I have a modular Sinatra app which runs fine when executed with rackup. The config.ru file is defined as follows:
map '/' do
run My::Controllers::Default
end
map '/api' do
run My::Controllers::Api
end
When I run the app under nginx/passenger I get nothing but 404's, even for the '/' route. Suspecting that something was wrong with routing, I modified config.ru as follows:
run My::Controllers::Default
After restarting nginx, I was served the default page of the app. However, the default page of the app reaches into the api route to get some documentation to display, and that part returns a 404. Given that config.ru is able to run the Default controller, I'm sure that the issue has nothing to do with being able to load all of the relevant ruby files--which seems to be the problem in other related questions I've found on SO.
With that in mind I modified config.ru as follows:
map '/api' do
run My::Controllers::Api
end
run My::Controllers::Default
At this point I'm back to getting nothing but 404's, even for the '/' route. It seems that the map statement is confusing the webserver and making it unable to find the correct routes.
If I just run the app using rackup everything behaves as expected, so I'm really at a loss to explain what I'm seeing.
I remember this being the answer. Let me know if it works for you. If it does I'll "Accept" the answer so that others will find it.
Middleware
A bug in passenger prevents it from understanding the map statement in config.ru https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/phusion-passenger/PoEEp9YcWbY/1y0QL_i3tHYJ
class PassengerFix
def initialize(app)
#app = app
end
def call(env)
env["SERVER_NAME"] = env["HTTP_HOST"]
return #app.call(env)
end
end
config.ru
configure do
use PassengerFix
end
Related
I'm working on a Sinatra app for the first time and am stumbling into an issue with serving a javascript asset.
I am following the Sinatra convention of putting the static files in “public” folder and it works locally but when we create a Docker image, we get a 404 while this works with localhost.
I see where I can set the public_folder which I have tried like this:
http://sinatrarb.com/configuration.html
but still 404'ing. Is there a way to get the top-level object and ask it where it expects the public_folder to be (like Rails.env)?
You can check the settings object.
irb(main):001:0> require "sinatra"
=> true
irb(main):002:0> settings.public_folder
=> "/usr/lib/ruby/2.5.0/irb/public"
This allows you to create a route which returns the path, something like this
require 'sinatra'
get '/' do
settings.public_folder
end
Without more information I would guess that your public folder points to a wrong directory inside your docker because the project :root points to a different directory that what you expect.
I started to build a website with padrino. At the moment the main class of my app is the simplest thing in the world:
class App < Padrino::Application
enable :sessions
get :index do
send_file 'public/view/index.html'
end
error 404 do
send_file 'public/view/errors/404.html'
end
end
So the views are simply htmls - the idea behind it is to use angularjs to render all the thingies provided by a rest api. I guess that's fairly standard.
My problem is - although it works fine for rendering the home page (localhost:3000/), the custom error doesn't work at all; let's say I try localhost:3000/test - the standard "Sinatra doesn’t know this ditty" page is rendered instead.
I'm running padrino 0.12.4 with WEBrick 1.3.1. What am I doing wrong here?
I believe what's going on here is that when you go to localhost:3000/test, your Sinatra app is looking for the "test" action under your App Controller. Obviously this action is not being found because it's not listed as a route! Therefore explicitly tell Sinatra to return a 404 page if the diddy wasn't found:
error Sinatra::NotFound do
content_type 'text/plain'
[404, 'Not Found']
end
I have a Sinatra application that uses the modular style. Everything works fine apart from my error handler blocks which don't get invoked. Here's the relevant code:
app.rb
require_relative './routes/base'
require_relative './routes/routing'
module Example
class App < Sinatra::Application
use Routes::Base
use Routes::Routing
end
end
base.rb
require 'sinatra/base'
module Example
module Routes
class Base < Sinatra::Application
configure do
# etc.
end
# Error pages.
error 404 do # <- Doesn't get invoked.
erb :not_found
end
error 500 do # <- Doesn't get invoked.
erb :internal_server_error
end
end
end
end
routing.rb
module Example
module Routes
class Routing < Base
get '/?' do
erb :home
end
end
end
end
Why don't my error handlers work?
Thanks in advance.
The use method is for adding middleware to an app, you can’t use it to compose an app like this.
