Dynamics CRM Linq Update multiple records - linq

Trying to update a list of Incident records. The first one in the foreach updates, the next one throws an exception stating "the context is not currently tracking the incident entity". Is this the correct way to code this?
var openCases = (from o in xrmContext.IncidentSet
where o.StateCode == 0
select o).Take(5).ToList();
foreach (var c in openCases)
{
var numDays = ((TimeSpan) (DateTime.Now - c.CreatedOn)).Days;
Console.WriteLine("case age: {0}, case number:{1}", numDays, c.TicketNumber);
c.new_caseage = numDays;
xrmContext.UpdateObject(c);
xrmContext.SaveChanges();
}

When you call SaveChanges() it, in addition to saving any modified entity records, detaches all entity records being tracked in the context. Therefore, the second time you call SaveChanges() the entity record is not being tracked and you receive the error.
You should move the xrmContext.SaveChanges(); line to be after the foreach loop.
var openCases = (from o in xrmContext.IncidentSet
where o.StateCode == 0
select o).Take(5).ToList();
foreach (var c in openCases)
{
var numDays = ((TimeSpan) (DateTime.Now - c.CreatedOn)).Days;
Console.WriteLine("case age: {0}, case number:{1}", numDays, c.TicketNumber);
c.new_caseage = numDays;
xrmContext.UpdateObject(c);
}
xrmContext.SaveChanges();

All entities are detached by the OrganizationServiceContext after calling the SaveChanges method. To continue using the data context against previously retrieved entities, the entities need to be reattached.
However, the preference is to apply all modifications under a single call to SaveChanges, and then dispose the context, to avoid the need to reattach.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg695783.aspx
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg334504.aspx#track_related

A better way to do what your try to do is using the message ExecuteMultipleRequest, with it can configure how many record to process for every iteration (internal iteration)
var openCases = (from o in xrmContext.IncidentSet
where o.StateCode == 0
select o).Take(5).ToList();
var requestWithResults = new ExecuteMultipleRequest()
{
// Assign settings that define execution behavior: continue on error, return responses.
Settings = new ExecuteMultipleSettings()
{
ContinueOnError = false,
ReturnResponses = true
},
// Create an empty organization request collection.
Requests = new OrganizationRequestCollection()
};
foreach (var c in openCases)
{
var numDays = ((TimeSpan) (DateTime.Now - c.CreatedOn)).Days;
c.new_caseage = numDays;
CreateRequest createRequest = new CreateRequest { Target = c };
requestWithResults.Requests.Add(createRequest);
}
ExecuteMultipleResponse responseWithResults =
(ExecuteMultipleResponse)_serviceProxy.Execute(requestWithResults);
Hope it helps

Related

Is Dynamics CRM 2013 sdk cache result of QueryExpresions by Default?

I wrote this simple query:
var connectionString = String.Format("Url={0}; Username={1}; Password={2}; Domain={3}", url, username, password, domain);
var myConnection = CrmConnection.Parse(connectionString);
CrmOrganizationServiceContext _service = new CrmOrganizationServiceContext(myConnection);
var whoAmI = _service.Execute(new WhoAmIRequest());
var query = new QueryExpression
{
EntityName = "phonecall",
ColumnSet = new ColumnSet(true)
};
query.PageInfo = new PagingInfo
{
Count = 20,
PageNumber = 1,
PagingCookie = null
};
query.Orders.Add(new OrderExpression
{
AttributeName = "actualstart",
OrderType = OrderType.Descending
});
query.Criteria = new FilterExpression() { FilterOperator = LogicalOperator.And };
query.Criteria.AddCondition("call_caller", ConditionOperator.In, lines);
var entities = _service.RetrieveMultiple(query).Entities;
I have a program which runs this query every minute. On the first execution the correct results are displayed but for subsequent queries the results never change as I update records in CRM.
If I restart my program the results refresh correctly again on the first load.
Why are the results not updating as records are modified in CRM?
It is the CrmOrganizationServiceContext that is doing the caching - I found the following worked a treat and the results of my RetrieveMultiple are no longer cached :)
Context = new CrmOrganizationServiceContext(CrmConnection.Parse(connectionString));
Context.TryAccessCache(cache => cache.Mode = OrganizationServiceCacheMode.Disabled);
RetrieveMultiple always brings back fresh results so there must be some other aspect of your program which is causing stale data to be displayed.

How to add documents in Lucene.Net.Linq?

