Despite of FetchType.EAGER and JOIN FETCH, I get a LazyInitalizationException while adding some objects to a #ManyToMany collection via a JSF UISelectMany component such as in my case the <p:selectManyMenu>.
The #Entity IdentUser, with FetchType.EAGER:
#Column(name = "EMPLOYERS")
#ManyToMany(fetch = FetchType.EAGER, cascade= CascadeType.ALL)
#JoinTable(name = "USER_COMPANY", joinColumns = { #JoinColumn(name = "USER_ID") }, inverseJoinColumns = { #JoinColumn(name = "COMPANY_ID") })
private Set<Company> employers = new HashSet<Company>();
The #Entity Company, with FetchType.EAGER:
#ManyToMany(mappedBy="employers", fetch=FetchType.EAGER)
private List<IdentUser> employee;
The JPQL, with JOIN FETCH:
public List<IdentUser> getAllUsers() {
return this.em.createQuery("from IdentUser u LEFT JOIN FETCH u.employers WHERE u.enabled = 1 AND u.accountNonLocked=0 ").getResultList();
}
The JSF UISelectMany component causing the exception while submitting:
<p:selectManyMenu value="#{bean.user.employers}" converter="#{entityConverter}">
<f:selectItems value="#{bean.companies}" var="company" itemValue="#{company}" itemLabel="#{company.name}"/>
</p:selectManyMenu>
The relevant part of the stack trace:
org.hibernate.LazyInitializationException: failed to lazily initialize a collection, could not initialize proxy - no Session
at org.hibernate.collection.internal.AbstractPersistentCollection.throwLazyInitializationException(AbstractPersistentCollection.java:566)
at org.hibernate.collection.internal.AbstractPersistentCollection.withTemporarySessionIfNeeded(AbstractPersistentCollection.java:186)
at org.hibernate.collection.internal.AbstractPersistentCollection.initialize(AbstractPersistentCollection.java:545)
at org.hibernate.collection.internal.PersistentSet.add(PersistentSet.java:206)
at com.sun.faces.renderkit.html_basic.MenuRenderer.convertSelectManyValuesForModel(MenuRenderer.java:382)
at com.sun.faces.renderkit.html_basic.MenuRenderer.convertSelectManyValue(MenuRenderer.java:129)
at com.sun.faces.renderkit.html_basic.MenuRenderer.getConvertedValue(MenuRenderer.java:315)
at org.primefaces.component.selectmanymenu.SelectManyMenuRenderer.getConvertedValue(SelectManyMenuRenderer.java:37)
...
How is this caused and how can I solve it?
While submitting, the JSF UISelectMany components need to create a brand new instance of the collection with the submitted and converted values prefilled. It won't clear out and reuse the existing collection in the model as that may either get reflected in other references to the same collection, or may fail with an UnsupportedOperationException because the collection is unmodifiable, such as the ones obtained by Arrays#asList() or Collections#unmodifiableList().
The MenuRenderer, the renderer behind UISelectMany (and UISelectOne) components who's responsible for this all, will by default create a brand new instance of the collection based on collection's getClass().newInstance(). This would in turn fail with LazyInitializationException if the getClass() returns an implementation of Hibernate's PersistentCollection which is internally used by Hibernate to fill the collection property of an entity. The add() method namely needs to initialize the underlying proxy via the current session, but there's none because the job isn't performed within a transactional service method.
To override this default behavior of MenuRenderer, you need to explicitly specify the FQN of the desired collection type via the collectionType attribute of the UISelectMany component. For a List property, you'd like to specify java.util.ArrayList and for a Set property, you'd like to specify java.util.LinkedHashSet (or java.util.HashSet if ordering isn't important):
<p:selectManyMenu ... collectionType="java.util.LinkedHashSet">
The same applies to all other UISelectMany components as well which are directly tied to a Hibernate-managed JPA entity. E.g:
<p:selectManyCheckbox ... collectionType="java.util.LinkedHashSet">
<h:selectManyCheckbox ... collectionType="java.util.LinkedHashSet">
<h:selectManyListbox ... collectionType="java.util.LinkedHashSet">
<h:selectManyMenu ... collectionType="java.util.LinkedHashSet">
See also the VDL documentation of among others <h:selectManyMenu>. This is unfortunately not specified in VDL documentation of <p:selectManyMenu>, but as they use the same renderer for converting, it must work. If the IDE is jerking about an unknown collectionType attribute and annoyingly underlines it even though it works when you ignore'n'run it, then use <f:attribute> instead.
