I am trying to compare some characters in BASH
read a
if (($a == "Y"))
then
echo "YES"
elif (($a == "y"))
then
echo "YES"
else
echo "NO"
fi
but for some reason it does not work as expected. It always output YES. Looking at this super simple script, I can not understand what is wrong.
It's due to spacing and the brackets.
read a
if [[ $a == "Y" ]]
then
echo "YES"
elif [[ $a == "y" ]]
then
echo "YES"
else
echo "NO"
fi
You should review bash comparison. You're trying to use an arithmetic expansion construct to do string comparison. Instead, you should use the [ exp ] or [[ exp ]] constructs.
((expression)) is used for 'arithmetic evaluation' and strings inside (( )) will be treated as variable names, thus
if (($a == "Y"))
is equivalent to
if [ $a == $Y ]
(if $Y is a string, then bash will try to expand the name until it finds a numeric value or undefined variable)
You need to use [ ] or [[ ]] to compare strings as #KRUKUSA said.
Related
How do I compare a variable to a string (and do something if they match)?
Using variables in if statements
if [ "$x" = "valid" ]; then
echo "x has the value 'valid'"
fi
If you want to do something when they don't match, replace = with !=. You can read more about string operations and arithmetic operations in their respective documentation.
Why do we use quotes around $x?
You want the quotes around $x, because if it is empty, your Bash script encounters a syntax error as seen below:
if [ = "valid" ]; then
Non-standard use of == operator
Note that Bash allows == to be used for equality with [, but this is not standard.
Use either the first case wherein the quotes around $x are optional:
if [[ "$x" == "valid" ]]; then
or use the second case:
if [ "$x" = "valid" ]; then
Or, if you don't need an else clause:
[ "$x" == "valid" ] && echo "x has the value 'valid'"
a="abc"
b="def"
# Equality Comparison
if [ "$a" == "$b" ]; then
echo "Strings match"
else
echo "Strings don't match"
fi
# Lexicographic (greater than, less than) comparison.
if [ "$a" \< "$b" ]; then
echo "$a is lexicographically smaller then $b"
elif [ "$a" \> "$b" ]; then
echo "$b is lexicographically smaller than $a"
else
echo "Strings are equal"
fi
Notes:
Spaces between if and [ and ] are important
> and < are redirection operators so escape it with \> and \< respectively for strings.
To compare strings with wildcards, use:
if [[ "$stringA" == *"$stringB"* ]]; then
# Do something here
else
# Do something here
fi
I have to disagree one of the comments in one point:
[ "$x" == "valid" ] && echo "valid" || echo "invalid"
No, that is not a crazy oneliner
It's just it looks like one to, hmm, the uninitiated...
It uses common patterns as a language, in a way;
And after you learned the language.
Actually, it's nice to read
It is a simple logical expression, with one special part: lazy evaluation of the logic operators.
[ "$x" == "valid" ] && echo "valid" || echo "invalid"
Each part is a logical expression; the first may be true or false, the other two are always true.
(
[ "$x" == "valid" ]
&&
echo "valid"
)
||
echo "invalid"
Now, when it is evaluated, the first is checked. If it is false, than the second operand of the logic and && after it is not relevant. The first is not true, so it can not be the first and the second be true, anyway.
Now, in this case is the the first side of the logic or || false, but it could be true if the other side - the third part - is true.
So the third part will be evaluated - mainly writing the message as a side effect. (It has the result 0 for true, which we do not use here)
The other cases are similar, but simpler - and - I promise! are - can be - easy to read!
(I don't have one, but I think being a UNIX veteran with grey beard helps a lot with this.)
The following script reads from a file named "testonthis" line by line and then compares each line with a simple string, a string with special characters and a regular expression. If it doesn't match, then the script will print the line, otherwise not.
Space in Bash is so much important. So the following will work:
[ "$LINE" != "table_name" ]
But the following won't:
["$LINE" != "table_name"]
So please use as is:
cat testonthis | while read LINE
do
if [ "$LINE" != "table_name" ] && [ "$LINE" != "--------------------------------" ] && [[ "$LINE" =~ [^[:space:]] ]] && [[ "$LINE" != SQL* ]]; then
echo $LINE
fi
done
You can also use use case/esac:
case "$string" in
"$pattern" ) echo "found";;
esac
Bash 4+ examples. Note: not using quotes will cause issues when words contain spaces, etc. Always quote in Bash, IMO.
