTF-8</project.build.sourceEncoding>
<project.reporting.outputEncoding>UTF-8</project.reporting.outputEncoding>
<jacoco.version>0.7.9</jacoco.version> . <sonar.jacoco.reportPaths>${project.basedir}/../target/jacoco.exec</sonar.jacoco.reportPaths>
<sonar.jacoco.itReportPath>${project.basedir}/../target/jacoco-it.exec</sonar.jacoco.itReportPath>
<sonar.language>java</sonar.language>
<sonar.java.coveragePlugin>jacoco</sonar.java.coveragePlugin>
</properties>
...
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-failsafe-plugin</artifactId>
<version>3.0.0-M3</version>
<goals>
<goal>integration-test</goal>
<goal>verify</goal>
</goals>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.surefire</groupId>
<artifactId>surefire-junit47</artifactId>
<version>3.0.0-M3</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.jacoco</groupId>
<artifactId>jacoco-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>${jacoco.version}</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>agent-for-ut</id>
<goals>
<goal>prepare-agent</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<append>true</append>
<destFile>${sonar.jacoco.reportPaths}</destFile>
</configuration>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>agent-for-it</id>
<phase>package</phase>
<goals>
<goal>prepare-agent-integration</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<append>true</append>
<destFile>${sonar.jacoco.itReportPath}</destFile>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
This was inspired by the example found here.
However, when I run it with the command mvn clean install failsafe:integration-test sonar:sonar, it causes some of the unit tests which were previously being covered to not show up in the Sonarqube output. I believe that the prepare-agent and prepare-agent integrationgoals are using on-the-fly instrumentation. According to JaCoCo's docs, on-the-fly instrumentation is not possible while using PowerMock (which my project is utilizing), so we have to use the offline instrumentation for JaCoCo.
I looked at this example for using offline instrumentation and used the following pom.xml with the command mvn clean install test sonar:sonar:
parent pom.xml that fails to build due to NoClassDefFound errors
<build>
...
<plugin>
<groupId>org.jacoco</groupId>
<artifactId>jacoco-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>${jacoco.version}</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>default-instrument</id>
<goals>
<goal>instrument</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>default-restore-instrumented-classes</id>
<goals>
<goal>restore-instrumented-classes</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</build>
And here's the resulting error:
Any ideas for the proper pom.xml configuration to enable offline instrumentation to get integration and unit test coverage to show up in Sonarqube?
I know this question is 10 months old, but for anyone else coming across this, you need to add this to your dependencies in your pom.xml file.
<dependency>
<groupId>org.jacoco</groupId>
<artifactId>org.jacoco.agent</artifactId>
<classifier>runtime</classifier>
<version>${jacoco.version}</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>

How to bind two plugins in Maven

Using Maven, I need to automatically deploy a web application to a Tomcat server, then run a MainClass in order to do some post-deploy operations.
These two things alone are already working, through cargo-maven2-plugin respectively exec-maven-plugin. However I don't know how bind them together.
I see two options:
Making the "official" maven deploy goal to simply execute cargo-plugin, then exec-maven and nothing else
Binding the execution of exec-maven to the completion of cargo:deploy
The first is my favouire. Unfortunately I don't know how to implement any of them.
The current pom.xml:
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.cargo</groupId>
<artifactId>cargo-maven2-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.4.15</version>
<configuration>
<container>
<containerId>tomcat8x</containerId>
<type>remote</type>
<systemProperties>
<cargo.jvmargs>-XX:MaxPermSize=256M -Xmx1024m</cargo.jvmargs>
</systemProperties>
</container>
<configuration>
<type>runtime</type>
<properties>
<cargo.hostname>${my.hostname}</cargo.hostname>
<cargo.servlet.port>${my.port}</cargo.servlet.port>
<cargo.tomcat.manager.url>${my.hostname}/manager</cargo.tomcat.manager.url>
<cargo.remote.username>tomcat</cargo.remote.username>
<cargo.remote.password>tomcat</cargo.remote.password>
</properties>
</configuration>
<deployables>
<deployable>
<location>${project.build.directory}/${project.build.finalName}.war</location>
<type>war</type>
<properties>
<context>/${project.build.finalName}</context>
</properties>
</deployable>
</deployables>
</configuration>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
<artifactId>exec-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.4.0</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<!-- NEED TO BE AFTER DEPLOY -->
<phase>package</phase>
<goals>
<goal>java</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<mainClass>ch.MainClass</mainClass>
<arguments>
<argument>Will be forwarded to main()</argument>
</arguments>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
I would suggest to bind cargo-maven2-plugin to the pre-integration-test phase and the exec-maven-plugin in your case to the integration-test phase which is after the package phase. See also the documentation about the default life cycle phases.
The deploy phase is usually used to deploy the generated artifacts to a maven repository so it does not really make sense to bind running an integration test to this phase.
<plugin>
<groupId>...</groupId>
<artifactId>...</artifactId>
<version>...</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<phase>integration-test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>xxxx</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
....
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
The above configuration can be applied to both of your plugins exec-maven-plugin as well as cargo-maven2-plugin...
The best approach is to separate such integration test scenarios into a separate module or if you have only a single module use a profile to active integration tests.

