We have detected FHIR Query resource is missing in FHIR Continuous Integration page.
Nevertheless,it´s present in Java implementation in zip library for that branch.
We are using this resource in certain FHIR messaging services which are already implemented: Message Bundles with at least MessageHeader and Query resources.
Will Query be present in DSTU2 or the missing is simply an integration error for documentation?
Thanks in advance for clarification.
Regards
Query has been supplanted by the notion of OperationDefinition, though how this is done in the messaging space isn't fully documented yet. The reference implementations aren't yet fully aligned with the draft specification. Both of these deficiencies will be corrected before the DSTU ballot opens in April.
Section 2.1.1.5 here (http://hl7.org/implement/standards/FHIR-Develop/search.html) will describe this usecase for you, however this section is not finished yet. It will be based on the way operations are invoked asynchronously (see 2.2.0.5 here http://hl7.org/implement/standards/FHIR-Develop/operations.html). This section is also sketchy. I will take this up with Grahame and Lloyd to flesh it out.
Related
recently I've implemented MFN M15 message sender using HL7 (v2.x).
I see that HAPI FHIR is emerging as de-facto standard. Can someone point me out what would be MFN M15 message counterpart in https://hapifhir.io/?
NOTE:
I've already downloaded ca.uhn.hapi.fhir:org.hl7.fhir.dstu3:4.2.10-SNAPSHOT, and start investigation in org.hl7.fhir.dstu3.model but some directions would be more than gratefull.
Work on managing inventory using FHIR is still an area of exploration in FHIR (definitely a long way from 'de-facto standard' in this space, though FHIR is certainly becoming that for some areas of healthcare. In DSTU3, you may be able to cobble together part of a solution using Device and Medication. You might also look at this stream on chat.fhir.org: https://chat.fhir.org/#narrow/stream/179165-committers/topic/inventory.20tracking
I finally got my sample dmn-quarkus example running. Is there a property that enables the trace, such a way it prints the sequence of decisions executed?
I noticed that when I provide a incorrect JSON for my DMN model, Kogito responds with a detail response, telling me which decision failed.
This is awesome! Is there a property to turn on to get the details in each response?
Kogito is based on a domain-model first approach to code generation
Kogito ergo domain
Kogito adopts to your business domain rather than the other way around [...]
this means the automatically code-generated API will always take the "shape" of the input/output context of the DMN model, and no longer the v7.x kie-server approach of a generic API.
The information you obtain during error is meant to provide an analogous to a stacktrace.
You can always leverage the Kogito API programming model to build the REST service yourself, in the way better fit your specific business requirement --shall that be provide a list of DMNDecisionResult(s). For instance a pragmatic approach could be to inspect the automatically generated code, and then code a bespoke service, based on this one.
We are looking into Audit functional requirements, but that is not provided out of the box yet. We always welcome community feedback, especially even more in this very early versions! Don't hesitate to join the community on our mailing-list or raise a JIRA ticket to take part of the conversation, the team will be glad to look further into it considering community feedback and suggestions!
I'm looking for a way to write notes into patient chart in Epic. Couldn't find any current FHIR specs about writing notes , but I didn't find this proposal http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=ClinicalNote_FHIR_Resource_Proposal
Are there any other options ?
Great question. I work on the FHIR team at Epic and from a FHIR perspective we are having a similar problem identifying the appropriate place in FHIR to return notes. The proposal you have linked is a starting artifact in defining a new resource for that purpose. Until we determine in the FHIR community if a new spec should be created or an existing FHIR resource should be used, we do not have a FHIR specification to develop support against.
Outside of FHIR, today there are multiple ways to get notes into Epic such as HL7 v2, document based exchange, or something more Epic defined (these are just the ones I'm aware of). Without knowing more about your use case, it is hard to say what option may or may not meet your needs. I recommend you reach out through the contact us at https://open.epic.com/. From this email group they can dive into what integrations would meet your specific scenario and you will have input from a full gamut of integration experts.
And if you are interested in the standards side of things and getting notes in the FHIR specification, I'd encourage you to get involved on chat.fhir.org or any of the HL7 FHIR meetings to provide input on the specification!
*Edited to point to website instead of email.
While trying to understand how an existing system will map to FHIR resources, I am stuck in the documentation on Treatment/Care Preferences like the ones outlined here: http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=Care_Preference
Would these preferences be handled in a list of extended objects? Or will FHIR be implementing a CarePreference resource?
This isn't catered for in the current set of resources. I guess you use Other (http://hl7.org/implement/standards/fhir/other.htm). It does seem like the kind of thing we'd want to define a resource for, but I'm not aware of any plans for one right now. I forwarded the suggestion along to the appropriate team.
btw, I'm not sure this question meets Stack Overflows guidelines - it might get edited/closed.
"Other" is the solution for now. Speed of the development of a specific resource is likely to be dependent on the number asking for it and the detail of the use-cases they supply. Consider sharing these on the FHIR list server. Alerts might be another mechanism to flag important preferences.
I'm studying business layer and need a complete reference which covers issues about "how to manage dependency between business layer and other layers", "how many ways are there to send data between layers" and most important for me "how to group business logic and make business component and talk about possible ways....".
do you know any reference?
EDIT:
I would be delighted if you introduce some e-book for it.
Thank you
the best (in my opinion) approaches to decoupling layers it to use a message passing metaphor. This way communication between the layers is done with messages that are types that contain information only pertinent to the communication. These light weight types are then interpreted by each layer as they see fit.
In essence don't pass things that are not needed. If both layers need a piece of information then there is a high likely hood that some other entity should be brokering access to that information (for example persisted data in db).
I recently stumbled onto this one and found it to be a great read (free ebook in PDF, or read it in MSDN), got the printed version on Amazon shortly after.
Microsoft Patterns & Practices Application Architecture Guide 2.0 -
http://apparchguide.codeplex.com/
EDIT: Here's the section on Business Layers in the MSDN version: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee658103%28v=PandP.10%29.aspx
I think you should consider reading these books.
(source: infibeam.com)
How about something like
Three-Layered Services Application
(source: microsoft.com)
and
Layered Application