I have many hashes that contain the same keys but are all out of order from each other. I need to reorder each one to make them fit the proper order:
correct_order = {
:cat => "cat",
:dog => "dog",
:bear => "bear",
:zebra => "zebra",
:monkey => "monkey"
}
hash1 = {
:bear => "bear",
:cat => "cat"
}
hash2 = {
:cat => "cat",
:monkey => "monkey",
:zebra => "zebra",
:bear => "bear"
}
hash3 = {
:dog => "dog",
:monkey => "monkey",
:cat => "cat"
}
How would I go about comparing the key order of hash1, hash2, and hash3 to make each key match its place in the correct_order hash? hash2 would become:
hash2 {
:cat => "cat",
:bear => "bear",
:zebra => "zebra",
:monkey => "monkey"
}
Note that each new hash will not necessarily have all the keys. Each hash will be of varing size AND varying order.
Thank you
You can't "sort" a hash.
The doc says: Hashes enumerate their values in the order that the corresponding keys were inserted.
So you will have to create a new hash. For instance:
def sort_hash(ordered_keys, hash_to_sort)
new_hash= {}
ordered_keys.each do |key|
new_hash[key]= hash_to_sort[key] if hash_to_sort.has_key?(key)
end
new_hash
end
correct_order = {
:cat => "cat",
:dog => "dog",
:bear => "bear",
:zebra => "zebra",
:monkey => "monkey"
}
hash2 = {
:cat => "cat",
:monkey => "monkey",
:zebra => "zebra",
:bear => "bear"
}
puts sort_hash(correct_order.keys, hash2)
Note that the function returns a new hash. hash2 is not modified.
There is something that needs be said about the order of hash elements, but I'll address that after showing you how you can do what you want to do. This assumes you are using Ruby 1.9+, where the order of key insertion is maintained.
Code
def reorder(hash, order)
keys = order & hash.keys
Hash[keys.zip(hash.values_at(*keys))]
end
Examples
order = correct_order.keys
#=> [:cat, :dog, :bear, :zebra, :monkey]
reorder(hash1, order)
#=> {:cat=>"cat", :bear=>"bear"}
reorder(hash2, order)
#=> {:cat=>"cat", :bear=>"bear", :zebra=>"zebra", :monkey=>"monkey"}
reorder(hash3, order)
#=> {:cat=>"cat", :dog=>"dog", :monkey=>"monkey"}
Explanation
Let's see how the code deals with hash1:
hash = hash1
#=> {:bear=>"bear", :cat=>"cat"}
order
#=> [:cat, :dog, :bear, :zebra, :monkey]
keys = order & hash.keys
#=> [:cat, :dog, :bear, :zebra, :monkey] & [:bear, :cat]
#=> [:cat, :bear]
arr = keys.zip(hash.values_at(*keys))
#=> keys.zip({:bear=>"bear", :cat=>"cat"}.values_at(*[:cat, :bear]))
#=> keys.zip({:bear=>"bear", :cat=>"cat"}.values_at(:cat, :bear))
#=> keys.zip(["cat", "bear"])
#=> [[:cat, "cat"], [:bear, "bear"]]
Hash[arr]
#=> {:cat=>"cat", :bear=>"bear"}
In Ruby 1.9+ you can instead write the last step as:
arr.to_h
Note that the method Array#& preserves the order of the first array.
Hash order
Prior to Ruby 1.9 you could not depend on the order of key-value pairs (let's just say keys) in a hash. That changed in 1.9. Now you can be confident that when you enumerate the keys of a hash, the order of the enumeration will follow the order in which the keys were added to the hash. Be warned that that change was not embraced by all Rubyists. If you've been thinking of hashes as unordered collections for twenty years, it's a big change. Personally, I like the change and have found good uses for it.
Related
I'm new to ruby, I am solving a problem that involves hashes and key. The problem asks me to Implement a method, #pet_types, that accepts a hash as an argument. The hash uses people's # names as keys, and the values are arrays of pet types that the person owns. My question is about using Hash#each method to iterate through each num inside the array. I was wondering if there's any difference between solving the problem using hash#each or hash.sort.each?
I spent several hours coming up different solution and still to figure out what are the different approaches between the 2 ways of solving the problem below.
