I have a repository method that gets all the Users from the database. Each User has a single child object called Profile and one or many child objects that fall under a List called Companies. This repository method has been tested, works fine and returns type IQueryable, which I am using as a base to later get narrowed down results once a query is triggered.
What I am trying to do is get a list of users from that repository method that have at least one associated company that has an ID that matches an element in an existing list called 'targetCompanyIDs'. The list is of type List<int> and the company's ID is also an int. Here is my attempt to generate that list of users:
List<User> usersData = rep.GetUsersProfilesAndCompanies().Where(u => targetCompanyIDs.Contains(u.CompanyStructures.ID)).ToList();
The error I get is that type List does not contain a definition for ID. Makes sense, right? So what I tried to do is treat the User's associated companies as some type of group or aggregate. Here is my second attempt:
List<User> usersData = rep.GetUsersProfilesAndCompanies().Where(u => targetCompanyIDs.Contains(u.CompanyStructures.Any(cs => cs.ID))).ToList();
What I am trying to say is, for any company the user has associated with it, does that company's ID match with the list targetCompanyIDs? If so, include the user on the list. Unfortunately this gives an 'invalid argument' error.
Is there any way in LINQ to query against multiple child elements like I am trying to do here?
Try this way :
List<User> usersData = rep.GetUsersProfilesAndCompanies()
.Where(u => u.CompanyStructures.Any(o => targetCompanyIDs.Contains(o.ID)))
.ToList();
Related
Is there a way to restrict the "columns" returned from a Realm Xamarin LINQ query?
For example, if I have a Customer RealmObject and I want a list of all customer names, do I have to query All<Customer> and then enumerate the results to build the names list? That seems cumbersome and inefficient. I am not seeing anything in the docs. Am I missing something obvious here? Thanks!
You have to remember that Realm is an object based store. In a RDBMS like Sqlite, restricting the return results to a sub-set of "columns" of an "record" makes sense, but in an object store, you would be removing attributes from the original class and thus creating a new dynamic class to then instantiate these new classes as objects.
Thus is you want just a List of strings representing the customer names you can do this:
List<string> names = theRealm.All<Customer>().ToList().Select(customer => customer.Name).ToList();
Note: That you take the Realm.All<> results to a List first and then using a Linq Select "filter" just the property that you want. Using a .Select directly on a RealmResults is not currently supported (v0.80.0).
If you need to return a complex type that is a subset of attributes from the original RealObject, assuming you have a matching POCO, you can use:
var custNames = theRealm.All<Customer>().ToList().Select((Customer c) => new Name() { firstName = c.firstName, lastName = c.lastName } );
Remember, once you convert a RealmResult to a static list of POCOs you do lose the liveliness of using RealmObjects.
Personally I avoid doing this whenever possible as Realm is so fast that using a RealmResult and thus the RealObjects directly is more efficient on processing time and memory overhead then converting those to POCOs everytime you need to new list...
There is a table, it is a poco entity generated by entity framework.
class Log
{
int DoneByEmpId;
string DoneByEmpName
}
I am retrieving a list from the data base. I want distinct values based on donebyempid and order by those values empname.
I have tried lot of ways to do it but it is not working
var lstLogUsers = (context.Logs.GroupBy(logList => logList.DoneByEmpId).Select(item => item.First())).ToList(); // it gives error
this one get all the user.
var lstLogUsers = context.Logs.ToList().OrderBy(logList => logList.DoneByEmpName).Distinct();
Can any one suggest how to achieve this.
Can I just point out that you probably have a problem with your data model here? I would imagine you should just have DoneByEmpId here, and a separate table Employee which has EmpId and Name.
I think this is why you are needing to use Distinct/GroupBy (which doesn't really work for this scenario, as you are finding).
I'm not near a compiler, so i can't test it, but...
Use the other version of Distinct(), the one that takes an IEqualityComparer<TSource> argument, and then use OrderBy().
See here for example.
Being new to attribute routing, I'd like to ask for help getting this to work.
This test is a simple dynamic DB table viewer: Given a table name (or stored query name or whatever) and optionally some WHERE parameters, return query results.
Table COMPANIES (one of any number of tables which has an associated SELECT query stored somewhere, keyed by table name):
ID NAME HQ INDUSTRY
1 Apple USA Consumer electronics
2 Bose USA Low-quality, expensive audio equipment
3 Nokia FIN Mobile Phones
Controller:
[Route("view/{table}/{parameters}")]
public object Get(string table, Dictionary<string, string> parameters) {
var sql = GetSql(table);
var dbArgs = new DynamicParameters(parameters);
return Database.Query(sql, dbArgs); // Return stuff/unrelated to problem
}
SQL stored in some resource or table. Obviously the parameters must match exactly:
SELECT * FROM companies
WHERE name = :name
-- OR hq = :hq
-- OR ...etc. Doesn't matter since it never gets this far.
Request (Should look clean, but the exact URL format isn't important):
www.website.com/view/companies?hq=fin --> 404: No matching controller
www.website.com/view/companies/hq=fin --> parameters is null
www.website.com/view/companies/hq=fin&name=nokia --> Exception: A potentially dangerous Request.Path value was detected from the client (&).
