I want to get list of records from an entity model (I'm using EF version 5) with a particular accountID. I'm being supplied with the tableName string (this has to be dynamic) and the accountID. I'm trying the following 2 methods but none of them is working (giving me errors on the IQueryable object 'table':
PropertyInfo info = _db.GetType().GetProperty(tableName);
IQueryable table = info.GetValue(_db, null) as IQueryable;
var query = table.Where(t => t.AccountID == accID)
.Select(t => t);
List <object> recList = ( from records in table
where records.AccountID == accID
select records).ToList<object>();
The var query = table.Where(....).Select(...) is the correct move as it allows reflection for the query builder at runtime. However, t.AccountID is an error because of the type of t remains unknown.
I've previously used a similar approach in LINQ to SQL, using System.Linq.Expressions.Expression, e.g.:
// NOT TESTED
var table=context.GetTable(dynamicTableName);
var theT=table.Experssion; // actually, I forget. DynamicExpression or MemberBinding? or
var theField=Expression.Field(theT, "AccountID"); // or dynamic name
var query=table.Where(Expression.Equal(theField, accID);
var recList=query.ToList<object>();
If your object has a common interface there is a simpler syntax:
IQueryable<MyInterface> table = context.GetTable("table") as IQueryable<MyInterface>;
var recList=from r in table
where table.AccountID == ac // if your AccountID is on MyInterface
select table;
If you only have a few tables to support, you could do this as well:
IQueryable<MyInterface> table;
if("table1"==tableName)
table=_db.table1
elseif("table2"==tableName)
table=_db.table2
elseif("table3"==tableName)
table=_db.table3
else
throw exception
I built a DynamicRepository for a project I am working on. It uses generic methods exposed through EF along with dynamic linq. It might be helpful to look at that source code here:
https://dynamicmvc.codeplex.com/SourceControl/latest#DynamicMVC/DynamicMVC/Data/DynamicRepository.cs
You can query the entity framework metadata workspace to get the type for a given table name. This link might help:
Get Tables and Relationships
Related
I have some errors using Linq on DataTable and I couldn't figure it out how to solve it. I have to admit that i am pretty new to Linq and I searched the forum and Internet and couldn't figure it out. hope you can help.
I have a DataTable called campaign with three columns: ID (int), Product (string), Channel (string). The DataTable is already filled with data. I am trying to select a subset of the campaign records which satisfied the conditions selected by the end user. For example, the user want to list only if the Product is either 'EWH' or 'HEC'. The selection criteria is dynaically determined by the end user.
I have the following C# code:
private void btnClick()
{
IEnumerable<DataRow> query =
from zz in campaign.AsEnumerable()
orderby zz.Field<string>("ID")
select zz;
string whereClause = "zz.Field<string>(\"Product\") in ('EWH','HEC')";
query = query.Where(whereClause);
DataTable sublist = query.CopyToDataTable<DataRow>();
}
But it gives me an error on line: query = query.Where(whereClause), saying
No property or field 'zz' exists in type 'DataRow'".
If I changed to:
string whereClause = "Product in ('EWH','HEC')"; it will say:
No property or field 'Product' exists in type 'DataRow'
Can anyone help me on how to solve this problem? I feel it could be a pretty simple syntax change, but I just don't know at this time.
First, this line has an error
orderby zz.Field<string>("ID")
because as you said, your ID column is of type int.
Second, you need to learn LINQ query syntax. Forget about strings, the same way you used from, orderby, select in the query, you can also use where and many other operators. Also you'll need to learn the equivalent LINQ constructs for SQL-ish things, like for instance IN (...) is mapped to Enumerable.Contains etc.