Here are some examples in Bash 4+:
Example 1, check for 'yes' in string (case insensitive):
if [[ "${str,,}" == *"yes"* ]] ;then
Example 2, check for 'yes' in string (case insensitive):
if [[ "$(echo "$str" | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]')" == *"yes"* ]] ;then
Example 3, check for 'yes' in string (case sensitive):
if [[ "${str}" == *"yes"* ]] ;then
Example 4, check for 'yes' in string (case sensitive):
if [[ "${str}" =~ "yes" ]] ;then
Example 5, exact match (case sensitive):
if [[ "${str}" == "yes" ]] ;then
Example 6, exact match (case insensitive):
if [[ "${str,,}" == "yes" ]] ;then
Example 7, exact match:
if [ "$a" = "$b" ] ;then
Enjoy.
I would probably use regexp matches if the input has only a few valid entries. E.g. only the "start" and "stop" are valid actions.
if [[ "${ACTION,,}" =~ ^(start|stop)$ ]]; then
echo "valid action"
fi
Note that I lowercase the variable $ACTION by using the double comma's. Also note that this won't work on too aged bash versions out there.
I did it in this way that is compatible with Bash and Dash (sh):
testOutput="my test"
pattern="my"
case $testOutput in (*"$pattern"*)
echo "if there is a match"
exit 1
;;
(*)
! echo there is no coincidence!
;;esac
I was struggling with the same situation for a while, here is how I could resolve:
if [ "$var1" == "$var2" ]; then
#dowhateveryouwant
fi
Be careful with the spaces left before and after the comparison sign, otherwise it won't work or it'll give you an unexpected result.
I've spent so much time on using a single equal(=) sign but didn't work. I Hope it can help.
Are you having comparison problems? (like below?)
var="true"
if [[ $var == "true" ]]; then
# It should be working, but it is not...
else
# It is falling here...
fi
Try like the =~ operator (regular expression operator) and it might work:
var="true"
if [[ $var =~ "true" ]];then
# Now it works here!!
else
# No more inequality
fi
Bash regex operator =~ (official reference)
StackOverflow further examples (here)
I have written the following bash script:
if [ "crack" == "crack" -a "something/play" == *"play"* ];
then
echo "Passed"
else
echo "Failed"
fi
However the right side of this comparison is not working.
I noticed that if I use it the only right side with [[ "something/play" == *"play"* ]] it works correctly but how do I combine the two conditions inside the if clause.
It's a difference between [ and [[. The first is a standard command, where = just tests for equality. (Note that the standard operator is =, not ==.) The latter is a feature from ksh, supported in Bash and Zsh, and there, =/== is a pattern match. Also, you should avoid using -a within [ .. ], it can break if you do something like [ "$a" = foo -a "$b" = bar ] and $a or $b contains a !.
So,
$ if [[ "crack" == "crack" && "something/play" == *"play"* ]]; then echo true; fi
true
See also (in unix.SE): Why is [ a shell builtin and [[ a shell keyword? and What is the difference between the Bash operators [[ vs [ vs ( vs ((?.
If you use double brackets you can chain conditions with && (and) and || (or).
if [[ "crack" == "crack" && "something/play" == *"play"* ]]
then
echo "Passed"
else
echo "Failed"
fi
How do I compare a variable to a string (and do something if they match)?
Using variables in if statements
if [ "$x" = "valid" ]; then
echo "x has the value 'valid'"
fi
If you want to do something when they don't match, replace = with !=. You can read more about string operations and arithmetic operations in their respective documentation.
Why do we use quotes around $x?
You want the quotes around $x, because if it is empty, your Bash script encounters a syntax error as seen below:
if [ = "valid" ]; then
Non-standard use of == operator
Note that Bash allows == to be used for equality with [, but this is not standard.
Use either the first case wherein the quotes around $x are optional:
if [[ "$x" == "valid" ]]; then
or use the second case:
if [ "$x" = "valid" ]; then
Or, if you don't need an else clause:
[ "$x" == "valid" ] && echo "x has the value 'valid'"
a="abc"
b="def"
# Equality Comparison
if [ "$a" == "$b" ]; then
echo "Strings match"
else
echo "Strings don't match"
fi
# Lexicographic (greater than, less than) comparison.
if [ "$a" \< "$b" ]; then
echo "$a is lexicographically smaller then $b"
elif [ "$a" \> "$b" ]; then
echo "$b is lexicographically smaller than $a"
else
echo "Strings are equal"
fi
Notes:
Spaces between if and [ and ] are important
> and < are redirection operators so escape it with \> and \< respectively for strings.