I include my code in repl.it: https://repl.it/H0xp/6 or you can see below:
# Pet Types
# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Implement a method, #pet_types, that accepts a hash as an argument. The hash uses people's
# names as keys, and the values are arrays of pet types that the person owns.
# Example input:
# {
# "yi" => ["dog", "cat"],
# "cai" => ["dog", "cat", "mouse"],
# "venus" => ["mouse", "pterodactyl", "chinchilla", "cat"]
# }
def pet_types(owners_hash)
results = Hash.new {|h, k| h[k] = [ ] }
owners_hash.sort.each { |k, v| v.each { |pet| results[pet] << k } }
results
end
puts "-------Pet Types-------"
owners_1 = {
"yi" => ["cat"]
}
output_1 = {
"cat" => ["yi"]
}
owners_2 = {
"yi" => ["cat", "dog"]
}
output_2 = {
"cat" => ["yi"],
"dog" => ["yi"]
}
owners_3 = {
"yi" => ["dog", "cat"],
"cai" => ["dog", "cat", "mouse"],
"venus" => ["mouse", "pterodactyl", "chinchilla", "cat"]
}
output_3 = {
"dog" => ["cai", "yi"],
"cat" => ["cai", "venus", "yi"],
"mouse" => ["cai", "venus"],
"pterodactyl" => ["venus"],
"chinchilla" => ["venus"]
}
# method 2
# The 2nd and 3rd method should return a hash that uses the pet types as keys and the values should
# be a list of the people that own that pet type. The names in the output hash should
# be sorted alphabetically
# switched_hash = Hash.new()
# owners_hash.each do |owner, pets_array|
# pets_array.each do |pet|
# select_owners = owners_hash.select { |owner, pets_array|
owners_hash[owner].include?(pet) }
# switched_hash[pet] = select_owners.keys.sort
# end
# end
# method 3
#switched_hash
# pets = Hash.new {|h, k| h[k] = [ ] } # WORKS SAME AS: pets = Hash.new( Array.new )
# owners = owners_hash.keys.sort
# owners.each do |owner|
# owners_hash[owner].each do |pet|
# pets[pet] << owner
# end
# end
# pets
# Example output:
# output_3 = {
# "dog" => ["cai", "yi"],
# "cat" => ["cai", "venus", "yi"], ---> (sorted alphabetically!)
# "mouse" => ["cai", "venus"],
# "pterodactyl" => ["venus"],
# "chinchilla" => ["venus"]
# }
I used a hash data structure in my program to first solve this problem. Then I tried to rewrite it using the pet_hash. And my final codes is the following:
def pet_types(owners_hash)
pets_hash = Hash.new { |k, v| v = [] }
owners_hash.each do |owner, pets|
pets.each do |pet|
pets_hash[pet] += [owner]
end
end
pets_hash.values.each(&:sort!)
pets_hash
end
puts "-------Pet Types-------"
owners_1 = {
"yi" => ["cat"]
}
output_1 = {
"cat" => ["yi"]
}
owners_2 = {
"yi" => ["cat", "dog"]
}
output_2 = {
"cat" => ["yi"],
"dog" => ["yi"]
}
owners_3 = {
"yi" => ["dog", "cat"],
"cai" => ["dog", "cat", "mouse"],
"venus" => ["mouse", "pterodactyl", "chinchilla", "cat"]
}
output_3 = {
"dog" => ["cai", "yi"],
"cat" => ["cai", "venus", "yi"],
"mouse" => ["cai", "venus"],
"pterodactyl" => ["venus"],
"chinchilla" => ["venus"]
}
puts pet_types(owners_1) == output_1
puts pet_types(owners_2) == output_2
puts pet_types(owners_3) == output_3
Hash#sort has the same effect (at least for my basic test) as Hash#to_a followed by Array#sort.
hash = {b: 2, a: 1}
hash.to_a.sort # => [[:a, 1, [:b, 2]]
hash.sort # => the same
Now let's look at #each, both on Hash and Array.
When you provide two arguments to the block, that can handle both cases. For the hash, the first argument will be the key and the second will be the value. For the nested array, the values essentially get splatted out to the args:
[[:a, 1, 2], [:b, 3, 4]].each { |x, y, z| puts "#{x}-#{y}-#{z}" }
# => a-1-2
# => b-3-4
So basically, you should think of Hash#sort to be a shortcut to Hash#to_a followed by Array#sort, and recognize that #each will work the same on a hash as a hash converted to array (a nested array). In this case, it doesn't matter which approach you take. Clearly if you need to sort iteration by the keys then you should use sort.
