I have an Inno Setup which can perform 4 types of installation types
Full install
Server install
Client install
Custom install
When installing the client App i don't want to place files on the local machine but
connect the client with the server installation.
The user has in this case not to chose a destination for the installation but has to chose a directory where a server installation is already installed.
It would be less confusing for the user if he would first select the installation type and then the installation directory or the server directory.
Is there any way to perform a switch in the page order ?
I am thinking about something like this:
i am aware that this behavior is something that isn't directly build in inno setup and maybe not wished but it would be very helpfull for the user.
Maybe somebody has a different approach on this problem, i would appreciate that too
Since i haven't got an answer for this problem and i don't think that it is possible to change the order ,i disabled the DirPage in the Setup section and created a Page that does the same as the DirPage but put it at a different position in the Setup.
Here is how to disable the DirPage:
[Setup]
...
DisableDirPage=yes
I still would be happy if anyone has a more elegant solution, but so far it seems to be the only one.
Related
I have configured MAC OS X environment (SDKs, licenses, etc) under current user for build server and would like to reuse all the settings by a build agent. Jenkins was chosen as a good option but for some reason during installation it created a new user jenkins and launch the app under it, causing the environment setup to be not accessible (no SDKs, no licenses are found anymore).
Is it possible to install jenkins under current user?
Probably it could be installed under jenkins but then launched under current user?
Any other good options for me to consider are appreciated.
Try this: http://www.sailmaker.co.uk/blog/2013/04/02/advanced-jenkins-for-ios-and-mac/#Installing-Jenkins-itself
I’m also going to recommend installing Jenkins via Homebrew, to avoid
some nonsense in Jenkins’ own installer whereby it puts itself in
/Users/Shared/. You really don’t want that.
If you're free to reinstall however you'd like, I'd recommend re-installing as the user you want to use, using whatever type of install you prefer, and then simply copy over the old Jenkins data directory to the new installation's location, and then changing the permissions in that directory.
That is to say, the directory containing the config, plugin and job information (it may be something like /usr/lib/jenkins, but could vary).
Then, chown -R the data directory using the user:group info you want to use so Jenkins has access to the files.
I have used this type of method in the past to transfer all the data from one install to another totally separate install on the same box, and it has worked well (one could use this method to transfer the data to an install on another box, as well).
Note: I would highly recommend making a full backup of the data directory before doing this, in case anything goes awry.
So I have been given the task of upgrading one of our companies' old websites that is based on 1.5 to something newer (because a second site of ours on the same version just got hacked).
I know some php and some other web stuff, but I'd never used Joomla.
I have setup a lamp server on a local VM (ubuntu) for me to test it all out on, then upload the upgraded version as is suggested. My problem now is that I know the permissions are not correct because when I tried installing Akeeba Backup, it kept throwing errors such as "could not copy to /var/www/components and /var/www/administrator etc. I went in and chmod'd those 2 (and then the rest of www because of more errors) to 757 (from 755 for the most part) - which i know at that point might as well be 777. Then when I've tried to use Kickstart to restore from the JPA file I have, it just right away throws an error "could not create j_backup/ folder".
I know this slackening of all permissions on the root folder is wrong, but it was the only way to get it to 'work', which it's not even now, so my question is what did I do wrong in the setup and how do i fix it? I'm not great with Linux, but I'm thinking I have to make PHP owner of www? is that right? or terrible practice?
The other issue I see now is that I just installed the latest php and everything and I see Akeepa says not to use php 5.4... not sure how much of a problem that's going to be....
Some direction would be great because I'm more than a little lost.
Thanks!
This is certainly a headache. Most often, as you stated, the issue is the ownership of the files on your server. Files uploaded via FTP will be owned by your FTP user and may not be editable by the Apache/PHP user. Similarly, files created by installing extensions in Joomla! will be owned by the Apache/PHP user and your FTP user will not be able to modify them. Here is an article discussing the problem with a couple of possible solutions:
http://docs.joomla.org/Why_can%27t_you_install_any_extensions%3F#File_ownership_advice_from_ianmac
In the past, I have used an Apache Module called suPHP (http://www.suphp.org/Home.html) to solve this problem and keep it from reoccurring. suPHP executes PHP scripts with the permissions of their owners.