<p:selectManyMenu ... >
<f:attribute name="collectionType" value="java.util.LinkedHashSet" />
...
</p:selectManyMenu>
Solution: Replace the editUserBehavior.currentUser.employers with collection that is not managed by Hibernate.
Why? When the Entity becomes managed, the Hibernate replaces your HashSet with its own implementation of Set (be it PersistentSet). By analysing the implementation of JSF MenuRenderer, it turns out that at one point it creates new Set reflectively. See the comment in MenuRenderer.convertSelectManyValuesForModel()
// try to reflect a no-argument constructor and invoke if available
During construction of PersistentSet initialize() is invoked and - as this class is only meant to be invoked from Hibernate - LazyInitializationException is thrown.
Note: This is my suspicion only. I don't know your versions of JSF and Hibernate but this is more likely the case.
Related
How can I get actual child collection, when adding new one in separated transactional method, while updating parent.
I have spring boot app with hibernate/jpa and one-to-many unidirectional model:
parent:
#Entity
public class Deal {
private UUID id;
#OneToMany(cascade = CascadeType.ALL, fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
private List<Rate> rates;
....
}
child:
#Entity
public class Rate {
private UUID id;
....
}
And I have non transactional method for do some business logic by rest call:
public Deal applyDeal(UUID dealId) {
dealService.apply(dealId);
return dealService.getById(dealId);
}
Method apply in DealService has several methods in separate transactions (all methods doLogic() annotated with #Transactional(Propagation.REQUIRES_NEW):
public void apply(UUI dealId) {
someService1.do1Logic(...);
someService2.do2Logic(...);
someService3.do3Logic(...);
}
In do2Logic() I have some logic that adding new Rate entity to my parent entity with dealId and direct call of save method for Deal object.
#Transactional(Propagation.REQUIRES_NEW)
publid void do2Logic(...) {
...
var deal = dealService.getById(...);
deal.getRates().add(new Rate());
dealService.save(deal);
}
But when I get response from root method applyDeal the new child entity is absent.
If after that I will try to get this parent in separate rest call (getDeal) I get actual parent entity with new child in collection.
How to get actual child collection in parent response of applyDeal method?
I tried to make all logic in one #Transactional but it doesn't works.
I also don't understand why when I am try to get deal instance to return in applyDeal I get old data.
Thank you.
I guess you are running MySQL or MariaDB? These two database by default use the repeatable read transaction isolation level, which can cause this behavior. Try configuring the read committed isolation level instead, and/or remove the REQUIRES_NEW propagation if possible, since that will suspend an already running transaction to start a second one.
I have an basic spring application that uses hibernate and mapstruct
There are two Entities, each are implemented to have their subchild entities as List attribute in a ManyToMany relation
So there is
EntityA.class
with List<EntityB> (fetchType Lazy)
and vice versa
Now when my client calls, it wants to get a DTO that represents like following:
EntityADTO
with List<Long> entityBIds
How can I get my EntityA with only the Ids of EntityB most efficient and without loading the complete EntityB and post process it after?
Thanks a lot!
The #ManyToMany association information is persisted in a dedicated (join-)table and is loaded lazily on collection access, so there needs to be another query.
Instead of querying for the complete information of all associated entities, you could specifically query only for the needed id property.
