I'm experimenting with Spring Boot (1.1.9.RELEASE) and Apache Velocity (1.7) with the intention of using Velocity as a templating tool for generating emails. I'm using Thymeleaf (2.1.3.RELEASE) for web templates.
Spring Boot's Autoconfiguration detects Velocity on the classpath during start up and adds it as a web view resolver. While this is brilliant, it's not what I want so I tried
#EnableAutoConfiguration(exclude = {VelocityAutoConfiguration.class})
public class Application {
but I still ended up with a velocityViewResolver bean once the application had started up.
Any idea how I might go about disabling this automatic configuration?
Thanks in advance for any replies.
With Spring Boot 1.2.5, disabling the autoconfiguration on the main application class seems to be enough:
#SpringBootApplication
#EnableAutoConfiguration(exclude = { VelocityAutoConfiguration.class })
Edit
I don't exactly know since when that works, but now (Spring Boot 1.3.2) you can also set :
spring.velocity.enabled=false
in application.properties.
Related
Upgrading an existing system to Spring Boot with Auto config. Currently the system is all Java config. I'm confused over whether to continue the use of #Profile. Is this annotation no longer needed? I searched extensively about upgrading and found only references to non-Spring Java migration and creating new projects.
Typical #Profile usage in our configuration classes looks something like:
#Bean
#Profile("is-standalone")
public Service unsecuredService(SomeApi someApi) {
return new ...
}
I inferred from the Spring Boot examples that using one of the #Conditional annotations is recommended like this:
#Bean
#ConditionalOnProperty("unsecured.enabled")
public Service unsecuredService(SomeApi someApi) {
return new ...
}
Then in a YAML file the is-standalone Profile enables or disables all the various properties for that Profile. Is this the proper way to upgrade? To repeat a question from above differently, can the #Profile usage be left as is? This is for a fairly large project, the upgrade is non-trivial, so I would like to do this only once!
Depends where your previous #Profile annotation is coming from. If you're using Spring's #Profile, the functionality is as follows:
Annotating a class with #Profile("dev") will load the class and register it in the Spring context only when the dev profile is active
Annotating a class with #Profile("!dev") will load the class and register it in the Spring context only when the dev profile is inactive
If this sounds like what you have already, no change is needed.
Before migrating to Spring Boot 2.1, we had a couple of controller tests in our services utilizing #WebMvcTest in combination with #AutoConfigureMockMvc:
#WebMvcTest(SomeController.class)
#AutoConfigureMockMvc(secure = false)
public class SomeControllerTests { ... }
This had the effect that the Spring Security configuration was disabled and you could run MVC tests without mocking OAuth/JWT.
In Spring Boot 2.1, the secured attribute is deprecated and the release notes mention that
[...] #WebMvcTest looks for a WebSecurityConfigurer bean [...].
In order to avoid the deprecated secured attribute and loading of our WebSecurityConfigurer we rewrote our tests to:
#WebMvcTest(
value = SomeController.class,
excludeFilters = #ComponentScan.Filter(type = FilterType.ASSIGNABLE_TYPE, classes = WebSecurityConfigurer.class),
excludeAutoConfiguration = MockMvcSecurityAutoConfiguration.class)
public class SomeControllerTests { ... }
The question is: is there a more compact way in Spring Boot 2.1 to define such tests?
Yes, rather than working around the fact the flag is deprecated, you should embrace the fact that this is going in that direction going forward.
As of Spring Boot 2.1, if you have Spring Security, your tests will be secured using your custom configuration. What is the actual problem with that?
If you don't want to authenticate for certain tests, just use Spring Security's test infrastructure and add #WithMockUser.
Encountered the same scenario and what helped was using the below annotations instead of #WebMvcTest. In this case, #WithMockUser did not help.
#WebAppConfiguration
#Import({MockMvcAutoConfiguration.class})
#EnableConfigurationProperties({ResourceProperties.class, WebMvcProperties.class})
Classes that existed in controllers / value of #WebMvcTest goes into value of #Import annotation.
Source: https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-boot/issues/14227#issuecomment-688824627
I have this Spring MVC application that makes use of PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer to load properties using #Value annotation.
I understand that all properties are loaded at server startup when context is initialized.
Howevver, is there a way that I can access updated properties without having to restart TOMCAT? (perhaps making use of Apache Commons PropertiesConfiguration)?
Is there a way I can configure Apache Commons PropertiesConfiguration to work with Spring PropertyPlaceholderconfigurer?
Add #RefreshScope annotation above the class which consumes the properties (ie has #Value annotation). Example goes as follows:
#RefreshScope
class PropertiesConsumer {
....
#Value(..)
private consumerFoo;
....
}
I have created a spring mvc based application but I didn't use this #Configuration annotation. What is the purpose of using #Configuration annotation? By using this, what are we communicating to springMVC container?
Assuming your application is using xml configuration rather than AnnotationConfig so it is not loaded to ApplicationContext at all.
#Configuration is used when ApplicationContext has been initialized and bean registration.
#Configuration annotation is a core Spring annotation, and not Spring MVC. It is a core entry point to configuring Spring-based application using Java config instead of XML config.
Please, use Spring Documentation more often because it is a place where you will find answers to most of your questions. Like this one:
Indicates that a class declares one or more Bean #Bean methods and may
be processed by the Spring container to generate bean definitions and
service requests for those beans at runtime
Can someone help me with a minimal project setup with Spring Boot and Struts2?
I have already create a Spring Boot application with a H2-database. I also added a h2Configuration class, so that I'm able to access the database with localhost:8080/console.
But how can I add Struts2 to my Application without web.xml?
Without web.xml you can only write a Struts2 filter using servlet 3.0 or higher
#WebFilter("/*")
public class Struts2Filter extends Struts2PrepareAndExecuteFilter {
}
The content could be empty, it's enough to add annotated filter without any inclusion in the web.xml file.
If you want to integrate Struts2 with Spring, then you should use a plugin.
Struts 2 provides a plugin that enables Spring to inject into the ActionSupport classes any dependent objects you've specified in the Spring configuration file. Consult Spring Plugin documentation for more information about how the plugin works.