The Lucene.Net.Linq project seems pretty powerful and while querying seems pretty simple, I'm not quite sure how to add/update documents. Can an example or two be provided?
There are some full examples in the test project at https://github.com/themotleyfool/Lucene.Net.Linq/tree/master/source/Lucene.Net.Linq.Tests/Samples.
Once you've configured your mappings and initialized your provider, you make updates by opening a session:
var directory = new RAMDirectory();
var provider = new LuceneDataProvider(directory, Version.LUCENE_30);
using (var session = provider.OpenSession<Article>())
{
session.Add(new Article {Author = "John Doe", BodyText = "some body text", PublishDate = DateTimeOffset.UtcNow});
}
You can also update existing documents. Simply retrieve the item from the session, and the session will detect if a modification was made:
using (var session = provider.OpenSession<Article>())
{
var item = session.Query().Single(i => i.Id == someId);
item.Name = "updated";
}
Or you can delete documents:
using (var session = provider.OpenSession<Article>())
{
var item = session.Query().Single(i => i.Id == someId);
session.Delete(item);
}
When the session is disposed, all pending changes in the session are written to the index and then committed. This is done within a synchronization context to ensure all changes in the session are committed and seen atomically when queries are being executed on other threads.

How many times the query will hit the database?

Can any one plz optimize the below linq query.It should hit the database only once.
List<LearningItem> items = this.learningitemRepository.GetAll().ToList();
var model = new List<StatementViewerModel>();
foreach (var statement in subjects)
{
var mi = new StatementViewerModel();
mi.UserName = statement.UserName;
mi.SubjectName = statement.Name;
**int nofItems = items.Where(x => x.SubjectId == statement.SubjectId).Count();**
double ratio = (double)statement.AttendedItems / (double)nofItems;
int subjectprogress = (int)(ratio * 100);
mi.Progress = subjectprogress;
model.Add(mi);
}
From what you have posted, your Database should only be being accessed through the GetAll() method of your learmingitemRepository. So if you are worried that you are querying the Database more than once, the GetAll() function is where you should look (assuming your example is not in a function that is being repeatedly called itself).
The rest of your code is iterating over your subjects collection and adding objects to your model collection. There does not appear to be anything in the foreach loop that is accessing your Database.

Explicit construction of entity type in query is not allowed [duplicate]