Possible queries could look e.g. like this:
// Spring-Data repository (requires an extra interface for the result):
interface IdOnly(){
Long getId();
}
interface EntityBRepository extends JpaRepository<EntityB, Long> {
List<IdOnly> getIdByEntityAId(Long enitityAId);
}
// alternative JPQL query (does not need the interface):
#Query("SELECT b.id FROM EntityB b JOIN b.entityAs as a WHERE a.id=:entityAId")
List<Long> getIdByEntityAIdJpaQuery(#Param("enitityAId") Long enitityAId);
This way, only the needed EntityB ids for an associated EntityA are loaded from the DB.
For even further tuning, one could also write a native query directly accessing only the join-table, which avoids all joins:
#Query(nativeQuery = true, //
value = "SELECT entityBId FROM entityA_entityB WHERE enitityAId=:enitityAId")
List<Long> getIdByEntityAIdNative(#Param("enitityAId") Long enitityAId);
For executing the query when mapping with mapstruct, you can use the spring repository bean e.g. as described here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/51292920
In addition to #Fladdimir's answer which is a great approach if you only need the list of values occasionally, JPA allows defining Entity Graphs that can specify what in an object graph you want loaded. This can allow you to define your entity and specific attributes from child/referenced entities in the graph, allowing objects to be returned but the bulk of the data unfetched. This can allow you to process Entity B instances, but without them being fully populated.
There are many tutorials but I've referenced https://www.baeldung.com/jpa-entity-graph more than once. As the tutorial referenced mentions though, Hibernate might have some issues with how it handles attributes that are normally eagerly fetched, so it might not work the way you want (but will with other JPA providers like EclipseLink, which is where I've used this).
Alternatively, if this is a collection of IDs you are going to want/need frequently, you can modify your object model to have them fetched differently.
public class EntityA {
..
#ElementCollection
#CollectionTable(name = "RELATION_TABLE_NAME", joinColumns = #JoinColumn(name = "A_ID", insertable=false, updatable=false))
#Column(name = "B_ID", insertable=false, updatable=false)
List<Long> bIds;
}
This allows fetching the foriegn keys automatically in your AEntity. I've made it read-only, assuming you'd keep the existing A->B relationship and use that to set things. Doing so though means that these two relationships are entirely separate, and so might result in different queries to fetch this same set of data.
If that is a concern, you can alter things again, and remove the existing A->B relationship, and stick it in an intermediary object AB.
public class EntityA {
..
#ElementCollection
#CollectionTable(name = "RELATION_TABLE_NAME", joinColumns = #JoinColumn(name = "A_ID"))
List<AB> listOfBs;
}
#Embeddable
public class AB {
#Column("B_ID", insertable=false, updatable=false)
Long bId;
#ManyToOne(fetch=LAZY)
#JoinColumn(name = "B_ID")
B b;
}
This would allow you to fetch As and use B's ID values without having to fetch from the B table. Note that I've marked the basic bId property as read-only, assuming that your existing app would be setting things by assigning a B reference to the relationship, but you could mark the relationship as read-only instead, and set the FK value using the bId. This might be more efficient long term, as you don't have to look up the B instance to set the relationship.
Alternatively again, you can make AB an entity instead of an embeddable, and allow it to exist and be queried upon outside of As and Bs. There are quite a few options though, and ways to map it, and not likely necessary for a simple model and use case.
I have an Account entity and I'm trying to persist it using save function. My code:
#Override
public Account createAccount(String pin) {
Account account = new Account();
account.setBalance(0L);
account.setPin(pin);
return accountRepository.save(account);
}
Now my entity class has an autogenerated field called accountNumber. My entity class:
#Entity
#Table(name = "accounts")
#Data
public class Account {
#Column(name = "account_number", length = 32, insertable = false)
private String accountNumber;
private Long balance;
}
Now after calling save, the entity returned has accountNumber as null but i can see in the intellij database view that it is actually not null. All the other auto-generated fields like id etc are there in the returned entity just the accountNumber is null. Default value for accountNumber is set in the sql file :
ALTER TABLE accounts
ALTER COLUMN account_number SET DEFAULT DefaultValueSerializer(TRUE, TRUE, 12);
Here, DefaultValueSerializer is the function which is generating the account number.
