How can I sort my search based on file size in DAM.
I'm trying this and the sorting doesn't seem to work maybe because dam:size is a string:
type=dam:Asset
path=/content/dam/<my_project>
nodename=*.pdf
orderby=#jcr:content/metadata/dam:size
orderby.sort=desc
With XPath, you can do it like this:
/jcr:root/content/dam/<site>//element(*,dam:Asset) order by jcr:content/metadata/#dam:size descending
Related
Using Google sheet 'ImportXML', I was able to extract the following data from a url(in cell A2) using:
=IMPORTXML(A2,"//a/#href[substring-after(., 'AGX:')]").
Data:
/vector/AGX:5WH
/vector/AGX:Z74
/vector/AGX:C52
/vector/AGX:A27
/vector/AGX:C6L
But, I want to extract the code after "/vector/AGX:". The code is not fixed to 3 letters and number of rows is not fixed as well.
I used =INDEX(SPLIT(AP2,"/,'vector',':'"),1,2). But it applied to only one line of data. Had to copy the index+split function to the whole column and had to insert an additional column to store the codes.
5WH
Z74
C52
A27
C6L
But, I want to be able to extract the code(s) after AGX: using ImportXML in one go. Is there a way?
Solution
Your issue is in how you are implementing the index formula. The first parameter returns the rows (in your case each element) and the second the column (in your case either AGX or the code after that).
If instead of getting a single cell we apply this formula on a range and we do not set any value for the row, the formula will return all the values achieving what you were aiming for. Here is its implementation (where F1:F5 will be the range of values you want this formula to be applied) :
=INDEX(SPLIT(F1:F5,"/,'vector',':'"),,2)
If you are interested in a solution simply using IMPORTXML and XPATH, according to the documentation you could use a substring as follows:
=IMPORTXML(A1,"//a/#href[substring-after(.,'SGX:')]")
The drawback of this is that it will return the full string and not exclusively what is after the SGX: which means that you would need to use a Google sheet formula to splitting this. This is the furthest I have achieved exclusively using XPath. In XML it would be easier to apply a forEach and really select what is after the : but I believe in sheets is more complicated if not impossible just using XPath.
I hope this has helped you. Let me know if you need anything else or if you did not understood something. :)
I'm having a bit of difficulty with a problem I'm having. I have an array of names like so:
[Brutananadilewski, Carl]
[Crews, Xander]
[Cartman, Eric]
[Rubio, Daniel]
[Daniels, Julie]
etc. etc.
What I need to do is to create a list of unique names from this list without having first and last names repeated. So I would have the following as a result:
[Brutananadilewski, Daniel]
[Crews, Erix]
[Cartman, Xander]
[Rubio, Carl]
[Jill, Daniels]
The problem I'm having is trying to do this efficiently. My first instint was to use permutation and here is a snippet from the ruby docs
a.permutation(2).to_a #=> [[1,2],[1,3],[2,1],[2,3],[3,1],[3,2]]
The problem is having the following from that example [[1,2],[1,3]]
Theoretically if this was a first/last name this wouldnt work. I couldn't have this:
[Rubio Daniel, Rubio Julie, Rubio Eric]
Has anyone dealt with this before? I'm having an awfully hard time with efficiency and just getting it to work. Help would be appreciated thank you.
You can use transpose as mentioned by 3limin4tor, then shuffle and zip as mentioned by Dave Newton:
surnames, forenames = names.transpose
shuffled_forenames = forenames.shuffle
shuffled_names = shuffled_forenames.zip(surnames)
The desired outcome isn't entirely clear from the question, but if you're trying to create all combinations of first/last names and get a subset of those, you could also use product and uniq to get all the uniq combinations:
names = [
%w(Brutananadilewski Carl),
%w(Crews Xander),
%w(Cartman Eric),
%w(Rubio Daniel),
%w(Daniels Julie)
]
surnames, forenames = names.transpose
all_name_combos = forenames.product(surnames).uniq
You could then use shuffle and sample(INTEGER) to get a subset of those name combinations
all_name_combos.shuffle.sample(5)
I am new to this Middleware and I tried my level best to perform sorting using the flow steps in designer but couldn't make it.Can anybody help me out by giving me direction for how to complete my work?(like the flow steps in order and where i can put the conditions and all)
Thanks.
No need to over-complicate it - use the utilities - pub.document:sortDocuments is what you are looking for.
