I've put an #IntegrationTest annotation on every test, and sometimes I use it to add properties to the environment. When running all tests together, it seems that only the properties encountered in the first #IntegrationTest annotation are used, so some tests are failing. Is there a way to force a reload of those properties?
This is an example of my usage:
#RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
#SpringApplicationConfiguration(classes=TestApplication.class)
#WebAppConfiguration
#IntegrationTest("some.property=true")
public class SomeIntegrationTest {
Spring Boot Applications under test are started just once for all tests, which is a good thing regarding test performance. If you want to start another application with a different property set, you have to write another Spring Boot application class like this:
#Configuration
#EnableAutoConfiguration
public class MetricsTestApplication {
public static void main(String[] args) {
SpringApplication.run(MetricsTestApplication.class, args);
}
}
In the integration test, you reference that other class. In addition you have to set a different port than the first application has, and you can add the properties that differ from the properties of the first application:
#RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
#SpringApplicationConfiguration(classes=MetricsTestApplication.class)
#WebAppConfiguration
#IntegrationTest({"server.port=8091","batch.metrics.enabled=true"})
Our MetricsTestApplication with the different property set is now started under port 8091.
According to the API documentation #IntegrationTest annotation is "signifying that the tests are integration tests (and therefore require an application to startup "fully loaded" and listening on its normal ports)".
If you want to use reloadable properties, you should use EnvironmentTestUtils.
eg.
#Autowired
Environment env;
#Autowired
ConfigurableApplicationContext ctx;
#Before
public void before() {
EnvironmentTestUtils.addEnvironment(ctx, "test.value:myValue");
}
#Test
public void testGreeting() {
assertThat(env.getProperty("test.value"), comparesEqualTo("myValue"));
}
Related
I am using Junit5 to write unit test cases in java. I have few values that I have added in application.yaml but I am not able to retrieve them in my test file eg. ownerMasterList value is coming as null but it is present in application.yaml
#ExtendWith(MockitoExtension.class)
public class OwnerServiceTest {
#Value("${owner.master-list}")
private ownerMasterList;
#Test
void findAllOwners(){
---test detail
}
}
Using ConfigFileApplicationContextInitializer alone does not provide support for #Value("${…}") injection. Its only job is to ensure that application.properties files are loaded into Spring’s Environment. For #Value support, you need to either additionally configure a PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer or use #SpringBootTest, which auto-configures one for you.
From doc
#RunWith(SpringRunner.class)
#ContextConfiguration(initializers = ConfigFileApplicationContextInitializer.class)
public class OwnerServiceTest {...}
Please try providing property source
By reading your code, it seems that you are using JUnit5 (#ExtendWith(MockitoExtension.class)).
The correct extension to use to trigger the launch of a Spring application context is (#ExtendWith(SpringExtension.class)). If you are using Spring Boot, you can use the #SpringBootTest annotation which is itself annotated with #ExtendWith(SpringExtension.class).
One point to note though: you should not wire an application context when unit testing your code. You should rather test your class in isolation and inject the needed property (here ownerMasterList) through the constructor (see #BeforeEach JUnit 5 annotation):
class OwnerServiceTest {
private OwnerService ownerService;
#BeforeEach
void setUp() {
this.ownerService = new OwnerService(new ArrayList<>(...));
}
}
I am using the #DataJpaTest from Spring for my test which will then use H2 as in memory database as described here . I'm also using Flyway for production. However once the test starts FLyway kicks in and reads the SQL file. How can I exclude the FlywayAutoConfiguration and keep the rest as described here in spring documentation in order to let Hibernate create the tables in H2 for me?
#RunWith(SpringRunner.class)
#DataJpaTest
public class MyRepositoryTest {
#Autowired
private TestEntityManager entityManager;
#Autowired
private MyRepository triggerRepository;
}
Have you tried the #OverrideAutoConfiguration annotation?
It says it "can be used to override #EnableAutoConfiguration".
I'm assuming that from there you can somehow exclude FlywayAutoConfiguration
like so:
#EnableAutoConfiguration(exclude=FlywayAutoConfiguration.class)
Adding the dependency on an in-memory database to my build.gradle
e.g. testRuntime "com.h2database:h2:1.4.194"
And adding flyway.enabled=false to application.properties in src/test/resources worked for me.