I've tried other solutions available here like using saveAndFlush() etc, nothing worked in my case. What can be an issue?
As mentioned in comment Hibernate is not aware about what happens in database engine level so it does not see the value generated.
It would be wise to move generation of account number to JPA level instead of using db defaults.
I suggest you to study annotations #GeneratedValue and related stuff like #SequenceGenerator. That way the control of generating account number is in JPA level and there is no need for stuff like refreshing entity after save.
One starting point: Java - JPA - Generators - #SequenceGenerator
For non-id fields it is possible to generate value in method annotated with #PrePersist as other answer suggests but you could do the initialization already in the Accounts constructor .
Also see this answer for options.
You can create an annotated #PrePersist method inside the entity in which you set its fields to their default value.
That way jpa is going to be aware of the default.
There are other such annotation avaiable for different entity lifecycle event https://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/entitymanager/3.6/reference/en/html/listeners.html
P.s. if you decide to go this way remember to remove the insertable = false
Use
#Id
#GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY)
for your IDs. And also leave your saving to saveAndFlush so you can immediately see the changes, If any. I'd also recommend separating IDs and account numbers. They should not be the same. Try debugging your program and see where the value stops passing around.
I have a many-to-many relation with an additional column in the link table. I've configured it in a way that the owning side fetches children eager (so I don't get LazyInitializationException) and in the opposite direction it is lazy. This works.
I now wanted to fine-tune the transactions (before there was just #Transactional on class level of DAO and Service classes. I set method getById to readOnly = true:
#Transactional(readOnly = true)
public Compound getById(Long id) {
return compoundDAO.getById(id);
}
After this change I get a LazyInitializationException in following snippet:
Compound compound = compoundService.getById(6L);
Structure structure = compound.getComposition().get(0).getStructure();
System.out.println("StructureId: "+ structure.getId()); // LazyInitializationException
If I remove (readOnly = true) this works! Can anyone explain this behavior? I use Spring + Hibernate. Kind of confusing as I don't see any reason why this should affect which data is loaded?
EDIT:
Snippets of relationship definitions. This is a many-to-many with a column in the link table.
Owning side (eg Compound contains Structures):
#OneToMany(fetch = FetchType.EAGER, mappedBy = "pk.compound",
cascade = CascadeType.ALL, orphanRemoval = true)
#OrderBy("pk.structure.id ASC")
private List<CompoundComposition> composition = new ArrayList<>();
Belongs to side:
#OneToMany(fetch = FetchType.LAZY, mappedBy = "pk.structure",
cascade = CascadeType.ALL)
#OrderBy("pk.compound.id ASC")
private List<CompoundComposition> occurence;
Many-To-One in #Embeddable ID class
#ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY, cascade = CascadeType.ALL)
public Compound getCompound() {
return compound;
}
#ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY, cascade = CascadeType.ALL)
public Structure getStructure() {
return structure;
}
EDIT 2:
Stack Trace
org.hibernate.LazyInitializationException: could not initialize proxy - no Session
at org.hibernate.proxy.AbstractLazyInitializer.initialize(AbstractLazyInitializer.java:165) ~[hibernate-core-4.1.7.Final.jar:4.1.7.Final]
at org.hibernate.proxy.AbstractLazyInitializer.getImplementation(AbstractLazyInitializer.java:272) ~[hibernate-core-4.1.7.Final.jar:4.1.7.Final]
at org.hibernate.proxy.pojo.javassist.JavassistLazyInitializer.invoke(JavassistLazyInitializer.java:185) ~[hibernate-core-4.1.7.Final.jar:4.1.7.Final]
at org.bitbucket.myName.myApp.entity.Structure_$$_javassist_0.getId(Structure_$$_javassist_0.java) ~[classes/:na]
at org.bitbucket.myName.myApp.App.main(App.java:31) ~[classes/:na]
EDIT 3:
Also see my comment:
Log is very different with readOnly and it is missing the part were the relations are loaded, eg. some selects are missing in the log.