When I use: [Route("view/{table}{parameters}")] I get:
A path segment cannot contain two consecutive parameters. They must be separated by a '/' or by a literal string. Parameter name: routeTemplate. Makes sense.
My question is: How do I accept a table name and any number of unknown parameters in the usual key1=val1&key2=val2 form (not some awkward indexed format like the one mentioned here) which will be later bound to SQL parameters, preferably using a vanilla data structure rather than something like FormCollection.
I don't think that binding URL parameters to a Dictionary is built-in to the framework. I'm sure there's a way to extend it if you wanted to.
I think quickest (but still acceptable) option is to get the query string parameters using Request.GetQueryNameValuePairs() like this:
[Route("view/{table}")]
public object Get(string table) {
Dictionary<string, string> parameters = Request.GetQueryNameValuePairs()
.ToDictionary(x => x.Key, x => x.Value);
var sql = GetSql(table);
var dbArgs = new DynamicParameters(parameters);
return Database.Query(sql, dbArgs); // Return stuff/unrelated to problem
}
I already have a variable containing some groups. I generated that using the following LINQ query:
var historyGroups = from payee in list
group payee by payee.Payee.Name into groups
orderby groups.Key
select new {PayeeName = groups.Key, List = groups };
Now my historyGroups variable can contain many groups. Each of those groups has a key which is a string and Results View is sorted according to that. Now inside each of those groups there is a List corresponding to the key. Inside that List there are elements and each one those element is an object of a particular type. One of it's fields is of type System.DateTime. I want to sort this internal List by date.
Can anyone help with this? May be modify the above query or a new query on variable historyGroups.
Thanks
It is not clear to me what you want to sort on (the payee type definition is missing as well)
var historyGroups = from payee in list
group payee by payee.Payee.Name into groups
orderby groups.Key
select new {
PayeeName = groups.Key,
List = groups.OrderBy(payee2 => payee2.SomeDateTimeField)
};
Is most straightforward.
If you really want to sort only by date (and not time), use SomeDateTimeField.Date.
Inside that List there are elements and each one those element is an object of a particular type. One of it's fields is of type System.DateTime
This leads me to maybe(?) suspect
List = groups.OrderBy(payee2 => payee2.ParticularTypedElement.DateTimeField)
Or perhaps even
List = groups.OrderBy(payee2 => payee2.ObjectsOfParticularType
.OfType<DateTime>()
.FirstOrDefault()
)
I hope next time you can clarfy the question a bit better, so we don't have to guess that much (and come up with a confusing answer)
how can I build a table of "orders" containing "IdOrder", "Description" and "User"?... the "User" field is a reference to the table "Users", which has "IdUser" and "Name". I'm using repositories.
I have this repository:
Repository<Orders> ordersRepo = new OrderRepo<Orders>(unitOfWork.Session);
to return all Orders to View, I just do:
return View(ordersRepo.All());
But this will result in something like:
IdOrder:1 -- Description: SomeTest -- User: UserProxy123ih12i3123ih12i3uh123
-
When the expected result was:
IdOrder:1 -- Description: SomeTest -- User: Thiago.
PS: I don't know why it returns this "UserProxy123ih12i3123ih12i3uh123". In Db there is a valid value.
The View:
It is showed in a foreach (var item in Model).
#item.Description
#item.User //--> If it is #item.User.Name doesn't work.
What I have to do to put the Name on this list? May I have to do a query using LINQ - NHibernate?
Tks.
What type of ORM are you using? You mention "repositories" but does that mean LinqToSql, Entity Framework, NHibernate, or other?
It looks like you are getting an error because the User field is not loaded as part of the original query. This is likely done to reduce the size of the result set by excluding the related fields from the original query for Orders.
There are a couple of options to work around this:
Set up the repository (or context, depending on the ORM) to include the User property in the result set.
Explicitly load the User property before you access it. Note that this would be an additional round-trip to the database and should not be done in a loop.
In cases where you know that you need the User information it would make sense to ensure that this data in returned from the original query. If you are using LinqToSql take a look at the DataLoadOptions type. You can use this type to specify which relationships you want to retrieve with the query:
var options = new DataLoadOptions();
options.LoadWith<Orders>(o => o.User);
DataContext context = ...;
context.LoadOptions = options;
var query = from o in context.Orders
select o;
There should be similar methods to achive the same thing whatever ORM you are using.
In NHibernate you can do the following:
using (ISession session = SessionFactory.OpenSession())
{
var orders = session.Get<Order>(someId);
NHibernateUtil.Initialize(orders.User);
}
This will result in only two database trips (regardless of the number of orders returned). More information on this can be found here.
In asp.net MVC the foreign key doesn't work the way you are using it. I believe you have to set the user to a variable like this:
User user = #item.User;
Or you have to load the reference sometimes. I don't know why this is but in my experience if I put this line before doing something with a foreign key it works
#item.UserReference.load();
Maybe when you access item.User.Name the session is already closed so NHib cannot load appropriate user from the DB.
You can create some model and initialize it with proper values at the controller. Also you can disable lazy loading for Orders.User in your mapping.
But maybe it is an other problem. What do you have when accessing "#item.User.Name" from your View?