ExcludeFilesFromDeployment not working in Visual Studio 2013 Publish Web - visual-studio-2013

I have a fairly straightforward MVC 5 project in Visual Studio 2013. I have successfully set up publishing via Web Deploy to the server. I want to exclude a certain file from deployment without having to preview/uncheck it every time I publish (I am publishing the Release build).
I have edited the .csproj file for the project to include the <ExcludeFilesFromDeployment> tag.
<Project...>
<PropertyGroup Condition=" '$(Configuration)|$(Platform)' == 'Release|AnyCPU' ">
...
<ExcludeFilesFromDeployment>Library-that-is-not-good-for-server.dll</ExcludeFilesFromDeployment>
</PropertyGroup>
But nothing changes/the file still needs to be unchecked for addition when I go to publish in VS2013.
I have also tried adding a bin\ in front of the library, just in case. Not to mention, a warning pops up for the element that says "The element 'PropertyGroup' in namespace 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003' has invalid child element 'ExcludeFilesFromDeployment' in namespace 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003'. ..."
Microsoft's documentation that I was able to find in searches regarding excluding files from deployment, and the ExcludeFilesFromDeployment tag, http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee942158(v=vs.110).aspx, claim that the instructions only apply to VS2012 and partially to VS2010. Does anyone know what has changed for VS2013 or what I am doing wrong?

You need to add it in the profileName.pubxml file.
profileName.pubxml file position is:
my project ----> Properties ----> PublishProfiles ---> profileName.pubxml
Example:
<Project ToolsVersion="4.0" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003">
<PropertyGroup>
<ExcludeFilesFromDeployment>
Library-that-is-not-good-for-server.dll
</ExcludeFilesFromDeployment>
''' ''''

You probably need to have the following definition also in the 'profileName'.pubxml file:
<DeleteExistingFiles>False</DeleteExistingFiles>
Please remove all files from your Temp publish location(normally obj\Release\Package\PackageTmp) after excluding some files or directories.

Related

Stop Visual Studio 2017 From Autogenerating Output Directory

So I have a solution with 70ish projects that I updated to use a Directory.build.props file to use a single bin folder to make our CI process cleaner. Works great and now everything is in 1 locaction
BUT the problem now is when I open Visual Studio 2017 it creates a bunch of extra project folders now that NEVER get used. Anyway to disable this? It's just confusing to people and clutters up everyone's dev repo.
Example:
%sourceroot%\bin\release\ (this is where all the projects get happily binplaced)
%sourceroot%\bin\project1Neverused\ (unwanted folders that just clutter my dev box up)
%sourceroot%\bin\project2neverUsed\
%sourceroot%\bin\project1Neverused\
%sourceroot%\bin\project2neverUsed\
Here's my Directory.build.props file:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<Project ToolsVersion="15.0" DefaultTargets="Build" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003">
<PropertyGroup>
<SolutionDir>$(MSBuildThisFileDirectory)</SolutionDir>
<OutputPath>$(SolutionDir)bin\$(Configuration)\$(MSBuildProjectName)</OutputPath>
<OutDir>$(OutputPath)</OutDir>
</PropertyGroup>
</Project>
Now open the sln file in Visual studio and if you look VS will have auto generated those folders even though you haven't built anything yet. I want that to be disabled because it's just generating junk folders that aren't used. Since we use a props file for msbuild to binplace we didn't update each project file from the default of "bin\debug"
Yes, Visual Studio will create those bin/obj folder by default when you create a new project/solution. It seems that there is no direct setting to prevent Visual Studio from generating these folders.
As a workaround, you can try to add a delete task in Directory.build.props file to delete the those folder:
<Target Name="CleanFolder" AfterTargets="Build">
<RemoveDir Directories="$(BaseIntermediateOutputPath)" />
<RemoveDir Directories="$(ProjectDir)bin" />
</Target>
Hope this helps.

