I want to merge two meshes in threejs. I want to create a geometry of two planes that are intersecting each other perpendicular. Both of the planes must have the same texture.
I've tried the following.
Currently this error occurs: THREE.Geometry.merge(): geometry not an instance of THREE.Geometry.
var texture = THREE.ImageUtils.loadTexture('/img/foo.png');
var material = new THREE.MeshPhongMaterial( { map: texture, side: THREE.DoubleSide, transparent: true });
var m_plane_1 = new THREE.PlaneGeometry( 128, 128);
var m_plane_2 = new THREE.PlaneGeometry(128, 128);
var plane_1 = new THREE.Mesh(m_plane_1, material);
var plane_2 = new THREE.Mesh(m_plane_2, material);
plane_2.rotation.y = Math.PI / 2;
var combined = new THREE.Geometry();
combined.merge(plane_1); // does not work
//combined.merge(plane_1.geometry, plane_1.matrix); // this does not work
//combined.merge(m_plane_1.geometry, m_plane_1.matrix); // this does not work
scene.add(combined);
I've tried to read the source code for merge() but could not come to any conclusion. I've read stackoverflow threads but their approach does not work for me.
How can I solve this?
You want to get the intersection of the geometries. Then you can apply whatever texture you want to that new geometry.
To get the intersection, you should use Chandler Prall's Constructive Solid Geometry code: http://evanw.github.io/csg.js/
There are several ways to merge two geometries, but probably the simplest way to achieve what you want is to use the following pattern:
var geometry = new THREE.PlaneGeometry( 128, 128 );
var geometry2 = new THREE.PlaneGeometry( 128, 128 );
geometry2.applyMatrix( new THREE.Matrix4().makeRotationY( Math.PI / 2 ) );
geometry.merge( geometry2 );
three.js r.69
Try this:
plane_1.updateMatrix();
//Now the function merge
combined.merge(plane_1.geometry, plane_1.matrix);
//combined.merge(plane_1); // does not work
//combined.merge(plane_1.geometry, plane_1.matrix); // this does not work
//combined.merge(m_plane_1.geometry, m_plane_1.matrix); // this does not work
Related
I´m very new to three js and I want to create a half Cylinder as roof.
var geometry = new THREE.CylinderGeometry(100,100,150);
var material = new THREE.MeshNormalMaterial();
var cylinder = new THREE.Mesh( geometry, material);
scene.add(cylinder);
This is the Basic Cylinder but unfortunately I couldn´t find an specific answer to a half cylinder yet.
Is it possible to create this with vertices?
The last 2 params of CylinderGeometry constructor allows this. For example:
var geometry = new THREE.CylinderGeometry(100,100,150, 8, 1, false, 0, Math.PI);
0 is the start angle and Math.PI is the end angle; i.e. half of a circle.
So lets say theres a cube with 2 materials.I'm using MultiMaterial but maybe thats not the correct approach because its showing 6 draw calls instead of 2. I'm worried about performance when it scales up.
http://codepen.io/glued/pen/JXmvzm
This is just an example, I know about FaceColors but would like to mix a meshBasicMaterial with another Material, say, with a texture.
var greenMaterial = new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial({ color: 0xc4f288 })
var orangeMaterial = new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial({ color: 0xf4511e })
var mats = [
orangeMaterial,
greenMaterial,
orangeMaterial,
orangeMaterial,
greenMaterial,
orangeMaterial
]
let box = new THREE.Mesh(geometry, new THREE.MultiMaterial( mats ))
If i used vertexColors: FaceColors and a texture:
new MeshBasicMaterial({ vertexColors: FaceColors, map:someTexture }))
how would i designate the texture for a specific face only?
