I'm fiddling around with Mockito and Spring MVC. I'm trying to write unit tests for the code I've just written.
This is my CategoryService class:
#Service
public class CategoryService {
#Autowired
#Qualifier("categoryDaoImpl")
private CategoryDao categoryDao;
public void addCategory(Category category) {
category.setId(getLastCategoryId() + 1);
categoryDao.addCategory(category);
}
public Category getCategoryById(int id) {
return categoryDao.getCategoryById(id);
}
public List<Category> getCategories() {
return categoryDao.getAllCategories();
}
public int getCategoriesCount() {
return categoryDao.getCategoriesCount();
}
public int getLastCategoryId() {
if (categoryDao.getAllCategories().size() == 0) {
return 0;
}
return Collections.max(categoryDao.getAllCategories()).getId();
}
public CategoryDao getCategoryDao() {
return categoryDao;
}
public void setCategoryDao(CategoryDao categoryDao) {
this.categoryDao = categoryDao;
}
I've already tested CategoryDao with nearly 100% coverage.
And now I want to test CategoryService, but I have no idea how to test it, I mean methods like: addCategory, getCategoryById, getAllCategories, getCategoiesCount etc.
They're just talking to the DAO pattern, but what if another person changes its logic? I'd be glad if you told me or showed how to write a tests for such short methods.
As far as CategoryService is concerned, I only wrote tests for getLastCategoryId():
#Test
public void shouldGetLastCategoryIdWhenListIsEmpty() {
//given
List<Category> list = new ArrayList<Category>();
Mockito.when(categoryDao.getAllCategories()).thenReturn(list);
//when
int lastCategoryId = categoryService.getLastCategoryId();
//then
assertThat(lastCategoryId, is(0));
}
#Test
public void shouldGetLastCategoryIdWhenListIsNotEmpty() {
//given
List<Category> list = new ArrayList<Category>();
list.add(new Category(1, "a", "a"));
list.add(new Category(3, "a", "a"));
list.add(new Category(6, "a", "a"));
Mockito.when(categoryDao.getAllCategories()).thenReturn(list);
//when
int lastCategoryId = categoryService.getLastCategoryId();
//then
assertThat(lastCategoryId, is(6));
}
Thank you very much for help :)
Best regards,
Tom
You need to verify that the service methods behave as per their contracts even if they are modified in the future.
For e.g. The addCategory(Category c) method adds the category. This can be verified by verifying the categoryDao.addCategory() method is called with the category object that has the required properties set. In this case the id should be set to the lastCategoryId. Verifying could simply be done by create a spy of CategoryDao class (would be simpler then using third party libraries like mockito.
The test cases for getCategoryById(), getCategories() and getCategoriesCount() method could verify that the values returned are the ones returned by the dao.
I understand that this would mean just one test case per method, but these test cases just confirm that if there is more logic added in the service method implementation, the contract remains intact.
Here's one test case for addCategory()
public class CategoryServiceTest {
private CategoryService service;
private CategoryDaoSpy daoSpy;
#Before
public void setUp() {
service = new CategoryService();
daoSpy = new CategoryDaoSpy();
service.setCategoryDao(daoSpy);
}
#Test
public void shouldSaveCategoryWhenCategoryPassed() {
Category category = new Category();
service.addCategory(category);
assertEquals(daoSpy.getAddCategoryCallCount(), 1);
assertEquals(daoSpy.getCategories().size(), 1);
assertEquals(daoSpy.getCategories().get(0).getId(), 1);
}
}
public class CategoryDaoSpy extends CategoryDao {
private int addCategoryCallCount = 0;
private List<Category> categories = new ArrayList<>();
#Override
public void addCategory(Category category) {
this.addCategoryCallCount++;
categories.add(category);
}
public int getAddCategoryCallCount() {
return addCategoryCallCount;
}
public List<Category> getCategories() {
return categories;
}
#Override
public List<Category> getAllCategories() {
return Collections.emptyList();
}
}
Related
First question here, I hope I'm doing it right.
I'm using Entity Framework Core 5.0 (Code First) with an onion architecture (data/repo/service/mvc) and so I have a service for each table (almost).
It's work well but now I need to manage (get, insert, update, delete) about 150 tables which all have the same structure (Id, name, order).
I have added each of them as Entity class and their DbSet too in my DbContext, but I don't want to make 150 services, I would like to have a generic one .
