I would like to implement a small subset of siri/cortana like features in command line.
For e.g.
$ What is the sum of 100 and 1000
> Response: 1100
$ What is the product of 10 and 12
> Response: 120
The questions are predefined regular expressions. It needs to call the matching function in ruby.
Pattern: What is the sum of (\d)+ and (\d)+
Ruby method to call: sum(a,b)
Any pointers/suggestion is appreciated.
That sounds exactly like cucumber, maybe take a look and see if you can just use their classes to hack something together :) ?
You could do something like the following:
question = gets.chomp
/\A.*(sum |product |quotient |difference )\D+([0-9]+)\D+([0-9]+).*\z/.match question
send($1, $2.to_i, $3.to_i)
Quick explanation for anyone that may be new to matching in Ruby:
This gets a line of input from the command line and scans it for a function name (i.e. sum, product, etc) followed by a space and potentially some non-digit characters. Then, it looks for a first number (similarly followed by a space and 0 or more non-digit characters) and a second number followed by nothing or anything. The parentheses determine what gets assigned to the variables preceded by a $, i.e. the substring that matches the contents of the first set of parentheses gets assigned to $1.
Next, it calls the method whose name is the value of $1 with the arguments (casted to integers) found in $2 and $3.
Obviously, this isn't generalized at all--you're putting the method names in the regex, and it's taking a fixed number of arguments--but it'll hopefully be useful for getting you on the right track.
Related
I need a regular expression that can be used to find the Nth entry in a comma-separated list.
For example, say this list looks like this:
abc,def,4322,mail#mailinator.com,3321,alpha-beta,43
...and I wanted to find the value of the 7th entry (alpha-beta).
My first thought would not be to use a regular expression, but to use something that splits the string into an array on the comma, but since you asked for a regex.
most regexes allow you to specify a minimum or maximum match, so something like this would probably work.
/(?:[^\,]*,){5}([^,]*)/
This is intended to match any number of character that are not a comma followed by a comma six times exactly (?:[^,]*,){5} - the ?: says to not capture - and then to match and capture any number of characters that are not a comma ([^,]+). You want to use the first capture group.
Let me know if you need more info.
EDIT: I edited the above to not capture the first part of the string. This regex works in C# and Ruby.
You could use something like:
([^,]*,){$m}([^,]*),
As a starting point. (Replace $m with the value of (n-1).) The content would be in capture group 2. This doesn't handle things like lists of size n, but that's just a matter of making the appropriate modifications for your situation.
#list = split /,/ => $string;
$it = $list[6];
or just
$it = (split /,/ => $string)[6];
Beats writing a pattern with a {6} in it every time.
I am still struggling to find some ruby regex syntax despite the numerous documentation on-line. I have an array of string and I am looking for strings that include one number (whatever the number of digits) but not specific one (let's say for instance dates from 19XX to 201X).
I manage to get the regex for "the line contain a number"
.*\p{N}.*
I manage to get "exclude the line if this number is a year"
(?!19\d\d|20[0-1]\d)\d{4}
But I fail to combine both. I would need something that would intuitively be written as such
(.*\p{N}.*)&&(?!19\d\d|20[0-1]\d)\d{4}
But I am not sure how an AND operator can be used.
Here it is:
^(?!.*19\d\d.*)(?!.*20[01]\d.*)(.*\p{N}.*)$
You want a string that:
(?!.*19\d\d.*) doesn't contains 19xx
(?!.*20[01]\d.*) doesn't contains 200x or 201x
(.*\p{N}+.*) contains, at least, one digit
In regex && means, well, literal && and not and operator
If you want to capture numbers that are not in the range 1900-2019 you can replace with:
(?!\b19\d\d\b)(?!\b20[01]\d\b)(\b\p{N}+\b)
You can test it here
While the solution by Thomas is probably the best one, another option would be to go without negation: just select everything, that matches:
re = /\D(
[03-9]\d*|
(?:1|2|20)(?=\D)|
1[0-8]\d*|
19\d?(?=\D)|
19\d{3,}|
20[2-9]\d*|
20[01]?(?=\D)|
20[01]\d{2,}
)/x
▶ 'Here 2014 and 1945 and 1878 and 20000 and 2 and 19 and 195 and 203'.scan re
#⇒ [["1878"], ["20000"], ["2"], ["19"], ["195"], ["203"]]
I need to write this solution as an AWK command. I am stuck on the last question:
Write a one line shell command that will count all lines in a file called "file.txt" that begin with a decimal number in parenthesis, containing a mix of both upper and lower case letters, and end with a period.
Example(s):
This is the format of lines we want to print. Lines that do not match this format should be skipped:
(10) This is a sample line from file.txt that your script should
count.
(117) And this is another line your script should count.
Lines like this, as well as other non-matching lines, should be skipped:
15 this line should not be printed
and this line should not be printed
Thanks in advance, I'm not really sure how to tackle this in one line.
