I have a query that makes use of multiple joins:
public function scopePurchased($query, $userId)
{
return $query
->join('products','characters.id','=','products.productable_id')
->join('bundle_product','bundle_product.product_id','=','products.id')
->join('bundles','bundles.id','=','bundle_product.bundle_id')
->join('purchases','purchases.bundle_id','=','bundles.id')
->join('users','purchases.user_id','=','users.id')
->whereNull('purchases.deleted_at')
->where('purchases.refunded', false)
->where('products.productable_type', '=', get_class($this))
->where('users.id','=',$userId)
->groupBy('characters.id')
->orderBy('characters.title', 'ASC');
}
And I want to retrieve an array of ID's from this query to use in another scope so:
$query->purchased($userID)->lists('id')
My initial thought was to use lists('id') which complained about an ambiguous query on the ID.
Column 'id' in field list is ambiguous
(
SQL: select `id` from `characters`
inner join `products` on `characters`.`id` = `products`.`productable_id`
inner join `bundle_product` on `bundle_product`.`product_id` = `products`.`id`
inner join `bundles` on `bundles`.`id` = `bundle_product`.`bundle_id`
inner join `purchases` on `purchases`.`bundle_id` = `bundles`.`id`
inner join `users` on `purchases`.`user_id` = `users`.`id`
where `characters`.`deleted_at` is null
and `purchases`.`deleted_at` is null
and `purchases`.`refunded` = 0
and `products`.`productable_type` = Character and `users`.`id` = 1
group by `characters`.`id`
order by `characters`.`title` asc
)
Makes sense, fair enough so I changed the lists to
$query->purchased($userID)->lists('characters.id')
Thinking that naming the table and column should fix it but finding that the lists function drops the 'character.' part and so having the same error.
It appear that lists may not use a dot notation, bring me to my question... Can I escape the dot notation or is there another way to get the list of ID's as an array?
Many thanks
You can alias the column name before using lists:
$query->purchased($userID)->select('characters.id as _id')->lists('_id');
This will avoid any column name conflicts.
Related
I will have to write an inner join with custom SELECT statement in it and one of the conditions required is to get those rows which have matching null values in the columns, I was able to get the relationship in raw sql statment with (a.<col> = b.<col> OR (a.<col> IS NULL AND b.<col> IS NULL)) but I do not know how to write it using Laravel Eloquent. What is the inner join with OR in Laravel Eloquent? I have tried with $join->on('a.<col>', '=', 'b.<col>')->where('a.<col>', '=', DB::raw(NULL))->where('b.<col>', '=', DB::raw(NULL)); but it doesn't give me the expected result.
I am failing to convert next SQL code into laravel eloquent:
SELECT t1.template, t1.created_at
FROM sent_emails t1
where created_at = (
select max(created_at) from sent_emails t2 where t2.template = t1.template
)
group by t1.created_at, t1.template
or:
SELECT t1.template, t1.created_at
FROM sent_emails t1
JOIN
(
SELECT Max(created_at) date, template
FROM sent_emails
GROUP BY template
) AS t2
ON t1.template = t2.template
AND t1.created_at = t2.date
group by t1.created_at, t1.template
Both queries return same data set. Creating subquery in separate variable is not an option as I need multiple values to be returned from it.
I also don't know how can I set alias name if I create table using models (and not using DB::), so this is my unsuccessful try:
$sent_emails = SentEmail::where('created_at', function($query) {
SentEmail::where('template', 't1.template')->orderBy('created_at', 'desc');
})->groupBy('template', 'created_at')->get(['template', 'created_at']);
You query should be something like this (I'm not at a computer to test this, so it may require further editing)
$sent_emails = SentEmail::where('created_at', function($query) {
$query->where('created_at', SentEmail::->whereColumn('column_name', 'table.column_name')->orderBy('created_at', 'desc')->max('created_at'));
})->groupBy('template', 'created_at')->get(['template', 'created_at']);
I have belongsToMany relationship between items and vehicle.
items can be assigned to multiple vehicles. same vehicle can b assigned to multiple items. so my pivot table item_vehicle have extra column date which will show that when vehicle is assigned to item.
here is my query.
select `items`.`id`, `items`.`name`, `items`.`area` as `total_area`,
`item_vehicle`.`date`, `vehicles`.`name` as `vehicle_name`,
SUM(parcel_vehicle.area) as processed_area
from `parcels`
inner join `item_vehicle` on `item_vehicle`.`p_id` = `items`.`id`
inner join `vehicles` on `item_vehicle`.`t_id` = `vehicles`.`id`
where `item_vehicle`.`date` < '?' and `items`.`processed` = ? and `vehicles`.`name`=?