How can I bind it to my generic repository ?
public class Repository<T> : IRepository<T> where T : BaseEntity
{
private readonly ApplicationContext context;
private DbSet<T> entities;
private readonly RepositorySequence repoSequence;
private string typeName { get; set; }
public Repository(ApplicationContext context)
{
this.context = context;
entities = context.Set<T>();
this.repoSequence = new RepositorySequence(context);
this.typeName = typeof(T).Name;
}
public T Get(long plng_Id)
{
return entities.SingleOrDefault(s => s.Id == plng_Id);
}
[...]
}
In an ideal world, would like to have something like this :
public async Task Insert(dynamic pdyn_Entity)
{
Type DynamicType = Type.GetType(pdyn_Entity);
Repository<DynamicType> vobj_Repo = new Repository<DynamicType>(mobj_AppContext);
long Id = await vobj_Repo.InsertAsync(pdyn_Entity);
}
But I can try to get type from DbSet string Name too, I just managed to retrieve some data :
public IEnumerable<object> GetAll(string pstr_DbSetName)
{
return ((IEnumerable<BaseEntity>)typeof(ApplicationContext).GetProperty(pstr_DbSetName).GetValue(mobj_AppContext, null));
}
I've tried the following method (2.0 compatible apparently) to get the good DbSet, not working neither (no Query) : https://stackoverflow.com/a/48042166/10359024
What am I missing?
Thanks a lot for your help
Not sure why you need to get type?
You can use something like this.
Repository.cs
public class Repository<T> : IRepository<T> where T : BaseEntity
{
private readonly ApplicationContext context;
private DbSet<T> entities;
public Repository(ApplicationContext context)
{
this.context = context;
entities = context.Set<T>();
}
public List<T> Get()
=> entities.ToList();
public T Get(long plng_Id)
=> entities.Find(plng_Id);
public long Save(T obj)
{
if (obj.ID > 0)
entities.Update(obj);
else
entities.Add(obj);
return obj.ID;
}
public void Delete(T obj)
=> entities.Remove(obj);
}
Then you can use either one of these 2 options you want
Multiple repositories following your tables
UserRepository.cs
public class UserRepository : Repository<User> : IUserRepository
{
private readonly ApplicationContext context;
public UserRepository(ApplicationContext context)
{
this.context = context;
}
}
BaseService.cs
public class BaseService : IBaseService
{
private readonly ApplicationContext context;
private IUserRepository user;
private IRoleRepository role;
public IUserRepository User { get => user ??= new UserRepository(context); }
public IRoleRepository Role { get => user ??= new RoleRepository(context); }
public BaseService(ApplicationContext context)
{
this.context = context;
}
}
If you are lazy to create multiple repositories, can use this way also. Your service just simple call Repository with entity name.
BaseService.cs
public class BaseService : IBaseService
{
private readonly ApplicationContext context;
private IRepository<User> user;
private IRepository<Role> role;
public IRepository<User> User { get => user ??= new Repository<User>(context); }
public IRepository<Role> Role { get => role ??= new Repository<Role>(context); }
public BaseService(ApplicationContext context)
{
this.context = context;
}
}
Finally, you can call service like this. You can use multiple services instead of BaseService if you want.
HomeController.cs
public class HomeController : Controller
{
private readonly IBaseService service;
public HomeController(IBaseService service)
{
this.service = service;
}
public IActionResult Index()
{
var user = service.User.Get();
return View(user);
}
public IActionResult Add(User user)
{
var id = service.User.Save(user);
return View();
}
}
I suggest to use first option (multiple repositories) because you may need to customise functions in own repository in future. And create service class following your controller name. For example, you have HomeController, UserController, etc. Create HomeService, UserService and link them with BaseService so that you can create customised functions in their own service class.
I assume you have a base entity like this:
public class BaseEntity
{
[Key]
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Order { get; set; }
}
Then you can do CRUD operations in your generic repository like this:
public int Create(T item)
{
if (item == null) return 0;
entities.Add(item);////SaveChanges
return item.Id;
}
public void Update(T updatedItem)
{
context.SetModified(updatedItem);//SaveChanges
}
public IQueryable<T> All()
{
return entities();
}
And in each of the methods you have access to your 3 common fields in BaseEntity
Thank you all for your responses.