Visual Studio: Change the build path in user file only

I can change the build path for a project in Visual Studio from the Project Properties dialog. But making a change to the .csproj file would interfere with the setup of other developers on the team, since this file is checked into source control.
So how can I change the build path so that this change only goes into the .user file?
Here's one way to do it:
In Visual Studio, make a change in the project properties.
Identify what changed in the .csproj file (using a diff tool)
Put that change into the .csproj.user file, making sure to include the xml structure.
Revert the change in the .csproj file so it remains unchanged.
Example of a changed path in a .csproj.user file:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<Project>
<PropertyGroup Condition=" '$(Configuration)|$(Platform)' == 'Debug|AnyCPU' ">
<OutputPath>..\..\..\CustomPath\</OutputPath>
</PropertyGroup>
</Project>

Custom Build Rule fails after converting to VS2013

I need to integrate a legacy VS2008 project into my VS2013 solution. This project uses some custom build rules which initially worked after converting the .vcproj to a .vcxproj. However, when doing a fresh checkout of the project including the .vcxproj, the project file can no longer be opened.
I've tracked it down to this issue:
The project file references a couple of custom build rules like this:
<ImportGroup Label="ExtensionSettings">
<Import Project="..\..\..\tools\build\ms_mc.props" />
(8 similar lines follow)
</ImportGroup>
However, the ms_mc.props file is not present, but there is a ms_mc.rule file. If I convert the VS2008 solution with VS2013 (and assumably also if I opened it in VS2008, which I don't possess), the ms_mc.props file (plus a .targets and a .xml file) is created. However, if I delete that file and open the converted VS2013 project, the file does not get created.
I realized, in the old .vcproj, the corresponding lines are
<ToolFiles>
<ToolFile RelativePath="..\..\..\tools\build\ms_mc.rule" />
(8 similar lines follow)
</ToolFiles>
Why does VS2008 reference the .rule file and VS2013 imports the .props file without specifying the .rule file? And more importantly: How can I make this work again?
The .rule and .props file are added for reference
ms_mc.rule:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<VisualStudioToolFile
Name="MS MC"
Version="8,00"
>
<Rules>
<CustomBuildRule
Name="MS_MC"
DisplayName="Microsoft Message Catalogue Compiler"
CommandLine="mc [Verbose] [inputs] [RCIncludePath] [CIncludePath]"
Outputs="[$RCIncludePath]\$(InputName).rc;[$RCIncludePath]\$(InputName).h"
FileExtensions="*.mc"
ExecutionDescription="Compiling Message Catalogue $(InputName).mc"
>
<Properties>
<BooleanProperty
Name="Verbose"
DisplayName="Verbose"
Description="Gives verbose output. (-v)"
Switch="-v"
/>
<StringProperty
Name="RCIncludePath"
DisplayName="RC include file path"
Description="Gives the path of where to create the RC include file and the binary message resource files it includes. (-r [pathspec])"
Switch="-r [value]"
DefaultValue=".\"
/>
<StringProperty
Name="CIncludePath"
DisplayName="C include file path"
Description="Gives the path of where to create the include header file. (-h [pathspec])"
Switch="-h [value]"
DefaultValue=".\"
/>
</Properties>
</CustomBuildRule>
</Rules>
</VisualStudioToolFile>
ms_mc.props (after Conversion to VS2013):
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<Project xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003">
<PropertyGroup
Condition="'$(MS_MCBeforeTargets)' == '' and '$(MS_MCAfterTargets)' == '' and '$(ConfigurationType)' != 'Makefile'">
<MS_MCBeforeTargets>Midl</MS_MCBeforeTargets>
<MS_MCAfterTargets>CustomBuild</MS_MCAfterTargets>
</PropertyGroup>
<PropertyGroup>
<MS_MCDependsOn
Condition="'$(ConfigurationType)' != 'Makefile'">_SelectedFiles;$(MS_MCDependsOn)</MS_MCDependsOn>
</PropertyGroup>
<ItemDefinitionGroup>
<MS_MC>
<Verbose>False</Verbose>
<RCIncludePath>.\</RCIncludePath>
<CIncludePath>.\</CIncludePath>
<CommandLineTemplate>mc [Verbose] [inputs] [RCIncludePath] [CIncludePath]</CommandLineTemplate>
<Outputs>%(RCIncludePath)\%(Filename).rc;%(RCIncludePath)\%(Filename).h</Outputs>
<ExecutionDescription>Compiling Message Catalogue %(Filename).mc</ExecutionDescription>
</MS_MC>
</ItemDefinitionGroup>
</Project>
I found this blog post for VS2010 which states the following:
Custom build rule is a build feature introduced in VS2005. It provides the ability for the users to easily Plug-In third party tools to use in their build process. The custom build rule is defined by “.rules” files.
and more importantly
In VS2010, due to the migration to MSBuild, the information in the rules file is represented by three files: .XML, .props and .targets files.
This basically means that the .XML, .props and .targets files are in fact not created by VS2008; instead, they are a replacement of the old .rules file format since VS2010. Using this information, I can now safely check in those new files without breaking the VS2008 solution. I might have to adapt the new files manually in order to make them work as before, as also mentioned in the blog.