Using Linq commands and Linq To SQL datacontext, Im trying to instance an Entity called "Produccion" from my datacontext in this way:
Demo.View.Data.PRODUCCION pocoProduccion =
(
from m in db.MEDICOXPROMOTORs
join a in db.ATENCIONs on m.cmp equals a.cmp
join e in db.EXAMENXATENCIONs on a.numeroatencion equals e.numeroatencion
join c in db.CITAs on e.numerocita equals c.numerocita
where e.codigo == codigoExamenxAtencion
select new Demo.View.Data.PRODUCCION
{
cmp = a.cmp,
bonificacion = comi,
valorventa = precioEstudio,
codigoestudio = lblCodigoEstudio.Content.ToString(),
codigopaciente = Convert.ToInt32(lblCodigoPaciente.Content.ToString()),
codigoproduccion = Convert.ToInt32(lblNroInforme.Content.ToString()),
codigopromotor = m.codigopromotor,
fecha = Convert.ToDateTime(DateTime.Today.ToShortDateString()),
numeroinforme = Convert.ToInt32(lblNroInforme.Content.ToString()),
revisado = false,
codigozona = (c.codigozona.Value == null ? Convert.ToInt32(c.codigozona) : 0),
codigoclinica = Convert.ToInt32(c.codigoclinica),
codigoclase = e.codigoclase,
}
).FirstOrDefault();
While executing the above code, I'm getting the following error that the stack trace is included:
System.NotSupportedException was caught
Message="The explicit construction of the entity type 'Demo.View.Data.PRODUCCION' in a query is not allowed."
Source="System.Data.Linq"
StackTrace:
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.QueryConverter.VisitMemberInit(MemberInitExpression init)
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.QueryConverter.VisitInner(Expression node)
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.QueryConverter.Visit(Expression node)
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.QueryConverter.VisitSelect(Expression sequence, LambdaExpression selector)
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.QueryConverter.VisitSequenceOperatorCall(MethodCallExpression mc)
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.QueryConverter.VisitMethodCall(MethodCallExpression mc)
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.QueryConverter.VisitInner(Expression node)
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.QueryConverter.Visit(Expression node)
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.QueryConverter.VisitFirst(Expression sequence, LambdaExpression lambda, Boolean isFirst)
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.QueryConverter.VisitSequenceOperatorCall(MethodCallExpression mc)
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.QueryConverter.VisitMethodCall(MethodCallExpression mc)
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.QueryConverter.VisitInner(Expression node)
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.QueryConverter.ConvertOuter(Expression node)
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.SqlProvider.BuildQuery(Expression query, SqlNodeAnnotations annotations)
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.SqlProvider.System.Data.Linq.Provider.IProvider.Execute(Expression query)
en System.Data.Linq.DataQuery`1.System.Linq.IQueryProvider.Execute[S](Expression expression)
en System.Linq.Queryable.FirstOrDefault[TSource](IQueryable`1 source)
en Demo.View.InformeMedico.realizarProduccionInforme(Int32 codigoExamenxAtencion, Double precioEstudio, Int32 comi) en D:\cs_InformeMedico\app\InformeMedico.xaml.cs:línea 602
en Demo.View.InformeMedico.UpdateEstadoEstudio(Int32 codigo, Char state) en D:\cs_InformeMedico\app\InformeMedico.xaml.cs:línea 591
en Demo.View.InformeMedico.btnGuardar_Click(Object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) en D:\cs_InformeMedico\app\InformeMedico.xaml.cs:línea 683
InnerException:
Is that now allowed in LINQ2SQL?
Entities can be created outside of queries and inserted into the data store using a DataContext. You can then retrieve them using queries. However, you can't create entities as part of a query.
I am finding this limitation to be very annoying, and going against the common trend of not using SELECT * in queries.
Still with c# anonymous types there is a workaround, by fetching the objects into an anonymous type, and then copy it over into the correct type.
For example:
var q = from emp in employees where emp.ID !=0
select new {Name = emp.First + " " + emp.Last, EmployeeId = emp.ID }
var r = q.ToList();
List<User> users = new List<User>(r.Select(new User
{
Name = r.Name,
EmployeeId = r.EmployeeId
}));
And in the case when we deal with a single value (as in the situation described in the question) it is even easier, and we just need to copy directly the values:
var q = from emp in employees where emp.ID !=0
select new { Name = emp.First + " " + emp.Last, EmployeeId = emp.ID }
var r = q.FirstOrDefault();
User user = new User { Name = r.Name, EmployeeId = r.ID };
If the name of the properties match the database columns we can do it even simpler in the query, by doing select
var q = from emp in employees where emp.ID !=0
select new { emp.First, emp.Last, emp.ID }
One might go ahead and write a lambda expression that can copy automatically based on the property name, without needing to specify the values explictly.
Here's another workaround:
Make a class that derives from your LINQ to SQL class. I'm assuming that the L2S class that you want to return is Order:
internal class OrderView : Order { }
Now write the query this way:
var query = from o in db.Order
select new OrderView // instead of Order
{
OrderID = o.OrderID,
OrderDate = o.OrderDate,
// etc.
};
Cast the result back into Order, like this:
return query.Cast<Order>().ToList(); // or .FirstOrDefault()
(or use something more sensible, like BLToolkit / LINQ to DB)
Note: I haven't tested to see if tracking works or not; it works to retrieve data, which is what I needed.
I have found that if you do a .ToList() on the query before trying to contruct new objects it works
I just ran into the same issue.
I found a very easy solution.
var a = att as Attachment;
Func<Culture, AttachmentCulture> make =
c => new AttachmentCulture { Culture = c };
var culs = from c in dc.Cultures
let ac = c.AttachmentCultures.SingleOrDefault(
x => x.Attachment == a)
select ac == null ? make(c) : ac;
return culs;
I construct an anonymous type, use IEnumerable (which preserves deferred execution), and then re-consruct the datacontext object. Both Employee and Manager are datacontext objects:
var q = dc.Employees.Where(p => p.IsManager == 1)
.Select(p => new { Id = p.Id, Name = p.Name })
.AsEnumerable()
.Select(item => new Manager() { Id = item.Id, Name = item.Name });
Within the book "70-515 Web Applications Development with Microsoft .NET Framework 4 - Self paced training kit", page 638 has the following example to output results to a strongly typed object:
IEnumerable<User> users = from emp in employees where emp.ID !=0
select new User
{
Name = emp.First + " " + emp.Last,
EmployeeId = emp.ID
}
Mark Pecks advice appears to contradict this book - however, for me this example still displays the above error as well, leaving me somewhat confused. Is this linked to version differences? Any suggestions welcome.
I found another workaround for the problem that even lets you retain your result as IQueryale, so it doesn't actually execute the query until you want it to be executed (like it would with the ToList() method).
So linq doesn't allow you to create an entity as a part of query? You can shift that task to the database itself and create a function that will grab the data you want. After you import the function to your data context, you just need to set the result type to the one you want.
I found out about this when I had to write a piece of code that would produce a IQueryable<T> in which the items don't actually exist in the table containing T.
pbz posted a work around by creating a View class inherited from an entity class that you could be working with. I'm working with a dbml model of a table that has > 200 columns. When I try and return the whole table I get "Root Element missing" errors. I couldn't find anyone who wanted to deal with my particular issue so I was looking at rewriting my entire approach. Just creating a view class for the entitiy class worked in my case.
As pbz suggests : Create a view class that inherits from your entity class. For me this is tbCamp so :
internal class tbCampView : tbCamp
{
}
Then use the view class in your query :
using (var dc = ConnectionClass.Connect(Dev))
{
var camps = dc.tbCamps.Select(s => new tbCampView
{
active = s.active,
idCamp = s.idCamp,
campName = s.campName
});
SmartTableViewer(camps, dg1);
}
private void SmartTableViewer<T>(IEnumerable<T> allRecords)
{
// Build sorted rows back into new table
var table = new DataTable();
// Create columns based on type
if (allRecords is IEnumerable<tbCamp> tbCampRecords)
{
// Get the columns you want
table.Columns.Add("idCamp");
table.Columns.Add("campName");
foreach (var record in tbCampRecords)
{
// Make a new row
var r = table.NewRow();
// Add the contents to each column of the row
r["idCamp"] = record.idCamp;
r["campName"] = record.campName;
// Add the row to the table.
table.Rows.Add(r);
}
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("Unhandled type. Add support for new data type in SmartTableViewer()");
return;
}
// Update table in grid
dg1.DataSource = table.DefaultView;
}
Here is what happens when you try and create an entity class object in the query.
I didn't want to have to use an anonymous type if I could help it because I wanted the type to be tbCamp. Since tbCampView is of type tbCamp the is operator works well. see Brian Hasden's answer Passing a generic List<> in C#
I'm surprised this is even an issue but with larger tables I run into this error so I thought I would just show it here :
When trying to read this table into memory I get the following error. There are < 2000 rows but the columns are > 200 for each. I don't know if that is an issue or not.
If I just want a few columns I need to create a custom class and handle that which isn't that big of a pain. With the approach pbz provided I don't have to worry about it.
Here is the entire project in case it helps someone.
public partial class Form1 : Form
{
private const bool Dev = true;
public Form1()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
private void btnGetAllCamps_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
using (var dc = ConnectionClass.Connect(Dev))
{
IQueryable<tbCampView> camps = dc.tbCamps.Select(s => new tbCampView
{
// Project columns as needed.
active = s.active,
idCamp = s.idCamp,
campName = s.campName
});
// pass in as a
SmartTableViewer(camps);
}
}
private void SmartTableViewer<T>(IEnumerable<T> allRecords)
{
// Build sorted rows back into new table
var table = new DataTable();
// Create columns based on type
if (allRecords is IEnumerable<tbCamp> tbCampRecords)
{
// Get the columns you want
table.Columns.Add("idCamp");
table.Columns.Add("campName");
foreach (var record in tbCampRecords)
{
//var newRecord = record;
// Make a new row
var r = table.NewRow();
// Add the contents to each column of the row
r["idCamp"] = record.idCamp;
r["campName"] = record.campName;
// Add the row to the table.
table.Rows.Add(r);
}
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("Unhandled type. Add support for new data type in SmartTableViewer()");
return;
}
// Update table in grid
dg1.DataSource = table.DefaultView;
}
internal class tbCampView : tbCamp
{
}
}