I need to have the type because I am using a blazor component which automatically binds to these tables. This component has the name of the desired entity class (in string) as a parameter. Thanks to #Asherguru's response I was able to find a way to do this:
1 - I made a 'SedgmentEntity' Class :
public abstract class SegmentEntity : ISegmentEntity
{
public abstract long Id { get; set; }
public abstract string Name { get; set; }
public abstract short? Order { get; set; }
}
2 - A SegmentRepository which is typed via Reflection:
public class SegmentRepository : ISegmentRepository
{
private readonly ApplicationContext context;
private readonly RepositorySequence repoSequence;
public SegmentRepository(ApplicationContext context)
{
this.context = context;
this.repoSequence = new RepositorySequence(context);
}
public async Task<long> Insert(string pstr_EntityType, SegmentEntity pobj_Entity)
{
Type? vobj_EntityType = Assembly.GetAssembly(typeof(SegmentEntity)).GetType("namespace.Data." + pstr_EntityType);
if (vobj_EntityType != null)
{
// create an instance of that type
object vobj_Instance = Activator.CreateInstance(vobj_EntityType);
long? nextId = await repoSequence.GetNextId(GetTableName(vobj_EntityType));
if (nextId == null)
{
throw new TaskCanceledException("Sequence introuvable pour " + vobj_EntityType.FullName);
}
PropertyInfo vobj_PropId = vobj_EntityType.GetProperty("Id");
vobj_PropId.SetValue(vobj_Instance, nextId.Value, null);
PropertyInfo vobj_PropName = vobj_EntityType.GetProperty("Name");
vobj_PropName.SetValue(vobj_Instance, pobj_Entity.Name, null);
PropertyInfo vobj_PropOrder = vobj_EntityType.GetProperty("Order");
vobj_PropOrder.SetValue(vobj_Instance, pobj_Entity.Order, null);
return ((SegmentEntity)context.Add(vobj_Instance).Entity).Id;
}
}
public IEnumerable<object> GetAll(string pstr_EntityType)
{
Type? vobj_EntityType = Assembly.GetAssembly(typeof(SegmentEntity)).GetType("namespace.Data." + pstr_EntityType);
if (vobj_EntityType != null)
{
PropertyInfo vobj_DbSetProperty = typeof(ApplicationContext).GetProperties().FirstOrDefault(prop =>
prop.PropertyType.FullName.Contains(vobj_EntityType.FullName));
return (IEnumerable<object>)vobj_DbSetProperty.GetValue(context, null);
}
return null;
}
}
I still have to handle the Get and the Delete functions but it should be fine.
Then I will be able to create a single service which will be called by my component.
Thanks again !
Fighting with TestNG, Spring an Hibernate. I'm writing test for Service class, and it's always failure. But without test class works fine. So App is working, but tests don't want to.
Here is my test class
#Transactional
public class BorrowerServiceTest {
#Mock
BorrowerDAOImpl borrowerDAO;
#InjectMocks
BorrowerService borrowerService;
#BeforeClass
public void setUp() {
MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this);
}
#Test
public void persistTest() {
Borrower borrower = new Borrower.BorrowerBuilder().firstName("Lars").lastName("Urlich").adress("LA")
.phoneNumber("900900990").build();
borrowerService.persist(borrower);
List<Borrower> borrowerList = borrowerService.getBorrowerByName("Lars Urlich");
Assert.assertEquals(true, borrower.equals(borrowerList.get(0)));
}
}
My BorrowerService:
#Service("borrowerService")
#Transactional
public class BorrowerService {
#Autowired
private BorrowerDAO borrowerDAO;
public List<Borrower> getBorrowers() {
return borrowerDAO.getBorrowers();
}
public List<Borrower> getBorrowerByName(String name) {
return borrowerDAO.getBorrowerByName(name);
}
public boolean removeBorrower(Borrower borrower) {
return borrowerDAO.removeBorrower(borrower);
}
public boolean persist(Borrower borrower) {
return borrowerDAO.persist(borrower);
}
}
My BorrowerDAOImpl:
#Repository("borrowerDAO")
#Transactional
public class BorrowerDAOImpl extends DAO implements BorrowerDAO {
#Override
public List<Borrower> getBorrowers() {
List<Borrower> borrowerList = null;
Query query = entityManager.createQuery("SELECT B FROM Borrower B");
borrowerList = query.getResultList();
return borrowerList;
}
#Override
public List<Borrower> getBorrowerByName(String name) {
List<Borrower> borrowerList = null;
String[] values = name.split(" ");
