I am using Retrofit and Gson to query an API, however I have never come across a JSON response like it.
The Response:
{
Response: {
"Black":[
{"id":"123","code":"RX766"},
{"id":"324","code":"RT344"}],
"Green":[
{"id":"3532","code":"RT983"},
{"id":"242","code":"RL982"}],
"Blue":[
{"id":"453","code":"RY676"},
{"id":"134","code":"R67HJH"}]
}
}
The problem is the list elements id eg "black" is dynamic, so I a have no idea what they will be.
So far I have created a class for the inner type;
class Type {
#SerializedName("id") private String id;
#SerializedName("code") private String code;
}
Is it possible to have the following?
class Response {
#SerializedName("response")
List<Type> types;
}
And then move the list ID into the type, so the Type class would become;
class Type {
#SerializedName("id") private String id;
#SerializedName("code") private String code;
#SerializedName("$") private String type; //not sure how this would be populated
}
If not, how else could this be parsed with just Gson attributes?
Ok so I have just seen this question;
How to parse dynamic JSON fields with GSON?
which looks great, is it possible to wrap a generic map with the response object?
If the keys are dynamic you want a map.
class Response {
#SerializedName("response")
Map<String, List<Type>> types;
}
After deserialization you can coerce the types into something more semantic in your domain.
If this is not suitable you will need to register a TypeAdapter or a JsonDeserializer and do custom deserialization of the map-like data into a simple List.
Related
Is there any good way to ignore some request query parameters from binding to DTO parameters?
#Data // setters and getters
class Dto {
private String param1;
private String param2;
}
#GetMapping("/hello-world")
#ResponseBody
public ResponseEntity<Dto> sayHello(Dto params)
{ ... }
I would like to exclude binding of specific param in such case.
After some research I can't find any solution for it, any help?
I'm using spring data mongo. I have a collection within a document that when I add an item to it I would like to assign a new automatically generated unique identifier to it e.g. (someGeneratedId)
#Document(collection = "questionnaire")
public class Questionnaire {
#Id
private String id;
#Field("answers")
private List<Answer> answers;
}
public class Answer {
private String someGeneratedId;
private String text;
}
I am aware I could use UUID.randomUUID() (wrapped in some kind of service) and set the value, I was just wondering if there was anything out of the box that can handle this? From here #Id seems to be specific to _id field in mongo:
The #Id annotation tells the mapper which property you want to use for
the MongoDB _id property
TIA
No there is no out of the box solution for generating ids for properties on embedded documents.
If you want to keep this away from your business-logic you could implement a BeforeConvertCallback which generates the id's for your embedded objects.
#Component
class BeforeConvertQuestionnaireCallback implements BeforeConvertCallback<Questionnaire> {
#Override
public Questionnaire onBeforeConvert(#NonNull Questionnaire entity, #NonNull String collection) {
for (var answer : entity.getAnswers()) {
if (answer.getId() == null) {
answer.setId(new ObjectId().toString());
}
}
return entity;
}
}
You could also implement this in a more generic manner:
Create a new annotation: #AutogeneratedId.
Then listen to all BeforeConvertCallback's of all entities and iterate through the properties with reflection. Each property annotated with the new annotation gets a unique id if null.
I would like to know how to access a deep collection class attribute in a GET request. My endpoint maps my query strings through #ModelAttribute annotation:
Given that:
public class MyEntity
{
Set<Item> items;
Integer status;
// getters setters
}
public class Item
{
String name;
// getters setters
}
And my GET request: localhost/entities/?status=0&items[0].name=Garry
Produces bellow behavior?
#RequestMapping(path = "/entities", method = RequestMethod.GET)
public List<MyEntity> findBy(#ModelAttribute MyEntity entity) {
// entity.getItems() is empty and an error is thrown: "Property referenced in indexed property path 'items[0]' is neither an array nor a List nor a Map."
}
Should my "items" be an array, List or Map? If so, there´s alternatives to keep using as Set?
Looks like there is some problem with the Set<Item>.