Maven Wagon plugin: Can wagon:upload upload to multiple locations?

I'm looking into the Maven Wagon Plugin to attempt uploading some artifacts to remote UNC Server shares (\\servername\share\directory\to\put\to), and I have gotten it configured to work like so in the POM:
<build>
<extensions>
<extension>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.wagon</groupId>
<artifactId>wagon-file</artifactId>
<version>1.0-beta-7</version>
</extension>
</extensions>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
<artifactId>wagon-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.0-beta-3</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>upload-jar-to-folder</id>
<phase>deploy</phase>
<goals>
<goal>upload</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
<configuration>
<fromDir>${project.build.directory}</fromDir>
<includes>*</includes>
<url>file://localhost///${servername}/${sharename}</url>
<toDir>directory/to/put/artifact</toDir>
</configuration>
</plugin>
...
</build>
This works great for one server when I pass in -Dservername=x -Dsharename=y, but how can I scale it out so I can run a deploy for QA or Prod where I have multiple servers to deploy to?
I've considered (and written) a script to run mvn wagon:upload -Penvironment# multiple times--once for each server--but this seems flawed to me. If I'm shelling out to a script to handle this process, I could just as well script out the entire deploy, too. However, this takes away from the usefulness of Wagon (and Maven)...
Is there a way to run multiple <executions> for one goal? For instance, running multiple profile configured wagon:upload tasks when I just run mvn deploy -Pqa?
If you want to use multiple profiles you could just use: mvn deploy -Denv=qa and trigger some profiles on this property and define the configuration for your severs in the profiles. For this kind of profile activation look at
http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-profiles.html
and search for
-Denvironment=test
Here's an example POM which does two executions of the maven-antrun-plugin in one build:
<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd">
<modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
<groupId>org.stackoverflow</groupId>
<artifactId>q5328617</artifactId>
<version>0.0.1-SNAPSHOT</version>
<profiles>
<profile>
<activation>
<property>
<name>env</name>
<value>qa</value>
</property>
</activation>
<id>qa1</id>
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<artifactId>maven-antrun-plugin</artifactId>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>qa1</id>
<phase>test</phase>
<configuration>
<tasks>
<echo level="info">Executing qa1</echo>
</tasks>
</configuration>
<goals>
<goal>run</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
<dependencies>
</dependencies>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
</profile>
<profile>
<activation>
<property>
<name>env</name>
<value>qa</value>
</property>
</activation>
<id>qa2</id>
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<artifactId>maven-antrun-plugin</artifactId>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>qa2</id>
<phase>test</phase>
<configuration>
<tasks>
<echo level="info">Executing qa2</echo>
</tasks>
</configuration>
<goals>
<goal>run</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
<dependencies>
</dependencies>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
</profile>
</profiles>
</project>

Resources