How to target both Win32 and x64 platforms with ONLY one set of solution/project files?

I'm trying to migrate a multiple-project from VC++2005 to VC++2010, and I also need to port this application from Win32 to x64 platform.
I know that a project file could contain settings for both platforms, but it requires that I have to manully change the platfrom setting for each project say if I want to build for x64.
What I want to do is to have ONLY one set of solution/project files that could target both of these platforms, and with some kind of simple switch I can choose what platform I am building now.
Is there such a way? Or do I have to maintain two sets of solution/projects files, one for each platform, so that if I want to build for x64, I can only open the solution file for x64, and if I want to build for Win32, I have to open the solution file for Win32?
You can use the "Configuration Manager" in Visual Studio 2010 to make multiple configurations for your solution and project files.
In the menu bar of VS 2010, go to "Build" --> "Configuration Manager..."
Let's say you've the platform property which duplicates in each project file:
<Platform>x86</Platform>
You can extract this property from ALL project file in a single CommonProperties.properties file:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<Project
ToolsVersion="4.0"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003"
DefaultTargets="Default">
<PropertyGroup>
<Platform>x86</Platform>
</PropertyGroup>
</Project>
And then just import it in ALL project files:
<Import Project="CommonProperties.properties" />
EDIT: Multiple platform support
<Platform Condition="'$(Platform)' == 'Win32'">x86</Platform>
<Platform Condition="'$(Platform)' == 'x64'">x64</Platform>
Useful links:
Property Element
MSBuild Conditional Constructs

How can I use a single Visual Studio solution to build both x86 and x64 at the same time?

