I am using Entity Framework and this is my view model:
public class UserDetailsModel:CityModel
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Fullname { get; set; }
}
public class VendorInCategoryModel
{
public int CategoryId { get; set; }
public int VendorId { get; set; }
public virtual CategoryMasterModel CategoryMaster { get; set; }
public virtual UserDetailsModel UserDetails { get; set; }
}
public class CategoryMasterModel
{
public int CategoryId { get; set; }
public string CategoryName { get; set; }
}
This is my query to fetch vendor details along with category details of particular vendor say v001:
UserDetailsModel workerDetails = context.UserDetails.
Where(d => d.Id == _vendorId).
Select(d => new UserDetailsModel
{
Id = d.Id,
Fullname = d.Fullname,
CategoryId = d.VendorInCategory.Select(v => v.CategoryId).FirstOrDefault(),
}).SingleOrDefault();
Here I have used FirstOrDefault to fetch categoryId (that is single value)
But I don't want to use FirstOrDefault as I have used in so many queries and it is giving me wrong output in some cases. So that the reason why I don't want to use FirstOrDefault.
When I have written SingleOrDefualt in place of FirstOrDefault it is throwing me error
that use FirstOrDefault.
So how to overcome this? Can anybody please help me?
It looks like maybe your outer select is capable of returning multiple results (e.g. if there are more than one UserDetailsModel with the same Id). If it returns multiple results then your call to .SingleOrDefault() will throw an exception as it expects only a single result or no results. See LINQ: When to use SingleOrDefault vs. FirstOrDefault() with filtering criteria for more details.
Related
With the SDK of Azure.Data.Tables I’m trying to write a query that groups the data and fetches the highest value from each group. Is there a way to achieve this?
Currently I’m fetching all the data and executing the following LINQ query:
public class SomeClass
{
public string CompanyName { get; set; }
public long SomeValue { get; set; }
public string ProperyAttribute1 { get; set; }
public string ProperyAttribute2 { get; set; }
public long ProperyAttribute3 { get; set; }
}
List<SomeClass> someList = FetchingDataFromCosmosDbTableStorage(); //fetching all the data
var result = someList.GroupBy(x => x.CompanyName)
.Select(y => y.OrderByDescending(i => i.SomeValue).First())
.ToList();
Instead of filtering all the data in my application I would prefer to write a query to get the same result from CosmosDb Table.
Let's take such classes:
public class Child
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public string ExtraProp { get; set; }
}
public class Parent
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Text { get; set; }
public Child Child { get; set; }
public string ParentExtraProp { get; set; }
}
public class ChildVo
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
public class ParentVo
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Text { get; set; }
public ChildVo Child { get; set; }
}
Automapper mapping:
Mapper.CreateMap<Child, ChildVo>();
//.ForSourceMember(x => x.ExtraProp, o => o.Ignore()); //does not help
//.IgnoreAllNonExisting(); //does not help
Mapper.CreateMap<Parent, ParentVo>();
and query in Linq to Nhibernate:
var test = Session.Query<Parent>()
.Where(x => x.Id == myId)
.ProjectTo<ParentVo>()
.ToList();
ProjectTo selects only columns (properties) which are defined in ParentVo (not all properties from Parent class) - that's great. But is selects all columns (properties) from my Child class, despite the fact that they are not defined in ChildVo.
Why does Automapper ignore my nested property mapping? Is it possible to use all defined mappings during projection?
While I'm not familiar with nhibernate, the same test you've performed here works fine in Entity Framework. In EF you can see the query which has been generated before executing it - try doing this and seeing if it shows the additional column.
public class TestContext : DbContext {
public DbSet<Parent> Parents { get; set; }
}
var query = testContext.Parents.ProjectTo<ParentVo>();
Console.WriteLine(query.ToString());
This produces the following output (note no ExtraProp):
SELECT
[Extent1].[Id] AS [Id],
[Extent1].[Text] AS [Text],
CASE WHEN ([Extent2].[Id] IS NOT NULL) THEN 1 END AS [C1],
[Extent1].[Child_Id] AS [Child_Id],
[Extent2].[Name] AS [Name]
FROM [dbo].[Parents] AS [Extent1]
LEFT OUTER JOIN [dbo].[Children] AS [Extent2] ON [Extent1].[Child_Id] = [Extent2].[Id]
This makes me think that the problem is not AutoMapper specifically, but without seeing the generated query it's hard to tell.