I am converting an old JDBC app into a spring-data-jpa app and I'm working on the first tests now. I kept seeing a security module instantiation error from spring-boot as it tried to bootstrap the security setup, even though #DataJpaTest should theoretically be excluding it.
My problem with the security module probably stems from the pre-existing implementation which I inherited using PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer (via my PropertySpringConfig import below)
Following the docs here:
http://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/1.4.x/reference/htmlsingle/#test-auto-configuration
and your comments on #LiviaMorunianu's answer, I managed to work my way past every spring-boot exception and get JUnit to run with an auto-configured embedded DB.
My main/production spring-boot bootstrap class bootstraps everything including the stuff I want to exclude from my tests. So instead of using #DataJpaTest, I copied much of what it is doing, using #Import to bring in the centralized configurations that every test / live setup will use.
I also had issues because of the package structure I use, since initially I was running the test which was based in com.mycompany.repositories and it didn't find the entities in com.mycompany.entities.
Below are the relevant classes.
JUnit Test
#RunWith(SpringRunner.class)
#Transactional
#Import({TestConfiguration.class, LiveConfiguration.class})
public class ForecastRepositoryTests {
#Autowired
ForecastRepository repository;
Forecast forecast;
#Before
public void setUp() {
forecast = createDummyForecast(TEST_NAME, 12345L);
}
#Test
public void testFindSavedForecastById() {
forecast = repository.save(forecast);
assertThat(repository.findOne(forecast.getId()), is(forecast));
}
Live Configuration
#Configuration
#EnableJpaRepositories(basePackages = {"com.mycompany.repository"})
#EntityScan(basePackages = {"com.mycompany.entity"})
#Import({PropertySpringConfig.class})
public class LiveConfiguration {}
Test Configuration
#OverrideAutoConfiguration(enabled = false)
#ImportAutoConfiguration(value = {
CacheAutoConfiguration.class,
JpaRepositoriesAutoConfiguration.class,
DataSourceAutoConfiguration.class,
DataSourceTransactionManagerAutoConfiguration.class,
HibernateJpaAutoConfiguration.class,
TransactionAutoConfiguration.class,
TestDatabaseAutoConfiguration.class,
TestEntityManagerAutoConfiguration.class })
public class TestConfiguration {
// lots of bean definitions...
}
PropertySpringConfig
#Configuration
public class PropertySpringConfig {
#Bean
static PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer propertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer()
throws IOException {
return new CorePropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer(
System.getProperties());
}
}
In my particular case, i needed to disable the FlywayDB on in-memory integration tests. These are using a set of spring annotations for auto-configuring a limited applicationContext.
#ImportAutoConfiguration(value = TestConfig.class, exclude = FlywayAutoConfiguration.class)
the exclude could effectively further limit the set of beans initiated for this test
I had the same problem with my DbUnit tests defined in Spock test classes. In my case I was able to disable the Flyway migration and managed to initialize the H2 test database tables like this:
#SpringBootTest(classes = MyApplication.class, webEnvironment = SpringBootTest.WebEnvironment.NONE,
properties = ["flyway.enabled=false", "spring.datasource.schema=db/migration/h2/V1__init.sql"])
I added this annotation to my Spock test specification class. Also, I was only able to make it work if I also added the context configuration annotation:
#ContextConfiguration(classes = MyApplication.class)
I resolved the same issue by excluding the autoconfiguration from my application definition, i.e.
#SpringBootApplication(exclude = {FlywayAutoConfiguration.class})
public class Application {
public static void main(String[] args) {
SpringApplication.run(Application.class, args);
}
}
you can also sue the following annotation:
#RunWith(SpringRunner.class)
#DataJpaTest(excludeAutoConfiguration = {MySqlConfiguration.class, ...})
public class TheClassYouAreUnitTesting {
}
You can just disable it in your test yaml file:
flyway.enabled: false
My goal is to migrate a Spring Boot application previously developed with Spring Boot 1.3 to the newest Spring Boot version 1.4. The application consists of several maven modules and only one of them contains class annotated with #SpringBootApplication.
One part of migration is to use #WebMvcTest annotation to efficiently test controllers, and here I get an issue.