I am trying to merge an array of hashes based on a particular key/value pair.
array = [ {:id => '1', :value => '2'}, {:id => '1', :value => '5'} ]
I would want the output to be
{:id => '1', :value => '7'}
As patru stated, in sql terms this would be equivalent to:
SELECT SUM(value) FROM Hashes GROUP BY id
In other words, I have an array of hashes that contains records. I would like to obtain the sum of a particular field, but the sum would grouped by key/value pairs. In other words, if my selection criteria is :id as in the example above, then it would seperate the hashes into groups where the id was the same and the sum the other keys.
I apologize for any confusion due to the typo earlier.
Edit: The question has been clarified since I first posted my answer. As a result, I have revised my answer substantially.
Here are two "standard" ways of addressing this problem. Both use Enumerable#select to first extract the elements from the array (hashes) that contain the given key/value pair.
#1
The first method uses Hash#merge! to sequentially merge each array element (hashes) into a hash that is initially empty.
Code
def doit(arr, target_key, target_value)
qualified = arr.select {|h|h.key?(target_key) && h[target_key]==target_value}
return nil if qualified.empty?
qualified.each_with_object({}) {|h,g|
g.merge!(h) {|k,gv,hv| k == target_key ? gv : (gv.to_i + hv.to_i).to_s}}
end
Example
arr = [{:id => '1', :value => '2'}, {:id => '2', :value => '3'},
{:id => '1', :chips => '4'}, {:zd => '1', :value => '8'},
{:cat => '2', :value => '3'}, {:id => '1', :value => '5'}]
doit(arr, :id, '1')
#=> {:id=>"1", :value=>"7", :chips=>"4"}
Explanation
The key here is to use the version of Hash#merge! that uses a block to determine the value for each key/value pair whose key appears in both of the hashes being merged. The two values for that key are represented above by the block variables hv and gv. We simply want to add them together. Note that g is the (initially empty) hash object created by each_with_object, and returned by doit.
target_key = :id
target_value = '1'
qualified = arr.select {|h|h.key?(target_key) && h[target_key]==target_value}
#=> [{:id=>"1", :value=>"2"},{:id=>"1", :chips=>"4"},{:id=>"1", :value=>"5"}]
qualified.empty?
#=> false
qualified.each_with_object({}) {|h,g|
g.merge!(h) {|k,gv,hv| k == target_key ? gv : (gv.to_i + hv.to_i).to_s}}
#=> {:id=>"1", :value=>"7", :chips=>"4"}
#2
The other common way to do this kind of calculation is to use Enumerable#flat_map, followed by Enumerable#group_by.
Code
def doit(arr, target_key, target_value)
qualified = arr.select {|h|h.key?(target_key) && h[target_key]==target_value}
return nil if qualified.empty?
qualified.flat_map(&:to_a)
.group_by(&:first)
.values.map { |a| a.first.first == target_key ? a.first :
[a.first.first, a.reduce(0) {|tot,s| tot + s.last}]}.to_h
end
Explanation
This may look complex, but it's not so bad if you break it down into steps. Here's what's happening. (The calculation of qualified is the same as in #1.)
target_key = :id
target_value = '1'
c = qualified.flat_map(&:to_a)
#=> [[:id,"1"],[:value,"2"],[:id,"1"],[:chips,"4"],[:id,"1"],[:value,"5"]]
d = c.group_by(&:first)
#=> {:id=>[[:id, "1"], [:id, "1"], [:id, "1"]],
# :value=>[[:value, "2"], [:value, "5"]],
# :chips=>[[:chips, "4"]]}
e = d.values
#=> [[[:id, "1"], [:id, "1"], [:id, "1"]],
# [[:value, "2"], [:value, "5"]],
# [[:chips, "4"]]]
f = e.map { |a| a.first.first == target_key ? a.first :
[a.first.first, a.reduce(0) {|tot,s| tot + s.last}] }
#=> [[:id, "1"], [:value, "7"], [:chips, "4"]]
f.to_h => {:id=>"1", :value=>"7", :chips=>"4"}
#=> {:id=>"1", :value=>"7", :chips=>"4"}
Comment
You may wish to consider makin the values in the hashes integers and exclude the target_key/target_value pairs from qualified:
arr = [{:id => 1, :value => 2}, {:id => 2, :value => 3},
{:id => 1, :chips => 4}, {:zd => 1, :value => 8},
{:cat => 2, :value => 3}, {:id => 1, :value => 5}]
target_key = :id
target_value = 1
qualified = arr.select { |h| h.key?(target_key) && h[target_key]==target_value}
.each { |h| h.delete(target_key) }
#=> [{:value=>2}, {:chips=>4}, {:value=>5}]
return nil if qualified.empty?