As for file permissions other than ownership, please refer to the Joomla! documentation for the correct settings: http://docs.joomla.org/Verifying_permissions. One quick way to handle this (if you can install extensions after correcting the ownership issue) is to use the AdminTools extension (http://extensions.joomla.org/extensions/access-a-security/site-security/site-protection/14087). One of its tools ‘fixes’ the file permissions on your server by resetting them to the Joomla! default.
Good luck!
I am running SQLManagementStudio_x86_2012_ENU.exe to install SQL Server 2012. I came across a problem and I was hunged on it too long.
I have seen the same problem in SO and they are give a solution for that. I also over come that problem but again stuck again in half way through. So I am going to ask this again(not a spam)
Problem: When I ran above mentioned exe it was installed fine, Then I tried to create a instance of the server. I used SQL Server Installation Center in configuration tools. then I selected new SQL Server and it asks me to select the SQL Server Installation Media. I selected C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server but it was invalied.
then I figured out that it is asking for the Installation media itself. So I extracted the .exe file to a folder and selected that path. that was taken as a valid media.
I refered to this link.
some have mentioned that this was a bug here.
when I clicked next it gives the following error. so that I can not proceed and create a instance. Can some one help me on this.
thanks in advance.
I have tried lot of things to come up with a solution for this. As you can see in the picture, there are only 2 check boxes which are already checked and disabled. This is not the right .exe file to run(I was unable to create a server instance using this). I downloaded the right SQL server installation file from here.
There are several .exe files that gives different functionality enhancements. I chose SQL server with tools which is about 1GB. I did not have to uninstall the existing sql server installation. I installed this and it worked fine. I will post back if I found a way to create a SQL server form the given installation. If you have the same problem as described above, most probably you are using the wrong .exe file.
Good luck with your fix.
We are currently using VSS for version control. Quite few of our developers are interested in a distributed model (And want to get rid of VSS). Our network is full of Windows machines and while our IT department has experience maintaining Linux machines they would prefer not to.
What DVCS systems can host their central repository on Windows while providing..
Push access to the repository.
Basic authentication. Mostly just a way to allow or deny access to the whole repository. No need for fine grained access.
Server process so users don't need write right to the repository reducing the risk of accidentally messing with it.
On the client side a GUI such as Tortoise would be more or less a requirement (Sorry, Windows shell sucks. :|). Ease of installation would be a huge plus as our IT department is already quite low on resources. And using windows credentials for authentication would be an advantage but not a requirement as long as the client is able to store the credentials.
I have had a (really) quick look at Git, Mercurial and Bazaar.
Git seemed to use ssh or simple WebDAV for repository access, requiring write permission for the users.
Mercurial had a built in http server, but this seemed to be only for pull purposes. Update: Mercurial supports push as well.
Bazaar Seemed to use sftp for repository access, again requiring a write permission for the users.
Are there windows server processes for any DVCS systems and has anyone managed to set one up in a Windows land?
And apologies if this is a duplicate question. I couldn't find one.
Update
Got Mercurial working for push purposes! Detailed list what was required can be found as an answer below.
Mercurial's almost certainly your easiest option on Windows.
If you didn't care about authentication, you actually can trivially allow hg serve to permit push. To do so, you merely need to add the following to the .hg/hgrc file in the repository you wish to serve:
[web]
allow_push = *
push_ssl = false
The first line says that anyone may push to this repository. The second tells Mercurial to allow pushing without SSL, since hg serve does not currently natively support HTTPS. At this point, users can push to your repository without having an account anywhere. If you're simply a small shop, that's probably fine--especially since you can use Mercurial's ability to sign changesets to guarantee a much higher level of verifiability than HTTP Basic will provide, anyway.