I've got an x86 Visual Studio solution with many project files in it. Some of the DLL files are designed to work as plug-ins to other applications on a user's system.
We're expanding some of the DLL files to be able to support 64-bit applications. I'd like to set up the solution/projects so that just hitting "Build" will build both the x86 and x64 versions of those DLL
files. The solution contains both C++ and C# projects.
I realize that "Batch Build" is capable of building both, though it would be more convenient if developers could just click the same button as they have previously and have all of the output DLL files generated.
Here are a couple of the modifications that I've tried to a test project, but that I haven't gotten to work:
I've tried modifying the <Target Name="AfterBuild"> to try:
<Target Name="AfterBuild" Condition=" '$(Platform)' == 'x86' ">
<PropertyGroup>
<Platform>x64</Platform>
<PlatformTarget>x64</PlatformTarget>
</PropertyGroup>
<CallTarget Targets="Build"/>
</Target>
But that results in the following error:
C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v3.5\Microsoft.Common.targets(565,5): error MSB4006: There is a circular dependency in the target dependency graph involving target "Build".
I think my conditions will prevent infinite recursion, but I understand how MSBuild could not see it that way.
I've also tried:
<Project DefaultTargets="MyBuild86;MyBuild64" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003" ToolsVersion="3.5">
...
<Target Name="MyBuild86">
<PropertyGroup>
<Platform>x86</Platform>
<PlatformTarget>x86</PlatformTarget>
</PropertyGroup>
<CallTarget Targets="Build"/>
</Target>
<Target Name="MyBuild64">
<PropertyGroup>
<Platform>x64</Platform>
<PlatformTarget>x64</PlatformTarget>
</PropertyGroup>
<CallTarget Targets="Build"/>
</Target>
But my DefaultTargets appears to be ignored from within the Visual Studio IDE.
Last, I've tried creating a separate project that imports the first project:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<Project ToolsVersion="3.5" DefaultTargets="Build" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003">
<PropertyGroup>
<Configuration Condition=" '$(Configuration)' == '' ">Debug</Configuration>
<Platform>x64</Platform>
<PlatformTarget>x64</PlatformTarget>
<ProductVersion>9.0.30729</ProductVersion>
<SchemaVersion>2.0</SchemaVersion>
<OutputPath>..\$(Configuration)\x64\</OutputPath>
<ProjectGuid>{A885CAC3-2BBE-4808-B470-5B8D482CFF0A}</ProjectGuid>
</PropertyGroup>
<Import Project="BuildTest.csproj" />
</Project>
And this so far has shown the most promise. However, Visual Studio seems to ignore my OutputPath setting from this new project and instead outputs the EXE/DLL file to the path specified in the original project. There isn't any PropertyGroup block that I can see that is being executed in the original project to override this, so I'm not sure what's happening.
We do something similar to build core assemblies for .NET Compact Framework.
Try this:
<Target Name="AfterBuild">
<MSBuild Condition=" '$(Platform)' == 'x86' " Projects="$(MSBuildProjectFile)" Properties="Platform=x64;PlatFormTarget=x64" RunEachTargetSeparately="true" />
</Target>
Importing a project in such manner works for me in Visual Studio 2010:
TestProject64.vcxproj
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<Project DefaultTargets="Build" ToolsVersion="4.0" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003">
<Import Project="TestProject.vcxproj" />
<ItemGroup Label="ProjectConfigurations">
<ProjectConfiguration Include="Release|x64">
<Configuration>Release</Configuration>
<Platform>x64</Platform>
</ProjectConfiguration>
</ItemGroup>
<PropertyGroup Label="Globals">
<ProjectGuid>{B7D61F1C-B413-4768-8BDB-31FD464AD053}</ProjectGuid>
</PropertyGroup>
</Project>
TestProject64.vcxproj.filters
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<Project ToolsVersion="4.0" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003">
<Import Project="TestProject.vcxproj.filters" />
</Project>
TestProject.vcxproj has two configurations defined inside: Release|x86 and Release|x64. As you can see, TestProject64.vcxproj has only the Release|x64 configuration. Defining of at least one configuration in TestProject64.vcxproj is necessary, otherwise Visual Studio will not be able to add TestProject64.vcxproj to a solution.
Now it's possible to include both TestProject.vcxproj and TestProject64.vcxproj to the same solution and build Release|x86 and Release|x64 at the same time.
I think the best way of doing this is to invoke MSBuild from the command line. It shouldn't need editing of MSBuild files. Just run
msbuild myproj.sln /p:Configuration="Debug|Win32"
msbuild myproj.sln /p:Configuration="Debug|x64"
I assume that if a developer is using Visual Studio then they'll only be generating the DLL files so they can debug with them, and that you have a separate build process if you're actually deploying the DLL files.
For C++, and if it's a project whose files/settings don't change often, one way to do it is create two projects within the solution, with both projects referring to the same source files. Then, in x64 builds, set one project to build 64-bit and the other 32-bit. (In x86 builds, set one as 32-bit and turn off the other.)
We've been using this for a while and it works fine.
Of course, you have to be careful that any changes you make to one are also made to its copy. i.e. if you add/remove a file or change its build setting, you have to do it in two places. Source-code changes still only need to be done once, because there's still only one copy of each source file.
And, of course, you may decide that doing this is more complex/risky than switching away from using the IDE. In our case it's worked really well, though.
You are not going to be able to do this with the UI of Visual Studio. For this you will need to hack the MSBuild files.
Try this link from MSDN for MSBuild Overview
I would suggest to create a dummy C++ Makefile project and then invoke MSBuild twice from it:
msbuild myproj.sln /p:Configuration="Debug|Win32"
msbuild myproj.sln /p:Configuration="Debug|x64"
Perhaps I've missed the point of this discussion.
Using Visual Studio, go to menu Build → Configuration Manager. In the Active Solution Platform drop down, select "New...", and a New Solution Platform dialog appears. Select x64 and accept the default Copy From. Close the dialog and the Configuration Manager.
Now open menu Build → Batch Build. Check those configurations you want to build and build them. You will find the x64 build executables separate from the Win32 executable files.
You can verify that these are what was intended by right clicking on the executable files, selecting Properties, and select the Compatibility tab. In the dropdown window you can check to see what operating systems the executable file can be run in.
Obviously, there may be some other tweaking you might have to do to get all the output files in their proper places, but this method seem somewhat simpler than fooling with build than those described above.
I ran into this problem with a project running in Visual Studio 2008 (on Windows XP) (32-bit) and also Visual Studio 2010 (on Windows 7) (64-bit).
The solution I used was to use the $(PROGRAMFILES) variable. It resolved correctly on both machines.

Resources