D3 and GeoJSON - strange lines? - d3.js

Why is my GeoJSON rendered like this with D3 given below code? (Should be a map of Uganda)
GeoJSON snippet
"type": "FeatureCollection",
"features": [{
"type": "Feature",
"properties": {
"D_06_ID": 1,
},
"geometry": {
"type": "Polygon",
"coordinates": [
[
[472470.4185696139, 183515.90337615015]
Code
var projection = d3.geo.mercator()
.scale(60)
var path = d3.geo.path().projection(projection);
svg.selectAll(".subunit")
.data(data.features)
.enter().append("path")
.attr("d", path);

Related

amcharts 4 category X axis labels not aligned with graphed data

Using rotated labels on category X axis. (Real graph uses long names but results are the same.)
A: Alignment of axis labels and their data points is fine without label rotation.
B: Labels are not aligned when rotated.
The only difference between A and B graph coding is the addition of "labels":{"rotation":90} in the xAxes renderer.
How can alignment be fixed?
var chart =am4core.createFromConfig({
"colors": { "list": ["#DB3", "#000", "#888"] },
"data": [$data],
"legend": { "markers":{"width":20, "height":10},
"position":"top",
"useDefaultMarker":true
},
"series": [
{ "dataFields": { "categoryX":"X", "valueY":"Y1" },
"name": "[font-size:16px;font-weight:600;]{$n1}[/]",
"strokeWidth": 2,
"type": "LineSeries"
},
{ "dataFields": { "categoryX":"X", "valueY":"Y2" },
"name": "[font-size:16px;font-weight:600;]{$n2}[/]",
"strokeWidth": 2,
"type": "LineSeries"
},
{ "dataFields": { "categoryX":"X", "valueY":"Y3" },
"name": "[font-size:16px;font-weight:600;]others[/]",
"strokeWidth": 2,
"type": "LineSeries"
}
],
"xAxes": [
{ "dataFields": { "category": "X" },
"renderer": { "minGridDistance":11, "labels":{"rotation":90}},
"type": "CategoryAxis"
}
],
"yAxes": [
{ "renderer": {"minGridDistance":15},
"title": {"text": "[font-size:16px;font-weight:600;]Values[/]"},
"type": "ValueAxis"
}]
}, "line", am4charts.XYChart);
LABELS renderer needed "verticalCenter":"middle" with rotation.
I don't know how many other things I tried!

Using d3.js v4 - using parentId to resolve ambiguity

I am trying to understand the right usage to achieve my collapsible tree d3 but unable to establish the proper parent/child references since I cannot use "parent". Attempting to use parentID.
This is my dataset I am testing with:
var result = [
{ "id": 1, "name": "Top Level", "parent": null, "parentId": "" },
{ "id": 2, "name": "PROD", "parent": "Top Level", "parentId": 1 },
{ "id": 3, "name": "QAT", "parent": "Top Level", "parentId": 1 },
{ "id": 4, "name": "App1", "parent": "PROD", "parentId": 2 },
{ "id": 5, "name": "App1", "parent": "QAT", "parentId": 3 },
{ "id": 6, "name": "ServerPROD001", "parent": "App1", "parentId": 4 },
{ "id": 7, "name": "ServerQAT001", "parent": "App1", "parentId": 5 }
];
and based on the collapsible tree:
// convert the flat data into a hierarchy
var treeData = d3.stratify()
.id(function (d) { return d.name; })
.parentId(function (d) { return d.parent })
(result);
This works fine if I do not include items 6 and 7. If I do include these I get an ambiguity error which makes sense because it cannot determine which "App1" to associate to.
I tried changing the code to use the parentId but just get an error of "missing:1" now.
// convert the flat data into a hierarchy
var treeData = d3.stratify()
.id(function (d) { return d.name; })
.parentId(function (d) { return d.parentId })
(result);
Note - I cannot change the "App1" name values to something unique as they will exist in multiple areas with that given name.
Since you have the id that is unique and not the name:
// convert the flat data into a hierarchy
var treeData = d3.stratify()
.id(function (d) { return d.id; }) // return the id instead of the name
.parentId(function (d) { return d.parentId })
(result);
and then set the name you need to be displayed like this:
// assign the name to each node as the initial name
treeData.each(function(d) {
d.name = d.data.name;
});
A working example can be found here, based on this
:)
Good luck!