Query query = entityManager.createQuery("SELECT B FROM Borrower B WHERE B.firstName LIKE '" + values[0]
+ "' AND B.lastName LIKE '" + values[1] + "'");
borrowerList = query.getResultList();
return borrowerList;
}
#Override
public boolean removeBorrower(Borrower borrower) {
String firstName = borrower.getFirstName();
String lastName = borrower.getLastName();
Query query = entityManager
.createQuery("DELETE Borrower where FIRST_NAME LIKE :FirstName AND LAST_NAME LIKE :LastName");
query.setParameter("FirstName", firstName);
query.setParameter("LastName", lastName);
query.executeUpdate();
return true;
}
#Override
public boolean persist(Borrower borrower) {
entityManager.persist(borrower);
return true;
}
}
and abstract DAO:
#Repository
#Transactional
public abstract class DAO {
#PersistenceContext
protected EntityManager entityManager;
}
Maven returns failure:
java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Index: 0, Size: 0
at java.util.LinkedList.checkElementIndex(LinkedList.java:555)
at java.util.LinkedList.get(LinkedList.java:476)
at com.me.service.test.BorrowerServiceTest.persistTest(BorrowerServiceTest.java:41)
I also had to fight with this. The problem here is that your test runs in it's own transaction, so nothing will be committed during method's execution. Now here is what I did:
public class IntegrationTest extends SomeTestBase
{
#Autowired
private PlatformTransactionManager platformTransactionManager;
private TransactionTemplate transactionTemplate;
#Autowired
private BeanToTest beanToTest;
#Override
#Before
public void setup()
{
super.setup();
this.transactionTemplate = new TransactionTemplate(this.platformTransactionManager);
}
#Test
public void fooTest()
{
// given
// when
boolean result = this.transactionTemplate.execute(new TransactionCallback<Boolean>()
{
#Override
public Boolean doInTransaction(TransactionStatus status)
{
return IntegrationTest.this.beanToTest.foo();
}
});
// then
}
}
This allows you to have methods execute within a separate transaction. Please note that you might declare some variables as final.
Hope that helps.
Check the Spring documentation: it looks your test class should extend AbstractTestNGSpringContextTests.
Use #Commit annotation on the whole test class or even method to persist changes made in the test. For more information https://docs.spring.io/spring/docs/current/spring-framework-reference/testing.html#commit
Is it possible to use inheritance in Spring Boot YML configuration classes? If so, how would that be accomplished?
For example:
#ConfigurationProperties(prefix="my-config")
public class Config {
List<Vehicle> vehicles;
}
And the class (or interface) "Vehicle" has two implementations: Truck and Car. So the YAML might look like:
my.config.vehicles:
-
type: car
seats: 3
-
type: truck
axles: 3
I do not think it is possible (at least not that I know of). You could however design your code as follow:
Inject the properties into a Builder object
Define an object with all properties, which we'll call the VehicleBuilder (or factory, you choose its name).
The VehicleBuilders are injected from the Yaml.
You can then retrieve each builder's vehicle in a #PostConstruct block. The code:
#ConfigurationProperties(prefix="my-config")
#Component
public class Config {
private List<VehicleBuilder> vehicles = new ArrayList<VehicleBuilder>();
private List<Vehicle> concreteVehicles;
public List<VehicleBuilder> getVehicles() {
return vehicles;
}
public List<Vehicle> getConcreteVehicles() {
return concreteVehicles;
}
#PostConstruct
protected void postConstruct(){
concreteVehicles = vehicles.stream().map(f -> f.get())
.collect(Collectors.<Vehicle>toList());
}
}
The builder:
public class VehicleBuilder {
private String type;
private int seats;
private int axles;
public Vehicle get() {
if ("car".equals(type)) {
return new Car(seats);
} else if ("truck".equals(type)) {
return new Trunk(axles);
}
throw new AssertionError();
}
public void setType(String type) {
this.type = type;
}
public void setSeats(int seats) {
this.seats = seats;
}
public void setAxles(int axles) {
this.axles = axles;
}
}
Im new using this front end framework application...
I recently started to work with smartgwt and i'm bulding a new application with a Spring MVC integration.