group by items.id
what will be the eloquent way of doing this
Item::with(['vehicle'=>function($q){$q->wherePivot('date','<','2019/2/12');}])->whereHas('vehicle',function($q){$q->where('vehicles.id','2');})->where('processed',1)->where('id',4)
->get();
my concerns is it should run only one query
$parcels = Parcel::join('item_vehicle', 'item_vehicle.pid', '=' ,'items.id')
->join('vehicles', 'vehicles.id', '=' ,'item_vehicle.t_id')
->where('item_vehicle.date', '<', $date)
->where('items.processed', $processed)
->where('vehicles.name', $vehicleName)
->select(
'items.id',
'items.name',
\DB::raw('items.area as total_area'),
'item_vehicle.date',
\DB::raw('vehicles.name as vehicle_name'),
\DB::raw('SUM(parcel_vehicle.area) as processed_area')
)
->groupBy('items.id')
->get();
However, you have non-aggregated columns in select and you are doing group by. To make this work you might need to disable mysql's only_full_group_by mode
How can I write the following in Laravel's Eloquent?
SELECT *
FROM
( SELECT real_estate.property_id,
real_estate.amount_offered,
payee.summa
FROM real_estate
LEFT JOIN
(SELECT property_id,
SUM(amount) AS summa
FROM payments
GROUP BY property_id) payee ON payee.property_id = real_estate.property_id ) yoot
WHERE summa = 0.05 * amount_offered
Been on this for a while now and really can't get around it. Lemme explain the whole cause for the panic.
I have two tables, one for property and another for payments made on those properties. Now at any given time I will like to query for what properties have been paid for to a certain percentage hence the 0.05 which reps 5%. As it is the query works but I need an Eloquent alternative for it. Thanks
Anywhere you have subqueries in your SQL you'll need to use DB::raw with Eloquent. In this case you have a big subquery for the FROM statement, so the easiest way would be to do this:
DB::table(
DB::raw('SELECT real_estate.property_id, real_estate.amount_offered, payee.summa FROM real_estate LEFT JOIN (SELECT property_id, SUM(amount) AS summa FROM payments GROUP BY property_id) payee ON payee.property_id = real_estate.property_id)')
)
->where('summa', DB::raw('0.05 * amount_offered'))->get();
Notice I used DB::raw for the WHERE statment value as well. That's because you are doing a multiplication using a column name, and the value would otherwise be quoted as a string.
If you want to go a step further and build each subquery using Eloquent, then convert it to an SQL string and injecting it using DB::raw, you can do this:
$joinQuery = DB::table('payments')
->select('property_id', 'SUM(amount) AS summa')
->groupBy('property_id')
->toSql();
$tableQuery = DB::table('real_estate')
->select('real_estate.property_id', 'real_estate.amount_offered', 'payee.summa')
->leftJoin(DB::raw('(' . $joinQuery . ')'), function ($join)
{
$join->on('payee.property_id', '=', 'real_estate.property_id');
})
->toSql();
DB::table(DB::raw('(' . $tableQuery . ')'))->where('summa', DB::raw('0.05 * amount_offered'))->get();
In this case, the second approach doesn't have any benefits over the first, except perhaps that it's more readable. However, building subqueries using Eloquent, does have it's benefitfs when you'd need to bind any variable values to the query (such as conditions), because the query will be correctly built and escaped by Eloquent and you would not be prone to SQL injection.
I have the following Linq statement:
(from order in Orders.AsEnumerable()
join component in Components.AsEnumerable()
on order.ORDER_ID equals component.ORDER_ID
join detail in Detailss.AsEnumerable()
on component.RESULT_ID equals detail.RESULT_ID
where orderRestrict.ORDER_MNEMONIC == "MyOrderText"
select new
{
Mnemonic = detail.TEST_MNEMONIC,
OrderID = component.ORDER_ID,
SeqNumber = component.SEQ_NUM
}).ToList()
I expect this to put out the following query:
select *
from Orders ord (NoLock)
join Component comp (NoLock)
on ord .ORDER_ID = comp.ORDER_ID
join Details detail (NoLock)
on comp.RESULT_TEST_NUM = detail .RESULT_TEST_NUM
where res.ORDER_MNEMONIC = 'MyOrderText'
but instead I get 3 seperate queries that select all rows from the tables. I am guessing that Linq is then filtering the values because I do get the correct values in the end.
The problem is that it takes WAY WAY too long because it is pulling down all the rows from all three tables.
Any ideas how I can fix that?
Remove the .AsEnumerable()s from the query as these are preventing the entire query being evaluated on the server.