With all that being said, here is your query
var productFilter = new[] { "EWH", "HEC" };
var query =
from zz in campaign.AsEnumerable()
where productFilter.Contains(zz.Field<string>("Product"))
orderby zz.Field<int>("ID")
select zz;
Update As per your comment, if you want to make this dynamic, then you need to switch to lambda syntax. Multiple and criteria can be composed by chaining multiple Where clauses like this
List<string> productFilter = ...; // coming from outside
List<string> channelFilter = ...; // coming from outside
var query = campaign.AsEnumerable();
// Apply filters if needed
if (productFilter != null && productFilter.Count > 0)
query = query.Where(zz => productFilter.Contains(zz.Field<string>("Product")));
if (channelFilter != null && channelFilter.Count > 0)
query = query.Where(zz => channelFilter.Contains(zz.Field<string>("Channel")));
// Once finished with filtering, do the ordering
query = query.OrderBy(zz => zz.Field<int>("ID"));
I try to find some references on LINQ with dynamic added strong types, static I have as in example:
var rowColl = _data.AsEnumerable();
var json = (from r in rowColl
select new
{
name = r.Field<string>("name"),
id = r.Field<int>("id"),
}).ToList();
Now where I am interested in if its possible to make "name" and "id" dynamic added on runtime as the information is available in the DataTable "_data", I think there is a simple solution for this however cant find any references on this
It's better practice to avoid using "var" as your type when possible. It looks like rowColl is of type IEnumerable<DataRow>. If that's true, then I would look to see what you can use in the DataRow class (see msdn documentation).
Given that rowColl is actually IEnumerable<DataRow>... If the columns are always going to be in the same order, then you could just do something like r[0] and r[1] in your select statement, i.e.
var json = (from r in rowColl
select new
{
name = r[0], // Where 0 is the index of the "name" column
id = r[1],
}).ToList();
If it complains at you for type-safety, then you could use int.Parse() to cast the string to an int and use the .ToString() extension on your columns instead.
It's an exercise of EF code-first. There's a simple method. I want to get the Entity SQL command text generated by object services.
(MyDbContext is derived form DbContext. Person is a POCO class.)
using (MyDbContext context = new MyDbContext())
{
var query = context.Set<Person>().FirstOrDefault(p => p.Age == 1);
Console.WriteLine(query.Name);
var objquery = query as ObjectQuery;
if (objquery != null)
Console.WriteLine(objquery.CommandText);
}
I used to get native SQL command text by ObjectQuery.TraceString in LINQ to Entity. Now, what I need is Entity-SQL statement, NOT native SQL statement.
But, I can't cast the query from IQueryable<Person> to ObjectQuery or ObjectQuery<Person>.
I tried to get members of DbQuery by reflection. It seems that DbQuery hasn't any property about command text or trace string.
Thanks
My suggestion for what you want is using Dynamic Linq. The library (part of the Linq Samples) includes many IQueryable extensions that return Linq.DataQuery objects. Once you consume the DataQuery you'll have the expected object.
var testQuery =
db.Cases.
Where("KeyID > 1").
Take(1);
foreach (var r in testQuery)
{
Console.WriteLine(r);
}
Then, you can check against your query as such.
testQuery.Expression
testQuery.Provider
These will give you:
{Table(Case).Where( => (.Keyid > 1)).Take(1)}
System.Linq.Expressions.Expression {System.Linq.Expressions.MethodCallExpression}
-and-
{SELECT TOP (1) [t0].[Keyid], [t0].[FileNo], [t0].[MatterType], [t0].[LoanNo], [t0].[Investor], [t0].[LoanType], [t0].[Client], [t0].[ClientFileNo], [t0].[ClientStatus], [t0].[Mortgagor], [t0].[County], [t0].[PropertyStreet1], [t0].[PropertyStreet2], [t0].[PropertyCity], [t0].[PropertyState], [t0].[PropertyZipcode], [t0].[Status], [t0].[BoxNo], [t0].[InsurerLoanno], [t0].[InvestorLoanno], [t0].[insurer_name_id], [t0].[OldSystemKey], [t0].[FinalBilling], [t0].[HoldBilling], [t0].[LastModified], [t0].[PiggyLoanNo], [t0].[CurrComentID], [t0].[LockEFILE], [t0].[MSJAmount], [t0].[Created], [t0].[Locked], [t0].[FinalBillingDate], [t0].[HoldBillingDate], [t0].[CreatedBy], [t0].[Stage], [t0].[PriorStage], [t0].[DefendantUpdated], [t0].[VestingCode], [t0].[FileSource], [t0].[SubVestingCode], [t0].[AttorneyAssigment], [t0].[VoluntarySurrender], [t0].[FNMARisk], [t0].[Source], [t0].[REO_ID], [t0].[WTI_ID], [t0].[CaseDismissed], [t0].[REO_CompanyID], [t0].[SubMattertype], [t0].[VendorCode], [t0].[SubType]
FROM [dbo].[Cases] AS [t0]
WHERE [t0].[Keyid] > #p0}
System.Linq.IQueryProvider {System.Data.Linq.DataQuery<CMSDEVMapping.Case>}
You can also verify your type in the loop:
r.GetType() {Name = "Case" FullName = "CMSDEVMapping.Case"} System.Type {System.RuntimeType}
The main problem is that I recieve the following message:
"base {System.SystemException} = {"Unable to create a constant value of type 'BokButik1.Models.Book-Author'. Only primitive types ('such as Int32, String, and Guid') are supported in this context."}"
based on this LinQ code:
IBookRepository myIBookRepository = new BookRepository();
var allBooks = myIBookRepository.HamtaAllaBocker();
IBok_ForfattareRepository myIBok_ForfattareRepository = new Bok_ForfattareRepository();
var Book-Authors =
myIBok_ForfattareRepository.HamtaAllaBok_ForfattareNummer();
var q =
from booknn in allBooks
join Book-Authornn in Book-Authors on booknn.BookID equals
Book-Authornn.BookID
select new { booknn.title, Book-AuthorID };
How shall I solve this problem to get a class instance that contain with property title and Book-AuthorID?