I'm using a ListGrid with a RestDataSource (Consume the Rest service with mvc:annotation-driven for plain JSON)
I can see that the servaice gets consuming properly perhaps my grid is never shown with the data in it.
Can someone help me here ?
Here's my ListGrid class
public class ListGrid extends com.smartgwt.client.widgets.grid.ListGrid {
private final SpringJSONDataSource springJSONDataSource;
public ListGrid(List<DataSourceField> fields) {
this(new PatientDataSource(fields));
}
public ListGrid(SpringJSONDataSource springJSONDataSource) {
this.springJSONDataSource = springJSONDataSource;
init();
}
private void init() {
setAutoFetchData(true);
setAlternateRecordStyles(true);
setEmptyCellValue("???");
setDataPageSize(50);
setDataSource(springJSONDataSource);
}
}
Now there's the DataSource implmentation
public abstract class SpringJSONDataSource extends RestDataSource {
protected final HTTPMethod httpMethod;
public SpringJSONDataSource(List<DataSourceField> fields) {
this(fields, HTTPMethod.POST);
}
public SpringJSONDataSource(List<DataSourceField> fields, HTTPMethod httpMethod) {
this.httpMethod = httpMethod;
setDataFormat(DSDataFormat.JSON);
addDataSourceFields(fields);
setOperationBindings(getFetch());
addURLs();
}
private void addURLs() {
if(getUpdateDataURL() != null)
setUpdateDataURL(getUpdateDataURL());
if(getRemoveDataURL() != null)
setRemoveDataURL(getRemoveDataURL());
if(getAddDataURL() != null)
setAddDataURL(getAddDataURL());
if(getFetchDataURL() != null)
setFetchDataURL(getFetchDataURL());
}
private void addDataSourceFields(List<DataSourceField> fields) {
for (DataSourceField dataSourceField : fields) {
addField(dataSourceField);
}
}
protected abstract OperationBinding getFetch();
protected abstract OperationBinding getRemove();
protected abstract OperationBinding getAdd();
protected abstract OperationBinding getUpdate();
public abstract String getUpdateDataURL();
public abstract String getRemoveDataURL();
public abstract String getAddDataURL();
public abstract String getFetchDataURL();
}
The class PatientDataSource that extends SpringJSONDataSource
public class PatientDataSource extends SpringJSONDataSource {
public PatientDataSource(List<DataSourceField> fields) {
super(fields);
setPrettyPrintJSON(true);
}
#Override
protected OperationBinding getFetch() {
OperationBinding fetch = new OperationBinding();
fetch.setOperationType(DSOperationType.FETCH);
fetch.setDataProtocol(DSProtocol.POSTMESSAGE);
DSRequest fetchProps = new DSRequest();
fetchProps.setHttpMethod(httpMethod.toString());
fetch.setRequestProperties(fetchProps);
return fetch;
}
#Override
public String getFetchDataURL() {
return "/spring/fetchPatients";
}
#Override
protected OperationBinding getRemove() {
return null;
}
#Override
public String getRemoveDataURL() {
return null;
}
#Override
protected OperationBinding getAdd() {
return null;
}
#Override
public String getAddDataURL() {
return null;
}
#Override
protected OperationBinding getUpdate() {
return null;
}
#Override
public String getUpdateDataURL() {
return null;
}
}
My spring controller PatientControler
#Controller
public class PatienController {
Logger logger = Logger.getLogger(PatienController.class);
#Autowired
private PatientServices patientServices;
#RequestMapping(value = "/patientTest", method = RequestMethod.GET)
#ResponseBody
public Object getTest()
{
return patientServices.getAllPatients();
}
#RequestMapping(value = "/fetchPatients", method = RequestMethod.POST)
#ResponseBody
public Object getAllPatients()
{
return patientServices.getAllPatients();
}
}
PatientServiceImpl
public class PatientServicesImpl implements PatientServices {
public List<Patient> getAllPatients() {
List<Patient> patients = new ArrayList<Patient>();
Patient patient;
for(int i = 0 ; i < 500 ; i++){
patient = new Patient();
patient.setDateOfBirth(new Date());
patient.setFirstName("Joe");
patient.setMiddleName("Moe");
patient.setLastName("Blow");
patient.setLastConsultation(new Date());
patient.setSex(Sex.M);
patients.add(patient);
}
return patients;
}
}
*Im Really stuck right now i've been looking for all type of answers .... but so far nothing worked when i tried to override the transformResponse from my RestDataSource impentation the parameter "data" as an OBJECT, returns me an array [object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object] *
The Data which is transferred from the RestDataSource has a specific format which is described in the JavaDoc of the RestDataSource
Your server must understand the request and send back a valid response.