For a larger, shop, though, you'd be totally right in wanting at least a simple barrier for committing. To do that, you need to make two changes. First, you'll need to put Mercurial behind a web server with either reverse proxy support or CGI support. Thankfully, recent versions of IIS support both. You can consult the CGI directions in the Mercurial Redbook for Mercurial-specific steps, and Microsoft's guide to setting up CGI applications in IIS 6 for help on the IIS side.
Next, you'll need to set up some basic authentication. IIS provides HTTP Basic out-of-the-box, which, as a bonus, can authenticate directly against your domain, keeping administrative overhead to a minimum.
Finally, you'll want to change the allow_push line to support only specific users by specifying a comma-delimited list of user names. For example:
allow_push = benjamin, ted, the_cow
That's it. Mercurial will now allow push from users who can authenticate via HTTP Basic authentication, and allow pull from everyone else.
After Benjamin pointed out the HTTP serving CGI scripts I decided to try those out and managed to get a repository hosted over HTTP. The Redbook which Benjamin linked was of much help as were two Mercurial wiki articles. One which describes Mercurial publishing in general and another containing step by step instructions for setting up the HgWebDir CGI script.
These instructions weren't completely foolproof though so I had to poke around a bit. Most likely as I'm running 64bit Vista. The instructions below document what I did. Now that I've done it once I'd probably do things in another order so don't consider these step by step instructions.
Mercurial
First I acquired the Mercurial binary from http://mercurial.berkwood.com/ which got installed into d:\dev\Mercurial. I created a repository for testing under d:\dev\testRepo repository using hg init. The d:\dev\Mercurial\library.zip contains Mercurial library files required by the CGI script so they were extracted to d:\dev\Mercurial\library. Something which confused me at first is that when I opened the zip file I received an error message and saw no contents. Just extracting the file to a directory worked though.
For the web script, I downloaded Mercurial source which contained the hgwebdir.cgi which got moved and renamed to d:\dev\Mercurial\webroot\hgwebdir.py. The step by step article contains good instructions for modifying the hgwebdir script for Windows. They also contain instructions for hgweb.config which in my case ended up looking like this:
[paths]
/hg/hgwebdir.py/test = D:\dev\Mercurial\testRepo
Also the repository wanted the following config so I could push there without SSL. Note I am using Basic Authentication to authenticate users currently. I had to create the config in D:\dev\Mercurial\testRepo\.hg\hgrc and add the following lines to it:
[web]
allow_push = *
push_ssl = false
Python
The CGI script is a Python script so it requires Python. It's seems pretty picky on which Python version executes it. One of the articles mentioned that running it requires same version that was used to build the Mercurial. In the end I got it working on Python 2.5 x86 after trying Python 2.6 x64, Python 2.4, Python 2.5 x64.
IIS
Two things I missed and had to install were CGI support and Basic Authentication. Both of these were installed through Control Panel, Programs and Features. Once done with installation I created a virtual directory (Which I later changed to an Application) in IIS pointing to D:\dev\Mercurial\webroot. The virtual directory required an CGI handler for *.py files which could be added from Handler Mappings. The executable was D:\dev\SDKs\Python25_x86\Python.exe %s. Once IIS had permissions to the webroot directory I could navigate to http://localhost/hg/hgwebdir.py/test and see the repository.
So now the read access was working. When I tried pushing to the repository I received weird error messages telling me it wasn't a real repository.
After an hour of debugging I ended up copying the whole D:\dev\Mercurial\library\mercurial tree under webroot so that Python could find D:\dev\Mercurial\webroot\mercurial\hgweb\hgwebdir_mod.pyc. After this Wireshark was reportting Access Denied errors in the stack trace. No idea what the real reason to this was but changing the virtual directory into an Application in IIS and moving it on top of an application pool which ran using Local System account the access denied errors went away.
Also at some point I gave HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\WinSock2\Parameters registry key more permissions so IIS could access it. Doubt that it requires these after using Local System account.