How do you convert TopoJSON linestring to polygon?

I have a TopoJSON file containing the boundaries of various districts in Uttar Pradesh, India. When you load the data on a map, you see only the outlines of the districts; the districts themselves are not filled.
I believe the problem is that each district is of type GeometryCollection that has its own geometries made up of a series of LineStrings.
Instead, I want each district to be of type Polygon that just has arcs.
For example, the first object is:
{
"type": "GeometryCollection",
"geometries": [{
"type": "GeometryCollection",
"properties": {
"district_number": 1,
"district_name": "Ghaziabad"
},
"geometries": [{
"type": "LineString",
"arcs": [0]
}, {
"type": "LineString",
"arcs": [1]
}, {
"type": "LineString",
"arcs": [2]
}, {
"type": "LineString",
"arcs": [3]
}, {
"type": "LineString",
"arcs": [4]
}, {
"type": "LineString",
"arcs": [5]
}]
}
I think I want to convert it, and every other object, to:
{
"type": "Polygon",
"properties": {
"district_number": 1,
"district_name": "Ghaziabad"
},
"arcs": [[0,1,2,3,4,5]]
}
I could fix it manually, but that seems insane. Is there a better way?
Update
So I figured out how to convert the object into the result I thought I wanted, but I got some very wacky polygons. Here is my (very clunky) code. Thanks to Saeed Adel Mehraban for some guidance with this.
d3.json('map.topojson',function(error,data){ // get my json that needs to be converted
var arr = data.objects.collection.geometries; // this is the relevant array
var newArr = []; // in order to map each object, i need to put each one into a new array as a single-item array
arr.forEach(function(d,i){
var curr = [d];
newArr.push(curr);
})
newArr.forEach(function(e,i){ // now that i have my new array, i want to convert each object that contains a LineString into a Polygon
var output = e.map(function(d){
var arcsArr = []; // an empty array to push each single value of the LineString arcs into
return {
"type": "Polygon", // change the type to polygon
"properties": d.properties, // keep the properties
"arcs": d.geometries.map(function(g) { // a single key-value pair for arcs, made up of the individual arcs from the LineString
arcsArr.push(g.arcs[0]);
return [arcsArr]; // the array of arcs must be in another array
})
};
});
var output = output[0]; // get only the first item in the output array, which is the object i have modified
output.arcs = output.arcs[0]; // and change the arcs so we're only taking the first array (as we've duplicated the arrays)
$('body').append(JSON.stringify(output)+','); // append the whole thing to the body so I can copy it and paste it into the appropriate part of the JSON
});
});
This "worked" in the sense that my LineStrings were indeed converted to Polygons, retaining the original border. But the polygons themselves are a nightmare, with straight lines crisscrossing the map at all kinds of angles.
Is there something like a command line tool that can convert boundaries made of LineStrings into Polygons?
I believe I ran into the same problem being described.
This is Zambia drawn as a svg polyline foreach arc (red being the first arc listed, and magenta being the last):
However when attempting to create a polygon by concatenating the arcs:
What happened was the arcs for every object were listed clockwise, but the points in every individual arc were listed counterclockwise. Without seeing the topojson that OP is using I cannot 100% confirm this, but I suspect that this was the case.
I solved this by reversing the points in an arc before pushing them to the array of points to draw the polygon and now all is well:
Maybe a map function like below? (I write that with simplistic assumption about data schema. I can't guarantee that it works for complex linestrings since I'm not familiar with topojson format. But it works with your provided data)
var foo = [
{
"type": "GeometryCollection",
"geometries": [{
"type": "GeometryCollection",
"properties": {
"district_number": 1,
"district_name": "Ghaziabad"
},
"geometries": [{
"type": "LineString",
"arcs": [0]
}, {
"type": "LineString",
"arcs": [1]
}, {
"type": "LineString",
"arcs": [2]
}, {
"type": "LineString",
"arcs": [3]
}, {
"type": "LineString",
"arcs": [4]
}, {
"type": "LineString",
"arcs": [5]
}]
}]
}
];
var bar = foo.map(function(d) {
return {
"type": "Polygon",
"properties": d.geometries[0].properties,
"arc": d.geometries.map(function(g1) {
return g1.geometries.map(function(g) {
return g.arcs[0];
});
})
};
});
console.log(bar);