Consider an example application from Spring Boot github page. #WebMvcTest annotation works perfectly, because, as far as I understand (after I did several tests), there is a class in the main package annotated with #SpringBootApplication. Note that I follow the same concept as shown in the example above for my own #WebMvcTest tests.
The only difference I see that in my application, controller classes are located in a separate maven module (without #SpringBootApplication annotated class), but with #Configuration and SpringBootConfiguration configurations. If I do not annotate any class with #SpringBootApplication I always get an assertion while testing controller. My assertion is the same as when SampleTestApplication class in the example above modified to have only #EnableAutoConfiguration and #SpringBootConfiguration annotations (#SpringBootApplication is not present):
getVehicleWhenRequestingTextShouldReturnMakeAndModel(sample.test.web.UserVehicleControllerTests) Time elapsed: 0.013 sec <<< FAILURE!
java.lang.AssertionError: Status expected:<200> but was:<404>
at org.springframework.test.util.AssertionErrors.fail(AssertionErrors.java:54)
at org.springframework.test.util.AssertionErrors.assertEquals(AssertionErrors.java:81)
at org.springframework.test.web.servlet.result.StatusResultMatchers$10.match(StatusResultMatchers.java:664)
at org.springframework.test.web.servlet.MockMvc$1.andExpect(MockMvc.java:171)
at sample.test.web.UserVehicleControllerTests.getVehicleWhenRequestingTextShouldReturnMakeAndModel(UserVehicleControllerTests.java:68)
How should I deal with that? Should I always have class annotated with #SpringBootApplication in order to run #WebMvcTest tests?
EDIT 1: I did a small maven project with 2 modules and a minimal configuration. It is here. Now, I get NoSuchBeanDefinitionException exception for repository defined in another module. If I configure "full" #SpringBootApplication - everything is fine.
EDIT 2: I modified small test project from EDIT 1 to give an original issue. I was playing with different annotations and added #ComponentScan on configuration class, because I suspected that beans are not registered properly. However, I expect that only #Controller bean (defined in #WebMvcTest(...class)) shall be registered based on magic behind #WebMvcTest behaviour.
EDIT 3: Spring Boot project issue.
Short answer: I believe so.
Long answer:
I believe #WebMvcTest needs to find the SpringBootApplication configuration since WebMvcTest's sole purpose is to help simplify tests (SpringBootApplication would rather try to load the whole world).
In your specific case, since you don't have any in your non-test packages, I believe it also finds SampleTestConfiguration which is annotated with #ScanPackages and somehow loads every beans.
Add the following in src/main/java/sample/test
#SpringBootApplication
public class SampleTestConfiguration {
}
And change your test to this:
#RunWith(SpringRunner.class)
#WebMvcTest(MyController.class)
public class MyControllerTest {
#Autowired
private MockMvc mvc;
#MockBean
private MyService ms;
#Autowired
private ApplicationContext context;
#Test
public void getDataAndExpectOkStatus() throws Exception {
given(ms.execute("1")).willReturn(false);
mvc.perform(get("/1/data").accept(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON_VALUE)).andExpect(status().isOk()).andExpect(content().string("false"));
}
#Test
public void testMyControllerInAppCtx() {
assertThat(context.getBean(MyController.class), is(not(nullValue())));
}
#Test
public void testNoMyAnotherControllerInAppCtx() {
try {
context.getBean(MyAnotherController.class);
fail("Bean exists");
} catch (BeansException e) {
// ok
}
}
}
#WebMvcTest finds the SpringBootApplication, then load only a limited number of beans (see documentation):
#WebMvcTest will auto-configure the Spring MVC infrastructure and
limit scanned beans to #Controller, #ControllerAdvice, #JsonComponent,
Filter, WebMvcConfigurer and HandlerMethodArgumentResolver. Regular
#Component beans will not be scanned when using this annotation.
WebMvcTest requires SpringBootApplication: WebMvcTest inherits many AutoConfiguration, so it needs SpringBoot to load them. Then it disables many other AutoConfiguration and your Controllers become easily testable.
The whole point of using WebMvcTest is when you have a SpringBootApplication and you wish to make it simpler to test by disabling all beans except Controllers. If you don't have SpringBootApplication, then why use WebMvcTest at all?