Then either
qualified.each_with_object({}) {|h,g| g.merge!(h) { |k,gv,hv| gv + hv } }
#=> {:value=>7, :chips=>4}
or
qualified.flat_map(&:to_a)
.group_by(&:first)
.values
.map { |a| [a.first.first, a.reduce(0) {|tot,s| tot + s.last}] }.to_h
#=> {:value=>7, :chips=>4}
I'm pretty new in Ruby programming. In Ruby there are plenty ways to write elegant code. Is there any elegant way to link two arrays with objects of the same type by attribute value?
It's hard to explain. Let's look at the next example:
a = [ { :id => 1, :value => 1 }, { :id => 2, :value => 2 }, { :id => 3, :value => 3 } ]
b = [ { :id => 1, :value => 2 }, { :id => 3, :value => 4 } ]
c = link a, b
# Result structure after linkage.
c = {
"1" => {
:a => { :id => 1, :value => 1 },
:b => { :id => 1, :value => 1 }
},
"3" => {
:a => { :id => 3, :value => 3 },
:b => { :id => 3, :value => 4 }
}
}
So the basic idea is to get pairs of objects from different arrays by their common ID and construct a hash, which will give this pair by ID.
Thanks in advance.
If you want to take an adventure through Enumerable, you could say this:
(a.map { |h| [:a, h] } + b.map { |h| [:b, h] })
.group_by { |_, h| h[:id] }
.select { |_, a| a.length == 2 }
.inject({}) { |h, (n, v)| h.update(n => Hash[v]) }
And if you really want the keys to be strings, say n.to_s => Hash[v] instead of n => Hash[v].
The logic works like this:
We need to know where everything comes from we decorate the little hashes with :a and :b symbols to track their origins.
Then add the decorated arrays together into one list so that...
group_by can group things into almost-the-final-format.
Then find the groups of size two since those groups contain the entries that appeared in both a and b. Groups of size one only appeared in one of a or b so we throw those away.
Then a little injection to rearrange things into their final format. Note that the arrays we built in (1) just somehow happen to be in the format that Hash[] is looking for.
If you wanted to do this in a link method then you'd need to say things like:
link :a => a, :b => b
so that the method will know what to call a and b. This hypothetical link method also easily generalizes to more arrays:
def link(input)
input.map { |k, v| v.map { |h| [k, h] } }
.inject(:+)
.group_by { |_, h| h[:id] }
.select { |_, a| a.length == input.length }
.inject({}) { |h, (n, v)| h.update(n => Hash[v]) }
end
link :a => [...], :b => [...], :c => [...]
I assume that, for any two elements h1 and h2 of a (or of b), h1[:id] != h2[:id].
I would do this:
def convert(arr) Hash[arr.map {|h| [h[:id], h]}] end
ah, bh = convert(a), convert(b)
c = ah.keys.each_with_object({}) {|k,h|h[k]={a: ah[k], b: bh[k]} if bh.key?(k)}
# => {1=>{:a=>{:id=>1, :value=>1}, :b=>{:id=>1, :value=>2}},
# 3=>{:a=>{:id=>3, :value=>3}, :b=>{:id=>3, :value=>4}}}
Note that:
ah = convert(a)
# => {1=>{:id=>1, :value=>1}, 2=>{:id=>2, :value=>2}, 3=>{:id=>3, :value=>3}}
bh = convert(b)
# => {1=>{:id=>1, :value=>2}, 3=>{:id=>3, :value=>4}}
Here's a second approach. I don't like it as well, but it represents a different way of looking at the problem.
def sort_by_id(a) a.sort_by {|h| h[:id]} end
c = Hash[*sort_by_id(a.select {|ha| b.find {|hb| hb[:id] == ha[:id]}})
.zip(sort_by_id(b))
.map {|ha,hb| [ha[:id], {a: ha, b: hb}]}
.flatten]
Here's what's happening. The first step is to select only the elements ha of a for which there is an element hb of b for which ha[:id] = hb[id]. Then we sort both (what's left of) a and b on h[:id], zip them together and then make the hash c.