Use json file instead of csv in d3.js pie chart

There is an example of making pie chart using d3.js https://bl.ocks.org/mbostock/3887235
here in this example .csv file is used.
age,population
<5,2704659
5-13,4499890
14-17,2159981
18-24,3853788
25-44,14106543
45-64,8819342
≥65,612463
I want to use json file.
[
{"age": "<5",
"population": 2704659
},
{"age": "5-13",
"population": 4499890
},
{"age": "14-17",
"population": 2159981
},
{"age": "18-24",
"population": 3853788
},
{"age": "25-44",
"population": 14106543
},
{"age": "45-64",
"population": 8819342
},
{"age": ">=65",
"population": 612463
}
]
what code I need to change in the source file?
I have used
d3.json("data.json", function(error, data) {
But it not worked for me.
Look at this pie chart : https://jsfiddle.net/reko91/qkHK6/1942/
Data is like so :
var data = [{"label":"Category A", "value":20},
{"label":"Category B", "value":50},
{"label":"Category C", "value":30}];
Makes the container using the data :
var vis = d3.select('#chart')
.append("svg:svg")
.data([data])
Makes a variable pie :
var pie = d3.layout.pie().value(function(d) {
return d.value;
});
Then uses this variable :
var arcs = vis.selectAll("g.slice").data(pie).enter().append("svg:g").attr("class", "slice");
Which in turn gets used to create the slices :
arcs.append("svg:path")
.attr("fill", function(d, i) {
return color(i);
})
.attr("d", function(d) {
// log the result of the arc generator to show how cool it is :)
console.log(arc(d));
return arc(d);
});
There you go, pie chart made via json :)
This is just an example, obviously can't implement the exact changes unless you show us your code

Parsing errors when i try to create pie chart using d3js

I am trying to create pie charts using d3js. I dont face any issues when i used simple json file. But later when i tried to use slightly more complex json, i am getting these 2 errors.
Error: Problem parsing d="M0,-300A300,300 0 1,1 NaN,NaNLNaN,NaNA20,20 0 1,0 0,-20Z"
Error: Problem parsing d="MNaN,NaNA300,300 0 1,1 NaN,NaNLNaN,NaNA20,20 0 1,0 NaN,NaNZ"
from my understanding the error is at arcs.append("path").attr("d", arc). but donno how to fix it.
here is the d3js code
<div id="sample1">
<script>
var r = 300;
var color = d3.scale.category10()
var canvas = d3.select("#sample1").append("svg")
.attr("width", 700)
.attr("height", 700);
var group = canvas.append("g")
.attr("transform", "translate(350,350)");
var arc = d3.svg.arc()
.innerRadius(20)
.outerRadius(r);
var pie = d3.layout.pie()
.value(function(d) {
d.children.forEach(function(x) {
return x.value;
});
})
.sort(null);
d3.json("js/mydata.json", function(data) {
var arcs = group.selectAll(".arc")
.data(pie(data.children))
.enter()
.append("g")
.attr("class", "arc");
arcs.append("path")
.attr("d", arc)
.attr("fill", function(d) {
d.data.children.forEach(function(x) {
return color(x.name);
});
});
})
</script>
</div>
here is my json
{
"name": "All",
"children": [
{
"name": "Main1",
"children": [
{
"name": "Sub1",
"value": 6.25
},
{
"name": "Sub2",
"value": 12.50
},
{
"name": "Sub3",
"value": 6.25
}
]
},
{
"name": "Main2",
"children": [
{
"name": "Sub4",
"value": 6.25
},
{
"name": "Sub5",
"value": 12.50
},
{
"name": "Sub6",
"value": 6.25
}
]
},
{
"name": "Main3",
"children": [
{
"name": "Sub7",
"value": 6.25
},
{
"name": "Sub8",
"value": 12.50
},
{
"name": "Sub9",
"value": 6.25
}
]
},
{
"name": "Main4",
"children": [
{
"name": "Sub10",
"value": 6.25
},
{
"name": "Sub11",
"value": 12.50
},
{
"name": "Sub12",
"value": 6.25
}
]
}
]
}
Updated:
The approach given by "Lars Kotthoff" worked. how ever this approach does not fix my actual problem which i dint mentioned here. The problem is, i want to give a border to all the Main1,Main2,Main3,Main4. it means although there are 12 colors here borders will be only 4 i.e grouping all three colors into one based on ite parent.
Below picture shows my requirement.

Resources