This is not a homework solution service. But I think I can give a few pointers.
One idea would be to create a counter, and then print the result at the end:
awk '<COND> {c++} END {print c}'
I'm getting a bit confused by the terminology. First you claim that the lines should be counted, but in the examples, it says that those lines should be printed.
Now of course you could do something like this:
awk '<COND>' file.txt | wc -l
The first part will print out all lines that follow the condition, but the output will be parsed to wc -l which is a separate program that counts the number of lines.
Now as to what the condition <COND> should be, I leave to you. I strongly suggest that you google regular expressions and awk, it shouldn't be too hard.
I think the requirement is very clear
Write a one line shell command that will count all lines in a file called "file.txt" that begin with a decimal number in parenthesis, containing a mix of both upper and lower case letters, and end with a period.
1. begin with a decimal number in parenthesis
2. containing a mix of both upper and lower case letters
3. end with a period
check all three conditions. Note that in 2. it doesn't say "only" so you can have extra class of characters but it should have at least one uppercase and one lowercase character.
The example mixes concepts printing and counting, if part of the exercise it's very poorly worded or perhaps assumes that the counting will be done by wc by a piped output of a filtering script; regardless more attention should have been paid, especially for a student exercise.
Please comment if anything not clear and I'll add more details...
I want to be able to match all the following cases below using Ruby 1.8.7.
/pages/multiedit/16801,16809,16817,16825,16833
/pages/multiedit/16801,16809,16817
/pages/multiedit/16801
/pages/multiedit/1,3,5,7,8,9,10,46
I currently have:
\/pages\/multiedit\/\d*
This matches upto the first set of numbers. So for example:
"/pages/multiedit/16801,16809,16817,16825,16833"[/\/pages\/multiedit\/\d*/]
# => "/pages/multiedit/16801"
See http://rubular.com/r/ruFPx5yIAF for example.
Thanks for the help, regex gods.
\/pages\/multiedit\/\d+(?:,\d+)*
Example: http://rubular.com/r/0nhpgki6Gy
Edit: Updated to not capture anything... Although the performance hit would be negligible. (Thanks Tin Man)
The currently accepted answer of
\/pages\/multiedit\/[\d,]+
may not be a good idea because that will also match the following strings
.../pages/multiedit/,,,
.../pages/multiedit/,1,
My answer requires there be at least one digit before the first comma, and at least one digit between commas, and it must end with a digit.
I'd use:
/\/pages\/multiedit\/[\d,]+/
Here's a demonstration of the pattern at http://rubular.com/r/h7VLZS1W1q
[\d,]+ means "find one or more numbers or commas"
The reason \d* doesn't work is it means "find zero or more numbers". As soon as the pattern search runs into a comma it stops. You have to tell the engine that it's OK to find numbers and commas.
This seems like a simple one, but I am missing something.
I have a number of inputs coming in from a variety of sources and in different formats.
Number inputs
123
123.45
123,45 (note the comma used here to denote decimals)
1,234
1,234.56
12,345.67
12,345,67 (note the comma used here to denote decimals)
Additional info on the inputs
Numbers will always be less than 1 million
EDIT: These are prices, so will either be whole integers or go to the hundredths place
I am trying to write a regex and use gsub to strip out the thousands comma. How do I do this?
I wrote a regex: myregex = /\d+(,)\d{3}/
When I test it in Rubular, it shows that it captures the comma only in the test cases that I want.
But when I run gsub, I get an empty string: inputstr.gsub(myregex,"")
It looks like gsub is capturing everything, not just the comma in (). Where am I going wrong?
result = inputstr.gsub(/,(?=\d{3}\b)/, '')
removes commas only if exactly three digits follow.
(?=...) is a lookahead assertion: It needs to be possible to be matched at the current position, but it's not becoming part of the text that is actually matched (and subsequently replaced).
You are confusing "match" with "capture": to "capture" means to save something so you can refer to it later. You want to capture not the comma, but everything else, and then use the captured portions to build your substitution string.
Try
myregex = /(\d+),(\d{3})/
inputstr.gsub(myregex,'\1\2')
In your example, it is possible to tell from the number of digits after the last separator (either , or .) that it is a decimal point, since there are 2 lone digits. For most cases, if the last group of digits does not have 3 digits then you can assume that the separator in front is decimal point. Another sign is the multiple appearance of a separator in big numbers allows us to differentiate between decimal point and separators.
However, I can give a string 123,456 or 123.456 without any sort of context. It is impossible to tell whether they are "123 thousand 456" or "123 point 456".
You need to scan the document to look for clue whether , is used for thousand separator or decimal point, and vice versa for .. With the context provided, then you can safely apply the same method to remove the thousand separators.
You may also want to check out this article on Wikipedia on the less common ways to specify separators or decimal points. Knowing and deciding not to support is better than assuming things will work.