I could be missing something obvious, but I can't seem to figure out how to update an existing subscriber name in a CreateSend client list using Ruby.
All list details are correct, here's what I have (subscriber already exists in the list):
#subscriber = CreateSend::Subscriber.get(
{:api_key => ENV['CM_API_KEY']}, ENV['CM_LIST_ID'], "me#me.com"
)
According to the tests the update() method should have 4 params:
#subscriber.update("me#me.com", "Name of Person", [], true)
Calling this results in an ArgumentError error: wrong number of arguments (4 for 1).
So, I try calling update by passing in a hash of the updated attributes:
#subscriber.update({"Name" => "New Name"})
No errors occur and the returned #subscriber object contains all the updated fields until you reload it from the API - it's back to the original state.
Reference to the test code:
https://github.com/campaignmonitor/createsend-ruby/blob/master/test/subscriber_test.rb#L51
I've found the answer to this if anyone else experiences the same issue.
CreateSend::Subscriber.get returns an instance of the Hashie class, where the update methods expects one parameter containing a hash. This does not actually update the subscriber details, but only the attributes of the local Hashie instance variable.
CreateSend::Subscriber.new will return an instance of the Subscriber class where the update method expects 4 parameters. Calling the update method in this instance will actually perform the update correctly.
Related
Upon submitting a form in Sinatra, I'm coming up with the following error:
App 40327 output: 2018-06-28 02:59:17 - NoMethodError - undefined method `[]' for nil:NilClass:
App 40327 output: /Library/WebServer/Documents/blammo/routes/publish.rb:87:in `block in <class:MyApp>'
The form is a file upload form, and a single text field. Simple. The file goes through, as does the text field. They are both captured just fine.
I submit the params to a method, which is ultimately responsible for generating the error on the following line down the page:
fname = params[:s_single_file_upload][:filename]
The method in question returns fine with a boolean. I've rewritten it a couple of ways and flushed out anything that might trip something I'm
unfamiliar with.
So the params is messed up if this method mentioned above is being called. So fname can't be assigned. I expect the params to be intact
at this point in the code. Is there any destruction if the params are perused before this point? In another language, I've seen params destroyed
in one way or another for some reason, but I'm not sure about Ruby.
I'm not finding any nil:NilClass, but that's exactly what it's reporting. Here's the trigger of this method:
result = Alpha::rf_alpha_sniff(params)
And the module::method:
module Alpha
def self.rf_alpha_sniff(incoming)
qualifiers = %w(alpha bravo charlie delta echo foxtrot)
incoming.delete('captures')
incoming.delete('splat') # take out Mustermann's 'captures' and 'splat'
incoming.delete('s_single_file_upload') # non-perusal 'single_file_upload'
incoming.values.each do |item|
item = item.gsub(" ","_")
Dev::hq_log("item: #{ qualifiers.include?(item.downcase) }")
return true if qualifiers.include?(item.downcase)
end
return false
end
end
So the page progresses fine without this method. When the method is induced any way, the params seem to get screwed up, so the file is pretty much
gone.
How is this method interfering with the params so that it's unavailable later on down the script? I'm expecting it to be fully available everywhere.
Turns out, using incoming.delete was deleting items from the params hash, as it was a reference to the original, instead of using a copy.
So, I have to copy the params by using params.dup (duplicate) so they are not the same object.
Having a view of the params hash post-testing-method, showed me that objects were indeed deleted. Another one solved.
I use:
self.txtLogin_element.when_present.set(email)
But when it executes I get a warning:
*** You are calling a method named set at C:/login_page.rb:12:in `specify_email'.
*** This method does not exist in page-object so it is being passed to the driver.
*** This feature will be removed in the near future.
How to specify a new variant with when_present
Variants:
self.txtLogin_element.when_present = email
self.txtLogin.when_present.set(email)
do not work.
Assuming that txtLogin_element is a text field (PageObject::Elements::TextField), there is no set method. The Page-Object gem sets text fields via the value= method instead. Therefore, to remove the warning, use:
self.txtLogin_element.when_present.value = email
If you have made the switch to Page-Object v2.0 and therefore Watir v6.0, when_present is no longer needed. Watir now waits for elements to be present before interacting with them. You can now simply do:
self.txtLogin_element.value = email
Which ultimately means that you can just use the methods generated by the accessor:
self.txtLogin = email
I'm struggling to access the Google Contacts API.First I tried the google-api-ruby-client gem but it turned out that it does not support the Contacts API.