Once these were done pushing stuff to the repository using hg push http://localhost/hg/hgwebdir.cgi/test was working!
Problems and solutions
Where to find the library files.
They were in the library.dll under Mercurial installation folder. I just had to extract them even if my unzip program refused to view me its contents.
How to get the Python script to run
Download the correct Python version for x86 architecture as the script uses some x86 libraries. The correct Python version depends on the Mercurial version. For 1.2.1 it was Python 2.5 x86.
Alternatively you could try building Mercurial from sources with whatever Python version you want but in my case this failed when building extensions.
How to set CGI up in IIS
First make sure CGI is installed in IIS. This wasn't assumed to be true in the IIS instructions Benjamin posted.
Create a new Module Mapping for *.py in IIS Handler Mappings. The correct Module is CgiModule and the executable is your Python executable + %s
How to allow the CGI script to write to the repository
Make sure the script has everything it requires. I had to move the library\mercurial\hgweb\hgwebdir_mod.pyc to another place.
Make sure the script has permissions to everywhere it wants. I solved this by Creating a new Application Pool for the CGI script that used Local System account, converting the Virtual Directory to an Application in IIS and selecting the new Application Pool.
After reading Mikko's Answer which almost worked for me, I came up with my own notes for installation. My setup was designed to be a "non protected and open" repository that members of my team could use installed on a Windows 2008 Server.
1. Install Python.
The version of Python I used was Python 2.6.2 and I used the Windows x86 MSI Installer.
Install for all Users.
Install to C:\Mercurial\Python
Use Default Feature Options.
2. Install MinGW.
The version of Minimalist GNU for Windows I used was MinGW 5.1.4
Install the MinGW-5.1.4.exe.
Choose the Download and Install Option.
Choose the Current Package Option to Install.
For the Components to Install Select the "Minimal" option.
Install to C:\Mercurial\MinGW
3. Modify your path.
You need to add in locations to your environmental path at this point.
Add 'C:\Mercurial\Python26;C:\Mercurial\MinGW\bin' to the path (Order Matters.)
4. Install Mercurial.
The version of mercurial that I used was the latest release in the stable branch and I did not use the binaries, but used the source code. I wanted to compile mercurial myself so that it would work with whatever version of Python I had installed so I didn't have to worry about any compatability issues which I found to be the biggest challenge with other install methods. The easist way to get the source is by downloading the "zip" file.
Mercurial Stable Release
Extract Zip File to C:\Mercurial\Source.
Build the Source at command prompt.
python setup.py build --force -c mingw32
python setup.py install --force --skip-build
5. Modify your path.
You need to insert into your environmental path another location for the 'hg' command.
Add 'C:\Mercurial\Python26\Scripts;C:\Mercurial\Python26;C:\Mercurial\MinGW\bin' to the path (Order Matters.)
6. Create your Config file.
You need to have a default user name set if your going to do any commits locally on this server.
Create file '"C:\Documents and Settings{username}.hgrc"'
[ui]
editor = Notepad
username = your_name
6. Test your Install.
Open up a new command window and test with 'hg debuginstall' to validate. You should see something like the following.
Checking encoding (cp1252)...
Checking extensions...
Checking templates...
Checking patch...
Checking commit editor...
Checking username...
No problems detected
7. Setup Web Directory.
Create Directory 'C:\Mercurial\Web'
Copy the hgwebdir.cgi file from the 'C:\Mercurial\Source' to 'C:\Mercurial\Web'
8. Configure IIS7 for Centralized Repository.
I used the DefaultAppPool which is using .Net 2.0, Pipeline=Integrated, Identity = ApplicationPoolIdentity.
Ensure CGI features are available in IIS7.
Control Panel/Programs/Windows Features/IIS/App Development Features/CGI
Add App into IIS on the Website you wish.
Alias=Mercurial -- Physical Path=C:\Mercurial\Web
On the App select HTTP Modules and add a new Module Mapping.