I figured it out by creating a material with a texture and removing the UVs on the geometry faces that i'm not using
the texture is 128x256, See the codepen as i'm using a 2d canvas to generate
texture.repeat.y = 0.5
texture.offset.y = 0.5
let geometry = new THREE.BoxGeometry(50, 50, 50)
function assignUvAndColor(geo, i, color = 0x00cbff){
geo.faceVertexUvs[0][i] = new Array(3).fill(new THREE.Vector2(0, -1))
geo.faces[i].color.setHex(color)
}
const greenColor = 0xacffd3
assignUvAndColor(geometry, 3, greenColor)
assignUvAndColor(geometry, 2, greenColor)
assignUvAndColor(geometry, 0, greenColor)
assignUvAndColor(geometry, 1, greenColor)
assignUvAndColor(geometry, 4)
assignUvAndColor(geometry, 5)
assignUvAndColor(geometry, 6)
assignUvAndColor(geometry, 7)
let material = new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial({ map: texture, vertexColors: THREE.FaceColors })
let box = new THREE.Mesh(geometry, material)
http://codepen.io/glued/pen/grBEmo?editors=0010
multimaterial will always do N drawcalls where N = length of its material array
(see renderer implementation)
it does not even try to check whether some of its materials are duplicite in reference - so in your examples you have multimaterial with 6 materials = 6 drawcalls
you will have to change the geometry face material index or abandon using multimaterial and divide your geometry manually
I am creating a scene & have used a boolean function to cut out holes in my wall. However the lighting reveals that the resultant shapes have messed up faces. I want the surface to look like one solid piece, rather than fragmented and displaying lighting backwards. Does anyone know what could be going wrong with my geometry?
The code that booleans objects is as follows:
//boolean subtract two shapes, convert meshes to bsps, subtract, then convert back to mesh
var booleanSubtract = function (Mesh1, Mesh2, material) {
//Mesh1 conversion
var mesh1BSP = new ThreeBSP( Mesh1 );
//Mesh2 conversion
var mesh2BSP = new ThreeBSP( Mesh2 );
var subtract_bsp = mesh1BSP.subtract( mesh2BSP );
var result = subtract_bsp.toMesh( material );
result.geometry.computeVertexNormals();
return result;
};
I have two lights in the scene:
var light = new THREE.DirectionalLight( 0xffffff, 0.75 );
light.position.set( 0, 0, 1 );
scene.add( light );
//create a point light
var pointLight = new THREE.PointLight(0xFFFFFF);
// set its position
pointLight.position.x = 10;
pointLight.position.y = 50;
pointLight.position.z = 130;
// add to the scene
scene.add(pointLight);
EDIT: Using WestLangley's suggestion, I was able to partially fix the wall rendering. And by using material.wireframe=true; I can see that after the boolean operation my wall faces are not merged. Is there a way to merge them?
Your problems are due to two issues.
First, you should be using FlatShading.
Second, as explained in this stackoverflow post, MeshLambert material only calculates the lighting at each vertex, and interpolates the color across each face. MeshPhongMaterial calculates the color at each texel.
You need to use MeshPhongMaterial to avoid the lighting artifacts you are seeing.
three.js r.68
Is that possible to interact with the buffer used when merging multiple mesh for changing color on the selected individual mesh ?
It's easy to do such thing with a collection of mesh but what about a merged mesh with multiple different material ?
#hgates, your last comment was very helpful to me, I was looking for the same thing for days !
Ok i set on each face a color, and set to true vertexColor on the
material, that solve the problem ! :)
I write here the whole concept that I used in order to add a proper answer for those who are in the same situation :
// Define a main Geometry used for the final mesh
var mainGeometry = new THREE.Geometry();
// Create a Geometry, a Material and a Mesh shared by all the shapes you want to merge together (here I did 1000 cubes)
var cubeGeometry = new THREE.CubeGeometry( 1, 1, 1 );
var cubeMaterial = new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial({vertexColors: true});
var cubeMesh = new THREE.Mesh( cubeGeometry );
var i = 0;
for ( i; i<1000; i++ ) {
// I set the color to the material for each of my cubes individually, which is just random here
cubeMaterial.color.setHex(Math.random() * 0xffffff);
// For each face of the cube, I assign the color
for ( var j = 0; j < cubeGeometry.faces.length; j ++ ) {
cubeGeometry.faces[ j ].color = cubeMaterial.color;
}
// Each cube is merged to the mainGeometry
THREE.GeometryUtils.merge(mainGeometry, cubeMesh);
}
// Then I create my final mesh, composed of the mainGeometry and the cubeMaterial
var finalMesh = new THREE.Mesh( mainGeometry, cubeMaterial );
scene.add( finalMesh );
Hope it will help as it helped me ! :)
Depends on what you mean with "changing colors". Note that after merging, the mesh is like any other non-merged mesh.
If you mean vertex colors, it would be possibly to iterate over the faces and determine the vertices which color to change based on the material index.