Next shot was the google_contacts_api gem. I used oauth2 to access the authentication key(Getting authentication token guide question). But after passing the token correctly to the api it is producing an error.
`<main>': undefined method `[]' for #<GoogleContactsApi::GroupSet:0x000000039fcad8>` (NoMethodError).
Here is my code.
# get token using oauth2 gem, and use it below in the google_contacts_api.
google_contacts_user = GoogleContactsApi::User.new(token)
contacts = google_contacts_user.contacts
groups = google_contacts_user.groups
# group methods
group = groups[0]
group.contacts
puts group.contacts
# contact methods
puts contacts.count
puts groups.count
contact = contacts[0]
contact.primary_email
contact.emails
What am I doing wrong?
UPDATE:
As #alvin suggested it is working now. But the group contacts are not being printed out. Instead it is printing #<GoogleContactsApi::ContactSet:0x000000020e49d8>.Example: here is what is printed by this code
groups = google_contacts_user.groups
# group methods
groups.each do |group|
group_contacts = group.contacts
puts group_contacts
end
Output:
#<GoogleContactsApi::ContactSet:0x000000020e49d8>
#<GoogleContactsApi::ContactSet:0x0000000504aec0>
#<GoogleContactsApi::ContactSet:0x0000000518dfd0>
#<GoogleContactsApi::ContactSet:0x000000052d9290>
#<GoogleContactsApi::ContactSet:0x000000054280d8>
#<GoogleContactsApi::ContactSet:0x0000000558c2f8>
#<GoogleContactsApi::ContactSet:0x00000005746eb8>
#<GoogleContactsApi::ContactSet:0x000000058a3ea0>
How can I print the group contacts?
Edited to add info about the Enumerable implementation
(I wrote the gem.)
There was a bug in the documentation. groups and contacts are instances of classes that implement Enumerable, which doesn't provide the [] method, but does provide the first method.
So, try groups.first instead of groups[0]. Likewise, use contacts.first instead of contacts[0]. My bad! (I probably did a to_a in my head.)
Response to Update
To answer the second half of the question, it looks like you found the relevant convenience methods for Contact and Group, in particular the Contact.primary_email method. See more methods in the (somewhat incomplete, sorry) YARD docs.
To get all the emails, you basically need to iterate over the returned contacts. As I mentioned in the updated response to the first part of your question, groups and contacts have all the methods of Enumerable. (Enumerable documentation). Here are some examples:
# What are all the groups called?
user.groups.map(&:title)
# Find group by title. (Returns nil if no such group.)
group = user.groups.select { |g| g.title = "Group Name" }
# Get all primary emails from a group
group.contacts.map(&:primary_email)
# Get all primary emails from all contacts regardless of group
user.contacts.map(&:primary_email)
You only need to use the Hashie::Mash methods to access data when no convenience accessor is provided (for example, if Google starts returning extra data the gem hasn't accounted for yet). The use case you described doesn't require this.
P.S. In the future, you might want to open a new question instead of editing your existing question.
I'm automating a site that has a page with a list of options selected by a radio button. When selecting one of the radios, a text field and a select list are presented.
I created a file (test_contracting.rb) that is the one through which I execute the test (ruby test_contracting.rb) and some other classes to represent my page.
On my class ContractPage, I have the following element declaration:
checkbox(:option_sub_domain, :id => "option_sub_domain")
text_field(:domain, :id => "domain_text")
select_list(:tld, :id => "domain_tld")
I've created in the ContractPage a method that sets the configuration of the domain like this:
def configure_domain(config={})
check_option_sub_domain
domain = config[:domain]
tld = config[:tld]
end
When I call the method configure_domain from the test_contracting.rb, it selects the radio button, but it doesn't fill the field with the values. The params are getting into the method correctly. I've checked it using "puts". Even if I change the params to a general string like "bla" it doesnt work. The annoying point is that if on test_contracting.rb I call the exact same components, it works.
my_page_instance = ContractPage.new(browser)
my_page_instance.domain = "bla"
my_page_instance.tld = ".com"
What I found to work was to in the configure_domain method, implement the following:
domain_element.value = config[:domain]
tld_element.send_keys config[:locaweb_domain]
Then it worked.
The documentation for the PageObjects module that I'm using as reference can be found here: http://rubydoc.info/github/cheezy/page-object/master/PageObject/Accessors#select_list-instance_method
Do you guys have any explation on why the method auto generated by the pageobject to set the value of the object didnt work in this scope/context ?
By the way, a friend tried the same thing with Java and it failed as well.