// Fullmetalboy
I also have tried making some dummy by using "allbooks" relation with Code Samples from the address http://www.hookedonlinq.com/JoinOperator.ashx. Unfortunately, still same problem.
I also have taken account to Int32 due to entity framework http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb896317.aspx. Unfortunatley, still same problem.
Using database with 3 tables and one of them is a many to many relationship. This database is used in relation with entity framework
Book-Author
Book-Author (int)
BookID (int)
Forfattare (int)
Book
BookID (int)
title (string)
etc etc etc
It appears that you are using two separate linq-to-sql repositories to join against. This won't work. Joins can only work between tables defined in a single repository.
However, if you are happy to bring all of the data into memory then it is very easy to make your code work. Try this:
var myIBookRepository = new BookRepository();
var myIBok_ForfattareRepository = new Bok_ForfattareRepository();
var allBooks =
myIBookRepository.HamtaAllaBocker().ToArray();
var Book_Authors =
myIBok_ForfattareRepository.HamtaAllaBok_ForfattareNummer().ToArray();
var q =
from booknn in allBooks
join Book_Authornn in Book_Authors
on booknn.BookID equals Book_Authornn.BookID
select new { booknn.title, Book_AuthorID = Book_Authornn.Book_Author };
Note the inclusion of the two .ToArray() calls.
I had to fix some of you variable names and I made a bit of a guess on getting the Author ID.
Does this work for you?
I would suggest only having a single repository and allowing normal joining to occur - loading all objects into memory can be expensive.
If you are making custom repositories you make also consider making a custom method that returns the title and author IDs as a defined class rather than as anonymous classes. Makes for better testability.
I have this sql that i want to have written in linq extension method returning an entity from my edm:
SELECT p.[Id],p.[Firstname],p.[Lastname],prt.[AddressId],prt.[Street],prt.[City]
FROM [Person] p
CROSS APPLY (
SELECT TOP(1) pa.[AddressId],a.[ValidFrom],a.[Street],a.[City]
FROM [Person_Addresses] pa
LEFT OUTER JOIN [Addresses] AS a
ON a.[Id] = pa.[AddressId]
WHERE p.[Id] = pa.[PersonId]
ORDER BY a.[ValidFrom] DESC ) prt
Also could this be re-written in linq extension method using 3 joins?
Assuming you have set the Person_Addresses table up as a pure relation table (i.e., with no data besides the foreign keys) this should do the trick:
var persons = model.People
.Select(p => new { p = p, a = p.Addresses.OrderByDescending(a=>a.ValidFrom).First() })
.Select(p => new { p.p.Id, p.p.Firstname, p.p.LastName, AddressId = p.a.Id, p.a.Street, p.a.City });
The first Select() orders the addresses and picks the latest one, and the second one returns an anonymous type with the properties specified in your query.
If you have more data in your relation table you're gonna have to use joins but this way you're free from them. In my opinion, this is more easy to read.
NOTE: You might get an exception if any entry in Persons have no addresses connected to them, although I haven't tried it out.