If you mean setting a color to the material itself, sure it's possible. Merged meshes can still have multiple materials the same way ordinary meshes do - in MeshFaceMaterial, though if you are merging yourself, you need to pass in a material index offset parameter for each geometry.
this.meshMaterials.push(new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial(
{color:0x00ff00 * Math.random(), side:THREE.DoubleSide}));
for ( var face in geometry.faces ) {
geometry.faces[face].materialIndex = this.meshMaterials.length-1;
}
var mesh = new THREE.Mesh(geometry);
THREE.GeometryUtils.merge(this.globalMesh, mesh);
var mesh = new THREE.Mesh(this.globalMesh, new THREE.MeshFaceMaterial(this.meshMaterials));
Works like a charm, for those who need example but ! This creates mutliple additional buffers (indices and vertex data) , and multiple drawElements call too :(, i inspect the draw call with webgl inpector, before adding the MeshFaceMaterial : 75 call opengl api running at 60fps easily, after : 3490 call opengl api fps drop about 20 % 45-50 fps, this means that drawElements is called for every mesh, we loose the context of merging meshes, did i miss something here ? i want to share different materials on the same buffer
I think this picture best explains my issue:
First I translate the box along the red line. Next, I want the effect of rotation to be the blue line in a, but what's actually happening is more like the blue line in b. It feels like changing the rotation is always relative to the original object space, but the translation (despite happening first) is always relative to the parent, and doesn't really affect the geometry points in relation to the object space. I apologize if that's confusing; clearly I'm new at this.
The important part of the code which produces this effect is below. Please keep in mind that the orientation of the image is different than this code produces; the image is merely an example to show the effect clearly.
var objectContainer = new THREE.Object3D();
var tubeRadius = 100;
var tubeGeometry = new THREE.CylinderGeometry(tubeRadius, tubeRadius, tubeRadius * 3, 36, 1, false);
var tube = new THREE.Mesh(tubeGeomtry, material);
scene.add( tube );
var boxes = new THREE.Object3D();
var boxEdge = 50;
var boxGeometry = new THREE.CubeGeometry(boxEdge, boxEdge, boxEdge);
var box1 = new THREE.Mesh( boxGeometry, material );
box1.translateX(tubeRadius + boxEdge / 2 + 5);
box1.translateY(boxEdge / 2);
box1.rotation = new THREE.Vector3(0, 2*Math.PI/3*0, 0);
boxes.add(box1);
var box2 = box1.clone();
box2.rotation = new THREE.Vector3(0, 2*Math.PI/3*1, 0);
boxes.add(box2);
var box3 = box1.clone();
box3.rotation = new THREE.Vector3(0, 2*Math.PI/3*2, 0);
boxes.add(box3);
scene.add( boxes );
The only solution I can think of is to wrap each box in another object space and rotate about that, but it seems like excessive work. What is the preferred method to achieve the result I'm looking for?
There are several ways of doing what you want, but I think the easiest is like so:
// parent
parent = new THREE.Group();
scene.add( parent );
// pivots
var pivot1 = new THREE.Object3D();
var pivot2 = new THREE.Object3D();
var pivot3 = new THREE.Object3D();
pivot1.rotation.z = 0;
pivot2.rotation.z = 2 * Math.PI / 3;
pivot3.rotation.z = 4 * Math.PI / 3;
parent.add( pivot1 );
parent.add( pivot2 );
parent.add( pivot3 );
// mesh
var mesh1 = new THREE.Mesh( geometry, material );
var mesh2 = new THREE.Mesh( geometry, material );
var mesh3 = new THREE.Mesh( geometry, material );
mesh1.position.y = 5;
mesh2.position.y = 5;
mesh3.position.y = 5;
pivot1.add( mesh1 );
pivot2.add( mesh2 );
pivot3.add( mesh3 );
Then in your render loop:
parent.rotation.z += 0.01;
three.js r.147
Creating a compound object whose centre will be the point about which the inner objects rotate is one obvious answer, and would be very quick to write. Just create an Object3D and add your box to it.
A similar approach is covered by this question. It shifts the point of the vertices for an object, so it effectively has a new centre.
Alternatively, you can mess around with the matrices by hand. Try this:
var boxGeometry = new THREE.CubeGeometry(boxEdge, boxEdge, boxEdge);
var mr = new THREE.Matrix4();
var mt = new THREE.Matrix4();
mt.setPosition(new THREE.Vector3(0,tubeRadius,0));
var box1 = new THREE.Mesh( boxGeometry, material );
box1.applyMatrix(mt);
var box2 = box1.clone();
mr.makeRotationZ(2 * Math.PI /3);
box2.applyMatrix(mr);
boxes.add(box2);
var box3 = box1.clone();
mr.makeRotationZ(4 * Math.PI /3);
box3.applyMatrix(mr);
boxes.add(box3);
boxes.add(box1);
scene.add( boxes );