In ruby all equals methods (methods that end with the = sign) need to have a receiver. Let me show you some code that will demonstrate why. Here is the code that sets a local variable to a value:
domain = "blah"
and here is the code that calls the domain= method:
domain = "blah"
In order for ruby to know that you are calling a method instead of setting a local variable you need to add a receiver. Simply change your method above to this and it will work:
def configure_domain(config={})
check_option_sub_domain
self.domain = config[:domain]
self.tld = config[:tld]
end
I'm pretty new to this world of Selenium and page objects but maybe one of my very recent discoveries might help you.
I found that that assignment methods for the select_list fields only worked for me once I started using "self" in front. This is what I have used to access it within my page object code. e.g., self.my_select_list="my select list value"
Another note - The send_keys workaround you mention is clever and might do the trick for a number of uses, but in my case the select list values are variable and may have several options starting with the same letter.
I hope something in here is useful to you.
UPDATE (Jan 3/12)
On diving further into the actual Ruby code for the page object I discovered that the select_list set is also using send_keys, so in actuality I still have the same limitation here as the one I noted using the send_keys workaround directly. sigh So much to learn, so little time!
So I need to access this service from my rails app. I'm using soap4r to read the WSDL and dynamically generate methods for accessing the service.
From what I've read, I should be able to chain methods to access the nested XML nodes, but I can't get it to work. I tried using the wsdl2ruby command and read through the generated code. From what I can tell, the soap library is not generating these accessor methods. I'm pretty new to ruby, so I don't know if I'm just missing something?
I know when I inspect the element, I can see the data I want. I just can't get to it.
For instance if I use the following code:
require "soap/wsdlDriver"
wsdl = "http://frontdoor.ctn5.org/CablecastWS/CablecastWS.asmx?WSDL"
driver = SOAP::WSDLDriverFactory.new(wsdl).create_rpc_driver
response = driver.getChannels('nill')
puts response.inspect
I get the following output:
ignored element: {http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap12/}binding
ignored element: {http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap12/}operation
ignored element: {http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap12/}body
ignored element: {http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap12/}address
#<SOAP::Mapping::Object:0x80b96394 {http://www.trms.com/CablecastWS/}GetChannelsResult=#<SOAP::Mapping::Object:0x80b96178 {http://www.trms.com/CablecastWS/}Channel=[#<SOAP::Mapping::Object:0x80b95f5c {http://www.trms.com/CablecastWS/}ChannelID="1" {http://www.trms.com/CablecastWS/}Name="CTN 5">, #<SOAP::Mapping::Object:0x80b9519c {http://www.trms.com/CablecastWS/}ChannelID="2" {http://www.trms.com/CablecastWS/}Name="PPAC 2">, #<SOAP::Mapping::Object:0x80b94620 {http://www.trms.com/CablecastWS/}ChannelID="14" {http://www.trms.com/CablecastWS/}Name="Test Channel">]>>
So the data is definitely there!
Here is the code generated by wsdl2ruby for the method being used above:
# {http://www.trms.com/CablecastWS/}GetChannels
class GetChannels
def initialize
end
end
# {http://www.trms.com/CablecastWS/}GetChannelsResponse
# getChannelsResult - ArrayOfChannel
class GetChannelsResponse
attr_accessor :getChannelsResult
def initialize(getChannelsResult = nil)
#getChannelsResult = getChannelsResult
end
end
Sorry for the long post, I figured the more info the more likely someone can point me in the right direction.
Thanks
-ray
Answer
require "soap/wsdlDriver"
wsdl = "http://frontdoor.ctn5.org/CablecastWS/CablecastWS.asmx?WSDL"
driver = SOAP::WSDLDriverFactory.new(wsdl).create_rpc_driver
response = driver.getChannels('nill')
for item in response.getChannelsResult.channel
puts item.name
puts item.channelID
end
How I got the Answer
You can figure out the methods of response via
response.methods
This will get you a long list of methods that are hard to sort through, so I like to subtract out the generic methods. Ruby lets you subtract arrays.
response.methods - Object.new.methods
Using this technique, I found the getChannelsResult method for response. I repeated the process
resonse.getChannelsResult.methods - Object.new.methods
I found the channel method for its result. Again!
response.getChannelsResult.channel.methods - Object.new.methods
This returned a bunch of methods including: sort, min, max etc. So I guessed Array. A simple confirmation was in order
response.getChannelsResult.channel.class
Sure enough it returned Array. To make life simple, I just worked with the first item of the array to get its methods
response.getChannelsResult.channel.first.methods - Object.new.methods
Whoalla, I found two more methods "name" and "channelID"