If you want to use Set for the items collection you have to initialize it and add some items:
e.g. like this:
public class MyEntity {
private Integer status;
private Set<Item> items;
public MyEntity() {
this.status = 0;
this.items = new HashSet<>();
this.items.add(new Item());
this.items.add(new Item());
}
//getters setters
}
but then you will be able to set only the values of this 2 items:
This will work: http://localhost:8081/map?status=1&items[0].name=asd&items[1].name=aaa
This will not work: http://localhost:8081/map?status=1&items[0].name=asd&items[1].name=aaa&items[2].name=aaa
it will say: Invalid property 'items[2]' of bean class MyEntity.
However if you switch to List:
public class MyEntity {
private Integer status;
private List<Item> items;
}
both urls map without the need to initialize anything and for various number of items.
note that I didn't use #ModelAttribute, just set the class as paramter
#GetMapping("map")//GetMapping is just a shortcut for RequestMapping
public MyEntity map(MyEntity myEntity) {
return myEntity;
}
Offtopic
Mapping a complex object in Get request sounds like a code smell to me.
Usually Get methods are used to get/read data and the url parameters are used to specify the values that should be used to filter the data that has to be read.
if you want to insert or update some data use POST, PATCH or PUT and put the complex object that you want to insert/update in the request body as JSON(you can map that in the Spring Controller with #RequestBody).
I've the following domain and needs to return selected field in response to client. How can I achieve that using Spring?
public class Vehicle {
private String vehicleId;
private Long dateCreated;
private String ownerId;
private String colourCode;
private String engineNumber;
private String transmission;
//getters & setters
}
My objective is to return only colourCode and transmission fields to client request. I've read about DTO and seems like I can achieve my objective with DTO but I don't find any good example how to implement it. Is DTO is the correct way to achieve my objective ?
Basically you just create VehicleDTO class with parameters you need
public class VehicleDTO {
private String colourCode;
private String transmission;
//getters and setters
}
and then in your code you construct VehicleDTO from your Vehicle class. Fortunately, we have BeansUtils class from Spring, that uses reflection to copy properties of one object to another, because you do not want to repeat logic for copying properties for every object. So it would be something like:
BeanUtils.copyProperties(v1, dto);
At the end your return VehicleDTO in your response instead of Vehicle
You can return IVehicle interface which exposes your properties of choice
public interface IVehicle {
String getTransmission();
String getColourCode();
}
and your Vehicle implents it
public class Vehicle implements IVehicle{ }
There are various ways you can achieve what you want.
You can add relevant usecase / APi specific DTO for the resource.
e.g. If your API return the vehical general details you may want to expose some level of details,
public class VehicleDetailsDTO {
private String colourCode;
private String transmission;
private String engineNumber; //more
//getters and setters
}
You can then either use BeanUtils or Dozzer to convert your Vehical resource to transportable object like your DTO.
BeanUtils : http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-beanutils/
Dozzer : http://dozer.sourceforge.net/documentation/mappings.html
Assuming you use JSON as output format and Jackson as serialization engine (default in Spring MVC), you can tell Jackson to not serialize null properties. Now you just need to populate the properties you need and can return the original business object.
I am trying to return some JSON from a WCF service. This service simply returns some content from my database. I can get the data. However, I am concerned about the format of my JSON. Currently, the JSON that gets returned is formatted like this:
{"d":"[{\"Age\":35,\"FirstName\":\"Peyton\",\"LastName\":\"Manning\"},{\"Age\":31,\"FirstName\":\"Drew\",\"LastName\":\"Brees\"},{\"Age\":29,\"FirstName\":\"Tony\",\"LastName\":\"Romo\"}]"}
In reality, I would like my JSON to be formatted as cleanly as possible. I believe (I may be incorrect), that the same collection of results, represented in clean JSON, should look like so:
Sucess([{"Age":35,"FirstName":"Peyton","LastName":"Manning"},{"Age":31,"FirstName":"Drew","LastName":"Brees"},{"Age":29,"FirstName":"Tony","LastName":"Romo"}])
can anyone please suggest me how could i achive this or let me correct if I am doing something wrong.
It normally depends on what and how you are returning data from JSON. If you are returning String then it might contain / in your string.
But if you are sending custom data, then it will be clean JSON. For example:
[DataContract(Namespace = "")]
public class MyData
{
private int age;
private String firstName;
private String LastName;
[DataMember]
public int Age
{
get
{
return age;
}
set
{
age = value;
}
}
//Apply same for other members
}
And suppose this is your operation contract.
MyData getData();
Hope, this will work.