I'm getting the following error when I try to insert a new row in one of my relational tables. I have the following two models:
public class CompanyCredit
{
[Key]
[DatabaseGenerated(DatabaseGeneratedOption.Identity)]
public int creditId { get; set; }
public int planCredit { get; set; }
public DateTime? PlanCreditExpirationDate { get; set; }
}
And
public class CompanyInformation
{
[Key]
[DatabaseGeneratedAttribute(DatabaseGeneratedOption.Identity)]
public int id { get; set; }
[Required]
[DisplayName("Company Name:")]
public string companyName { get; set; }
public string timeZone { get; set; }
//navigation Properties
public virtual CompanyCredit Credits { get; set; }
}
And this Relation in the dbContext
modelBuilder.Entity<CompanyInformation>().HasOptional(e => e.Credits);
I'm trying to add a record inside CompanyCredit table like so:
if (_company.Credits == null)
{
var _credits = new CompanyCredit();
_credits.planCredit = 200;
_credits.PlanCreditExpirationDate = System.DateTime.UtcNow.AddMonths(1);
_company.Credits = _credits;
repo.InsertOrUpdate(_company, User.Identity.Name);
}
And Finally Insert or update just marks Company as changed and _credit as added like so:
_db.Entry(_credits).State = System.Data.EntityState.Added;
_db.Entry(Company).State = System.Data.EntityState.Modified;
_db.SaveChanges();
When this runs I get the following Error that I just can't seem to find the reason to.
Cannot insert the value NULL into column 'creditId', table 'Project.dbo.CompanyCredits'; column does not allow nulls. INSERT fails.
The statement has been terminated.
Thank in advanced for your help.
I found the problem was in the attribute [DatabaseGenerated(DatabaseGeneratedOption.Identity)] this should have been [DatabaseGeneratedAttribute(DatabaseGeneratedOption.Identity)]
I thought I would post this so others might benefit from it.
Could you please try reversing the order of entity state modification, just before the saveChanges call
_db.Entry(Company).State = System.Data.EntityState.Modified;
_db.Entry(_credits).State = System.Data.EntityState.Added;
_db.SaveChanges();
I am trying to find one or more documents in RavenDB based on the values of a child collection.
I have the following classes
public class GoldenDocument
{
public GoldenDocument()
{
LinkedDocuments = new List<LinkedDocument>();
MergeMatchFields = new List<MergeMatchField>();
}
public string Id { get; set; }
public Guid SourceRowId { get; set; }
public List<MergeMatchField> MergeMatchFields { get; set; }
public List<LinkedDocument> LinkedDocuments { get; set; }
}
And the class that is in the collection MergeMatchFields
public class MergeMatchField
{
public string Id { get; set; }
public Guid OriginId { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public MatchType MatchType { get; set; }
public double MatchPerc { get; set; }
public string Value { get; set; }
}
In a List<MergeFields> mergeFields collection I have values that is not stored in RavenDB yet. Values are compared to values in a RavenDB document for find if it is a possible match by executing the following query:
using (var session = documentStore.OpenSession())
{
var docs = from gd in session.Query<GoldenDocument>()
from mf in gd.MergeMatchFields
from tf in mergeFields
where mf.Name == tf.Name
&& JaroWinklerCalculator.jaroWinkler(mf.Value, tf.Value) > .90d
&& !string.IsNullOrEmpty(mf.Value)
select gd;
}
I understand that ravenDB does not support SelectMany() so how would I go about getting the results from the Document store?
Create an index for this that would output the values you want to query on.
Note that you can't just execute arbitrary code the way you do here: JaroWinklerCalculator.jaroWinkler(mf.Value, tf.Value) > .90d
But you can use fuzzy queries, and they will do the same.
Models:
public class User
{
[Key]
public int UserId { get; set; }
public string UserName { get; set; }
}
public class Resource
{
[Key]
public int ResourceId { get; set; }
public string ResourceName { get; set; }
public string ResourceDescription { get; set; }
}
public class UserResource
{
[Key, Column(Order=0)]
public int UserId { get; set; }
[Key, Column(Order=1)]
public int ResourceId { get; set; }
public int ResourceQuantity { get; set; }
}
I want to select "ResourceName" from Resource model and "ResourceQuantity" from UserResource model for a given "UserId". Also, once selected, do I need a brand new model to carry only those two specified columns?
Also note that UserResource model has a composite key so I am confused as to how to make the join... Is this right?
var userResources =
from r in imDB.Resources
join ur in imDB.UserResources
on r.ResourceId equals ur.ResourceId
select new { r.ResourceName, ur.ResourceQuantity };
Hence you're using Code first you can create your models are as below by using EF conventions.
public class User {
public int Id { get; set; }
public string UserName { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<Resource> Resources { get; set; }
}
public class Resource {
public int Id { get; set; }
public string ResourceName { get; set; }
public int ResourceQuantity { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<User> Users {get;set;}
}
Then EF will generate your junction table is as UsersResources.You don't need to create additional model as you did.EF will look after that.
When using POCOs with EF, if you mark your navigation properties as
virtual you can use additional EF supports like Lazy Loading. So in
general use a virtual keyword in navigation properties considered to
be a good practice.
UPDATE
You may try something like below:
Method 1 : Method based syntax
imDB.Resources.Where(r => r.Users.Any(u => u.UserId == userId))
Method 2 : Query based syntax
from r in imDB.Resources
from u in r.Users
where u.UserId == userId
select r;
I hope this will help to you.