To compare strings with wildcards, use:
if [[ "$stringA" == *"$stringB"* ]]; then
# Do something here
else
# Do something here
fi
I have to disagree one of the comments in one point:
[ "$x" == "valid" ] && echo "valid" || echo "invalid"
No, that is not a crazy oneliner
It's just it looks like one to, hmm, the uninitiated...
It uses common patterns as a language, in a way;
And after you learned the language.
Actually, it's nice to read
It is a simple logical expression, with one special part: lazy evaluation of the logic operators.
[ "$x" == "valid" ] && echo "valid" || echo "invalid"
Each part is a logical expression; the first may be true or false, the other two are always true.
(
[ "$x" == "valid" ]
&&
echo "valid"
)
||
echo "invalid"
Now, when it is evaluated, the first is checked. If it is false, than the second operand of the logic and && after it is not relevant. The first is not true, so it can not be the first and the second be true, anyway.
Now, in this case is the the first side of the logic or || false, but it could be true if the other side - the third part - is true.
So the third part will be evaluated - mainly writing the message as a side effect. (It has the result 0 for true, which we do not use here)
The other cases are similar, but simpler - and - I promise! are - can be - easy to read!
(I don't have one, but I think being a UNIX veteran with grey beard helps a lot with this.)
The following script reads from a file named "testonthis" line by line and then compares each line with a simple string, a string with special characters and a regular expression. If it doesn't match, then the script will print the line, otherwise not.
Space in Bash is so much important. So the following will work:
[ "$LINE" != "table_name" ]
But the following won't:
["$LINE" != "table_name"]
So please use as is:
cat testonthis | while read LINE
do
if [ "$LINE" != "table_name" ] && [ "$LINE" != "--------------------------------" ] && [[ "$LINE" =~ [^[:space:]] ]] && [[ "$LINE" != SQL* ]]; then
echo $LINE
fi
done
You can also use use case/esac:
case "$string" in
"$pattern" ) echo "found";;
esac
Bash 4+ examples. Note: not using quotes will cause issues when words contain spaces, etc. Always quote in Bash, IMO.
Here are some examples in Bash 4+:
Example 1, check for 'yes' in string (case insensitive):
if [[ "${str,,}" == *"yes"* ]] ;then
Example 2, check for 'yes' in string (case insensitive):
if [[ "$(echo "$str" | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]')" == *"yes"* ]] ;then
Example 3, check for 'yes' in string (case sensitive):
if [[ "${str}" == *"yes"* ]] ;then
Example 4, check for 'yes' in string (case sensitive):
if [[ "${str}" =~ "yes" ]] ;then
Example 5, exact match (case sensitive):
if [[ "${str}" == "yes" ]] ;then
Example 6, exact match (case insensitive):
if [[ "${str,,}" == "yes" ]] ;then
Example 7, exact match:
if [ "$a" = "$b" ] ;then
Enjoy.
I would probably use regexp matches if the input has only a few valid entries. E.g. only the "start" and "stop" are valid actions.
if [[ "${ACTION,,}" =~ ^(start|stop)$ ]]; then
echo "valid action"
fi
Note that I lowercase the variable $ACTION by using the double comma's. Also note that this won't work on too aged bash versions out there.
I did it in this way that is compatible with Bash and Dash (sh):
testOutput="my test"
pattern="my"
case $testOutput in (*"$pattern"*)
echo "if there is a match"
exit 1
;;
(*)
! echo there is no coincidence!
;;esac
I was struggling with the same situation for a while, here is how I could resolve:
if [ "$var1" == "$var2" ]; then
#dowhateveryouwant
fi
Be careful with the spaces left before and after the comparison sign, otherwise it won't work or it'll give you an unexpected result.
I've spent so much time on using a single equal(=) sign but didn't work. I Hope it can help.
Are you having comparison problems? (like below?)
var="true"
if [[ $var == "true" ]]; then
# It should be working, but it is not...
else
# It is falling here...
fi
Try like the =~ operator (regular expression operator) and it might work:
var="true"
if [[ $var =~ "true" ]];then
# Now it works here!!
else
# No more inequality
fi
Bash regex operator =~ (official reference)
StackOverflow further examples (here)
Is there a difference between the two code snippets below
if [[ $a == "1" ]];then
echo $a
and
if [ $a == "1" ];then
echo $a
Also, is there a difference when I use -eq in place of == in the above snippet?
As for your main question: it is a duplicate of: Is [[ ]] preferable over [ ] in bash scripts?
You can also find a (hopefully) comprehensive discussion of the differences between [ ... ] and [[ ... ]] in this answer of mine.
In short: [[ ... ]] is parsed more like you'd expect in a regular programming language, and it implements many useful extensions, but it is not POSIX-compliant.