It's an old topic, but there is a solution which wasn't mentioned here.
You can create a class annotated with SpringBootApplication just in your test sources. Then, you still have a nice, multi-module structure of your project, with just one "real" SpringBootApplication.
Yes,according to the spring boot docs
The search algorithm works up from the package that contains the test until it finds a #SpringBootApplication or #SpringBootConfiguration annotated class. As long as you’ve structure your code in a sensible way your main configuration is usually found.
But after I started using #WebMvcTest,spring boot still try to load other beans, finally TypeExcludeFilter did the trick.
#RunWith(SpringRunner.class)
#WebMvcTest(controllers = {JzYsController.class} )
public class JzYsControllerTest {
private static final String REST_V4_JZYS = "/rest/v4/JzYs";
#Autowired
private MockMvc mockMvc;
#MockBean
private JzYsService service;
#Test
public void deleteYsByMlbh() throws Exception {
Mockito.when(service.deleteYsByMlbh(Mockito.anyString())).thenReturn(Optional.of(1));
mockMvc.perform(delete(REST_V4_JZYS + "?mbbh=861FA4B0E40F5C7FECAF09C150BF3B01"))
.andExpect(status().isNoContent());
}
#SpringBootConfiguration
#ComponentScan(excludeFilters = #Filter(type = FilterType.CUSTOM, classes = TypeExcludeFilter.class))
public static class config{
}
}
There is one more solution. You can not use #WebMvcTest, but configure MockMvc yourself through the builder
class TestControllerTest {
private MockMvc mvc;
#BeforeEach
public void setup() {
mvc = MockMvcBuilders.standaloneSetup(new TestController())
.build();
}
#Test
void test() throws Exception {
// When
var res = mvc.perform(MockMvcRequestBuilders.get("/test/test"));
// Then
res.andExpect(status().isOk());
}
}
But this solution may entail a number of other problems, such as problems with configurations, environment property injections, etc.
If in your TestCase class there is this annotations:
#SpringApplicationConfiguration(classes = {Application.class})
this will cause the Application.class, implementing the CommandLineRunner interface, to run the required method
public void run(String... args) throws Exception
I still think this is, mostly, a not wanted behaviour, since in your test environment you may not want to launch the entire application.
I have in mind two solution to circumvent this problem:
to remove the CommandLineRunner interface from my Application class
to have a different context for testing
Both this solution requires lot of coding.
Do you have a more convenient solution?
Jan's solution can be achieved easier.
In your test class, activate the "test" profile:
#RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
#ActiveProfiles("test")
public class MyFancyTest {}
In your CommandLineRunner set the profile to NOT test:
#Component
#Profile("!test")
public class JobCommandLineRunner implements CommandLineRunner {}
Then you don't have to manually set the profile in the Application.
As mentioned in the spring documentation you can use #ContextConfiguration with a special initializer:
ConfigDataApplicationContextInitializer is an ApplicationContextInitializer that you can apply to your tests to load Spring Boot application.properties files. You can use it when you do not need the full set of features provided by #SpringBootTest
In this example anyComponent is initialized and properties are injected, but run(args) methods won't be executed. (Application.class is my main spring entry point)
#RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
#ContextConfiguration(classes = Application.class,
initializers = ConfigDataApplicationContextInitializer.class)
public class ExtractorTest {
#Autowired
AnyComponent anyComponent;
#Test
public void testAnyComponent() {
anyComponent.anyMethod(anyArgument);
}
}
You can define a test configuration in the same package as your application that looks exactly the same, except that it excludes beans implementing CommandLineRunner. The key here is #ComponentScan.excludeFilters:
#Configuration
#ComponentScan(excludeFilters = #ComponentScan.Filter(type = FilterType.ASSIGNABLE_TYPE, value = CommandLineRunner.class))
#EnableAutoConfiguration
public class TestApplicationConfiguration {
}
Then, just replace the configuration on your test:
#RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
#SpringBootTest(classes = TestApplicationConfiguration.class)
public class SomeApplicationTest {
...
}
No CommandLineRunner will be executed now, because they are not part of the configuration.