EDIT 4:
So I tired with a basic DriverManagerDataSource and no Connection pool. The issue is exactly the same. For me looks like an issue in Hibernate.
This is just wow. I'm starting to understand why some people hate ORMs...Just feels like I'm constantly having to spend hours to solve a weird issue and the solution is a very specific set of annotations + some code to work around the limitations of said annotations.
First to why this happens (why meaning with which annotations, but not in terms of making logical sense, which is the actual problem here as using common-sense is useless. Only trial and error helps). In the owning side, in #OneToMany I have orphanRemoval = true (which I have found out is required for consistency. one would think database constraints should handle that...just one of the many things that can drive you crazy.). It seems that if the transaction is not read-only, then this setting leads to some data being fetched even so its lazy, namely here:
#ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY, cascade = CascadeType.ALL)
public Structure getStructure() {
return structure;
}
In a read-only transaction, this fetching does not happen. I would guess because if you can't change anything you will also not have to remove orphans and hence any data that the logic behind this setting requires is not needed in a read-only tx.
So the obvious solution would be in above relation to change to FetchType.EAGER. Wrong! If you do that you will not be able to update the owning side (Compound) using session.merge. This will lead to a StackOverFlowError.
The real solution was actually already mentioned. Just leave the config as is but explicitly load the desired relations in the Service layer:
#Transactional(readOnly = true)
#Override
public Compound getById(Long id) {
Compound compound = compoundDAO.getById(id);
for (CompoundComposition composition : compound.getComposition()){
Hibernate.initialize(composition.getStructure());
}
return compound;
}
I admit I'm tending to fall in the premature optimization trap. This doesn't look very efficient and also seems to break how SQL works in the first place. But then I'm in the lucky position that in most cases CompoundComposition will contain only 1 or 2 elements.
Perhaps you could put
value.getComposition().get(i).getStructure();
in the body of the getById() method, so that the lazy loading happens within the transaction. I realize in this case you'd have to loop over i which might be inconvenient.
Two things :-
Lazy fetch works on Collections Interface. Since ...
#ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY, cascade = CascadeType.ALL)
public Structure getStructure() {
return structure;
}
... this is not a collection interface (like List<Structure> would have been), it will be fetched in Eager fetch mode.
Make service method as transactional. It seems that after fetching from the dao layer, your structure is detached with NEVER flush mode. This is the underlying ORM issue I guess.
I am using spring 3.0.6, jpa 2.0, hibernate 3.6.8.
My question is, in which situations is javassist used to create "proxy" for a EntityClass? And what is reason of this proxy?
I have the following Entity:
#Entity
public MyEntity{
..
#ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
#JoinColumn(name = "adresseID")
private Adresse adresse;
#OneToMany(fetch = FetchType.LAZY, mappedBy = "myEntity")
private List<Parameter> parameters;
..
}
When I load a MyEntity from db, the class of entity is something like MyEntity__$$_javassist. Why is it done? What for? I think that just regular class MyEntity can be used here .
To implement lazy loading, we can:
for #OneToMany - PersistenceBag can be used here
for #ManyToOne - here should be used "enchancedClass" like Adress_$$_javassist
So what is reason for enchancing MyEntity? Where I can read something more about it? Which book/article/blog can you recommend me?
The primary reason why entity classes are enhanced is that JPA (or Hibernate) need to track entity objects state.
In particular JPA must be aware if given entity field is "dirty" - it was modified by user, but this change is not yet reflected in database, so JPA must synchronize it with database when transaction is commited.
The other case is "loaded" state of the entity field. Any field can be assigned to be lazy loaded. When such field is about to be used, JPA must be aware that database query has to be performed to initialize value of that field.
Hibernate's default is to use runtime enhacement - the proxy is just a subclass of the entity with extra stuff added.
Some general ideas are outlined here.