As for "is there a difference when I use -eq in place of ==?":
= and ==, its Bash alternative, perform string comparison.
Additionally, inside [[ ... ]] only, if the RHS of = or == is unquoted, it is interpreted as a glob-style pattern to match the LHS against; contrast [[ 'a' == '*' ]] && echo match with [[ 'a' == * ]] && echo match
Note that if you use [ ... ] (rather than [[ ... ]]) for POSIX compliance (portable use with /bin/sh), you should only use =, not ==; while Bash accepts == inside [ ... ] too, other shells don't.
-eq performs integer comparison
Other string/numeric operator pairs exist (e.g., -lt for numeric less-than vs. < for alphabetical (string) less-than, based on textual sort order).
Bash Conditional Expressions lists all operators you can use inside [ ... ] and [[ ... ]] (and also with test, which is effectively an alias of [ ... ]).
Additionally, inside [[ ... ]], regular expression-matching operator =~ is available - see Bash Conditional Constructs
In bash, numeric comparison is handled differently than string comparison
For numbers,
$var1 -eq $var2 // =
$var1 -gt $var2 // >
$var1 -ge $var2 // >=
$var1 -lt $var2 // <
$var1 -le $var2 // <=
$var1 -ne $var2 // !=
For strings
$str1 = $str2 // they are equal
str1 != str2 // not equal
str // Returns True if str is not null.
-n str // Returns True if the length of str is greater than zero.
-z str // Returns True if the length of str is equal to zero.
Note that == is the same as =
Also note that the == operates differently in a double bracket comparison (this is where your [ condition ] vs [[ condition ]] question comes in) when doing pattern matching. These comparisons/operators all all explained at http://www.tldp.org/LDP/abs/html/comparison-ops.html
I try to test if a string starts with a certain prefix. But my script seems not work (I would expect the "if" branch will not get run). Can some Bash expert help to take a look? thanks!
Here is my code and test result:
$ cat testb.bash
#!/bin/bash
my_var="abcdefg";
if [[ "${my_var:0:5}"=="order" ]]; then
echo "value of my_var is ${my_var}.";
fi;
if [[ "${my_var:0:5}" -eq "order" ]]; then
echo "value of my_var is ${my_var}.";
fi;
if [ "${my_var:0:5}"="order" ]; then
echo "value of my_var is ${my_var}.";
fi;
$ bash -x testb.bash
+ my_var=abcdefg
+ [[ -n abcde==order ]]
+ echo 'value of my_var is abcdefg.'
value of my_var is abcdefg.
+ [[ abcde -eq order ]]
+ echo 'value of my_var is abcdefg.'
value of my_var is abcdefg.
+ '[' abcde=order ']'
+ echo 'value of my_var is abcdefg.'
value of my_var is abcdefg.
$
Whitespace is significant in this case. As you can see in the -x output, it understands the first condition as
[[ -n "${my_var:0:5}==order" ]]
Moreover, to test for a prefix, you can use a pattern:
[[ $my_var == order* ]]
To test the existence of substring, you can use either of these:
if [[ "$j" =~ string1 ]]; then
if [[ $j == *string1* ]]; then
In your particular case, you miss a space surounding ==, so instead of
if [[ "${my_var:0:5}"=="order" ]]; then
it should be
if [[ "${my_var:0:5}" == "order" ]]; then
^ ^
Finally, note that your condition was evaluated as true because it was evaluating if [ "string" ], which is true if string is not empty:
$ [ "a" ] && echo "yes"
yes
Test
$ cat a
#!/bin/bash
my_var="abcdefg";
if [[ "${my_var:0:5}" == "order" ]]; then
echo "value of my_var is ${my_var}."
elif [[ "${my_var:0:5}" == "abcde" ]]; then
echo "yeahaa"
else
echo "is not"
fi
$ ./a
yeahaa
Ok, i tested your code, you shoud such as the following code:
prefix="pre_order";
pre="pre_"
len=${#pre}
echo $len
if [[ "${prefix:0:len}" == "blahvlah" ]] ; then
echo "dddd"
fi;
Notes:
use == for string comparation
for ${} you should initilize a string variable before ${}
use len=${#pre} for lenght of string.
A POSIX-compliant way to test for a prefix is to attempt to remove the prefix, and compare the result to the original string. If the two are the same, the prefix is not present, the removal fails, and the expression expands to the original string.
prefix=foo
string=foobar
if [ "${string#$prefix}" = "$string" ]; then
printf "$string does not start with $prefix\n"
else
printf "$string starts with $prefix\n"
fi