At the moment your example doesn't seem to honour the contract.
To debug the traffic send to and from your server you can use the SmartClient-Console. You can open it by a browser bookmark like this:
javascript:isc.showConsole()
Of cause you need to deploy this console by adding the following module to your gwt.xml
<inherits name="com.smartclient.tools.SmartClientTools"/>
Now go to the RPC Tab and check Track-RPCs
This code works fine, However, if I run execute a storedprocedure in my unit of work class (or any update, delete, add operation), I'm still getting original the data. Actually, I have already a solution(posted below in controller) but Im sure this is not the most elegant way, I hope someone can help me refactor the code. please help. Thanks
My unit of work
public class UnitOfWork : IUnitOfWork, IDisposable
{
private readonly ObjectContext _context;
private BookRepository _books;
public UnitOfWork(ObjectContext context)
{
if (context == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException("Context was not supplied");
}
_context = context;
}
public IRepository<Book> Books
{
get
{
if (_books== null)
{
_books= new BookRepository (_context);
}
return _books;
}
}
public void UpdateAuthor(int id)
{
_context.ExecuteStoreCommand("sp_UpdateAuthor #param1",
new SqlParameter("param1", id));
}
public void Commit()
{
_context.SaveChanges();
}
Book Repository
public class BookRepository : Repository<Book>
{
public BookRepository (ObjectContext context)
: base(context)
{
}
public override Machine GetById(object id)
{
return _objectSet.SingleOrDefault(s => s.Id== (int)id);
}
}
Generic Repository
public abstract class Repository<T> : IRepository<T>
where T : class, IAuditEntity
{
protected IObjectSet<T> _objectSet;
public Repository(ObjectContext context)
{
_objectSet = context.CreateObjectSet<T>();
}
public abstract T GetById(object id);
public IEnumerable<T> GetAll()
{
return _objectSet;
}
public IEnumerable<T> Query(Expression<Func<T, bool>> filter)
{
return _objectSet.Where(filter);
}
public void Add(T entity)
{
_objectSet.AddObject(entity);
}
public void Remove(T entity)
{
_objectSet.DeleteObject(entity);
}
}
Controller Code
public class HomeController : Controller
{
private IUnitOfWork _unitOfWork;
#region Core Action Methods
public HomeController()
{
this._unitOfWork = new UnitOfWork(((IObjectContextAdapter)new BookContext()).ObjectContext);
}
private IEnumerable<BookViewModel> GetBookdsViewModels(int id)
{
//THE CODE WHERE ITS NOT RETURNING THE UPDATED VLAUES
//var query = _unitOfWork.Books.GetAll().Where(d => d.Id== id);
//I WANT TO CHANGE THIS CODE
ObjectContext objectContext = ((IObjectContextAdapter)new BookContext()).ObjectContext;
ObjectSet<Book> set = objectContext.CreateObjectSet<Book>();
set.MergeOption = MergeOption.OverwriteChanges;
var query = from a in set
where a.Id== id && !a.IsDeleted
select a;
return query
.Select(
c => new BookViewModel
{
Id = c.Id ,
Name = c.Name
});
}
I believe the problem is because you're executing things directly against your database, and then trying to refer back to the local copy that's stored in your repository and they're different.
public void UpdateAuthor(int id)
{
_context.ExecuteStoreCommand("sp_UpdateAuthor #param1",
new SqlParameter("param1", id));
}
When you run this query, you're making a change in your db instead of your local - why dont you do something like this:
public void UpdateAuthor(int id)
{
var book = Books.GetById(id);
/* make changes to your book object */
_unit.Save();
}
If you're wanting to make changes using store procs, you're going to have to dispose of your context, and recreate the repo's so that you're working with data from the DB instead of the local copy.
Expanding on Mark Oreta's answer, you need to ensure your Model is updated after manually executing a stored proc on your database. If you must manually call that stored proc then try this afterward:
_context.Entry<Book>(instanceOfAuthor).Reload();
Which might be:
_context.Entry<Book>(_context.Books.GetById(id)).Reload();