I'm a bit late to the party, but a reasonable approach is to mark the bean with #ConditionalOnProperty, e.g.
#ConditionalOnProperty(prefix = "job.autorun", name = "enabled", havingValue = "true", matchIfMissing = true)
public CommandLineRunner myRunner() {...}
The following annotation will then disable it in tests:
#SpringBootTest(properties = {"job.autorun.enabled=false"})
If you have a mocking framework installed (e.g. MockMVC) you can create a mock instance of the CommandLineRunner implementation, more or less disabling it:
#MockBean
private TextProcessor myProcessor;
Previous answers didn't work wor me. I ended up using different profiles - example for the init method in Spring Boot:
SpringApplication app = new SpringApplication(AppConfig.class);
app.setAdditionalProfiles("production");
app.run(args);
This is not executed during the tests so we're safe here.
All tests have their own profile "test" (which is useful in many other ways, too):
#RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
#ActiveProfiles("test")
public class MyFancyTest {}
The command-line runner is annotated with the "production" profile so the tests ignore it:
#Component
#Profile("production")
public class JobCommandLineRunner implements CommandLineRunner {}
I solve this by not implementing CommandLineRunner. Just get a bean from the context, and call a method on it, passing argv. That way you will get the same result, and the application won't start automatically when running the tests.
I have the following piece of code for my abstract test class (I know XmlBeanFactory with ClassPathResource is deprecated, but it's unlikely to be the case of the problem).
#RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
#ContextConfiguration
public abstract class AbstractIntegrationTest {
/** Spring context. */
protected static final BeanFactory context = new XmlBeanFactory(new ClassPathResource(
"com/.../AbstractIntegrationTest-context.xml"));
...
}
It loads the default test configuration XML file AbstractIntegrationTest-context.xml (and then I use autowiring). I also need to use Spring in static methods annotated with #BeforeClass and #AfterClass, so I have a separate context variable pointing to the same location. But the thing is that this is a separate context, which will have different instances of beans. So how can I merge these contexts or how can I invoke Spring's bean initialization defined by #ContextConfiguration from my static context?
I have in mind a possible solution by getting rid of those static members, but I'm curious, if I can do it with relatively small changes to the code.
You are right, your code will produce two application contexts: one will be started, cached and maintained for you by #ContextConfiguration annotation. The second context you create yourself. It doesn't make much sense to have both.
Unfortunately JUnit is not very well suited for integration tests - mainly because you cannot have before class and after class non-static methods. I see two choices for you:
switch to testng - I know it's a big step
encode your setup/tear down logic in a Spring bean included in the context only during tests - but then it will run only once, before all tests.
There are also less elegant approaches. You can use static variable and inject context to it:
private static ApplicationContext context;
#AfterClass
public static afterClass() {
//here context is accessible
}
#Autowired
public void setApplicationContext(ApplicationContext applicationContext) {
context = applicationContext;
}
Or you can annotate your test class with #DirtiesContext and do the cleanup in some test bean:
#RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
#ContextConfiguration
#DirtiesContext(classMode = AFTER_CLASS)
public abstract class AbstractIntegrationTest {
//...
}
public class OnlyForTestsBean {
#PreDestroy
public void willBeCalledAfterEachTestClassDuringShutdown() {
//..
}
}
Not sure whether you chose any approach here, but I encounter the same problem and solved it another way using Spring test framework's TestExecutionListener.
There are beforeTestClass and afterTestClass, so both equivalent to #BeforeClass and #AfterClass in JUnit.
The way I do it:
#RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
#TestExecutionListeners(Cleanup.class)
#ContextConfiguration(locations = { "/integrationtest/rest_test_app_ctx.xml" })
public abstract class AbstractIntegrationTest {
// Start server for integration test.
}
You need to create a class that extends AbstractTestExecutionListener:
public class Cleanup extends AbstractTestExecutionListener
{
#Override
public void afterTestClass(TestContext testContext) throws Exception
{
System.out.println("cleaning up now");
DomainService domainService=(DomainService)testContext.getApplicationContext().getBean("domainService");
domainService.delete();
}
}
By doing this, you have access to the application context and do your setup/teardown here with spring beans.
Hopefully this help anyone trying to do integration test like me using JUnit + Spring.