Add an entity from another DataContex in linq

I am trying to merge data between two identical schema databases using Linq-to-sql:
List<Contact> contacts = (from c in oldDb.Contact
select c).ToList();
contacts.ForEach(c => c.CreatedByID = 0);
newDb.Contact.InsertAllOnSubmit(contacts);
newDb.SubmitChanges();
Merely throws an "An attempt has been made to Attach or Add an entity that is not new, perhaps having been loaded from another DataContext. This is not supported." exception.
Other than doing the following, how else can this be done generically (in reasonable execution time):
List<Contact> contacts = (from c in oldDb.Contact
select c).ToList();
contacts.ForEach(c => { c.CreatedByID = 0; newDb.Contact.InsertAllOnSubmit(contacts); });
newDb.SubmitChanges();
along with:
private t GetNewObject<t>(t oldObj)
{
t newObj = (t)System.Reflection.Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().CreateInstance(typeof(t).Name);
PropertyInfo[] props = typeof(t).GetProperties();
foreach (PropertyInfo _prop in props)
{
_prop.SetValue(newObj, _prop.GetValue(oldObj, null), null);
}
return newObj;
}
The problem is this method is rather slow when there's only 11 objects and 75 properties, I need to do this for a couple hundred thousand objects so any performance gains I can get at this end would greatly reduce overall run time.
Basically, is there any Detach or similar call I could do that will disconnect the existing objects from the old DataContext and connect them to the new DataContext. Without having to create all new objects for each and every one of the returned rows.
I didnt got the
contacts.ForEach(c => { c.CreatedByID = 0; newDb.Contact.InsertAllOnSubmit(contacts); });
shouldnt be something like
contacts.ForEach(c => {
Contact c2 = GetNewObject<Contact>(c);
c2.CreatedByID = 0;
newDb.Contact.InsertOnSubmit(c2);
});
also, here's a way of detaching the object from the old database: http://omaralzabir.com/linq_to_sql__how_to_attach_object_to_a_different_data_context/

Resources