Request Path=*.cgi, Module=CgiModule, Executable=C:\Mercurial\Python26\python.exe %s, Name=Mercurial.
When Prompted to add entry to ISAPI and CGI restrictions list say yes.
9. Test your Web Setup.
You should now be able to browse http://localhost/Mercurial/hgwebdir.cgi and see and empty repository list.
10. Configure IIS7 for Friendly URL
I did not like having the unfriendly URL and this step allows us to remap the URL to something more friendly. Install the URL Rewrite Moduel 1.1 Extension for IIS.
On the Mercurial IIS Application in IIS Manager featurs View select URL Rewrite Component and install a new Rule.
Choose Add Rules, then the Template 'Rule with rewrite map.' Rule Action=Rewrite, Specify Rewrite Map=Mercurial
Add a mapping Entry. OriginalValue='/Mercurial/Repo', New Value='/Mercurial/hgwebdir.cgi'
11. Create Mercurial Repository
You can now create a test repository.
Create a Directory C:\Mercurial\Repository and ensure IUSR account has the permissions to write to the directory. (If on Domain account is more like IUSR_{ComputerName}.
Create file C:\Mercurial\Web\hgweb.config to list the repositories.
[paths]
/ = C:\Mercurial\Repository\**
Add a directory C:\Mercurial\Repository\Test and initialize the repository with 'hg init'
** If you want now to be able to push without ssl create in the .hg directory of the repository a hgrc file the following lines.
[web]
allow_push = *
push_ssl = false
References:
Mercurial Wiki Windows Install
HG Book
Step by Step
Publishing Mercurial Repositories
For a team taking the first step away from VSS I would have suggested using SubVersion for source control and either TortoiseSVN or VisualSVN for the client.
But if the team has made the decision to switch to a DVCS then I'd suggest Mercurial because of it's better support for HTTP and windows on the client via TortoiseHg.
If you're looking for:
Distributed development support
Run Windows servers seamlessly
And a great GUI
You're exactly describing Plastic SCM
Excuse my necroposting and shameless self-promotion, but I've just released an alpha version of HgLab, which is a Mercurial Server for Windows with full pull-push support and Active Directory integration.
SCM-agnostic (to some degree) Windows-solution with Repository-frontent and management today may be SCM-Manager (Git, Mercurial, SVN repo out of a box with a single requirement of JVM)
My company is developing an application that has a dependency on another of our applications. That second application already has an Inno Setup installer.
So I think I'd like to bundle the second application's installer within the Inno Setup installer for the first application. But I'm not sure how to go about that properly. Does anyone know the "right way" to do this?
I found this: Inno Setup Knowledge Base—HOWTO: Install .MSI files. I assume the technique could be used for a nested Inno Setup installer. But I have a couple of questions about the fine details:
How could I make it so if the first application is uninstalled, the second is also uninstalled?
Is that a sensible thing to do (automatically uninstall the second application), or should I leave it to the user to do that manually?
If the user tries to uninstall the second application while the first is uninstalled, should I somehow detect that and give a warning? How could I do that?
For the level of uninstaller functionality you are talking about, I suggest you get familiar with pascal scripting in Inno Setup (if you are not already). It offers incredible customisation, but has the caveat of making your projects a lot more complex.
To answer your third question first:
Yes, you should do this. In order to do it properly, you need to add this functionality to the uninstaller of the second application (i.e. the one your app is dependent on). See Uninstall event functions in the Inno Setup help. You need to check in that uninstaller if your app is installed (by checking if HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\SecondAppName exists, for example) and in that case show an additional warning.
As for your second question:
If it is remotely possible that your customer wants to continue using the second app, even if he decides that he wants to uninstall the first one, you should offer him the choice. I would do this with a seperate wizard page in the uninstaller for your app, after your app is uninstalled.
And finally, your first question:
You need to determine the name (full path) of the other app's uninstaller exe. You can retrieve it from the registry key HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\SecondAppName\UninstallString. For executing it from a script in the [CODE] section, see Exec in the Inno Setup help.