r1 = a.select {|ha| b.find {|hb| hb[:id] == ha[:id]}}
# => [{:id=>1, :value=>1}, {:id=>3, :value=>3}]
r2 = sort_by_id(r1)
# => [{:id=>1, :value=>1}, {:id=>3, :value=>3}]
r3 = sort_by_id(b)
# => [{:id=>1, :value=>2}, {:id=>3, :value=>4}]
r4 = r2.zip(r3)
# => [[{:id=>1, :value=>1}, {:id=>1, :value=>2}],
# [{:id=>3, :value=>3}, {:id=>3, :value=>4}]]
r5 = r4.map {|ha,hb| [ha[:id], {a: ha, b: hb}]}
# => [[1, {:a=>{:id=>1, :value=>1}, :b=>{:id=>1, :value=>2}}],
# [3, {:a=>{:id=>3, :value=>3}, :b=>{:id=>3, :value=>4}}]]
r6 = r5.flatten
# => [1, {:a=>{:id=>1, :value=>1}, :b=>{:id=>1, :value=>2}},
# 3, {:a=>{:id=>3, :value=>3}, :b=>{:id=>3, :value=>4}}]
c = Hash[*r6]
# => {1=>{:a=>{:id=>1, :value=>1}, :b=>{:id=>1, :value=>2}},
# 3=>{:a=>{:id=>3, :value=>3}, :b=>{:id=>3, :value=>4}}}
Ok, I've found the answer by myself. Here is a quite short line of code, which should do the trick:
Hash[a.product(b)
.select { |pair| pair[0][:id] == pair[1][:id] }
.map { |pair| [pair[0][:id], { :a => pair[0], :b => pair[1] }] }]
The product method gives us all possible pairs, then we filter them by equal IDs of pair elements. And then we map pairs to the special form, which will produce a Hash we are looking for.
So Hash[["key1", "value1"], ["key2", "value2"]] returns { "key1" => "value1", "key2" => "value2" }. And I use this to get the answer on my question.
Thanks.
P.S.: you can use pair.first instead of pair[0] and pair.last instead of pair[1] for better readability.
UPDATE
As Cary pointed out, it is better to replace |pair| with |ha, hb| to avoid these ugly indices:
Hash[a.product(b)
.select { |ha, hb| ha[:id] == hb[:id] }
.map { |ha, hb| [ha[:id], { :a => ha, :b => hb }] }]
I have a hash that has a keys => meaning relation. Various elements of this hash are:
"fish" => "aquatic animal"
"fiend" => "bad person"
"great" => "remarkable"
I need to create a function find such that when I use this function find("fi"), it should give back both "fish" and "fiend" along with the definitions. So the output should be:
"fish" => "aquatic animal"
"fiend" => "bad person"
I am new to regular expressions and to Ruby.
hash.select{ |k,v| k.start_with? pattern }
You can do it as a single expression:
hash.select { |key, value| key.start_with? prefix }
Or if you're using Ruby 1.8:
hash.reject { |key, value| not key.start_with? prefix }
Examples:
{'foo' => 1, 'bar' => 2, 'baz' => 3}.select { |key, value| key.start_with? 'f' } # {'foo' => 1}
{'foo' => 1, 'bar' => 2, 'baz' => 3}.select { |key, value| key.start_with? 'b' } # {'bar' => 2, 'baz' => 3}
select would keep only pairs that don't match the condition in the block. str.start_with? prefix returns true if str starts with prefix (kind of obvious).
There is a slight awkwardness in the 1.8 code - I'm doing reject, instead of select and I need to negate the result from #start_with?. The reason is that in Ruby 1.8 Hash#reject returns a Hash, while Hash#select returns an array of pairs.
Say we have
[{:name=>"Joe", :age => 15},{:name=>"Josh", :age => 83},{:name=>"Jim", :age => 1203}]
What is the best way way to get the hash where the name is "Joe"? To return {:name=>"Joe", :age=>15}?
array.select will return an array of values (even if there is only one match):
my_array.select { |item| item[:name] == "Joe" }
# => [{:name => "Joe", :age => 15}]
You can use Enumerable's find method instead to return the first instance (as a hash):
my_array.find { |item| item[:name] == "Joe" }
# => {:name => "Joe", :age => 15}
array.select { |e| e[:name] == 'Joe' }.first
If this is an operation you need to perform frequently, then store the set of hashes as a hash of hashes, with the value for the name key as the key to each hash. That way you can look up your hashes in O(1) time.