In your example you actually have three different Sinatra applications, two of which are being run as middleware. When a Sinatra app is run as middleware then any request that matches one of its routes is handled by that app, otherwise the request is passed to the next component in the Rack stack. Error handlers will only apply if the request has been handled by the same app. The app that you have defined the error handlers in has no routes defined, so all requests will be passed on down the stack — the error handlers will never be used.
One way to organise a large app like this would be to simply use the same class and reopen it in the different files. This other question has an example that might be useful: Using Sinatra for larger projects via multiple files.
I created a 'Hello, World' app using Sinatra and then pushed to Heroku and all worked.
I've since created a basic Jekyll blog, and am trying to access it via Heroku using the following routes:
get '/?' do
file.read("_site/index.html")
end
get '/.*.*' do
file.read("_site/#{params[:splat]}")
end
not_found do
file.read("_site/error/index.html")
end
The route to the index works fine link to my site
but as soon as I click to the first post it always fails.
I have tried so many variations of different routes for the :splat and get, just can't seem to get it to work? Any ideas?
In the route that's failing, before the file.read statement, add warn "splat = #{params[:splat]}" and that will output the result to the terminal, and you can see what it's actually getting, e.g.
get '/.*.*' do
warn "splat = #{params[:splat]}"
file.read("_site/#{params[:splat]}")
end
You could also try using an absolute path to the files, though if you're getting the index page then it suggests it's not needed:
config do
set :statics, File.expand_path(File.join(settings.root, "_site"))
end
get '/.*.*' do
file.read( File.join settings.statics, params[:splat] )
end
Unless there's something else you were planning to use Sinatra's routes for, you could probably remove the Sinatra routes entirely and just make the "_site" folder the public_folder, and then Sinatra will do the serving of the static files for you:
config do
set :public_folder, File.expand_path(File.join(settings.root, "_site"))
end
# no more to do...
ok so this is very strange (well is to me), everything in my master branch works fine, I then created a new branch called twitter to conduct some twitter feed implementation. I have done this and was working yesterday on my linux machine.. I have pulled the branch today in a windows environment but when i load the app i now get the regular Sinatra 404 Sinatra doesn’t know this ditty.
This is my profile.rb file
require 'bundler/setup'
Bundler.require(:default)
require 'rubygems'
require 'sinatra'
require './config/config.rb' if File.exists?('./config/config.rb')
require 'sinatra/jsonp'
require 'twitter'
require 'sinatra/static_assets'
class Profile < Sinatra::Base
helpers Sinatra::Jsonp
enable :json_pretty
register Sinatra::StaticAssets
##twitter_client = Twitter::Client.new(
:consumer_key => ENV["CONSUMER_KEY"],
:consumer_secret => ENV["CONSUMER_SECRET"],
:oauth_token => ENV["OAUTH_TOKEN"],
:oauth_token_secret => ENV["OAUTH_SECRET"],
)
get '/' do
erb :index
end
get '/feed' do
jsonp ##twitter_client.user_timeline('richl14').map(&:attrs)
end
end
Config.ru
require './profile'
run Profile
Does anyone have any ideas of what i need to be looking at to solve this? Can anyone speak from experience with this?
Thanks
When you use the classic Sinatra style you use require 'sinatra' and then add routes to the top level. These routes get added to the Sinatra::Application. When you directly run this file, e.g. with ruby my_app.rb, Sinatra runs a built in web server, which will serve the Sinatra::Application app.
When you use the modular style, you use require 'sinatra/base', and then add routes to your Sinatra::Base subclass. In this case directly executing the file doesn’t start the built in server.
In your case you are using the modular style, but have used require 'sinatra'. You create your Profile app, but when you run the file directly Sinatra launches the built in server and serves the Sinatra::Application app. Since you haven’t added any routes to this (they’ve all been added to Profile) it runs but all requests return 404.
One way to get your app to launch you is to use rackup. This will launch the Profile app that you have explicitly set in your config.ru. (Explicitly starting your webserver will also work, e.g. using thin start).
Another possibility would be to add a line like this to the end of your Profile class:
run! if app_file == $0
This tells Sinatra to start the build in server running the Profile app if the file is the same as the Ruby file being executed, in a similar way to how the classic style app is launched. If you use this method you should change require 'sinatra' to require 'sinatra/base' otherwise you will get two servers launched, one after the other (in fact you should probably make that change anyway).
See the Sinatra docs for more info about the difference between classic and modular style.