If you receive stringList as input - convert this into a documentList. This can be done using pub.list:stringListToDocumentList (set the key to 'value')
Use pub.document:sortDocuments to sort the documentList. Remember to specify the key as 'value' once again and compareStringAs as 'numeric'. The order can also be set (ascending/descending)
What do you want to Sort? For Document-Lists you will find a built-in services in the WmPublic Folder.
For String-Lists i would use a Java-Service for Sorting.
Logic behind Sorting in webMethods is same as all other languages. You need LOOP to iterate every string in stringList, BRANCH to compare the two number and then map to the compare result to new StringList.
What format do you have the numbers in? Are they in a flat file or in a string list etc.
Is there any way to ignore "stop words" while sorting.
For example:
I have words like
dixit
singla
the marklogic
On sorting in descending order the result should be
singla, the marklogic, dixit
As in the above example the is ignored.
Any way to achieve this?
Update:
Stop word can occur at any place.
for example
the MarkLogic
MarkLogic is the best
the MarkLogic is awesome
while sorting should not consider any stop word in the text.
Above is just a small example to describe the problem.
In actual I am using search:search API.
For sorting, I am using sort-order search options.
The element on which I have to perform sorting is dynamic. There are approx 30-35 elements.
Is there any way to customize the collation at this level like to configure some words (stop words) which will be ignored while sorting.
There is no standard collation URI that is going to do this for you (at least none that I've ever seen). You can do it dynamically, of course, by sorting on the result of a function invocation, but if you want it done efficiently at scale (and available to search:search), then you need to materialize the sortable string into your document. I've often done this as an attribute on the element:
<title sortable="Great Gatsby, The">The Great Gatsby</title>
Then you put a range index on the title/#sortable attribute.
You can also use the "envelope pattern" where materialized metadata like this is maintained in its own section of the document with the original kept in its own section. For things like this, I think it's a bit more elegant to decorate the elements directly, to keep the context.
If I understand your question correctly you're trying to get rid of the definite article when sorting your result-set.
In order to do this you need to use some additional functions and create a 'sort' criteria. My solution would look like this (I'm also including some sample documents so that you can test this just by copy-pasting):
(:
xdmp:document-insert("/peter.xml", <person><firstName>Peter</firstName><lastName>O'Toole</lastName><age>60</age></person>);
xdmp:document-insert("/john.xml", <person><firstName>John</firstName><lastName>Adams</lastName><age>18</age></person>);
xdmp:document-insert("/simon.xml", <person><firstName>Simon</firstName><lastName>Petrov</lastName><age>22</age></person>);
xdmp:document-insert("/mark.xml", <person><firstName>Mark</firstName><lastName>the Lord</lastName><age>25</age></person>);
:)
for $person in /person
let $sort := fn:reverse(fn:tokenize($person/lastName, ' '))[1]
order by $sort
(: return $person :)
return $person/lastName/text()
Notice that now the sort order is going to be
- Adams
- the Lord
- O'Toole
- Petrov
I hope this will help.
How do you sort the values by ascending order when concatenating for SAS?
eg. In this example I am trying to acsend values for aeacnoth1_std1, aeacnoth2_std, etc.....
if cmiss( aeacnoth1_std, aeacnoth2_std)=0
then aeacolst=strip(aeacnoth1_std)||','||strip(aeacnoth2_std);
if cmiss( aeacnoth1_std, aeacnoth2_std, aeacnoth3_std)=0
then aeacolst=strip(aeacnoth1_std)||','||strip(aeacnoth2_std)||','||strip(aeacnoth3_std);
if cmiss( aeacnoth1_std, aeacnoth2_std, aeacnoth3_std, aeacnoth4_std)=0
then aeacolst=strip(aeacnoth1_std)||','||strip(aeacnoth2_std)||','||strip(aeacnoth3_std)||','||strip(aeacnoth4_std);
One possible approach:
Declare an array containing all the variables you want to concatenate
Sort the array into the desired order
Concatenate the array
The hard part is step 2, as SAS 9.1 or earlier doesn't provide any direct way of doing this. You might find this paper useful, or just Google for 'sas sort array' and see what comes up:
http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/sugi26/p096-26.pdf
EDIT: if you have SAS 9.2 or later, you can use call sortc to sort the array:
http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/lrdict/64316/HTML/default/viewer.htm#a003106052.htm